Cohomology fractals, Cannon–Thurston maps, and the geodesic flow

References

• Roger C. Alperin, Warren Dicks, and Joan Porti. The boundary of the Gieseking tree in hyperbolic three-space. Topology Appl., 93(3):219–259, 1999. doi:10.1016/S0166-8641(97)00270-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christopher J. Bishop and Peter W. Jones. The law of the iterated logarithm for Kleinian groups. In Lipa’s legacy (New York, 1995), volume 211 of Contemp. Math., pages 17–50. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1997. doi:10.1090/conm/211/02813
   Google Scholar
• Brian H. Bowditch. The Cannon–Thurston map for punctured-surface groups. Math. Z., 255(1):35–76, 2007. doi:10.1007/s00209-006-0012-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David Bachman, Saul Schleimer, and Henry Segerman. Cohomology fractals. In Carolyn Yackel, Robert Bosch, Eve Torrence, and Kristóf Fenyvesi, editors, Proceedings of Bridges 2020: Mathematics, Art, Music, Architecture, Education, Culture, pages 175–182, Phoenix, Arizona, 2020. Tessellations Publishing. http://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2020/bridges2020-175.html, arXiv:2002.00239.
   Google Scholar
• David Bachman, Saul Schleimer, and Henry Segerman. Cohomology fractals, 2020. https://github.com/henryseg/cohomology_fractals.
   Google Scholar
• Vladimir Bulatov. 3d hyperbolic tiling and horosphere cross section, 2018. Joint AMS/MAA meeting, San Diego, January 10, 2018. http://bulatov.org/math/180110/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Danny Calegari. Foliations and the geometry of 3–manifolds. Oxford Mathematical Monographs. Oxford University Press, 2007. http://math.uchicago.edu/dannyc/books/foliations/foliations.html.
   Google Scholar
• Andrew Casson. geo, software for geometrizing three-manifolds. https://faculty.math.illinois.edu/nmd/computop/software/casson.tar.gz.
   Google Scholar
• James W. Cannon and Warren Dicks. On hyperbolic once-punctured-torus bundles. Geom. Dedicata, 94:141–183, 2002. doi:10.1023/A:1020956906487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James W. Cannon and Warren Dicks. On hyperbolic once-punctured-torus bundles. II. Fractal tessellations of the plane. Geom. Dedicata, 123:11–63, 2006. doi:10.1007/s10711-006-9070-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marc Culler, Nathan M. Dunfield, Matthias Goerner, and Jeffrey R. Weeks. SnapPy, software for studying the geometry and topology of three-manifolds, (version 3.0). http://snappy.computop.org.
   Google Scholar
• Mikael Hvidtfeldt Christensen. Building 4d polytopes. https://syntopia.github.io/Polytopia/polytopes.html.
   Google Scholar
• James W. Cannon and William P. Thurston. Group invariant Peano curves. Geom. Topol., 11:1315–1355, 2007. doi:10.2140/gt.2007.11.1315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren Dicks and Joan Porti. On the Hausdorff dimension of the Gieseking fractal. Topology Appl., 126(1-2):169–186, 2002. doi:10.1016/S0166-8641(02)00077-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren Dicks and Makoto Sakuma. On hyperbolic once-punctured-torus bundles. III. Comparing two tessellations of the complex plane. Topology Appl., 157(12):1873–1899, 2010. arXiv:0811.1678, doi:10.1016/j.topol.2010.02.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harold G. Diamond and Jeffrey D. Vaaler. Estimates for partial sums of continued fraction partial quotients. Pacific J. Math., 122(1):73–82, 1986. doi:10.2140/pjm.1986.122.73
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren Dicks and David J. Wright. On hyperbolic once-punctured-torus bundles IV: Automata for lightning curves. Topology Appl., 159(1):98–132, 2012. doi:10.1016/j.topol.2011.08.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacques Franchi and Yves Le Jan. Hyperbolic dynamics and Brownian motion. Oxford University Press, 2012. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199654109.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Matthias Goerner. Verified computations for closed hyperbolic 3-manifolds. Bull. Lond. Math. Soc., 53(2):596–618, 2021. arXiv:1904.12095, doi:10.1112/blms.12445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damian Heard. Orb, software for studying hyperbolic three-orbifolds and three-manifolds (2018-06-30). https://github.com/DamianHeard/orb.
   Google Scholar
• Damian Heard. Computation of hyperbolic structures on 3–dimensional orbifolds. PhD thesis, University of Melbourne, 2005. https://github.com/DamianHeard/orb-thesis/.
   Google Scholar
• Eberhard Hopf. Statistik der geodätischen Linien in Mannigfaltigkeiten negativer Krümmung. Ber. Verh. Sächs. Akad. Wiss. Leipzig Math.-Phys. Kl., 91:261–304, 1939.
   Google Scholar
• Dubi Kelmer and Hee Oh. Exponential mixing and shrinking targets for geodesic flow on geometrically finite hyperbolic manifolds. 2018. arXiv:1812.05251v3.
   Google Scholar
• Marc Lackenby. Taut ideal triangulations of 3–manifolds. Geom. Topol., 4:369–395, 2000. arXiv:math/0003132, doi:10.2140/gt.2000.4.369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jos Leys. A fast algorithm for limit sets of kleinian groups with the Maskit parametrisation, 2017. http://www.josleys.com/articles/Kleinian%20escape-time_3.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Peter Liepa. Visualizing hyperbolic symmetries using WebGL (aka a hyperbolic doodler in your browser). https://brainjam.home.blog/2011/02/19/visualizing-hyperbolic-symmetries-using-webgl/.
   Google Scholar
• Curtis T. McMullen. lim. http://people.math.harvard.edu/ctm/programs/home/prog/lim/src/lim.tar.
   Google Scholar
• Curtis T. McMullen. Figure-eight orbifold fiber, 1995. http://people.math.harvard.edu/ctm/gallery/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Curtis T. McMullen. 2019–2020. personal communication.
   Google Scholar
• Abdelaziz Nait Merzouk. Knighty collection. https://github.com/Syntopia/Fragmentarium/tree/master/Fragmentarium-Source/Examples/Knighty%20Collection.
   Google Scholar
• Mahan Mj. Cannon–Thurston maps. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians—Rio de Janeiro 2018. Vol. II. Invited lectures, pages 885–917. World Sci. Publ., Hackensack, NJ, 2018. arXiv:1712.00760, doi:10.1142/11060
   Google Scholar
• David Mumford, Caroline Series, and David Wright. Indra’s pearls. Cambridge University Press, New York, 2002. The vision of Felix Klein. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107050051.024
   Google Scholar
• Roice Nelson and Henry Segerman. Visualizing hyperbolic honeycombs. Journal of Mathematics and the Arts, 11(1):4–39, 2017. arXiv:1511.02851, doi:10.1080/17513472.2016.1263789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• William F. Osgood. A Jordan curve of positive area. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 4(1):107–112, 1903. doi:10.2307/1986455
   Google Scholar
• Jessica S. Purcell. Hyperbolic knot theory (Graduate Studies in Mathematics). American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2020. arXiv:2002.12652.
   Google Scholar
• Mary Rees. Checking ergodicity of some geodesic flows with infinite Gibbs measure. Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems, 1(1):107–133, 1981. doi:10.1017/S0143385700001206
   Google Scholar
• Ja. G. Sinaĭ. The central limit theorem for geodesic flows on manifolds of constant negative curvature. Soviet Math. Dokl., 1:983–987, 1960.
   Google Scholar
• Alvy Smith. A pixel is not a little square, a pixel is not a little square, a pixel is not a little square, 1995. http://alvyray.com/Memos/CG/Microsoft/6_pixel.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Peter Stampfli. Fractal images from multiple inversion in circles. In Susan Goldstine, Douglas McKenna, and Kristóf Fenyvesi, editors, Proceedings of Bridges 2019: Mathematics, Art, Music, Architecture, Education, Culture, pages 263–270, Phoenix, Arizona, 2019. Tessellations Publishing. http://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2019/bridges2019-263.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Emil J. Straube. Harmonic and analytic functions admitting a distribution boundary value. Ann. Scuola Norm. Sup. Pisa Cl. Sci. (4), 11(4):559–591, 1984. http://www.numdam.org/item?id=ASNSP_1984_4_11_4_559_0.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis Sullivan. The density at infinity of a discrete group of hyperbolic motions. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. Publ. Math., (50):171–202, 1979. doi:10.1007/BF02684773
   Google Scholar
• William P. Thurston. Geometry and topology of 3–manifolds. 1978. https://msri.org/publications/books/gt3m/.
   Google Scholar
• William P. Thurston. Three-dimensional manifolds, kleinian groups and hyperbolic geometry. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.), 6(3):357–381, 1982. doi:10.1090/S0273-0979-1982-15003-0
   Google Scholar
• William P. Thurston. A norm for the homology of 3–manifolds. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc., 59(339):i–vi and 99–130, 1986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erik van den Ban and Marius Crainic. Analysis on manifolds. https://webspace.science.uu.nl/crain101/AS-2013/chapters-1-2-3.pdf, https://webspace.science.uu.nl/ban00101/anman2009/lecture2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Masaaki Wada. OPTi, software for visualising quasi-conformal deformations of once-punctured torus groups (version 4.0.5). https://apps.apple.com/us/app/opti/id1111993523.
   Google Scholar
• William Worden. tnorm, software for computing the thurston norm unit ball of finite volume orientable hyperbolic three-manifolds, 2018–2020. (version 0.1.14). https://pypi.python.org/pypi/tnorm.
   Google Scholar
• David Wright. 2019. personal communication.
   Google Scholar
• Roland Zweimüller. Infinite measure preserving transformations with compact first regeneration. J. Anal. Math., 103:93–131, 2007. doi:10.1007/s11854-008-0003-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar