Detection of hydrate plugs inside submarine pipelines using neutrons

References

• Ouyang Y, Wang C, Wu Y, et al. Trend of the environmental supervision on submarine pipeline installation. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2018;25(29):28829–28833.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang B, Gong R, Wang T, et al. Causes end treatment measures of submarine pipeline free-spanning. J Mar Sci Eng. 2020;8(5):329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian X, Das HS. Modeling subsea pipeline movement subjected to submarine debris-flow impact. J Pipeline Syst Eng Pract. 2019;10(3):04019016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu X, Wang L, Li Z, et al. Modeling of submarine initial pipe-laying process and its real-time semi-physical virtual reality system. Adv Mech Eng. 2018;10(1):1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong C, Li Z, Sun X, et al. An effective method for submarine pipeline inspection using three-dimensional (3D) models constructed from multisensor data fusion. J Coastal Res. 2018;34(4):1009–1019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Gao M, Ao C, et al. Collapse failure of submarine pipelines with corrosion defect. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 332 (ICEEMS 2019, Proceedings of a meeting held 21-23 June 2019, Singapore) pp. 032048.
   Google Scholar
• Coppard C, Forrest AL, Leong ZQ, et al. Assessment of subsea pipelines. Journal of Annual Conference of the Australasian Corrosion Association 2014: Corrosion and Prevention 2014, Paper 78 (Proceedings of a meeting held 21-24 September 2014, Darwin, Australia).
   Google Scholar
• Hammerschmidt EG. Formation of gas hydrate in natural gas transmission lines. Ind Eng Chem. 1934;26(8):851–855.
   Google Scholar
• Li W, Gong J, Lü X, et al. A study of hydrate plug formation in a subsea natural gas pipeline using a novel high-pressure flow loop. Pet Sci. 2013;10(1):97–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarinabadi S, Samimi A. Problems of hydrate formation in oil and gas pipes deals. Aust J Basic Appl Sci. 2011;5(12):741–745.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Sharify ZT, Lahieb Faisal M, Hamad LB, et al. A review of hydrate formation in oil and gas transition pipes. IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 870 (2020, Proceedings of a meeting held 11-12 February 2020, Assiut, Egypt) 012039.
   Google Scholar
• Chandragupthan B, Nounchi GB. Detecting and dealing with hydrate formation. Digital Refining – Processing, Operations & Maintenance. article 1000465 (Apr-2010). Gas 2010, pp 27-31, https://cdn.digitalrefining.com/data/articles/file/67785562.pdf. www.digitalrefining.com/article/1000465
   Google Scholar
• Alobaidi WM, Alkuam EA, Al-Rizzo HM, et al. Applications of ultrasonic techniques in oil and gas pipeline industries: a review. Am J Oper Res. 2015;5(4):274–287.
   Google Scholar
• Sinquin A, Palermo T, Peysson Y. Rheological and flow properties of gas hydrate suspensions. Oil Gas Sci Technol Rev IFP. 2004;59(1):41–57.
   Google Scholar
• Majid AAA, Wu DT, Koh CA. A perspective on rheological studies of gas hydrate slurry properties. Engineering. 2018;4(3):321–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Lima Silva PH, Naccache MF, de Souza Mendes PR, et al. Rheology of THF hydrate slurries at high pressure. Oil Gas Sci Technol Rev IFP Energies Nouvelles. 2020;75:16.
   Google Scholar
• Li X, Liu Y, Liu Z, et al. A hydrate blockage detection apparatus for gas pipeline using ultrasonic focused transducer and its application on a flow loop. Energy Sci Eng. 2020;8:1770–1780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stieghorst C, Hampel G, Karches B, et al. Determination of boron and hydrogen in materials for multicrystalline solar cell production with prompt gamma activation analysis. J Radioanal Nucl Chem. 2018;317(1):307–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carasco C, Eleon C, Perot B, et al. Data acquisition and analysis of the UNCOSS underwater explosive neutron sensor. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2012 Aug;59(4):1438–1442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IAEA radiation technology reports no. 1, neutron generators for analytical purposes, 2225-8833, ISBN 978-92-0-125110-7. 11.
   Google Scholar
• Revay Z, Kudejova P, Kleszcz K, et al. In-beam activation analysis facility at MLZ, Garching. Nucl Instrum Methods A. 2015;799:114–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinz Maier-Leibnitz Zentrum: Bücherl T, Söllradl S. et al. NECTAR: radiography and tomography station using fission neutrons. J Large-scale Res Facil. 2015;1:A19.
   Google Scholar
• Randriamalala TH, Rossbach M, Mauerhofer E, et al. FaNGaS: a new instrument for (n, n’, gamma) reaction measurements at FRM II” (note that FRM II and MLZ are the same facility). Nucl Instrum Methods. 2016;A806:370–377.
   Google Scholar
• Ullas V, Kumar D, Roy PK. Epoxy-glass microballoon syntactic foams: rheological optimization of the processing window, Hindawi. Adv Polym Technol. 2019;2019(Article ID 9180302):12.
   Google Scholar
• USGS 2014 science for a changing world review on international gas hydrate.
   Google Scholar
• Gerstenberg H, Petry W, FRM II (20 MW Germany), encyclopedia of nuclear energy, 2021, 113–123.
   Google Scholar
• Révay Z, Belgya T, Molnár G. Application of hypermet-PC in PGAA. J Radioanal Nucl Chem. 2005;265(2):261–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar