Fragment-similarity-based QSAR (FS-QSAR) algorithm for ligand biological activity predictions

References

• Kubinyi , H . 1997 . QSAR and 3D QSAR in drug design Part 1: Methodology . Drug Discov. Today , 2 : 457 – 467 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salum , L and Andricopulo , A . 2009 . Fragment-based QSAR: Perspectives in drug design . Mol. Diversity , 13 : 277 – 285 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen , J-Z , Han , X-W , Liu , Q , Makriyannis , A , Wang , J and Xie , X-Q . 2006 . 3D-QSAR studies of arylpyrazole antagonists of cannabinoid receptor subtypes CB1 and CB2. A combined NMR and CoMFA approach . J. Med. Chem. , 49 : 625 – 636 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison , CM , Enoch , SJ , Cronin , MTD , Madden , JC and Judson , P . 2009 . Definition of the applicability domains of knowledge-based predictive toxicology expert systems by using a structural fragment-based approach . ATLA , 37 : 533 – 545 .
   Google Scholar
• Casalegno , M , Sello , G and Benfenati , E . 2006 . Top-priority fragment QSAR approach in predicting pesticide aquatic toxicity . Chem. Res. Toxicol. , 19 : 1533 – 1539 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dudek , AZ , Arodz , O and Galvez , J . 2006 . Computational methods in developing quantitative structure–activity relationships (QSAR): A review . Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screen. , 9 : 213 – 228 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myint , KZ and Xie , X-Q . 2010 . Recent advances in fragment-based QSAR and multi-dimensional QSAR methods . Int. J. Mol. Sci. , 11 : 3846 – 3866 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Free , SJ and Wilson , J . 1964 . A mathematical contribution to structure-activity studies . J. Med. Chem. , 7 : 395 – 399 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansch , C and Fujita , T . 1964 . R-S-P analysis. A method for the correlation of biological activity and chemical structure . J. Am. Chem. Soc. , 86 : 1616 – 1626 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland , JJ , O'Brien , LA and Weaver , DF . 2003 . Spline-fitting with a genetic algorithm: A method for developing classification structure–activity relationships . J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. , 43 : 1906 – 1915 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lavey , B , Kozlowski , JA , Hipkin , RW , Gonsiorek , W , Lundell , DJ , Piwinski , J , Narula , SK and Lunn , CA . 2005 . Triaryl bis-sulfones as a new class of cannabinoid CB2 receptor inhibitors: Identification of a lead and initial SAR studies . Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. , 15 : 783 – 786 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavey , B , Kozlowski , JA , Shankar , B , Spitler , J , Zhou , G , Yang , D-Y , Shu , Y , Wong , M , Wong , S-C and Shin , N-Y . 2007 . Optimization of triaryl bis-sulfones as cannabinoid-2 receptor ligands . Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. , 17 : 3760 – 3764 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shankar , B , Lavey , B , Zhou , G , Spitler , J , Tong , L , Rizvi , R , Yang , D-P , Wolin , R , Kozlowski , JA and Shih , N-Y . 2005 . Triaryl bis-sulfones as cannabinioid-2 receptor ligands: SAR studies . Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. , 15 : 4417 – 4420 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neelam , S , Sonu , B and Bhupinder , S . 2008 . Quantitative correlation between theoretical molecular descriptors and drug-HSA binding affinities for various cox-2 inhibitors . Chem. Biol. Drug Design , 72 : 297 – 302 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alvesalo , JKO , Siiskonen , A , Vainio , MJ , Tammela , PSM and Vuorela , PM . 2006 . Similarity based virtual screening: A tool for targeted library design . J. Med. Chem. , 49 : 2353 – 2356 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bostrom , J , Hogner , A and Schmitt , S . 2006 . Do structurally similar ligands bind in a similar fashion? . J. Med. Chem. , 49 : 6716 – 6725 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson , M and Maggiora , G . 1990 . Concepts and Applications of Molecular Similarity , New York : John Wiley .
   Google Scholar
• Johnson , M , Maggiora , G , Lajiness , M , Moon , JB , Petke , JD and Rohrer , DC . 1995 . Molecular similarity analysis: Applications in drug discovery . Methods Princ. Med. Chem. , 3 : 89 – 110 .
   Google Scholar
• Lajiness , M , Johnson , M and Maggiora , G . 1989 . Molecular similarity: A basis for designing drug screening programs . Prog. Clin. Biol. Res. , 291 : 167 – 171 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lewis , RA , Pickett , SD and Clark , DE . 2007 . “ Computer-aided molecular diversity analysis and combinatorial library design ” . In Reviews in Computational Chemistry , Edited by: Lipkowitz , KB and Boyd , DB . Vol. 16 , 1 – 51 . New York : Wiley-VCH .
   Google Scholar
• Pozzan , A . 2006 . Molecular descriptors and methods for ligand based virtual high throughput screening in drug discovery . Curr. Pharm. Des. , 12 : 2099 – 2110 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willett , P . 2006 . Similarity-based virtual screening using 2D fingerprints . Drug Discov. Today , 11 : 1046 – 1053 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matlab. Natick, MA, USA, 2006; software available at http://www.mathworks.com/products/matlab/
   Google Scholar
• Burden , F . 1989 . Molecular identification number for substructure searches . J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. , 29 : 225 – 227 .
   Google Scholar
• Tanimoto , TT . Tanimoto coefficient, IBM internal report, 17 November 1957
   Google Scholar
• Tripos SYBYL 8.0. Tripos International, 1699 South Hanley Road, St Louis, MO, 63144, USA; software available at http://www.tripos.com
   Google Scholar
• Tripos Bookshelf 8.0, Tripos International, 1699 South Hanley Road, St Louis, MO, 63144, USA
   Google Scholar
• Pozo , R . Template Numerical Toolkit: An interface for scientific computing in C++, (2004), software available at http://math.nist.gov/tnt/index.html
   Google Scholar