Measurement uncertainty analysis for compressive loading-based ultrasonic wave propagation

References

• Vasconcelos G, Lourenço PB, Alves CAS, et al. Ultrasonic evaluation of the physical and mechanical properties of granites. Ultrasonics. 2008;48:453–466.10.1016/j.ultras.2008.03.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton N. Rock quality, seismic velocity. Attenuation and anisotropy. London: CRC Press; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Best AI, Sams MS. Compressional wave velocity and attenuation at ultrasonic and sonic frequencies in near-surface sedimentary rocks. Geophys. Prospect. 1997;45:327–344.10.1046/j.1365-2478.1997.00337.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang XL, Qi SW, Guo SF, et al. Experimental study of ultrasonic waves propagating through a rock mass with a single joint and multiple parallel joints. Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 2014;47:549–559.10.1007/s00603-013-0399-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn PF. Measurement and data analysis for engineering and science. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology. Evaluation of measurement data – guide to expression of uncertainty in measurement GUM. Sevres: BIPM; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• NASA Measurement Quality Assurance Handbook – Annex 3. Measurement uncertainty analysis principles and methods. Washington; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Willink R. Measurement uncertainty and probability. Cambridge; 2013.10.1017/CBO9781139135085
   Google Scholar
• Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology. Evaluation of measurement data, GUM supplement 1 – propagation of distributions using a Monte Carlo method. Sevres: BIPM; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Hall BD. Evaluating methods of calculating measurement uncertainty. Metrologia. 2008;45:L5–L8.10.1088/0026-1394/45/2/N01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theodorou D, Meligotsidou L, Karavoltsos S, et al. Comparison of ISO-GUM and Monte Carlo methods for the evaluation of measurement uncertainty: application to direct cadmium measurement in water by GFAAS. Talanta. 2011;83:1568–1574.10.1016/j.talanta.2010.11.059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Possolo A. Copulas for uncertainty analysis. Metrologia. 2010;47:262–271.10.1088/0026-1394/47/3/017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chary KB, Sarma LP, Prasanna Lakshmi KJ, et al. Evaluation of engineering properties of rock using ultrasonic pulse velocity and uniaxial compressive strength. Proceedings of the National Seminar on Non-destructive Evaluation; 2006; Hyderabad.
   Google Scholar
• Karakus M, Tutmez B. Assessing deformability of siltstone under compressive loading by ultrasonic wave propagation. 35th APCOM Symposium; 2011; Wollongong.
   Google Scholar
• Couvreur JF, Vervoort A, King MS, et al. Successive cracking steps of a limestone highlighted by ultrasonic wave propagation. Geophys. Prospect. 2001;49:71–78.10.1046/j.1365-2478.2001.00242.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priel M. From GUM to alternative methods for measurement uncertainty evaluation. Accred. Qual Assur. 2009;14:235–241.10.1007/s00769-009-0518-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkup L, Frenkel RB. An introduction to uncertainty in measurement. Cambridge; 2006.10.1017/CBO9780511755538
   Google Scholar
• Desenfant M, Fischer N, Blanquart B, et al. Evaluation of uncertainty using Monte Carlo simulations, transverse disciplines in metrology. 13th International Metrology Congress 2007; 2009; Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Possolo A. Statistical models and computation to evaluate measurement uncertainty. Metrologia. 2014;51:S228–S236.10.1088/0026-1394/51/4/S228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willink R. On using the Monte Carlo method to calculate uncertainty intervals. Metrologia. 2006;43:L39–L42.10.1088/0026-1394/43/6/N02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sklar A. Random variables, joint distribution functions, and copulas. Kybernetika. 1973; 9(6): 449–460.
   Google Scholar
• Nelsen RB. An introduction to copulas. Vol. 139, Lecture notes in statistics. New York: Springer Verlag; 1999.10.1007/978-1-4757-3076-0
   Google Scholar
• Possolo A. Five examples of assessment and expression of measurement uncertainty. Appl. Stochastic Models Bus. Ind. 2013;29:1–18.10.1002/asmb.v29.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt T. Coping with copulas, risk books. In: Rank J, editor. London; Risk Books. 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Embrechts P, Lindskog F, McNeil A. Modelling dependence with copulas and applications to risk management. In: S. Rachev, editor. Handbook of heavy tailed distributions in finance. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Kurowicka D, Cooke RM. Uncertainty analysis with high dimensional dependence modelling,ser. probability and statistics. New York; 2006.10.1002/0470863072
   Google Scholar
• Clemen RT, Reilly T. Correlations and copulas for decision and risk analysis. Manage. Sci. 1999;45:208–224.10.1287/mnsc.45.2.208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karakus M, Tutmez B, Kaleci D. Ultrasonic evaluation of igneous and metamorphic rocks under compressive loading. Proceedings of the 21th International Mining Congress and Exhibition of Turkey (IMCET2009); 2009; Antalya, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Ulusay R. The ISRM Suggested Methods for Rock Characterization, Testing and Monitoring: 2007–2014, Springer; Switzerland, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Cho H, Luck R, Stevens JV. An improvement on the standard linear uncertainty quantification using a least-squares method. J. Uncertainty Anal. Appl. 2015;3:1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Harris PM, Cox MG. On a Monte Carlo method for measurement uncertainty evaluation and its implementation. Metrologia. 2014;51:S176–S182.10.1088/0026-1394/51/4/S176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malengo A, Pennecchi F. A weighted total least-squares algorithm for any fitting model with correlated variables. Metrologia. 2013;50:654–662.10.1088/0026-1394/50/6/654
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar