Survey research in Russia: in the shadow of war

References

• Alyukov, M. 2022. “Propaganda, Authoritarianism, and Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine.” Nature Human Behavior 6 (6): 763–765. doi:10.1038/s41562-022-01375-x. Accessed 24 October 2022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreenkova, A.V. 2019. “Sensitive Questions in Cross-National Comparative Surveys.” Russian Education & Society 61 (1): 17–31. doi:10.1080/10609393.2019.1738783.
   Google Scholar
• Andrew, Karpinski, and Ross B. Steinman. 2006. “The Single Category Implicit Association Test as a Measure of Implicit Social Cognition.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 91 (1): 16–32. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.1.16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, Andrew Scott, and Mahzarin R. Banaji. 2006. “The Development of Implicit Attitudes: Evidence of Race Evaluations from Ages 6 and 10 and Adulthood.” Psychological Science 17 (1): 53–58. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01664.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, Nancy, James Dahlhamer, and Eleanor Singer. 2008. “Privacy Concerns, Too Busy, or Just Not Interested: Using Doorstep Concerns to Predict Survey Nonresponse.” Journal of Official Statistics 24 (4): 591–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beatty, Paul C., and Gordon B. Willis. 2007. “Research Synthesis: The Practice of Cognitive Interviewing.” Public Opinion Quarterly 71 (2): 287–311. Accessed 24 October 2022. doi:10.1093/poq/nfm006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertram, Gawronski, and Galen V. Bodenhausen. 2006. “Associative and Propositional Processes in Evaluation: An Integrative Review of Implicit and Explicit Attitude Change.” Psychological Bulletin 132 (5): 692–731. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.692.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertram, Gawronski, and Galen V. Bodenhausen. 2011. “The Associative Propositional Evaluation Model: Theory, Evidence, and Open Questions.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 44: 59–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair, G., and K. Imai. 2012. “Statistical Analysis of List Experiments.” Political Analysis 20 (4): 47–77. doi:10.1093/pan/mpr048.
   Google Scholar
• Blair, G., K. Imai, and J. Lyall. 2014. “Comparing and Combining List and Endorsement Experiments: Evidence from Afghanistan.” American Journal of Political Science 58 (4): 1043–1063. doi:10.1111/ajps.12086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair, Graeme, Kosuke Imai, and Yang-Yang Zhou. 2015. “Design and Analysis of the Randomized Response Technique.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 110 (511): 1304–1319. doi:10.1080/01621459.2015.1050028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brader, T. 2006. Campaigning for Hearts and Minds: How Emotional Appeals in Political Ads Work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brader, T., and J. Tucker. 2001. “The Emergence of Mass Partisanship in Russia from 1993-6.” American Journal of Political Science 45 (1): 69–83. doi:10.2307/2669360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brick, J.M., and D. Williams. 2013. “Explaining Rising Nonresponse Rates in Cross-Sectional Surveys.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 645 (1): 36–59. doi:10.1177/0002716212456834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley, N., K.L. Marquardt, O.J. Reuter, K. Tertytchnaya, I. Marques II, and B. Rosenfeld 2021. “Who Dissembles? Examining the Sources of Preference Falsification in an Authoritarian Regime.” October 24. Accessed 24 October 2022. doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/SPXH7.
   Google Scholar
• Chapkovski, P., and M. Schaub. 2022. “Solid Support or Secret Dissent? A List Experiment on Preference Falsification during the Russian War against Ukraine.” Research & Politics 9 (2): 20531680221108328. doi:10.1177/20531680221108328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colton, T.J. 2000. Transitional Citizens: Voters and What Influences Them in the New Russia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Colton, T.J., and H.E. Hale. 2009. “The Putin Vote: Presidential Electorates in a Hybrid Regime.” Slavic Review 68 (3): 473–503. doi:10.1017/S0037677900019690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colton, T.J., and M. McFaul. 2003. Popular Choice and Managed Democracy: The Russian Elections of 1999 and 2000. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, William A., Kristopher J. Preacher, and Mahzarin R. Banaji. 2001. “Implicit Attitude Measures: Consistency, Stability, and Convergent Validity.” Psychological Science 12 (2): 163–170. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frye, T., S. Gehlbach, K.L. Marquardt, and O.J. Reuter. 2022. “Is Putin’s Popularity (Still) Real? A Cautionary Note on Using List Experiments to Measure Popularity in Authoritarian Regimes.” PONARS Eurasia Policy Memo, May. Accessed 24 October 2022. https://www.ponarseurasia.org/is-putins-popularity-still-real-a-cautionary-note-on-using-list-experiments-to-measure-popularity-in-authoritarian-regimes/
   Google Scholar
• Frye, T., O.J. Reuter, and D. Szakonyi. 2019. “Hitting Them with Carrots: Voter Intimidation and Vote Buying in Russia.” British Journal of Political Science 49 (3): 857–881. doi:10.1017/S0007123416000752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gel’man, Vladimir. 2023. “Exogenous Shocks and Russian Studies.” Post-Soviet Affairs. 39. 1–2), this issue.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, H.E. 2006. Why Not Parties in Russia: Democracy, Federalism, and the State. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, H. 2022. “Authoritarian Rallying as Reputational Cascade? Evidence from Putin’s Popularity Surge after Crimea.” American Political Science Review 116 (2): 580–594. doi:10.1017/S0003055421001052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale, H.E., and T.J. Colton. 2017. “Who Defects? Unpacking a Defection Cascade from Russia’s Dominant Party 2008–12.” American Political Science Review 111 (2): 322–337. doi:10.1017/S0003055416000642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale, H., B. Rosenfeld, and K. Tertytchnaya. 2021. “Agreeableness and Preference Falsification.” September 26. Accessed 24 October 2022. doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/KW8HN.
   Google Scholar
• Han, Z., N. Liu, and R. Truex. 2022. “Word Association Tests for Political Science.” Princeton University. Accessed 24 October 2022. https://www.rorytruex.com/s/Manuscript-Word-Association-Tests-for-Political-Science-v-3152022.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Huang, H., C. Intawan, and S. Nicholson. 2022. “In Government We Trust: Implicit Political Trust and Regime Support in China.” Perspectives on Politics. 1–19. doi:10.1017/S1537592722001037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kays, K., K. Gathercoal, and W. Buhrow. 2012. “‘Does Survey Format Influence Self-Disclosure on Sensitive Question Items?” Computers in Human Behavior 28 (1): 251–256. Accessed 24 October 2022. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.09.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramon, Eric, and Keith Weghorst. 2019. “(Mis)measuring Sensitive Attitudes with the List Experiment: Solutions to List Experiment Breakdown in Kenya.” Public Opinion Quarterly 83 (S1): 236–263. Accessed 24 October 2022. doi:10.1093/poq/nfz009.
   Google Scholar
• Kuran, Timur. 1991. “Now Out of Never: The Element of Surprise in the East European Revolution of 1989.” World Politics 44 (1): 7–48. doi:10.2307/2010422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Lova, L. 2023. “Methods in Russian Studies: Overview of Top Political Science and Economics Journals.” Post-Soviet Affairs. 39. 1–2), this issue.
   Google Scholar
• Lankina, Tomila. 2023. “Branching Out or Inwards? The Logic of Fractals in Russian Studies.” Post-Soviet Affairs. 39. 1–2), this issue.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarev, E. 2019. “Laws in Conflict: Legacies of War, Gender, and Legal Pluralism in Chechnya.” World Politics 71 (4): 667–709. doi:10.1017/S0043887119000133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levada Center. 2022. “The War in Ukraine in the Perception of the Russian Population.” ( Public Opinion Polls by the Levada Center) v. 1.0, Discuss Data. doi:10.48320/21FF6C6E-C22A-4EC7-9454-D0970427A9F1.
   Google Scholar
• Libman, Alexander. 2023. “The Credibility Revolution and the Future of Russian Studies.” Post-Soviet Affairs. 39. 1–2), this issue.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, Lauren A. 2022. “Why Putin Uses Russian Law to Crack down on Dissent.” The Washington Post Monkey Cage, April 7. Accessed 24 October 2022. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/04/07/autocrats-russia-kremlin-protest-fines-jail/
   Google Scholar
• Morris, Jeremy. 2023. “Political Ethnography and Russian Studies in a Time of Conflict.” Post-Soviet Affairs. 39. (1–2), this issue.
   Google Scholar
• Reisinger, William M., Marina Zaloznaya, and Byung-Deuk Woo. 2023. “Fear of Punishment as a Driver of Survey Misreporting and Item Non-response in Russia and Its Neighbors.” Post-Soviet Affairs. 39. (1–2), this issue.
   Google Scholar
• Reuter, O.J. 2017. The Origins of Dominant Parties: Building Authoritarian Institutions in Post-Soviet Russia. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld, Bryn, Kosuke Imai, and Jacob N. Shapiro. 2016. “An Empirical Validation Study of Popular Survey Methodologies for Sensitive Questions.” American Journal of Political Science 60 (3): 783–802. doi:10.1111/ajps.12205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharafutdinova, Gulnaz. 2023. “On a Double Miss in the Study of Russian Politics: How Social and Political Psychology Might Help.” Post-Soviet Affairs. 39. (1–2), this issue.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, X., and R. Truex. 2021. “In Search of Self-Censorship.” British Journal of Political Science 51 (4): 1672–1684. doi:10.1017/S0007123419000735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smeltz, Dina, Emily Sullivan, Lily Wojtowicz, Denis Volkov, and Stepan Goncharov. 2022. “Russian Public Accepts Putin’s Spin of Ukraine Conflict.” The Chicago Council on Global Affairs. Accessed 4 November 2022. https://globalaffairs.org/research/public-opinion-survey/russian-public-accepts-putins-spin-ukraine-conflict
   Google Scholar
• Smyth, Regina. 2021. Elections, Protest, and Authoritarian Regime Stability: Russia 2008–2020. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smyth, Regina. 2023. “Plus Ça Change: Getting Real about the Evolution of Russian Studies after 1991.” Post-Soviet Affairs. 39. (1–2), this issue.
   Google Scholar
• Stockmann, D., A. Esarey, and J. Zhang. 2018. “Who Is Afraid of the Chinese State? Evidence Calling into Question Political Fear as an Explanation for Overreporting of Political Trust.” Political Psychology 39 (5): 1105–1121. doi:10.1111/pops.12471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tertytchnaya, Katerina 2022. “This Rally Is Not Authorized: Preventive Repression and Public Opinion in Electoral Autocracies.” World Politics, forthcoming. Accessed 21 November 2022. https://ktertytchnaya.files.wordpress.com/2021/06/preventive_repression__protest__public_opinion-1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Timothy, Frye, Scott Gehlbach, Kyle L. Marquardt, and Ora John Reuter. 2017. “Is Putin’s Popularity Real?” Post-Soviet Affairs 33 (1): 1–15. doi:10.1080/1060586X.2016.1144334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tourangeau, Roger, and Ting Yan. 2007. “Sensitive Questions in Surveys.” Psychological Bulletin 133 (5): 859–883. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.5.859.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truex, R., and D.L. Tavana. 2019. “Implicit Attitudes toward an Authoritarian Regime.” The Journal of Politics 81 (3): 1014–1027. doi:10.1086/703209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisberg, Herbert F. 2005.The Total Survey Error Approach: A Guide to the New Science of Survey Research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Accessed 24 October 2022. doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226891293.003.0012.
   Google Scholar
• Will, Bullock, Kosuke Imai, and Jacob N. Shapiro. 2011. “Statistical Analysis of Endorsement Experiments: Measuring Support for Militant Groups in Pakistan.” Political Analysis 19 (4): 363–384. doi:10.1093/pan/mpr031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zavadskaya, Margarita 2022. “On the Harmfulness of Russian Polls.” Riddle. May 4. Accessed 24 October 2022. https://ridl.io/on-the-harmfulness-of-russian-polls/
   Google Scholar
• Zheleznova, Marina 2022. “Vzhukh—i Propal ‘Prezident’, Teper’ Eto Prosto ch’e-to ‘Reshenie’. Sotsiolog Aleksei Titkov—o Tom, Skol’ko Rossiyan Deistvitel’no Odobryayut ‘Voennuyu Spetsoperatsiyu’ I Kak Ikh Prevratili V ‘Bol’shinstvo’ [Woosh, and the President Disappeared. Now It’s Just Someone’s ‘Decision.’ Sociologist Aleksei Titkov on How Many Russians Actually Support the ‘Special Military Operation’ and How They Became ‘The Majority’].” Republic.ru, March 24. Accessed 24 October 2022. https://republic.ru/posts/103411
   Google Scholar
• Zvonovsky, Vladimir 2022. “Respondents’ Cooperation in Surveys on Military Operations.” ExtremeScan, April 23. Accessed 24 October 2022. https://www.extremescan.eu/post/6-respondents-cooperation-in-surveys-on-military-operations
   Google Scholar