Exploring trust and distrust as conceptually and empirically distinct constructs: Association with symmetrical communication and public engagement across four pairings of trust and distrust

References

• 24/7 Wall Street. (2012, January 13). The 10 most hated companies in America. Retrieved from http://247wallst.com/special-report/2012/01/13/the-10-most-hated-companies-in-america/2/
   Google Scholar
• Adams, J. E., Highhouse, S., & Zickar, M. J. (2010). Understanding general distrust of corporations. Corporate Reputation Review, 13(1), 38–51. doi:10.1057/crr.2010.6
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, L. M. (1996). Employee cynicism: An examination using a contract violation framework. Human Relations, 49(11), 1395–1418. doi:10.1177/001872679604901102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnulf, J. K., Dreyer, H. C., & Grenness, C. E. (2005). Trust and knowledge creation: How the dynamics of trust and absorptive capacity may affect supply chain management development projects. International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 8(3), 225–236. doi:10.1080/13675560500224233
   Google Scholar
• Auger, G. A. (2014). Trust me, trust me not: An experimental analysis of the effect of transparency on organizations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 26(4), 325–343. doi:10.1080/1062726X.2014.908722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York,NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Barber, B. (1983). The logic and limits of trust. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bewsell, G. R. (2012). Distrust, fear and emotional learning: An online auction perspective. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 7(2), 1–12. doi:10.4067/S0718-18762012000200002
   Google Scholar
• Bigley, G. A., & Pearce, J. L. (1998). Straining for shared meaning in organization science: Problems of trust and distrust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 405–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York, NY: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bortree, D. S., & Seltzer, T. (2009). Dialogic strategies and outcomes: An analysis of environmental advocacy groups’ Facebook profiles. Public Relations Review, 35(3), 317–319. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandenburger, A., & Nalebuff, B. (1996). Co-opetition. New York, NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Breakenridge, D. (2008). PR 2.0: New media, new tools, new audiences. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Bromiley, P., & Cummings, L. L. (1995). Transaction costs in organizations with trust. In R. Bies, B. Sheppard, & R. Lewicki (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations (pp. 219–250). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruning, S. D., & Ledingham, J. A. (1999). Relationships between organizations and publics: Development of a multi-dimensional organization–public relationship scale. Public Relations Review, 25, 157–170. doi:10.1016/S0363-8111(99)80160-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burleson, B. R., & MacGeorge, E. L. (2002). Supportive communication. In M. L. Knapp, & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 374–424). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. K., Jr., & Cantrell, R. S. (1984). A behavioral decision theory approach to modeling dyadic trust in superiors and subordinates. Psychological Reports, 55(1), 19–28. doi:10.2466/pr0.1984.55.1.19
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Cacciatore, M. A., Meng, J., Boyd, B., & Reber, B. H. (2016). Political ideology, media-source preferences, and messaging strategies: A global perspective on trust building. Public Relations Review, 42(4), 616–626. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2016.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, J. (2006). The mechanism of trust and distrust formation and their relational outcomes. Journal of Retailing, 82(1), 25–35. doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2005.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Connelly, B. L., Miller, T., & Devers, C. E. (2012). Under a cloud of suspicion: Trust, distrust, and their interactive effect in interorganizational contracting. Strategic Management Journal, 33(7), 820–833. doi:10.1002/smj.v33.7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, P. (1988). Trust as a commodity. In D. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust: Making and breaking co-operative relations (pp. 49–72). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Deutsch, M. (1958). Trust and suspicion. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2, 265–279. doi:10.1177/002200275800200401
   Google Scholar
• Deutsch, M. (1960). Trust, trustworthiness and the F-scale. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 61, 138–140. doi:10.1037/h0046501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimoka, A. (2010). What does the brain tell us about trust and distrust? Evidence from a functional neuroimaging study. MIS Quarterly, 34(2), 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erikson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and society (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (2008). Social cognition: From brains to culture. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Forgas, J. P. (2000). Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fortune. (2011, March 21). World’s most admired companies. Retrieved from http://archive.fortune.com/magazines/fortune/mostadmired/2011/
   Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, F. (1995). Social capital and the global economy. Foreign Affairs, 74, 89–103. doi:10.2307/20047302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gambetta, D. (1988). Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations. New York, NY: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Gargiulo, M., & Ertug, G. (2006). The dark side of trust. In R. Bachmann, & A. Zaheer (Eds.), Handbook of trust research (pp. 165–186). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Govier, T. (1994). Is it a jungle out there? Trust, distrust, and the construction of social reality. Dialogue, 33, 237–252. doi:10.1017/S0012217300010519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groothuis, P. A., & Miller, G. (1997). The role of social distrust in risk-benefit analysis: A study of the siting of a hazardous waste disposal facility. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 15(3), 241–257. doi:10.1023/A:1007757326382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grunig, J. E. (1989). Symmetrical presuppositions as a framework for public relations theory. In C. Botan, & V. Hazelton (Eds.), Public relations theory (pp. 17–44). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Grunig, J. E. (2001). Two-way symmetrical public relations: Past, present, and future. In R. L. Heath (Ed.), Handbook of public relations (pp. 11–32). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Grunig, J. E. (2006). Furnishing the edifice: Ongoing research on public relations as a strategic management function. Journal of Public Relations Research, 18(2), 151–176. doi:10.1207/s1532754xjprr1802_5
   Google Scholar
• Grunig, J. E., & Grunig, L. S. (1989). Toward a theory of the public relations behavior of organizations: Review of a program of research. Journal of Public Relations Research, 1, 27–63. doi:10.1207/s1532754xjprr0101-4_2
   Google Scholar
• Grunig, J. E., & Huang, Y. H. (2000). From organizational effectiveness to relationship indicators: Antecedents of relationships, public relations strategies, and relationship outcomes. In J. A. Ledingham, & S. D. Bruning (Eds.), Public relations as relationship management: A relational approach to the study and practice of public relations (pp. 23–53). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Grunig, J. E., & Hunt, T. (1984). Managing public relations. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Grunig, L. A., Grunig, J. E., & Dozier, D. M. (2002). Excellent public relations and effective organizations: A study of communication management in three countries. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1994). Competing for the future. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hardin, R. (1992). The street-level epistemology of trust. Analyse and Kritik, 14, 152–176. doi:10.1515/auk-1992-0204
   Google Scholar
• Hardin, R. (1993). The street-level epistemology of trust. Politics & Society, 21, 505–529. doi:10.1177/0032329293021004006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, C. W. (1990). Cooperation, opportunism, and the invisible hand: Implications for transaction cost theory. Academy of Management Review, 15(3), 500–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hon, L. C., & Grunig, J. E. (1999). Guidelines for measuring relationship in public relations. Gainesville, FL: The Institute for Public Relations, Commission on PR Measurement and Evaluation.
   Google Scholar
• Hosmer, L. T. (1995). Trust: The connecting link between organizational theory and philosophical ethics. Academy of Management Review, 20, 379–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsia, R. L. (2002). Technology fears: Distrust and cultural persistence in electronic marketplace adoption. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 12, 169–195. doi:10.1016/S0963-8687(03)00034-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, K. A. (2014). Public relations and engagement: Theoretical imperatives of a multidimensional concept. Journal of Public Relations Research, 26(5), 381–383. doi:10.1080/1062726X.2014.959863
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, M. (2014). Understanding public engagement: Conceptualizing and measuring its infuence on supportive behavioral intentions. Journal of Public Relations Research, 26, 399–416. doi:10.1080/1062726X.2014.956107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kramer, R. M. (1999). Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology, 50(1), 569–598. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.569
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langfred, C. W. (2004). Too much of a good thing? Negative effects of high trust and individual autonomy in self managing teams. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 385–399. doi:10.2307/20159588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewicki, R. J. (2007). Trust and distrust. In A. K. Schneider, & C. Honeyman (Eds.), The negotiator’s fieldbook (pp. 191–202). Washington, DC: American Bar Association.
   Google Scholar
• Lewicki, R. J., & Bunker, B. B. (1995). Trust in relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 5, 583–601.
   Google Scholar
• Lewicki, R. J., & Bunker, B. B. (1996). Trust in relationships: A model of trust development and decline. In R. M. Kramer, & T. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations (pp. 114–139). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lewicki, R. J., McAllister, D. J., & Bies, R. J. (1998). Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 438–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewicki, R. J., Tomlinson, E. C., & Gillespie, N. (2006). Models of interpersonal trust development: Theoretical approaches, empirical evidence, and future directions. Journal of Management, 32, 991–1022. doi:10.1177/0149206306294405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. D., & Weigert, A. J. (1985). Social atomism, holism, and trust. The Sociological Quarterly, 26, 455–471. doi:10.1111/tsq.1985.26.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, C. P. (2010). Modeling corporate citizenship, organizational trust, and work engagement based on attachment theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(4), 517–531. doi:10.1007/s10551-009-0279-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovejoy, K., Waters, R. D., & Saxton, G. D. (2012). Engaging stakeholders through Twitter: How nonprofit organizations are getting more out of 140 characters or less. Public Relations Review, 38(2), 313–318. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and power. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Lumineau, F. (2014). How contracts influence trust and distrust. Journal of Management, 43(5), 1553–1577. doi:149206314556656
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709–734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAllister, D. J. (1997). The second face of trust: Reflections on the dark side of interpersonal trust in organizations. Research on Negotiation in Organizations, 6, 87–112.
   Google Scholar
• McKnight, D. H., & Chervany, N. L. (2001). Trust and distrust definitions: One bite at a time in trust. In R. Falcone, M. Singh, & Y. H. Tan (Eds.), Trust in cyber-societies: Integrating the human and artificial perspectives (pp. 27–54). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mellinger, G. D. (1956). Interpersonal trust as a factor in communication. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52(3), 304. doi:10.1037/h0048100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, A. K. (1996). Organizational responses to crisis. In R. M. Kramer, & T. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations (pp. 261–287). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Moon, B. B., & Rhee, Y. (2013). Exploring negative dimensions of organization-public relationships (NOPR) in public relations. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 90(4), 691–714. doi:10.1177/1077699013503161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, P. (1991). The limits of symmetry: A game theory approach to symmetric and asymmetric public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 3, 115–131. doi:10.1207/s1532754xjprr0301-4_5
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, R. (1989). Beyond ethical relativism in public relations: Coorientation, rules, and the idea of communication symmetry. Journal of Public Relations Research, 1(1–4), 67–86. doi:10.1207/s1532754xjprr0101-4_3
   Google Scholar
• Plowman, K. D. (1998). Power in conflict for public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 10, 237–261. doi:10.1207/s1532754xjprr1004_02
   Google Scholar
• Rawlins, B. (2008). Give the emperor a mirror: Toward developing a stakeholder measurement of organizational transparency. Journal of Public Relations Research, 21(1), 71–99. doi:10.1080/10627260802153421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rempel, J. K., & Holmes, J. G. (1986). How do I trust thee. Psychology Today, 20(2), 28–34.
   Google Scholar
• Rotter, J. B. (1980). Interpersonal trust, trustworthiness, and gullibility. American Psychologist, 35(1), 1. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.35.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393–404. doi:10.5465/AMR.1998.926617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600–619. doi:10.1108/02683940610690169
   Google Scholar
• Schilke, O., & Cook, K. S. (2015). Sources of alliance partner trustworthiness: Integrating calculative and relational perspectives. Strategic Management Journal, 36(2), 276–297. doi:10.1002/smj.2208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seppanen, R., & Blomqvist, K. (2006). It is not all about trust: The role of distrust in inter-organizational relationships. In L. Camarinha-Matos, H. Afsarmanesh, & M. Ollus (Eds), Network-centric collaboration and supporting frameworks (pp. 181–188). Boston, MA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, S. P. (1987). The social control of impersonal trust. American Journal of Sociology, 93(3), 623–658. doi:10.1086/228791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, H. (2016). Refining organization–public relationship quality measurement in student and employee samples. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. doi:10.1177/1077699016674186
   Google Scholar
• Sitkin, S. B., & Roth, N. L. (1993). Explaining the limited effectiveness of legalistic “remedies” for trust/distrust. Organization Science, 4(3), 367–392. doi:10.1287/orsc.4.3.367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, D., Dietz, G., & Weibel, A. (2014). The dark side of trust: When trust becomes a “poisoned chalice”. Organization, 21, 206–224. doi:10.1177/1350508412473866
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2004). Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Analysis, 24(2), 311–322. doi:10.1111/risk.2004.24.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solis, B. (2010). Engage: The complete guide for brands and businesses to build, cultivate, and measure success in the new web. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley, Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Swift, T. (2002). Trust, reputation and corporate accountability to stakeholders. Business Ethics: A European Review, 10(1), 16–26. doi:10.1111/1467-8608.00208
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Needham, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, M., & Kent, K. L. (2014). Dialogic engagement: Clarifying foundational concepts. Journal of Public Relations Research, 26, 384–398. doi:10.1080/1062726X.2014.956106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, W. K. (2000). A multidisciplinary analysis of the nature, meaning, and measurement of trust. Review of Educational Research, 70(4), 547–593. doi:10.3102/00346543070004547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U. S. Census Bureau. (2011). Age and sex composition: 2010 Census briefs. Summary generated by Lindsay M. Howden & Julie A. Meyer. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-03.pdf
   Google Scholar
• U. S. Census Bureau. (2012). Educational attainment in the United States: 2012. Current Population Survey: 2012 annual social and economic supplement, Table 1. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/data/tables/2012/demo/educational-attainment/cps-detailed-tables.html
   Google Scholar
• Worchel, P. (1979). Trust and distrust. In W. G. Austin, & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 174–187). Monterey, CA: Brooks, Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, S.-U. (2007). An integrated model for organization-public relational outcomes, organizational reputation, and their antecedents. Journal of Public Relations Research, 19(2), 91–121. doi:10.1080/10627260701290612
   Google Scholar
• Yang, S.-U., Kang, M., & Cha, H. (2015). A study on dialogic communication, trust, and distrust: Testing a scale for measuring organization–public dialogic communication (OPDC). Journal of Public Relations Research, 27(2), 175–192. doi:10.1080/1062726X.2015.1007998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, S.-U., & Lim, J. S. (2009). The effects of blog-mediated public relations (BMPR) on relational trust. Journal of Public Relations Research, 21(3), 341–359. doi:10.1080/10627260802640773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahra, S. A., Yavuz, R. I., & Ucbasaran, D. (2006). How much do you trust me? The dark side of relational trust in new business creation in established companies. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(4), 541–559. doi:10.1111/etap.2006.30.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35(2), 151. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.35.2.151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zand, D. E. (1972). Trust and managerial problem solving. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(2), 229–239. doi:10.2307/2393957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zucker, L. G. (1986). Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 1840–1920. Research in Organizational Behavior, 8, 53–111.
   Google Scholar