Relation between hardness and ultrasonic velocity on pipeline steel welded joints

References

• Amend B. In-situ analyses to characterize the properties and metallurgical attributes of in-service piping. Corrosion. 2013, Conference & Expo, Paper No. 2417, p. 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Amend B. Using hardness to estimate pipe yield strength: Field application of ASME CRTD. In: 9th International Pipeline Conference IPC2012-90262; Calgary, Alberta, Canada: ASME; 2012. p. 103–110.
   Google Scholar
• Radmard S, Berg M. New method uses hardness to find yield strength. Oil Gas J. 2011;109;122–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashemi SH. Strength-hardness statistical correlation in API X65 steel. Mat. Sci. Eng. A. 2011;528:1648–1655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desjardins G, Sahney R. Encyclopedic dictionary of pipeline integrity. Houston, TX: Clarion Technical Publishers; 2012. p. 118.
   Google Scholar
• API Spec 5L. Specification for line pipe. Washington, D.C., U.S.A. 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Pollard L, Belanger A, Clarke T. Managing HIC affected pipelines utilizing MFL hard spot technology. Corrosion. 2004; Paper No. 04172, p. 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM A1038. Standard test method for portable hardness testing by the ultrasonic contact impedance method. West, Conshohocken, U.S.A. 2013.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM E110. Standard test method for Rockwell and Brinell hardness of metallic materials by portable hardness testers. West, Conshohocken, U.S.A. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Vijayalakshmi KA, Muthupandi VB, Jayachitra RC. Influence of heat treatment on the microstructure, ultrasonic attenuation and hardness of SAF 2205 duplex stainless steel. Mat. Sci. Eng. A. 2011;529:447–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutlu IA, Oktay EA, Ekinci SB. Characterization of microstructure of H13 tool steel using ultrasonic measurements. Russ. J. Nondestruct. Test. 2013;49:112–120.10.1134/S106183091302006X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Łukomski T, Stepinski T. Steel hardness evaluation based on ultrasound velocity measurements. Insight - Non-Destructive Test Condition Monit. 2010;52:592–596.10.1784/insi.2010.52.11.592
   Google Scholar
• David SA, Babu SS, Vitek JM. Welding: solidification and microstructure, overview welding. JOM. 2003;55:14–20.
   Google Scholar
• Rokhlin SI, Matikas TE. Ultrasonic characterization of surfaces and interphases. MRS Bull. 1996;22–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nayfeh AH, Carreon H, Nagy PB. Role of anisotropy in noncontacting thermoelectric materials characterization. J. Appl. Phys. 2002;91:225–230.10.1063/1.1416852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouda BA, Meksen T. The characteristics of the ultrasonic testing chain elements influence on the welded joints non-destructive testing. 7th European Conference on Non-Destructive Testing; Broendby, Copenhagen, Denmark. 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Carreon H, Ruiz A, Barrera G, Zarate J. Characterization of the alumina–zirconia ceramic system by ultrasonic velocity measurements. Mater. Charact. 2009;60:875–881.10.1016/j.matchar.2009.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palanichamy P, Vasudevan M, Jayakumar T, Venugopal S, Raj B. Ultrasonic velocity measurements for characterizing the annealing behaviour of cold worked austenitic stainless steel. NDT & E Int. 2002;33:253–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drinkwater BW, Wilcox PD. Ultrasonic arrays for non-destructive evaluation: a review. NDT & E Int. 2006;39:525–541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komura I., Hirasawa T., Nagai S., Takabayashi J. and Naruse K. Crack detection and sizing technique by ultrasonic and electromagnetic methods. Nucl. Eng. Des. 2001;206:351–362.10.1016/S0029-5493(00)00421-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahaut S, Roy O, Beroni C, Rotter B. Development of phased array techniques to improve characterization of defect located in a component of complex geometry. Ultrasonics. 2002;40:165–169.10.1016/S0041-624X(02)00131-2
   Google Scholar
• Prada C, Kerbrat E, Cassereau D, Fink M. Time reversal techniques in ultrasonic nondestructive testing of scattering media. Inverse Prob. 2002;18:1761–1773.10.1088/0266-5611/18/6/320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouda AB, Benchaala A, Alem K. Ultrasonic characterization of materials hardness. Ultrasonics. 2000;38: 224–227.10.1016/S0041-624X(99)00081-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ANSI/NACE MR0175/ISO 15156-1. Petroleum and natural gas industries – materials for use in H2S-containing environments in oil and gas production, part 1: general principles for selection of cracking-resistant materials. Houston, TX: NACE International/ISO. 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Byars HG. Corrosion control in petroleum production. TPC Publication 5, NACE International. 1999;59–65.
   Google Scholar
• Omweg GM, Frankel GS, Bruce WA, Ramirez JE, Koch G. Performance of welded high-strength low-alloy steels in sour environments. Corrosion. 2003;59:640–653.10.5006/1.3277595
   Google Scholar
• Zao MC, Tang B, Shan Y, Yang K. Role of microstructure on sulfide stress cracking of oil and gas pipeline steels. Metall. Mater. Trans. A. 2003;34:1089–1096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Federation of Corrosion (EFC) Publication Number 16, A working party report on Guidelines on Materials Requirements for Carbon and Low Alloys Steels for H2S-Containing Environments in Oil and Gas Production. London, UK: Maney Publishing; 2009, p. 18–19.
   Google Scholar