Ultrasonic NDE of thick polyurethane flexible riser stiffener material

References

• Moghimirad E, Mahloojifar A, Mohammadzadeh B. Computational complexity reduction of synthetic-aperture focus in ultrasound imaging using frequency-domain reconstruction. Ultrason. Imaging. 2016;38:175–193.10.1177/0161734615583461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang C, Chang Y, Shih R, et al. Ultrasonic synthetic aperture focusing technique with finite source element for focused transducers. J. Test. Eval. 2014;42:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skjelvareid MH, Birkelund Y, Larsen Y. Synthetic aperture focusing of outwardly directed cylindrical ultrasound scans. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control. 2012;59:2460–2469.10.1109/TUFFC.2012.2478
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng R, Davies P, Bajaj AK. Flexible polyurethane foam modelling and identification of viscoelastic parameters for automotive seating applications. J. Sound Vibr. 2003;262:391–417.10.1016/S0022-460X(03)00104-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grad S, Kupcsik L, Gorna K, et al. The use of biodegradable polyurethane scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering: potential and limitations. Biomaterials. 2003;24:5163–5171.10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00462-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boet WJC, Out JMM. Analysis of a flexible-riser top connection with bend restrictor. Offshore Technology Conference; Houston, USA; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Demanze F, Hanonge D, Chalumeau A, et al. Fatigue life analysis of polyurethane bending stiffeners. ASME 2005 24th international conference on offshore mechanics and arctic engineering; American Society of Mechanical Engineers; Houston, USA; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Marinho MG, dos Santos JM, Carneval RDO. Integrity assessment and repair techniques of flexible risers. Proceedings of 25th international conference on offshore mechanics and arctic engineering; Hamburg, Germany; Vol. 4, Paper No. OMAE2006-92467, p. 253–260; 8 pages. doi:10.1115/OMAE2006-92467.
   Google Scholar
• Felix-Henry A, Lembeye P. Flexible pipes in-service monitoring. Proceedings of 23rd international conference on offshore mechanics and artic engineering; Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; 2004. Paper OMAE2004-51348.
   Google Scholar
• Jacques R, Clarke T, Morikawa S, et al. Monitoring the structural integrity of a flexible riser during dynamic loading with a combination of non-destructive testing methods. NDT & E Int. 2010;43:501–506.10.1016/j.ndteint.2010.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veith E, Bucherie C, Lechien JL, et al. Inspection of offshore flexible riser with electromagnetic and radiographic techniques. Proceedings of 15th world conference on non-destructive testing; Rome, Italy; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Bastianini F, Di Tommaso A, Pascale G. Ultrasonic non-destructive assessment of bonding defects in composite structural strengthenings. Compos. Struct. 2001;53:463–467.10.1016/S0263-8223(01)00058-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright WMD, Hutchins DA, Schindel DW. Ultrasonic evaluation of polymers and composites using air-coupled capacitance transducers. In: Thompson DO and Chimenti DE, editors. Review of progress in quantitative nondestructive evaluation, New York, CO: Plennun Press; 1995. Vol. 14B, p. 1399–1406.10.1007/978-1-4615-1987-4
   Google Scholar
• McKie ADW, Addison RC, Jr. Laser-based ultrasonic inspection of complexly contoured rocket engine components. In: Thompson DO and Chimenti DE, editor. Review of progress in quantitative nondestructive evaluation, New York (CO): Plennun Press; 1998. Vol. 17, p. 595–602.10.1007/978-1-4615-5339-7
   Google Scholar
• Rao NAHK. Investigation of a pulse compression technique for medical ultrasound: a simulation study. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 1994;32:181–188.10.1007/BF02518916
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torok R, Seller R. Pulse compression in search radar. Perodica Polytech. Ser. El. Eng. 1998;42:391–408.
   Google Scholar
• Gan TH, Hutchins DA, Billson DR, et al. The use of broadband acoustic transducers and pulse compression techniques for air-couple ultrasonic imaging. Ultrasonics. 2000;39:181–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seberry JR, Wysocki BJ, Wysocki TA. Advanced signal processing for communication systems. London: Kluwer Academic; 2002. p. 182–196.10.1007/b101913
   Google Scholar
• White JDH, Challis RE. A Golay sequencer based NDT system for highly attenuating materials. In: Non-Contacting and Remote NDT, IEE Colloquium on, IET; 1992. p. 7–1.
   Google Scholar
• Challis RE, Ivchenko VG. Sub-threshold sampling in a correlation-based ultrasonic spectrometer. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2011;22:22–33.10.1088/0957-0233/22/2/025902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Rodriguez M, Yañez Y, Garcia-Hernandez MJ, et al. Application of Golay codes to improve the dynamic range in ultrasonic Lamb waves air-coupled systems. NDT & E Int. 2010;43:677–686.10.1016/j.ndteint.2010.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowicki A, Klimonda Z, Lewandowski M., et al. Direct and post-compressed sound fields for different coded excitations- experimental results. In: Andre PM, editor. Acoustical imaging. Vol. 28. New York (NY): Springer; 2007. p. 399–407.
   Google Scholar
• Krautkrämer J. Determination of the size of defects by the ultrasonic impulse echo method. Br. J. Appl. Phys. 1959;10:240–245.10.1088/0508-3443/10/6/302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf E, Marchand EW. Comparison of the Kirchhoff and the Rayleigh–Sommerfeld theories of diffraction at an aperture. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 1964;54:587–594.10.1364/JOSA.54.000587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchins D, Burrascano P, Davis L, et al. Coded waveforms for optimised air-coupled ultrasonic nondestructive evaluation. Ultrasonics. 2014;54:1745–1759.10.1016/j.ultras.2014.03.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallav P, Gan TH, Hutchins DA. Elliptical-Tukey chirp signal for high-resolution, air-coupled ultrasonic imaging. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control. 2007;54:1530–1540.10.1109/TUFFC.2007.423
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spies M, Rieder H. Synthetic aperture focusing of ultrasonic inspection data to enhance the probability of detection of defects in strongly attenuating materials. NDT & E Int. 2010;43:425–431.10.1016/j.ndteint.2010.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masri W, Mina M, Udpa SS, et al. Synthetic aperture focusing techniques applied in the near field of a focused transducer. Ultrasonics Symposium, 1995. Proceedings, 1995 IEEE; Vol. 1. IEEE; 1995. p. 240–245.
   Google Scholar
• Rudin LI, Osher S, Fatemi E. Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms. Physica D. 1992;60:259–268.10.1016/0167-2789(92)90242-F
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricci M, Callegari S, Caporale S, et al. Exploiting non-linear chirp and sparse deconvolution to enhance the performance of pulse-compression ultrasonic NDT. Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS), 2012 IEEE International; IEEE; 2012.
   Google Scholar