REFERENCES
- Chinese PhD Quality Analysis Topic Group. 2010. Zhongguo boshi zhiliang baogao [Chinese PhD Quality Report], 78. Beijing: Beijing daxue chubanshe.
- Clark, B. R. 1987. The academic life: Small worlds, different worlds. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
- Cullen, D. J., M. Pearson, L. J. Saha, and R. H. Spear. 1994. Establishing effective PhD supervision. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government Publishing Service.
- European University Association. 2010. Salzburg II recommendations. European universities’ achievements in implementing the Salzburg principles. EUA’s Council of Doctoral Education. Brussels, Belgium: EUA
- Guerin, C. and I. Green 2015. ‘They’re the bosses’: Feedback in team supervision. Journal of Further and Higher Education 39 (3):320–335.
- Heath, T. 2002. A quantitative analysis of PhD students’ views of supervision. Higher Education Research & Development 21 (1):41–53.
- Humphrey, R., N. Marshall, and L. Leonardo. 2012. The impact of research training and research codes of practice on submission of doctoral degrees: An exploratory cohort study. Higher education quarterly 66 (1):47–64.
- Ives, G. and G. Rowley. 2005. Supervisor selection or allocation and continuity of supervision: Ph. D. students’ progress and outcomes. Studies in Higher Education 30 (5):535–555.
- Kulej, M., and C. Park. 2008. Postgraduate Research Experience Survey 2008: Final report. York UK: Higher Education Academy.
- Larsen, P. O. 2004. Quality in research training: Nordic co-operation on quality assessment of research training. Oslo, Norway: Nordic Academy for advanced study.
- Nankai University. “Xiao lingdao jiedairi: shisheng reyi daoshi zai yanjiusheng keyan zhong de zuoyong” (School Leadership Reception Day: Teachers and Students Enthusiastically Discuss the Role of Advisors in Graduate Student Scientific Research) [EB/OL]. (2012-11-02). http://news.nankai.edu.cn/nkyw/system/2012/11/02/000098254.shtml.
- Nature Publishing Group, “Zhuanxing zhong de Zhongguo keyan” [Chinese Scientific Research in Transition] [EB/OL], 2015-04-16).
- Paglis, L. L., S. G. Green, and T. N. Bauer. 2006. Does adviser mentoring add value? A longitudinal study of mentoring and doctoral student outcomes. Research in Higher Education 47 (4):451–476.
- Parry, O., P. Atkinson, and S. Delamont. 1997. The Structure of PhD Research. Sociology 31 (1):121–129.
- Pole, C. 1998. Joint Supervision and the PhD: safety net or panacea? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 23 (3):259–271.
- UNESCO Forum on Higher Education, Research and Knowledge. 2008. Trends and Issues in Postgraduate Education: Challenges for Research. UNESCO.
- Zhu J. An Exploration of Reform Models for Nanjing University PhD Graduate Students. Association of Chinese Graduate Schools 2015 Annual Conference, Chengdu, 2015-11-21.
- Zhou W., Z. Wang, J. Liu, H. Fu, Q. H. Zhao and Zhou, Y. Q. 2015. “2015 nian woguo yanjiusheng manyidu diaocha” [2015 Satisfaction Survey of Chinese Graduate Students], Xuewei yu yanjiusheng jiaoyu, 2015 (10):14–19.