34
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Reprint

Russian Education Policy From the Late 1980s Through the Early 2000s

Declarations and the Practical Impact on Inequality in K–12 Education

References

  • Apple, M.W. “Comparing Neo-liberal Projects and Inequality in Education.” Comparative Education, 2001, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 409–423.
  • Cherednichenko, G.V. “Shkol’naya reforma 90-kh godov: novovvedeniya i sotsial’naya selektsiya.” Sotsiologicheskiy zhurnal, 1999, nos. 1–2, pp. 5–22.
  • Crossley, M. “Bridging Sultures and Traditions in the Reconceptualisation of Comparative and International Education.” Comparative Education, 2000, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 319–332.
  • Forsey, M. “Challenging the System. A Dramatic Tale of Neoliberal Reform in an Australian High School.” In Education Policy in Practice: Critical Cultural Studies. Information Age Publishing, 2007.
  • Forsey, M., Davies, S., and Walford, G. “The Globalisation of School Choice? An Introduction Key to Issues and Concerns.” Oxford Studies in Comparative Education. Symposium Book: Oxford, 2008, pp. 9–25.
  • Froumin, I.D., Pinskaya, M.A. and Kosaretskiy, S.G. “Kak vernut’ obrazovaniyu funktsiyu sotsial’nogo lifta?” In V.A. Mau and T.L. Klyachko (eds.), Razvitiye chelovecheskogo kapitala – novaya sotsial’naya politika. Moscow: Delo RANKhiGS, 2013, pp. 105–128.
  • Gerber, T.P., and Hout, M. “Educational Stratification in Russia During the Soviet Period.” American Journal of Sociology, 1995, vol. 101, no. 3, pp. 611–660.
  • Harvey, D. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 2005.
  • Hirsh, E.D. The Schools We Need and Why We Don’t Have Them. New York: Anchor Books, 2010.
  • Hoxby, C.M. “Does Competition Among Public Schools Benefit Students and Taxpayers?” American Economic Review, 2000, vol. 90, no. 5, pp. 1209–1238.
  • Hoxby, C.M. “School Choice and School Competition: Evidence from the United States.” Swedish Economic Policy Review, 2003a, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 9–65.
  • Hoxby, C.M. The Economics of School Choice. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2003b.
  • Hursh D., and Martina, C.A. “Neoliberalism and Schooling in the U.S.: How State and Federal Government Education Policies Perpetuate Inequality.” Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 2003, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 30–52.
  • Ionin, L.G., and Shkaratan, O.I. “Parkinson i byurokraty.” In S.N. Parkinson (ed.), Zakony Parkinsona. Moscow: Progress, 1989, pp. 426–447.
  • James, D., Reay, D., Crozier, G., Beedell, P., Hollingworth, S., Jamieson, F. and Williams, K. “Neoliberal Policy and the Meaning of Counterintuitive Middle-class School Choices.” Current Sociology, 2010, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 623–641.
  • Kliebard, H. The Struggle for the American Curriculum 1893–1958. Thetford: Routledge & Kegan, 1986.
  • Kolesnikova, E.M. Demonopolizatsiya rynka obrazovatel’nykh uslug v postsovetskoy Rossii. Sotsiologiya obrazovaniya: Khrestomatiya. Moscow: VShE, 2008, pp. 207–217.
  • Konstantinovskiy, D.L. “Neravenstvo v sfere obrazovaniya: rossiyskaya situatsiya.” Gosudarstvo i obshchestvo, 2010, no 5, pp. 40–65.
  • Konstantinovskiy, D.L., Vakhshtayn, V.S., Kurakin, D.Yu. and Roshchina, Ya.M. Dostupnost’ kachestvennogo obshchego obrazovaniya: vozmozhnosti i ogranicheniya. Moscow: Logos, 2006.
  • Kosaretsky S., Grunicheva, I., and Pinskaya, М. “School System and Educational Policy in a Highly Stratified Post-Soviet Society: the Importance of Social Context. Working paper WP BRP 22/PA/2014.” Moscow: HSE, 2014.
  • Little, A. “Development Studies and Comparative Education: Context, Content, Comparison and Contributors.” Comparative Education, 2000, vol. 36, no 3, pp. 279–296.
  • Machin, S., and Vignoles, A. Education Policy in the UK. London: Centre for the Economics of Education, London School of Economics, 2006.
  • Merzhoeva, A.Kh., Stolyarenko, L.D., and Stolyarenko, V.E. Sotsial’no-filosofskiy analiz problem sotsial’noy selektsii v rossiyskoy sisteme obshchego obrazovaniya. Novocherkassk, 2011.
  • Pinskaya, M.A., Yastrebov, G.A., and Grunicheva, I.G. “Dostup k obrazovaniyu: otsenka situatsii v Rossii.” Narodnoye obrazovaniye, 2013a, no. 7, pp. 11–17.
  • Pinskaya, М., Kosaretsky, S., Froumin, I., Harris, A., and Jones, M. “Schools in Difficulty: Identification, Issues and Strategies for Improvement.” International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 2013b, vol. 3, no 5.
  • Radaev, V.V., and Shkaratan, O.I. “Vlast’ i sobstvennost’” Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya, 1991, no. 1, pp. 50–61.
  • Reimers, F. Unequal Schools, Unequal Chances: The Challenges To Equal Opportunity in the Americas. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000.
  • Rybakov, S.V. “Shkol’noye obrazovaniye v kontekste modernizatsii strany” Obozrevatel’, 2011, vol. 260, no. 9, pp. 35–47.
  • Shelestyuk, E.V. “Vesternizatsiya v SSSR i Rossii: analiz nekotorykh prichin.” In Inostrannyy yazyk v sisteme srednego i vysshego obrazovaniya. Materialy III mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, 1–2 oktyabrya 2013 goda. Prague: Vedecko vydavatelske centrum “Sociosfera-CZ,” 2013, pp. 71–79.
  • Shishkin, S.V. “Dostupnost’ vysshego obrazovaniya dlya naseleniya Rossii: chto pokazyvayut rezul’taty issledovaniy.” Universitetskoye upravleniye, 2005, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 80–88.
  • Shkaratan, O.I. “Etakratizm i rossiyskaya sotsietal’naya sistema.” Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’, 2004, no. 4, pp. 49–62.
  • Sholokhov, A.V. Obrazovatel’noye neravenstvo: sotsial’no-filosofskiy analiz. Ta-ganrog: Izd-vo TTI YuFU, 2009, ShubkinV.N. Sotsiologicheskiye opyty. Moscow: Mysl’, 1970.
  • Whitty, G., Power, S., Halpin, D. Devolution and Choice in Education: The School, The State and The Market. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press, 1998.
  • Yastrebov, G., Bessudnov, A., Pinskaya, М., and Kosaretsky, S. “Contextualizing Academic Performance in Russian Schools: School Characteristics, the Composition of Student Body and Local Deprivation. Working paper WP BRP55/SOC/2014.” Moscow: HSE, 2014.
  • Yastrebov, G.A., Pinskaya, M.A. and Kosaretskiy, S.G. “Ispol’zovaniye kontekstnykh dannykh v sisteme otsenki kachestva obrazovaniya: opyt razrabotki i aprobatsiya instrumentariya.” Voprosy obrazovaniya, 2014, no. 4, pp. 90–127.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.