Evaluating the reliability of tumour spheroid-on-chip models for replicating intratumoural drug delivery: considering the role of microfluidic parameters

References

• Maeda H, Nakamura H, Fang J. The EPR effect for macromolecular drug delivery to solid tumors: Improvement of tumor uptake, lowering of systemic toxicity, and distinct tumor imaging in vivo. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2013;65(1):71–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das V, Bruzzese F, Konečný P, et al. Pathophysiologically relevant in vitro tumor models for drug screening. Drug Discov Today. 2015;20(7):848–855.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young EW. Cells, tissues, and organs on chips: challenges and opportunities for the cancer tumor microenvironment. Integr Biol (Camb). 2013;5(9):1096–1109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moshksayan K, Kashaninejad N, Warkiani ME, et al. Spheroids-on-a-chip: Recent advances and design considerations in microfluidic platforms for spheroid formation and culture. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2018;263:151–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khademhosseini A, Langer R. Microengineered hydrogels for tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2007;28(34):5087–5092.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai H-F, Trubelja A, Shen AQ, et al. Tumour-on-a-chip: microfluidic models of tumour morphology, growth and microenvironment. J R Soc Interface. 2017;14(131):20170137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang M, Koh I, Lee SJ, et al. Droplet-based microtumor model to assess cell-ECM interactions and drug resistance of gastric cancer cells. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):41541–41510.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sontheimer-Phelps A, Hassell BA, Ingber DE. Modelling cancer in microfluidic human organs-on-chips. Nat Rev Cancer. 2019;19(2):65–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiswald L-B, Bellet D, Dangles-Marie V. Dangles-Marie V. Spherical cancer models in tumor biology. Neoplasia. 2015;17(1):1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nath S, Devi GR. Three-dimensional culture systems in cancer research: Focus on tumor spheroid model. Pharmacol Ther. 2016;163:94–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shang M, Soon RH, Lim CT, et al. Microfluidic modelling of the tumor microenvironment for anti-cancer drug development. Lab Chip. 2019;19(3):369–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Napolitano AP, Chai P, Dean DM, et al. Dynamics of the self-assembly of complex cellular aggregates on micromolded nonadhesive hydrogels. Tissue Eng. 2007;13(8):2087–2094.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee YB, Kim EM, Byun H, et al. Engineering spheroids potentiating cell-cell and cell-ECM interactions by self-assembly of stem cell microlayer. Biomaterials. 2018;165:105–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tung Y-C, Hsiao AY, Allen SG, et al. High-throughput 3D spheroid culture and drug testing using a 384 hanging drop array. Analyst. 2011;136(3):473–478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foty R. A simple hanging drop cell culture protocol for generation of 3D spheroids. J Vis Exp. 2011;(51):e2720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He H, He Q, Xu F, et al. Dynamic formation of cellular aggregates of chondrocytes and mesenchymal stem cells in spinner flask. Cell Prolif. 2019;52(4):e12587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee T-J, Bhang SH, La W-G, et al. Spinner-flask culture induces redifferentiation of de-differentiated chondrocytes. Biotechnol Lett. 2011;33(4):829–836.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amirifar L, Besanjideh M, Nasiri R, et al. Droplet-based microfluidics in biomedical applications. Biofabrication. 2022;14(2):022001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun Q, Tan SH, Chen Q, et al. Microfluidic formation of coculture tumor spheroids with stromal cells as a novel 3D tumor model for drug testing. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2018;4(12):4425–4433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besanjideh M, Shamloo A, Kazemzadeh Hannani S. Enhanced oil-in-water droplet generation in a T-junction microchannel using water-based nanofluids with shear-thinning behavior: a numerical study. Phys Fluids. 2021;33(1):012007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besanjideh M, Rezaeian M, Mahmoudi Z, et al. Investigating the effects of precursor concentration and gelling parameters on droplet-based generation of Ca-Alginate microgels: identifying new stable modes of droplet formation. Mater Today Chem. 2022;24:100821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Gao D, Liu H, et al. Drug cytotoxicity and signaling pathway analysis with three-dimensional tumor spheroids in a microwell-based microfluidic chip for drug screening. Anal Chim Acta. 2015;898:85–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhuang J, Zhang J, Wu M, et al. A dynamic 3D tumor spheroid chip enables more accurate nanomedicine uptake evaluation. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2019;6(22):1901462.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee DW, Doh I, Nam D-H. Unified 2D and 3D cell-based high-throughput screening platform using a micropillar/microwell chip. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2016;228:523–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu W, Sun M, Lu B, et al. A microfluidic platform for multi-size 3D tumor culture, monitoring and drug resistance testing. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2019;292:111–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan X, Li Z, Ye H, et al. Three-dimensional perfused tumour spheroid model for anti-cancer drug screening. Biotechnol Lett. 2016;38(8):1389–1395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui Z, Xu X, Trainor N, et al. Application of multiple parallel perfused microbioreactors and three-dimensional stem cell culture for toxicity testing. Toxicol in Vitro. 2007;21(7):1318–1324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Liu L, Ying X-X, et al. Dried rehmannia root protects against glutamate-induced cytotoxity to PC12 cells through energy metabolism-related pathways. Neural Regen Res. 2017;12(8):1338–1346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziółkowska K, Kwapiszewski R, Stelmachowska A, et al. Development of a three-dimensional microfluidic system for long-term tumor spheroid culture. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2012;173:908–913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabhachandani P, Motwani V, Cohen N, et al. Generation and functional assessment of 3D multicellular spheroids in droplet based microfluidics platform. Lab Chip. 2016;16(3):497–505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabhachandani P, Sarkar S, Mckenney S, et al. Microfluidic assembly of hydrogel-based immunogenic tumor spheroids for evaluation of anticancer therapies and biomarker release. J Control Release. 2019;295:21–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu LY, Di Carlo D, Lee LP. Microfluidic self-assembly of tumor spheroids for anticancer drug discovery. Biomed Microdevices. 2008;10(2):197–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu W, Wang J-C, Wang J. Controllable organization and high throughput production of recoverable 3D tumors using pneumatic microfluidics. Lab Chip. 2015;15(4):1195–1204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu C-Y, Tseng S-Y, Yang S-M, et al. A microfluidic chip with a U-shaped microstructure array for multicellular spheroid formation, culturing and analysis. Biofabrication. 2014;6(1):015009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu L, Chen MC, Cheung KC. Droplet-based microfluidic system for multicellular tumor spheroid formation and anticancer drug testing. Lab Chip. 2010;10(18):2424–2432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Yang Q, Zhang H, et al. Construction of cancer-on-a-chip for drug screening. Drug Discov Today. 2021;26(8):1875–1890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Q, Ju D, Liu Y, et al. Design of organ-on-a-chip to improve cell capture efficiency. Int J Mech Sci. 2021;209:106705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter LT, Jain RK. Transport of fluid and macromolecules in tumors. I. Role of interstitial pressure and convection. Microvasc Res. 1989;37(1):77–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain RK, Tong RT, Munn LL. Effect of vascular normalization by antiangiogenic therapy on interstitial hypertension, peritumor edema, and lymphatic metastasis: insights from a mathematical model. Cancer Res. 2007;67(6):2729–2735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stylianopoulos T, Jain RK. Combining two strategies to improve perfusion and drug delivery in solid tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110(46):18632–18637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graff CP, Wittrup KD. Theoretical analysis of antibody targeting of tumor spheroids: importance of dosage for penetration, and affinity for retention. Cancer Res. 2003;63(6):1288–1296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman TT, Chen J, Matveev K, et al. Spatio-temporal modeling of nanoparticle delivery to multicellular tumor spheroids. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2008;101(2):388–399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao Y, Li M, Chen B, et al. Predictive models of diffusive nanoparticle transport in 3-dimensional tumor cell spheroids. AAPS J. 2013;15(3):816–831.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boucher Y, Baxter LT, Jain RK. Interstitial pressure gradients in tissue-isolated and subcutaneous tumors: implications for therapy. Cancer Res. 1990;50(15):4478–4484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang C-H, Li J. Three-dimensional simulation of IgG delivery to tumors. Chem Eng Sci. 1998;53(20):3579–3600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teo CS, Tan WHK, Lee T, et al. Transient interstitial fluid flow in brain tumors: Effect on drug delivery. Chem Eng Sci. 2005;60(17):4803–4821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kashkooli FM, Soltani M, Hamedi M-H. Drug delivery to solid tumors with heterogeneous microvascular networks: Novel insights from image-based numerical modeling. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2020;151:105399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sefidgar M, Bashooki E, Shojaee P. Numerical simulation of the effect of necrosis area in systemic delivery of magnetic nanoparticles in hyperthermia cancer treatment. J Therm Biol. 2020;94:102742.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vazifehshenas FH, Bahadori F. Investigation of soret effect on drug delivery in a tumor without necrotic core. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng. 2019;102:17–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhan W, Gedroyc W, Xu XY. Effect of heterogeneous microvasculature distribution on drug delivery to solid tumour. J Phys D: Appl Phys. 2014;47(47):475401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albanese A, Lam AK, Sykes EA, et al. Tumour-on-a-chip provides an optical window into nanoparticle tissue transport. Nat Commun. 2013;4(1):1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Toley BJ, Tropeano Lovatt ZG, Harrington JL, et al. Microfluidic technique to measure intratumoral transport and calculate drug efficacy shows that binding is essential for doxorubicin and release hampers doxil. Integr Biol (Camb). 2013;5(9):1184–1196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu G, Li D. Three-dimensional modeling of transport of nutrients for multicellular tumor spheroid culture in a microchannel. Biomed Microdevices. 2007;9(3):315–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barisam M, Saidi MS, Kashaninejad N, et al. Prediction of necrotic core and hypoxic zone of multicellular spheroids in a microbioreactor with a U-shaped barrier. Micromachines. 2018;9(3):94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li W, Wang H-F, Kuruneru ST, et al. A numerical investigation of drug extravasation using a tumour–vasculature microfluidic device. Microfluid Nanofluid. 2018;22(12):1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li W, Wang H-F, Li Z-Y, et al. Numerical investigation of drug transport from blood vessels to tumour tissue using a tumour-vasculature-on-a-chip. Chem Eng Sci. 2019;208:115155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kheiri S, Kumacheva E, Young EW. Computational modelling and big data analysis of flow and drug transport in microfluidic systems: a spheroid-on-a-chip study. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021;9:1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajari MA, Baheri Islami S, Chen X. A numerical study on tumor-on-chip performance and its optimization for nanodrug-based combination therapy. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2021;20(3):983–1002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Øen SK, Aasheim LB, Eikenes L, et al. Image quality and detectability in siemens biograph PET/MRI and PET/CT systems—a phantom study. EJNMMI Phys. 2019;6(1):16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Le Bars M, Worster MG. Interfacial conditions between a pure fluid and a porous medium: implications for binary alloy solidification. J Fluid Mech. 2006;550(1):149–173.
   Google Scholar
• Eikenberry S. A tumor cord model for doxorubicin delivery and dose optimization in solid tumors. Theor Biol Med Model. 2009;6(1):1–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barenholz YC. Doxil®—the first FDA-approved nano-drug: lessons learned. J Control Release. 2012;160(2):117–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yokoi K, Chan D, Kojic M, et al. Liposomal doxorubicin extravasation controlled by phenotype-specific transport properties of tumor microenvironment and vascular barrier. J Control Release. 2015;217:293–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao J, Salmon H, Sarntinoranont M. Effect of heterogeneous vasculature on interstitial transport within a solid tumor. Microvasc Res. 2007;73(3):224–236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pluen A, Netti PA, Jain RK, et al. Diffusion of macromolecules in agarose gels: comparison of linear and globular configurations. Biophys J. 1999;77(1):542–552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt MM, Wittrup KD. A modeling analysis of the effects of molecular size and binding affinity on tumor targeting. Mol Cancer Ther. 2009;8(10):2861–2871.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mpekris F, Baish JW, Stylianopoulos T, et al. Role of vascular normalization in benefit from metronomic chemotherapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114(8):1994–1999.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baek N, Seo OW, Kim M, et al. Monitoring the effects of doxorubicin on 3D-spheroid tumor cells in real-time. Onco Targets Ther. 2016;9:7207–7218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Q, Hu X, He W, et al. Fluid shear stress and tumor metastasis. Am J Cancer Res. 2018;8(5):763–777.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santoro M, Lamhamedi-Cherradi S-E, Menegaz BA, et al. Flow perfusion effects on three-dimensional culture and drug sensitivity of ewing sarcoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112(33):10304–10309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabizon A, Catane R, Uziely B, et al. Prolonged circulation time and enhanced accumulation in malignant exudates of doxorubicin encapsulated in polyethylene-glycol coated liposomes. Cancer Res. 1994;54(4):987–992.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pluen A, Boucher Y, Ramanujan S, et al. Role of tumor–host interactions in interstitial diffusion of macromolecules: cranial vs. subcutaneous tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98(8):4628–4633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu NZ, Da D, Rudoll TL, et al. Increased microvascular permeability contributes to preferential accumulation of stealth liposomes in tumor tissue. Cancer Res. 1993;53(16):3765–3770.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhan W, Xu XY. A mathematical model for thermosensitive liposomal delivery of doxorubicin to solid tumour. J Drug Deliv. 2013;2013:172529.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bhandari A, Bansal A, Singh A, et al. Transport of liposome encapsulated drugs in voxelized computational model of human brain tumors. IEEE Trans Nanobioscience. 2017;16(7):634–644.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar