A Sparse Singular Value Decomposition Method for High-Dimensional Data

References

• Allen, G.I., Grosenick, L., and Taylor, J. (2011), “A Generalized Least Squares Matrix Decomposition,” Rice University Technical Report No. TR2011-03.
   Google Scholar
• Bach, F., Mairal, J., and Ponce, J. (2008), “Convex Sparse Matrix Factorizations,” CoRR, abs/0812.1869.
   Google Scholar
• Baik, J., and Silverstein, J.W. (2006), “Eigenvalues of Large Sample Covariance Matrices of Spiked Population Models,” Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 97, 1382–1408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickel, P.J., Gotze, F., and Van Zwet, W.R. (1997), “Resampling Fewer Than n Observations: Gains, Losses, and Remedies for Losses,” Statistica Sinica, 7, 1–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, J., and Li, R. (2001), “Variable Selection Via Nonconcave Penalized Likelihood and its Oracle Properties,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 96, 1348–1360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabriel, K.R. (2002), “Le Biplot-Outil d’Exploration de Données Multidimensionelles,” [“The Biplot-DNA Data Exploration Tool Multidimensional”] Journal de la Societe Francaise de Statistique, 143, 5–56.
   Google Scholar
• Golub, G.H., and Van Loan, C.F. (1996), Matrix Computations (3rd ed.), Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haerdle, W., Hall, P., and Marron, J. S. (1988), “How Far are Automatically Chosen Regression Smoothing Parameters From Their Minimum?” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 86–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoff, P.D. (2007), “Model Averaging and Dimension Selection for the Singular Value Decomposition,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 102, 674–685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm, S. (1979), “A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure,” Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6, 65–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, J.Z., Shen, H., and Buja, A. (2009), “The Analysis of Two-Way Functional Data Using Two-Way Regularized Singular Value Decompositions,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 104, 1609–1620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnstone, I.M. (2011), “Gaussian Estimation: Sequence and Multiresolution Models,” available at http://www-stat.stanford.edu/imj/.
   Google Scholar
• Johnstone, I.M., and Lu, A.Y. (2009), “On Consistency and Sparsity for Principal Components Analysis in High Dimensions,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 104, 682–693.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M., Shen, H., Huang, J.Z., and Marron, J.S. (2010), “Biclustering Via Sparse Singular Value Decomposition,” Biometrics, 66, 1087–1095.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., Hayes, D. N.N., Nobel, A., and Marron, J.S. (2008), “Statistical Significance of Clustering for High-Dimension, Low-Sample Size Data,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103, 1281–1293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, A.Y. (2002), “Sparse Principal Component Analysis for Functional Data,” Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, Z. (2013), “Sparse Principal Component Analysis and Iterative Thresholding,” The Annals of Statistics, 41, 772–801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mairal, J., Bach, F., Ponce, J., and Sapiro, G. (2010), “Online Learning for Matrix Factorization and Sparse Coding,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, 11, 19–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadler, B. (2009), Discussion of “On Consistency and Sparsity for Principal Components Analysis in High Dimensions” by Johnstone and Lu, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 104, 694–697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, A.B., and Perry, P.O. (2009), “Bi-Cross-Validation of the SVD and the Nonnegative Matrix Factorization,” The Annals of Applied Statistics, 3, 564–594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, D. (2007), “Asymptotics of Sample Eigenstructure for a Large Dimensional Spiked Covariance Model,” Statistica Sinica, 17, 1617–1642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, D., and Johnstone, I.M. (2007), “Augmented Sparse Principal Component Analysis for High Dimensional Data,” available at http://anson.ucdavis.edu/debashis/techrep/augmented-spca.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Shabalin, A., and Nobel, A. (2010), “Reconstruction of a Low-Rank Matrix in the Presence of Gaussian Noise,” available at http://arxiv.org/abs/1007.4148.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, D., Shen, H., and Marron, J.S. (2013), “Consistency of Sparse PCA in High Dimension, Low Sample Size Contexts,” Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 115, 317–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, H., and Huang, J.H. (2008), “Sparse Principal Component Analysis Via Regularized Low Rank Matrix Approximation,” Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 99, 1015–1034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sill, M., Kaiser, S., Benner, A., and Kopp-Schneider, A. (2011), “Robust Biclustering by Sparse Singular Value Decomposition Incorporating Stability Selection,” Bioinformatics, 27, 2089–2097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witten, D.M., and Tibshirani, R. (2010), “A Framework for Feature Selection in Clustering,” Journals of the American Statistical Association, 105, 713–726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witten, D.M., Tibshirani, R., and Hastie, T. (2009), “A Penalized Matrix Decomposition, With Applications to Sparse Principal Components and Canonical Correlation Analysis,” Biostatistics, 10, 515–534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wold, S. (1978), “Cross-Validatory Estimation of the Number of Components in Factor and Principal Component Models,” Technometrics, 20, 397–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, D., Ma, Z., and Buja, A. (2011), “Near Optimal Sparse SVD in High Dimensions.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, W., Li, S.Z., Lai, J.H., and Liao, S. (2007), “On Constrained Sparse Matrix Factorization,” in IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Zou, H., Hastie, T., and Tibshirani, R. (2006), “Sparse Principal Component Analysis,” Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 15, 265–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar