Delamination localization in wind turbine blades based on adaptive time-of-flight analysis of noncontact laser ultrasonic signals

References

• Global Wind Energy Council. Global wind report 2014. Global Wind Energy Council; 2015. Brussels, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Wind Measurement International. Operational and maintenance costs for wind turbines [Internet]; [cited 2015 May 26]. Available from: http://www.windmeasurementinternational.com/wind-turbines/om-turbines.php
   Google Scholar
• Peters VA, Ogilvie AB, Bond CR. Continuous reliability enhancement for wind (CREW) database: wind plant reliability benchmark. Albuquerque (New Mexico): Sandia National Laboratories (US); 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder K, Ecke W, Apitz J, et al. A fibre Bragg grating sensor system monitors operational load in a wind turbine rotor blade. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2006;17:1167–1172.10.1088/0957-0233/17/5/S39
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin CS, Chen Bl, Cheng JR, et al. Impact response of a wind turbine blade measured by distributed FBG sensors. Mater Manuf. Process. 2010;25:268–271.10.1080/10426910903426448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joose PA, Blanch MJ, Dutton AG, et al. Acoustic emission monitoring of small wind turbine blades. J. Sol. Energy Eng. 2002;124:446–454.10.1115/1.1509769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu L, Tian W, Mao E. Kinematics simulation of vertical flange lathe with double machining tools based on virtual prototype technology. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2011;101–102:302–305.10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.101-102
   Google Scholar
• Light-Marquez A, Sobin A, Park G. et al. Structural damage identification in wind turbine blades using piezoelectric active sensing. In: Prolux T, editor. Structural dynamics and renewable energy, Vol. 1. Springer New York (NY); 2011. p. 55–65.
   Google Scholar
• Gangbing S, Hui L, Bosko G, et al. Wind turbine blade health monitoring with piezoceramic-based wireless sensor network. Int. J. Smart Nano Mater. 2013;4:150–166.
   Google Scholar
• Niezrecki C, Avitabile P, Chen Julie, et al. Inspection and monitoring of wind turbine blade-embedded wave defects during fatigue testing. Struct Health Monit. 2014;13:629–643.10.1177/1475921714532995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruan J, Ho SCM, Patil D, et al. Wind turbine blade damage detection using an active sensing approach. Smart Mater Struct. 2014;23: 10.
   Google Scholar
• Raisutis R, Jasiuniene E, Zukauskas E. Ultrasonic NDT of wind turbine blades using guided waves. Ultrasound. 2008;63:7–11.
   Google Scholar
• Fantidis JG, Potolias C, Bandekas DV. Wind turbine blade nondestructive testing with a transportable radiography system. Sci. Technol. Nucl. Ins. 2011;2011:6.
   Google Scholar
• Rumsey MA, Musial W. Application of infrared thermography nondestructive testing during wind turbine blade tests. J. Sol. Energy Eng. 2001;123:271.10.1115/1.1409560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manohar A, Scalea FL di. Detection of defects in wind turbine composite blades using statistically enhanced lock-in thermography. 2013;12:566–574.
   Google Scholar
• Linag C. Eddy current pulsed thermography for non-destructive evaluation of carbon fibre reinforced plastic for wind turbine blades [dissertation]. Newcastle: Newcastle University; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Caron JN, DiComo GP, Nikitin S. Generation of ultrasound in materials using continuous-wave lasers. Opt. Lett. 2012;37:830–832.10.1364/OL.37.000830
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim H, Jhang K, Shin M, et al. A noncontact NDE method using a laser generated focused-lamb wave with enhanced defect-detection ability and spatial resolution. NDT&E Int. 2006;39:312–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An Y-K, Park B., Sohn, H. Complete noncontact laser ultrasonic imaging for automated crack visualization in a plate. Smart Mater. Struct. 2013;22:025022.10.1088/0964-1726/22/2/025022
   Google Scholar
• Staszewski WJ, Lee BC, Traynor R. Fatigue crack detection in metallic structures with lamb waves and 3D laser vibrometry. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2007;18:727–739.10.1088/0957-0233/18/3/024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaels TE, Michaels JE, Ruzzene M. Frequency–wavenumber domain analysis of guided wavefields. Ultrasonics. 2011 2013;51:452–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou C, Su Z, Cheng L. Probability-based diagnostic imaging using hybrid features extracted from ultrasonic lamb wave signals. Smart Mater. Struct. 2011;20:14.10.1088/0964-1726/20/12/125005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wandowski T, Malinowski P, Ostachowicz W. Damage detection with concentrated configurations of piezoelectric transducers. Smart Mater. Struct. 2011;20:025002.10.1088/0964-1726/20/2/025002
   Google Scholar
• Gannon, A, et al. A high-speed dual-stage ultrasonic guided wave system for localization and characterization of defects. Structural health monitoring and damage detection, Vol. 7; Springer International Publishing; 2015; p. 123–136.
   Google Scholar
• Michaels, JE, et al. Approaches to hybrid SHM and NDE of composite aerospace structures. Proc. SPIE 9064, Health Monitoring of Structural and Biological Systems 2014, 906427 (9 March 2014); doi: 10.1117/12.2045172
   Google Scholar
• Davies SJ, Edwards C, Taylor GS, et al. Laser-generated ultrasound: its properties, mechanisms and multifarious applications. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 1993;26:329–348 10.1088/0022-3727/26/3/001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchins DA. Mechanisms of pulsed photoacoustic generation. Can. J. Phys. 1986;64:1247–1264.10.1139/p86-217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castellini P, Martarelli M, Tomasini EP. Laser doppler vibrometry: development of advanced solutions answering to technology’s needs. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2006;20:1265–1285.10.1016/j.ymssp.2005.11.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin P, Rothberg S. Introducing speckle noise maps for Laser vibrometry. Opt. Laser Eng. 2009;47:431–442.10.1016/j.optlaseng.2008.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park B, An Y-K, Sohn H. Visualization of hidden delamination and debonding in composites through noncontact laser ultrasonic scanning. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2014;100:10–18.10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.05.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malinowski P, Wandowski T, Ostachowicz W. Damage detection potential of a triangular piezoelectric configuration. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2011;25:2722–2732.10.1016/j.ymssp.2011.02.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giurgiutiu V. Structural health monitoring: with piezoelectric wafer active sensors. Burlington, MA: Academic Press; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Kay S. Fundamentals of statistical signal processing, Vol. II: detection theory. Cloth: Prentice Hall; 1998.
   Google Scholar