Investigation of the roughness variation along the length of LPBF manufactured straight channels

References

• Wang D, Yang Y, Yi Z, et al. Research on the fabricating quality optimization of the overhanging surface in SLM process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2013;65:1471–1484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang D, Mai S, Xiao D, et al. Surface quality of the curved overhanging structure manufactured from 316-L stainless steel by SLM. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2016;86(1–4):781–792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinde MS, Ashtankar KM. Additive manufacturing-assisted conformal cooling channels in mold manufacturing processes. Adv Mech Eng. 2017;9(5):1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrovic V, Vicente Haro Gonzalez J, Jordá Ferrando O, et al. Additive layered manufacturing: sectors of industrial application shown through case studies. Int J Prod Res. 2011;49(4):1061–1079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson MK, Moroni G, Vaneker T, et al. Design for additive manufacturing: trends, opportunities, considerations, and constraints. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol. 2016;65(2):737–760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder JC, Stimpson CK, Thole KA, et al. Build direction effects on additively manufactured channels. J Turbomach [Internet]. 2016;138:1–8. Available from: http://proceedings.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/proceeding.aspx?doi=10.1115/GT2015-43935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox JC, Moylan SP, Lane BM. Effect of process parameters on the surface roughness of overhanging structures in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. Procedia CIRP. 2016;45:131–134.
   Google Scholar
• Chen H, Gu D, Xiong J, et al. Improving additive manufacturing processability of hard-to-process overhanging structure by selective laser melting. J Mater Process Technol. 2017;250:99–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsayed M, Ghazy M, Youssef Y, et al. Optimization of SLM process parameters for Ti6Al4V medical implants. Rapid Prototyp J [Internet]. 2019 Jun 28;25:433–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgado J, Ciurana J, Rodríguez CA. Influence of process parameters on part quality and mechanical properties for DMLS and SLM with iron-based materials. Int J Adv Manuf Technol [Internet]. 2012;60:601–610. [cited 2019 Jun 28]. Available from: http://production.datastore.cvt.dk/filestore?oid=5481034e0b2ed09c1528d9b5&targetid=5481034e0b2ed09c1528d9b7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koutiri I, Pessard E, Peyre P, et al. Influence of SLM process parameters on the surface finish, porosity rate and fatigue behavior of as-built Inconel 625 parts. J Mater Process Technol [Internet]. 2018;255:536–546. [cited 2019 Jun 28].
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black JT, Kohser RA, DeGarmo EP. Degarmo’s materials and processes in manufacturing. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Elshafei EAM, Awad MM, El-Negiry E, et al. Heat transfer and pressure drop in corrugated channels. Energy. 2010;35(1):101–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deo NS, Chander S, Saini JS. Performance analysis of solar air heater duct roughened with multigap V-down ribs combined with staggered ribs. Renewable Energy [Internet]. 2016;91:484–500. [cited 2019 Jun 28].
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pehlivan H, Taymaz I, Islamoǧlu Y. Experimental study of forced convective heat transfer in a different arranged corrugated channel. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf [Internet]. 2013;46:106–111. [cited 2019 Jun 28].
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klingaa CG, Dahmen T, Baier S, et al. X-ray CT and image analysis methodology for local roughness characterization in cooling channels made by metal additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf [Internet]. 2020;32:101032. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2214860419315970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson A, Senin N, Maskery I, et al. Internal surface measurement of metal powder bed fusion parts. Addit Manuf. 2018;20:126–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruth JP, Bartscher M, Carmignato S, et al. Computed tomography for dimensional metrology. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol. 2011;60:821–842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vorburger T. Optical methods of surface measurement. Gaithersburg, MD: NIST; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. ISO 25178-2:2012: geometrical product specifications (GPS) - Surface texture: areal - Part 2: terms, definitions and surface texture parameters. International Organization for Standardization; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Triantaphyllou A, Giusca CL, Macaulay GD, et al. Surface texture measurement for additive manufacturing. Surf Topogr Metrol Prop. 2015;3:1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmignato S, Dewulf W, Leach R. Industrial X-ray computed tomography. Ind X-Ray Comput Tomogr. Cham (Switzerland): Springer. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend A, Senin N, Blunt L, et al. Surface texture metrology for metal additive manufacturing: a review. Precis Eng. 2016;46:34–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. ISO 4287:1998: geometrical product specifications (GPS) - Surface texture: profile method - Terms, definitions and surface texture parameters. International Organization for Standardization; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Klingaa CG, Bjerre MK, Baier S, et al. Roughness investigation of SLM manufactured conformal cooling channels using X-ray computed tomography. e-J Nondestruct Test [Internet]. 2019. Available from: https://www.ndt.net/search/docs.php3?showForm=off&id=23739
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsmühlen J, Kleszczynski S, Ladewig A, et al. In-situ surface roughness measurement of laser beam melted parts – a feasibility study of layer image analysis. 2016. p. 1–6. Available from: http://www.lfb.rwth-aachen.de/bibtexupload/pdf/JAC16b.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Moshiri M. Integrated process chain for first-time-right mould components production using laser powder bed fusion metal additive manufacturing; 2020.
   Google Scholar