Fear of punishment as a driver of survey misreporting and item non-response in Russia and its neighbors

References

• Agerberg, Mattias. 2022. “Corrupted Estimates? Response Bias in Citizen Surveys on Corruption.” Political Behavior 44 (2): 653–678. doi:10.1007/s11109-020-09630-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahlquist, John S. 2018. “List Experiment Design, Non-Strategic Respondent Error, and Item Count Technique Estimators.” Political Analysis 26 (1): 34–53. doi:10.1017/pan.2017.31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aliyev, Huseyn. 2017. When Informal Institutions Change: Institutional Reforms and Informal Practices in the Former Soviet Union. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andreenkova, Anna V., and Debra Javeline. 2018. “Sensitive Questions in Comparative Surveys.” In Advances in Comparative Survey Methods: Multinational, Multiregional, and Multicultural Contexts (3MC), edited by Timothy P. Johnson, Beth‐Ellen Pennell, Ineke A.L. Stoop, and Brita Dorer, 139–160. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Aronow, Peter M., Alexander Coppock, Forrest W. Crawford, and Donald P. Green. 2015. “Combining List Experiment and Direct Question Estimates of Sensitive Behavior Prevalence.” Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 3 (1): 43–66. doi:10.1093/jssam/smu023.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blair, Graeme, Winston Chou, and Kosuke Imai. 2019. “List Experiments with Measurement Error.” Political Analysis 27 (4): 455–480. doi:10.1017/pan.2018.56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair, Graeme, and Kosuke Imai. 2012. “Statistical Analysis of List Experiments.” Political Analysis 20 (1): 47–77. doi:10.1093/pan/mpr048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, Kenneth A., and Mark D. Noble. 2011. “Structural Equation Models and the Quantification of Behavior.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108 (Suppl. 3): 15639–15646. doi:10.1073/pnas.1010661108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryn, Rosenfeld, Kosuke Imai, and Jacob N. Shapiro. 2016. “An Empirical Validation Study of Popular Survey Methodologies for Sensitive Questions.” American Journal of Political Science 60 (3): 783–802. doi:10.1111/ajps.12205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapkovskii, Filipp 2022. “Bolshinstvo Byvaet Voobrazhaemym [The Majority Is Imaginary].” Kholod, April 9. https://holod.media/2022/04/09/russians-against-war/
   Google Scholar
• Chaudhuri, Arijit, and Sanghamitra Pal. 2022. A Comprehensive Textbook on Sample Surveys. Kolkata: Indian Statistical Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Couper, Mick P. 2011. “The Future of Modes of Data Collection.” Public Opinion Quarterly 75 (5): 889–908. doi:10.1093/poq/nfr046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eady, Gregory. 2017. “The Statistical Analysis of Misreporting on Sensitive Survey Questions.” Political Analysis 25 (2): 241–259. doi:10.1017/pan.2017.8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frye, Timothy, Scott Gehlbach, Kyle L. Marquardt, and Ora John Reuter. 2017. “Is Putin’s Popularity Real?” Post-Soviet Affairs 33 (1): 1–15. doi:10.1080/1060586X.2016.1144334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frye, Timothy, Scott Gelbach, Kyle L. Marquardt, and Ora John Reuter. 2022. Is Putin’s Popularity (Still) Real? A Cautionary Note on Using List Experiments to Measure Popularity in Authoritarian Regimes. Washington, DC: PONARS Eurasia.
   Google Scholar
• Gel’man, Vladimir. 2023. “Exogenous Shocks and Russian Studies.” Post-Soviet Affairs. 39(1–2). this issue.
   Google Scholar
• Glynn, Adam N. 2013. “What Can We Learn with Statistical Truth Serum? Design and Analysis of the List Experiment.” Public Opinion Quarterly 77 (S1): 159–172. doi:10.1093/poq/nfs070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gooch, Andrew, and Lynn Vavreck. 2019. “How Face-to-Face Interviews and Cognitive Skill Affect Item Non-response: A Randomized Experiment Assigning Mode of Interview.” Political Science Research and Methods 7 (1): 143–162. doi:10.1017/psrm.2016.20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, Samuel A., and Graeme B. Robertson. 2019. Putin V. the People: The Perilous Politics of a Divided Russia. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guriev, Sergei, and Daniel Treisman. 2022. Spin Dictators: The Changing Face of Tyranny in the 21st Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, Henry E. 2022. “Authoritarian Rallying as Reputational Cascade? Evidence from Putin’s Popularity Surge after Crimea.” American Political Science Review 116 (2): 580–594. doi:10.1017/S0003055421001052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, Wagner, and Ineke A. L. Stoop. 2018. “Comparing Non-response and Non-response Biases in Multinational, Multiregional, and Multicultural Contexts.” In Advances in Comparative Survey Methods: Multinational, Multiregional, and Multicultural Contexts (3MC), edited by Timothy P. Johnson, Beth‐Ellen Pennell, Ineke A.L. Stoop, and Brita Dorer, 807–833. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Jiayuan, Li, and Noortgate Wim Van den. 2022. “A Meta-analysis of the Relative Effectiveness of the Item Count Technique Compared to Direct Questioning.” Sociological Methods & Research 51 (2): 760–799. doi:10.1177/0049124119882468.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Timothy P., and Fons J.R. van de Vijver. 2002. “Social Desirability in Cross-Cultural Research.” In Cross-Cultural Survey Methods, edited by Janet A. Harkness, Fons J.R. van de Vijver, and Peter Ph. Mohler, 193–209. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kuha, Jouni, Myrsini Katsikatsou, and Irini Moustaki. 2018. “Latent Variable Modelling with Non‐Ignorable Item Non‐Response: Multigroup Response Propensity Models for Cross‐National Analysis.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) 181 (4): 1169–1192. doi:10.1111/rssa.12350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Lova, L. 2023. “Methods in Russian Studies: Overview of Top Political Science and Economics Journals.” Post-Soviet Affairs. 39(1–2). this issue.
   Google Scholar
• Lankina, Tomila. 2023. “Branching Out or Inwards? The Logic of Fractals in Russian Studies.” Post-Soviet Affairs. 39(1–2). this issue.
   Google Scholar
• Libman, Alexander. 2023. “The Credibility Revolution and the Future of Russian Studies.” Post-Soviet Affairs. 39(1–2). this issue.
   Google Scholar
• Meitinger, Katharina M., and Timothy P. Johnson. 2020. “Power, Culture and Item Non-response in Social Surveys.” In Understanding Survey Methodology: Sociological Theory and Applications, edited by Philip S. Brenner, 169–191. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, Jeremy. 2023. “Political Ethnography and Russian Studies in a Time of Conflict.” Post-Soviet Affairs. 39(1–2). this issue.
   Google Scholar
• Ratigan, Kerry, and Leah Rabin. 2020. “Re-evaluating Political Trust: The Impact of Survey Non-response in Rural China.” The China Quarterly 243: 823–838. doi:10.1017/S0305741019001231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisinger, William M., Vicki L. Hesli Claypool, and Marina Zaloznaya. 2015 Surveys on Political Causes and Consequences of Bureaucratic Corruption in the Post-Soviet Region. Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa.
   Google Scholar
• Rivkin-Fish, Michele. 2005. “Bribes, Gifts and Unofficial Payments: Rethinking Corruption in Post-Soviet Russian Health Care.” In Corruption: Anthropological Perspectives, edited by Dieter Haller and Cris Shore, 47–64. Ann Arbor, MI: Pluto.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld, Bryn. 2023. “Survey Research in Russia: In the Shadow of War.” Post-Soviet Affairs. 39(1–2). this issue.
   Google Scholar
• Sakshaug, Joseph W., Alexandru Cernat, and Trivellore E. Raghunathan. 2019. “Do Sequential Mixed-Mode Surveys Decrease Non-response Bias, Measurement Error Bias, and Total Bias? An Experimental Study.” Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 7 (4): 545–571. doi:10.1093/jssam/smy024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, Xiaoxiao, and Rory Truex. 2021. “In Search of Self-Censorship.” British Journal of Political Science 51 (4): 1672–1684. doi:10.1017/S0007123419000735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tannenberg, Marcus. 2022. “The Autocratic Bias: Self-Censorship of Regime Support.” Democratization 29 (4): 591–610. doi:10.1080/13510347.2021.1981867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, Guo-Liang, Man-Lai Tang, Wu Qin, and Yin Liu. 2017. “Poisson and Negative Binomial Item Count Techniques for Surveys with Sensitive Question.” Statistical Methods in Medical Research 26 (2): 931–947. doi:10.1177/0962280214563345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tourangeau, Roger, and Ting Yan. 2007. “Sensitive Questions in Surveys.” Psychological Bulletin 133 (5): 859–883. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.5.859.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaloznaya, Marina. 2017. The Politics of Bureaucratic Corruption in Post-Transitional Eastern Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zaloznaya, Marina, William M. Reisinger, and Wenfang Tang. 2018. Surveys on Informal Economies and Societal Stability in China and Russia. Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa, study #W911NF1810078. Collected July–October 2018.
   Google Scholar