Machine learning for skin permeability prediction: random forest and XG boost regression

References

• Burli A, Law RM, Rodriguez J, et al. Organic compounds percutaneous penetration in vivo in man: relationship to mathematical predictive model. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2020;112:104614. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang K, Abraham MH, Liu X. An equation for the prediction of human skin permeability of neutral molecules, ions and ionic species. Int J Pharm. 2017;521(1-2):259–266. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.02.059.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar M, Sharma A, Mahmood S, et al. Franz diffusion cell and its implication in skin permeation studies. J Dispersion Sci Technol. .Forthcoming. [cited 2023 Mar 29]:[14 p.]. doi: 10.1080/01932691.2023.2188923.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundborg M, Wennberg CL, Narangifard A, et al. Predicting drug permeability through skin using molecular dynamics simulation. J Control Release. 2018;283:269–279. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2018.05.026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ita K, Ukaoma M. Progress in the transdermal delivery of antimigraine drugs. J Drug Delivery Sci Technol. 2022;68:103064. doi: 10.1016/j.jddst.2021.103064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ita K, Ashong S. Percutaneous delivery of antihypertensive agents: advances and challenges. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2020;21(2):56. doi: 10.1208/s12249-019-1583-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naseem S, Zushi Y, Nabi D. Development and evaluation of two-parameter linear free energy models for the prediction of human skin permeability coefficient of neutral organic chemicals. J Cheminform. 2021;13(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s13321-021-00503-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potts RO, Guy RH. Predicting skin permeability. Pharm Res. 1992;9(5):663–669. doi: 10.1023/a:1015810312465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss GP, Cronin MTD. Quantitative structure–permeability relationships for percutaneous absorption: re-analysis of steroid data. Int J Pharm. 2002;238(1-2):105–109. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5173(02)00057-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tsakovska I, Pajeva I, Al Sharif M, et al. Quantitative structure-skin permeability relationships. Toxicology. 2017;387:27–42. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2017.06.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potts RO, Guy RH. A predictive algorithm for skin permeability: the effects of molecular size and hydrogen bond activity. Pharm Res. 1995;12(11):1628–1633. doi: 10.1023/a:1016236932339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Degim IT, Pugh WJ, Hadgraft J. Skin permeability data: anomalous results. Int J Pharm. 1998;170(1):129–133. doi: 10.1016/S0378-5173(98)00113-6.
   Google Scholar
• Pugh WJ, Degim IT, Hadgraft J. Epidermal permeability-penetrant structure relationships: 4, QSAR of permeant diffusion across human stratum corneum in terms of molecular weight, H-bonding and electronic charge. Int J Pharm. 2000;197(1-2):203–211. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5173(00)00326-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun Y, Brown MB, Prapopoulou M, et al. The application of stochastic machine learning methods in the prediction of skin penetration. Appl Soft Comput. 2011;11(2):2367–2375. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2010.08.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salma H, Melha YM, Sonia L, et al. Efficient prediction of in vitro piroxicam release and diffusion from topical films based on biopolymers using deep learning models and generative adversarial networks. J Pharm Sci. 2021;110(6):2531–2543. doi: 10.1016/j.xphs.2021.01.032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abraham MH. Scales of solute hydrogen-bonding: their construction and application to physicochemical and biochemical processes. Chem Soc Rev. 1993;22(2):73–83. doi: 10.1039/cs9932200073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abraham MH, Acree WEJr. Equations for the transfer of neutral molecules and ionic species from water to organic phases. J Org Chem. 2010;75(4):1006–1015. doi: 10.1021/jo902388n.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abraham MH, Martins F. Human skin permeation and partition: general linear free-energy relationship analyses. J Pharm Sci. 2004;93(6):1508–1523. doi: 10.1002/jps.20070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abraham MH, Zhao YH. Determination of solvation descriptors for ionic species: hydrogen bond acidity and basicity. J Org Chem. 2004;69(14):4677–4685. doi: 10.1021/jo049766y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss GP, Sun Y, Wilkinson SC, et al. The application and limitations of mathematical modelling in the prediction of permeability across mammalian skin and polydimethylsiloxane membranes. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2011;63(11):1411–1427. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.2011.01345.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali S, Abuhmed T, El-Sappagh S, et al. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): what we know and what is left to attain trustworthy artificial intelligence. Inf Fusion. 2023;99:101805. doi: 10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bannigan P, Bao Z, Hickman RJ, et al. Machine learning models to accelerate the design of polymeric long-acting injectables. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):35. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-35343-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashrafi P, Moss GP, Wilkinson SC, et al. The application of machine learning to the modelling of percutaneous absorption: an overview and guide. SAR QSAR Environ Res. 2015;26(3):181–204. doi: 10.1080/1062936X.2015.1018941.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul D, Sanap G, Shenoy S, et al. Artificial intelligence in drug discovery and development. Drug Discov Today. 2021;26(1):80–93. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2020.10.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou N, Li M, He L, et al. Predicting 30-days mortality for MIMIC-III patients with sepsis-3: a machine learning approach using XGboost. J Transl Med. 2020;18(1):462. doi: 10.1186/s12967-020-02620-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar M, Kumar D, Garg Y, et al. Marine-derived polysaccharides and their therapeutic potential in wound healing application - a review. Int J Biol Macromol. 2023;253(Pt 6):127331. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.127331.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kumar M, Hilles AR, Ge Y, et al. A review on polysaccharides mediated electrospun nanofibers for diabetic wound healing: their current status with regulatory perspective. Int J Biol Macromol. 2023;234:123696. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.123696.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar M, Keshwania P, Chopra S, et al. Therapeutic potential of nanocarrier-mediated delivery of phytoconstituents for wound healing: their current status and future perspective. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2023;24(6):155. doi: 10.1208/s12249-023-02616-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao W, Xu F, Zhou Z-H. Towards convergence rate analysis of random forests for classification. Artif Intell. 2022;313:103788. doi: 10.1016/j.artint.2022.103788.
   Google Scholar
• Xia Z, Stewart K. A counterfactual analysis of opioid-involved deaths during the COVID-19 pandemic using a spatiotemporal random forest modeling approach. Health Place. 2023;80:102986. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2023.102986.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couronné R, Probst P, Boulesteix A-L. Random forest versus logistic regression: a large-scale benchmark experiment. BMC Bioinf. 2018;19(1):270. doi: 10.1186/s12859-018-2264-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin AM, Ramkumar N, Gladders B, et al. Using a cohort study of diabetes and peripheral artery disease to compare logistic regression and machine learning via random forest modeling. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022;22(1):300. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01774-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Ishwaran H. Random forests for genomic data analysis. Genomics. 2012;99(6):323–329. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2012.04.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarwidi D, Pudjaprasetya SR, Adytia D, et al. An optimized XGBoost-based machine learning method for predicting wave run-up on a sloping beach. MethodsX. 2023;10:102119. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2023.102119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong C, Qiao Y, Shang C, et al. Non-contact screening system based for COVID-19 on XGBoost and logistic regression. Comput Biol Med. 2022;141:105003. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.105003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khera R, Haimovich J, Hurley NC, et al. Use of machine learning models to predict death after acute myocardial infarction. JAMA Cardiol. 2021;6(6):633–641. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2021.0122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattani G. Combining data envelopment analysis and random forest for selecting optimal locations of solar PV plants. Energy AI. 2023;11:100222. doi: 10.1016/j.egyai.2022.100222.
   Google Scholar
• Kwak S, Kim J, Ding H, et al. Machine learning prediction of the mechanical properties of γ-TiAl alloys produced using random Forest regression model. J Mater Res Technol. 2022;18:520–530. doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.02.108.
   Google Scholar
• Nam DY, Rhee JK. Assessment of MicroRNAs associated with tumor purity by random Forest regression. Biology. 2022;11(5):787. doi: 10.3390/biology11050787.
   Google Scholar
• Trindade PHE, Mello JFSR, Silva NEOF, et al. Improving ovine behavioral pain diagnosis by implementing statistical weightings based on logistic regression and random forest algorithms. Animals. 2022;12(21):2940. doi: 10.3390/ani12212940.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olaniran OR, Abdullah MAA. Bayesian weighted random forest for classification of high-dimensional genomics data. Kuwait J Sci. 2023;50(4):477–484. doi: 10.1016/j.kjs.2023.06.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma X, Chen Z, Chen P, et al. Predicting the utilization factor of blasthole in rock roadways by random forest. Undergr Space. 2023;11:232–245. doi: 10.1016/j.undsp.2023.01.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue L, Liu Y, Xiong Y, et al. A data-driven shale gas production forecasting method based on the multi-objective random forest regression. J Petrol Sci Eng. 2021;196:107801. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutschmann TM, Baumann K. Evaluating high-variance leaves as uncertainty measure for random forest regression. Molecules. 2021;26(21):6514. doi: 10.3390/molecules26216514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan Y, Han Y, Yap CW, et al. Prediction of drug permeation through microneedled skin by machine learning. Bioeng Transl Med. 2023;n/a(n/a):e10512. doi: 10.1002/btm2.10512.
   Google Scholar
• Baba H, Takahara J-I, Yamashita F, et al. Modeling and prediction of solvent effect on human skin permeability using support vector regression and random forest. Pharm Res. 2015;32(11):3604–3617. doi: 10.1007/s11095-015-1720-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar