Gender and local executive office in regional Russia: the party of power as a vehicle for women’s empowerment?

References

• Abramson, Paul R., John H. Aldrich, and David Rohde. 1987. “Progressive Ambition among United States Senators: 1972–1988.” Journal of Politics 49 (1): 3–35.10.2307/2131132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belyaeva, G.F. 2008. “Politicheskaya aktivnost zhenshchin v Rossii.” [Political Activity of Women in Russia.] Voprosy Gosudarstvennogo i Munistipal’nogo Upravleniya (1): 151–165. www.vgmu.hse.ru.
   Google Scholar
• Black, Gordon S. 1972. “A Theory of Political Ambition: Career Choices and the Role of Structural Incentives.” American Political Science Review 66 (1): 144–159.10.2307/1959283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bledsoe, Timothy, and Marry Herring. 1990. “Victims of Circumstances: Women in Pursuit of Political Office.” American Political Science Review 84 (1): 213–223.10.2307/1963638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrell, Barbara. 1994. A Woman’s Place is in the House: Campaigning for Congress in the Feminist Era. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, Susan J. 1989. “The Personal is Political: The Intersection of Private Lives and Public Roles among Women and Men in Elective and Appointive Office.” Women and Politics 9 (2): 51–67.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, Susan J., and Kira Sanbonmatsu. 2013. More Women Can Run: Gender and Pathways to the State Legislatures. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199322428.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, Susan J., and W. S. Strimling. 1983. Women’s Routes to Elective Office: A Comparison with Men’s. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for the American Woman and Politics.
   Google Scholar
• Crowder-Meyer, Melody. 2013. Gendered Recruitment without Trying: How Local Party Recruiters Affect Women's Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Darcy, Robert, Susan Welch, and Janet C. Clark. 1994. Women, Elections, and Representations. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dodson, Debra L. 1997. “Change and Continuity in the Relationship Between Private Responsibilities and Public Officeholding: The More Things Change, the More They Stay the Same.” Policy Studies Journal 25 (4): 569–584.10.1111/psj.1997.25.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Euromoney. 2015. “Nabiullina named Euromoney Central Bank Governor of the Year 2015.” September 16. http://www.euromoney.com/Article/3488964/Nabiullina-named-Euromoney-Central-Bank-Governor-of-the.html.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Law. 2003. Federal Law #131 of the Russian Federation (On General Principles of Organization of Local Self-Government Institutions in the Russian Federation). Moscow: The Government of the Russian Federation. Accessed October 6.
   Google Scholar
• Fiorina, Morris P. 1989. “Keystone Reconsidered.” In Congress Reconsidered. 7th ed., edited by Lawrence C. Dodd and Bruce Oppenheimer. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flammang, Janet A. 1997. Women’s Political Voice: How Women are Transforming the Practice and Study of Politics. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, Richard L., and Jennifer L. Lawless. 2004. “Entering the Arena: Gender and the Initial Decision to Run for Office.” American Journal of Political Science 48 (2): 264–280.10.1111/ajps.2004.48.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, Richard L., and Jennifer L. Lawless. 2005. “Gendered Perceptions and Political Candidacies: A Central Barrier to Women’s Equality in Electoral Politics.” American Journal of Political Science 55 (1): 59–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, Richard L., and Jennifer L. Lawless. 2014. “Uncovering the Origins of the Gender Gap in Political Ambition.” American Political Science Review 108 (3): 499–519.10.1017/S0003055414000227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulton, Sarah A. 2012. “Running Backwards and in High Heels: The Gendered Quality Gap and Incumbent Electoral Success.” Political Research Quarterly 65 (2): 303–314.10.1177/1065912911401419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulton, Sarah A., Cherie D. Maestas, L. Sandy Maisel, and Walter J. Stone. 2006. “The Sense of a Woman: Gender, Ambition, and the Decision to Run for Congress.” Political Research Quarterly 59 (2): 235–248.10.1177/106591290605900206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gertzog, Irwin N., and M. Michelle Simard. 1981. “Women and ‘Hopeless’ Congressional Candidacies: Nomination Frequency, 1916–1978.” American Politics Quarterly 9 (4): 449–466.10.1177/1532673X8100900404
   Google Scholar
• Golosov, Grigorii V. 2014. “Is Electoral Authoritarianism Good for Women’s Representation? Evidence from 1999–2011 Regional Legislative Elections in Russia.” Post-Soviet Affairs 30 (1): 51–66.10.1080/1060586X.2013.831653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Interfax. 2017. “Nabiullina stala luchshim glavoi TsB v Evrope po versii The Banker.” [Nabiullina is Named the Best Chairperson of the Central Bank in Europe by The Banker.] January 4. http://www.interfax.ru/business/544099.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Janet E. 2016. “Fast-tracked or Boxed In? Informal Politics, Gender, and Women’s Representation in Putin’s Russia.” Perspectives on Politics 14 (3): 643–659.10.1017/S1537592716001109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, Janet E., and Alexandra Novitskaya. 2016. “Gender and Politics.” In Putin’s Russia. 6th ed., edited by Stephen K. Wegren, 215–232. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick, Jean J. 1974. Political Woman. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kochkina, Elena V. 1999. “Zhenschiny v rossiiskikh organakh vlasti.” [Women in Russian Bodies of Power.] Obshchestvennye Nauki i Sovremennost 1: 173–183.
   Google Scholar
• Krook, Mona Lena. 2009. Quotas for Women in Politics: Gender and Candidate Selection Reform Worldwide. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195375671.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Lawless, Jennifer L., and Richard L. Fox. 2010. It Still Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don’t Run for Office. Rev. ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511778797
   Google Scholar
• Mayhew, David. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Niven, David. 1998. The Missing Majority: The Recruitment of Women as State Legislative Candidates. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Open Women Line. 2003. “Diskriminatsiya zhenschin v realizatsii izbiratel’nkh prav.” [Discrimination of Women in the Realization of Electoral Rights.] http://www.owl.ru/rights/women2003/discr-19.html.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, Barbara, and Dennis Simon. 2003. “Political Ambition and Women in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1916–2000.” Political Research Quarterly 56 (2): 127–138.10.1177/106591290305600202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paxton, Pamela, Melanie M. Hughes, and Matthew A. Painter. 2009. “Growth in Women’s Political Representation: A Longitudinal Exploration of Democracy, Electoral System, and Gender Quotas.” European Journal of Political Research 49 (1): 25–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, H. Douglas. 1975. “Congress and the Evolution of Legislative Professionalism.” In Congress in Change: Evolution and Reform, edited by J. Ornstein, 2–23. New York: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Riabov, Oleg, and Tatiana Riabova. 2014. “Remasculinization of Russia? Gender, Nationalism, and the Legitimation of Power under Vladimir Putin.” Problems of Post-Communism 61 (2): 23–35.10.2753/PPC1075-8216610202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohde, David W. 1979. “Risk Bearing and Progressive Ambition: The Case of the Members of the U.S. House of Representatives.” American Journal of Political Science 23 (1): 1–26.10.2307/2110769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozell, Mark. 2000. “Helping Women Run and Win: Feminist Groups, Candidate Recruitment, and Training.” Women and Politics 21 (3): 101–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2006. Where Women Run: Gender and Party in the American States. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.10.3998/mpub.168630
   Google Scholar
• Sapiro, Virginia. 1982. “Private Costs of Public Commitments or Public Costs of Private Commitments? Family Roles versus Political Ambition.” American Journal of Political Science 26 (2): 265–279.10.2307/2111039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlesinger, Joseph A. 1966. Ambition and Politics: Political Careers in the United States. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
   Google Scholar
• Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A. 2009. “Making Quotas Work: The Effect of Gender Quota Laws On the Election of Women.” Legislative Studies 34 (1): 5–28.10.3162/036298009787500330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sperling, Valerie. 2015. Sex, Politics, and Putin: Political Legitimacy in Russia. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stalsburg, Brittany L. 2010. “Voting For Mom: The Political Consequences of Being a Parent for Male and Female Candidates.” Politics and Gender 6 (3): 373–404.10.1017/S1743923X10000309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temkina, Anna. 2013. “Nastoyashchii muzhchina.” [Real Man.] Politi.ru. http://politi.ru/article/2013/06/12/temkina/.
   Google Scholar
• The Government of the Russian Federation. Decree # 410-p. 2017. The National Strategy for Women’s Advancement 2017–2022. March 8. Moscow: Russia.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, Sue. 2002. “The Personal Is Political: Antecedents of Gendered Choices of Elected Representatives.” Sex Roles 47 (7/8): 343–353.10.1023/A:1021431114955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripp, Aili Mari, and Alice Kang. 2008. “The Global Impact of Quotas: On the Fast Track to Increased Female Legislative Representation.” Comparative Political Studies 41 (3): 338–361.10.1177/0010414006297342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch, Susan. 1978. “Recruitment of Women to Public Office.” Western Political Quarterly 31 (3): 372–380.
   Google Scholar