Bibliography
- Andreenkova, A.V. “‘Shchepetil’nye’ voprosy v raznykh kul’turakh.” In A.V. Andreenkova, Sravnitel’nye mezhstranovye issledovaniya v sotsial’nykh naukakh: teoriya, metodologiya, praktika. Moscow: Novyy khronografw, 2014, pp. 372–381.
- Andreenkova, А., and Javeline, D. “Sensitive Questions in Comparative Surveys.” In T.P. Johnson, B.-E. Pennell, I. Stoop, and B. Dorer (eds), Advances in Comparative Survey Methods: Multinational, Multiregional and Multicultural Contexts, 2018, pp. 139–160.
- Bradburn, N., and Sudman, S. Improving Interview Method and Questionnaire Design. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1979.
- Devyatko, I.F. Metody sotsiologicheskogo issledovaniya. Moscow: Knizhnyy dom “Universitet”, 2002.
- Karp, J.A., and Brockington, D. “Social Desirability and Response Validity: A Comparative Analysis of Overreporting Voter Turnout in Five Countries.” Journal of Politics, 2005, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 825–840.
- Larina, T.I. “Eksperimental’nyy podkhod k opredeleniyu kachestva sotsiologicheskogo instrumentariya: senzitivnaya tematika.” Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya, 2015, no. 2, http://teoria-practica.ru/rus/files/arhiv_zhurnala/2015/2/sociology/larina.pdf ( data obrashcheniya: 15.03.2017).
- Myagkov, A.Yu. “Statisticheskiye strategii sensitivnykh izmereniy.” Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya, 2002, no. 1, pp. 111–121.
- Rogozin, D.; Manuil’skaya, K.; and Klimov, I. “Testirovaniye voprosov o dokhode.” Sotsial’naya real’nost’, 2006, no. 11, pp. 103–115.
- Sakshaug, J.W.; Yan, T.; and Tourangeau, R. “Nonresponse Error, Measurement Error, and Mode of Data Collection: Tradeoffs in a Multi-mode Survey of Sensitive and Non-sensitive Items.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 2010, vol. 74, no. 5, pp. 907–933.
- Tourangeau, R.; Rips, L.J.; and Rasinski, K. The Psychology of Survey Response. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
- Tourangeau, R., and Yan, T. “Sensitive Questions in Surveys.” Psychological Bulletin, 2007, no. 133, pp. 859–883.
- Westall, W. “Comparing Respondents’ Trust and Understanding of Two Variants of the Randomized Response Method.” Master’s thesis, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium, 2011.
- Willis, G.B. “The Use of the Psychological Laboratory to Study Sensitive Survey.” In L. Harrison and A. Hughes (eds.), The Validity of Self-reported Drug Use: Improving the Accuracy of Survey Estimates. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse, 1997, pp. 416–438.
- Willis, G. Analysis of the Cognitive Interview in Questionnaire Design: Understanding Qualitative Research. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2015.
- Willis, G.B., and Miller, K. “Cross-Cultural Cognitive Interviewing: Seeking Comparability and Enhancing Understanding.” Field Methods, 2011, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 331–341.