Ultrasound-mediated drug delivery by gas bubbles generated from a chemical reaction

References

• Aldrich JE. Basic physics of ultrasound imaging. Crit Care Med. 2007;35:S131–S137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fass L. Imaging and cancer: a review. Mol Oncol. 2008;2:115–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frinking PJ, Bouakaz A, Kirkhorn J, et al. Ultrasound contrast imaging: current and new potential methods. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2000;26:965–975.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klibanov AL. Targeted delivery of gas-filled microspheres, contrast agents for ultrasound imaging. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 1999;37:139–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klibanov AL. Ligand-carrying gas-filled microbubbles: ultrasound contrast agents for targeted molecular imaging. Bioconjugate Chem. 2005;16:9–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindner JR. Microbubbles in medical imaging: current applications and future directions. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2004;3:527–532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seo M, Gorelikov I, Williams R, et al. Microfluidic assembly of monodisperse, nanoparticle-incorporated perfluorocarbon microbubbles for medical imaging and therapy. Langmuir. 2010;26:13855–13860.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrara K, Pollard R, Borden M. Ultrasound microbubble contrast agents: fundamentals and application to gene and drug delivery. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2007;9:415–447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klibanov AL. Microbubble contrast agents: targeted ultrasound imaging and ultrasound-assisted drug-delivery applications. Invest Radiol. 2006;41:354–362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raisinghani A, Demaria AN. Physical principles of microbubble ultrasound contrast agents. Am J Cardiol. 2002;90:3J–7J.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Miyoshi H, Nakamura M. Encapsulated ultrasound microbubbles: therapeutic application in drug/gene delivery. J Control Release. 2006;114:89–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernot S, Klibanov AL. Microbubbles in ultrasound-triggered drug and gene delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2008;60:1153–1166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farook U, Stride E, Edirisinghe MJ. Preparation of suspensions of phospholipid-coated microbubbles by coaxial electrohydrodynamic atomization. J R Soc Interface. 2009;6:271–277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcewan C, Kamila S, Owen J, et al. Combined sonodynamic and antimetabolite therapy for the improved treatment of pancreatic cancer using oxygen loaded microbubbles as a delivery vehicle. Biomaterials. 2016;80:20–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parhizkar M, Stride E, Edirisinghe M. Preparation of monodisperse microbubbles using an integrated embedded capillary T-junction with electrohydrodynamic focusing. Lab Chip. 2014;14:2437–2446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stride E, Edirisinghe M. Novel preparation techniques for controlling microbubble uniformity: a comparison. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2009;47:883–892.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson ES, Orozco J, Wu Z, et al. Toward in vivo detection of hydrogen peroxide with ultrasound molecular imaging. Biomaterials. 2013;34:8918–8924.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahalingam S, Xu Z, Edirisinghe M. Antibacterial activity and biosensing of PVA-lysozyme microbubbles formed by pressurized gyration. Langmuir. 2015;31:9771–9780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibsen S, Schutt CE, Esener S. Microbubble-mediated ultrasound therapy: a review of its potential in cancer treatment. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2013;7:375–388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan Z, Kumon RE, Deng CX. Mechanisms of microbubble-facilitated sonoporation for drug and gene delivery. Ther Deliv. 2014;5:467–486.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mitragotri S. Healing sound: the use of ultrasound in drug delivery and other therapeutic applications. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2005;4:255–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller DL, Thomas RM. Frequency dependence of cavitation activity in a rotating tube exposure system compared to the mechanical index. J Acoust Soc Am. 1993;93:3475–3480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coussios CC, Farny CH, Haar GT, et al. Role of acoustic cavitation in the delivery and monitoring of cancer treatment by high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU). Int J Hyperthermia. 2007;23:105–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oerlemans C, Deckers R, Storm G, et al. Evidence for a new mechanism behind HIFU-triggered release from liposomes. J Control Release. 2013;168:327–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkel T, Holbrook NJ. Oxidants, oxidative stress and the biology of ageing. Nature. 2000;408:239–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensley K, Robinson KA, Gabbita SP, et al. Reactive oxygen species, cell signaling, and cell injury. Free Radic Biol Med. 2000;28:1456–1462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trachootham D, Alexandre J, Huang P. Targeting cancer cells by ROS-mediated mechanisms: a radical therapeutic approach? Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2009;8:579–591.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raj L, Ide T, Gurkar AU, et al. Selective killing of cancer cells by a small molecule targeting the stress response to ROS. Nature. 2011;475:231–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liou GY, Storz P. Reactive oxygen species in cancer. Free Radic Res. 2010;44:479–496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giorgio M, Trinei M, Migliaccio E, et al. Hydrogen peroxide: a metabolic by-product or a common mediator of ageing signals? Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007;8:722.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quickenden TI, Creamer JI. A study of common interferences with the forensic luminol test for blood. Luminescence. 2001;16:295–298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kikuchi K, Nagano T, Hayakawa H, et al. Detection of nitric oxide production from a perfused organ by a luminol-H2O2 system. Anal Chem. 1993;65:1794–1799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang C, Huang G, Ding SJ, et al. Atomic layer deposition of Pt nanoparticles for microengine with promoted catalytic motion. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2016;11:289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin HP, Mou CY. “Tubules-Within-a-Tubule” hierarchical order of mesoporous molecular sieves in MCM-41. Science. 1996;273:765–768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann F, Cornelius M, Morell J, et al. Silica-based mesoporous organic-inorganic hybrid materials. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2006;45:3216–3251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wibowo AS, Singh M, Reeder KM, et al. Structures of human folate receptors reveal biological trafficking states and diversity in folate and antifolate recognition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:15180–15188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams JW, Morrison JF, Duggleby RG. Methotrexate, a high-affinity pseudosubstrate of dihydrofolate reductase. Biochemistry. 1979;18:2567–2573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perng JK, Lee S, Kundu K, et al. Ultrasound imaging of oxidative stress in vivo with chemically-generated gas microbubbles. Ann Biomed Eng. 2012;40:2059–2068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang K, Rossin R, Hagooly A, et al. Folate-mediated cell uptake of shell-crosslinked spheres and cylinders. J Polym Sci A Polym Chem. 2008;46:7578–7583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciekot J, Goszczynski T, Boratynskit J. Methods for methotrexate determination in macromolecular conjugates drug carrier. Acta Pol Pharm. 2012;69:1342–1346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang LY, Zhou HF, Wang XD, et al. Evaluation of nanoparticle effect on bubble nucleation in polymer foaming. J Phys Chem C. 2016;120:26841–26851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcclure A. Using high-intensity focused ultrasound as a means to provide targeted drug delivery. J Diagn Med Sonogr. 2016;32:343–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar