Linear and nonlinear quantitative structure-property relationship modelling of skin permeability

References

• G. Lian, L. Chen and L. Han, An evaluation of mathematical models for predicting skin permeability, J. Pharm. Sci. 97, (2008), 584–598.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Yamashita and M. Hashida, Mechanistic and empirical modeling of skin permeation of drugs, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 55, (2003), 1185–1199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G.L. Flynn, Physicochemical determinants of skin absorption, in Principles of Route-to-Route Extrapolation for Risk Assessment, T.R. Gerrity and C.J. Henry, eds., ElsevierNew York, 1990, pp. 93–127.
   Google Scholar
• M.R. Prausnitz, S. Mitragotri and R. Langer, Current status and future potential of transdermal drug delivery, Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 3, (2004), 115–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W.J. Pugh, I.T. Degim and J. Hadgraft, Epidermal permeability–penetrant structure relationships. 4. QSAR of permeant diffusion across human stratum corneum in terms of molecular weight, H-bonding and electronic charge, Int. J. Pharm. 197, (2000), 203–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Basak and D. Mumtaz, A quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) study of dermal absorption using theoretical molecular descriptors, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 18, (2007), 45–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B.J. Neely, S.V. Madihally, R.L. Robinson and K.A.M. Gasem, Nonlinear quantitative structure-property relationship modeling of skin permeation coefficient, J. Pharm. Sci. 98, (2009), 4069–4084.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Chauhan and M. Shakya, Role of physicochemical properties in the estimation of skin permeability: In vitro data assessment by partial least-squares regression, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 21, (2010), 481–494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Patel, W. ten Berge and M.T.D. Cronin, Quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) for the prediction of skin permeation of exogenous chemicals, Chemosphere 48, (2002), 603–613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Katritzky, D. Dobchev, D. Fara, E. Hur, K. Tumm, L. Kurunczi, M. Karelson, A. Varnek and V. Solovev, Skin permeation rate as a function of chemical structure, J. Med. Chem. 49, (2006), 3305–3314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Chen, G. Lian and L. Han, Modeling transdermal permeation. Part I. Predicting skin permeability of both hydrophobic and hydrophilic solutes, AIChE J. 56, (2010), 1136–1146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.D. Walker, R. Rodford and G. Patlewicz, Quantitative structure-activity relationships for predicting percutaneous absorption rates, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 22, (2003), 1870–1884.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.E. Baynes, X.-R. Xia, V. Vijay and J.E. Riviere, A solvatochromatic approach to quantifying formulation effects on dermal permeability, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 19, (2008), 615–630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.P. Gonzalez and A.M. Helguera, Prediction the human skin permeation through a topological substructural approach, 9th International Electronic Conference on Synthetic Organic, Chemistry (ECSOC-9), 2005.
   Google Scholar
• T.A. Roy, A.J. Krueger, C.R. Mackerer, W. Neil, A.M. Arroyo and J.J. Yang, SAR models for estimating the percutaneous absorption of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 9, (1998), 171–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B.D. Gute, G.D. Grunwald and S.C. Basak, Prediction of the dermal penetration of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs): A hierarchical QSAR approach, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 10, (1999), 1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HyperChem Release 8 for Windows. Hypercube Inc., Gainesville, FL, 2007; software available at http://www.hyper.com.
   Google Scholar
• Dragon. Version 5.4-2006 Talete srl, Milan, Italy; software available at http://www.talete.mi.it/index.htm.
   Google Scholar
• T. Puzyn, J. Leszczynski and M.T.D. Cronin, Recent Advances in QSAR Studies: Methods and Applications, SpringerLondon, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• J. Kennedy and R.C. Eberhart, Particle swarm optimization. Proceedings of the 1995 international conference on neural networks, Perth, Australia, Vol. 4, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• D.K. Agrafiotis and W. Cedeno, Feature selection for structure-activity correlation using binary particle swarms, J. Med. Chem. 45, (2002), 1098–1107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I.G. Tsygankova, Variable selection in QSAR models for drug design, Curr. Comput. Aided Drug Des. 4, (2008), 132–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Q. Shen, J.H. Jing, G.L. Shen and R.Q. Yu, Modified particle swarm optimization algorithm for variable selection in MLR and PLS modeling: QSAR studies of antagonism of angiotensin II antagonists, Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 22, (2004), 145–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.S. Andrews, An investigation into mutation operators for particle swarm optimization. Proceedings of the 2006 congress on, evolutionary computation (CEC’06), 2006.
   Google Scholar
• M. Clerc and J. Kennedy, Particle swarm – Explosion, stability, and convergence in a multidimensional complex space, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 6, (2002), 58–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Niknam, H. Zeinoddini-Meymand and M. Nayeripour, A practical algorithm for optimal operation management of distribution network including fuel cell power plants, Renew. Energ. 35, (2010), 1696–1714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Khajeh, H. Modarress and H. Zeinoddini-Meymand, Application of modified particle swarm optimization as an efficient variable selection strategy in QSAR/QSPR studies, J. Chemom. 26, (2012), 598–603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Khajeh, H. Modarress, and H. Zeinoddini-Meymand, Modified particle swarm optimization method for variable selection in QSAR/QSPR studies, Struct. Chem. 2012; doi:10.1007/s11224-012-0165-1.
   Google Scholar
• J. Jang, ANFIS: Adaptive network-based fuzzy inference systems, IEEE Trans. Systems Man. Cybernet. 23, (1993), 665–685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Sugeno, Industrial Applications of Fuzzy Control, ElsevierAmsterdam, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• A. Khajeh, H. Modarress and B. Rezaee, Application of adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for solubility prediction of carbon dioxide in polymers, Expert Syst. Appl. 36, (2009), 5728–5732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Khajeh and H. Modarress, Prediction of solubility of gases in polystyrene by adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system and radial basis function neural network, Expert Syst. Appl. 37, (2010), 3070–3074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Todeschini and V. Consonni, Molecular Descriptors for Chemoinformatics, Wiley-VCHWeinheim, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• A.K. Ghose, V.N. Viswanadhan and J.J. Wendoloski, A knowledge-based approach in designing combinatorial or medicinal chemistry libraries for drug discovery. 1. A qualitative and quantitative characterization of known drug databases, J. Comb. Chem. 1, (1999), 55–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V.N. Viswanadhan, M.R. Reddy, R.J. Bacquet and M.D. Erion, Assessment of methods used for predicting lipophilicity: Application to nucleosides and nucleoside bases, J. Comput. Chem. 14, (1993), 1019–1026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.K. Ghose and G.M. Crippen, Atomic physicochemical parameters for three-dimensional structure-directed quantitative structure–activity relationships. I. Partition coefficients as a measure of hydrophobicity, J. Comput. Chem. 7, (1986), 565–577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.K. Ghose, A. Pritchett and G.M. Crippen, Atomic physicochemical parameters for three-dimensional structure directed quantitative structure−activity relationships III: Modeling hydrophobic interactions, J. Comput. Chem. 9, (1988), 80–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.T.D. Cronin, J.C. Dearden, J.C. Duffy, R. Edwards, N. Manga, A.P. Worth and A.D.P. Worgan, The importance of hydrophobicity and electrophilicity descriptors in mechanistically-based QSARs for toxicological endpoints, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 13, (2002), 167–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Hartmann and J. Schmitt, Lipophilicity–Beyond octanol/water: A short comparison of modern technologies, Drug Discov. Today 1, (2004), 431–439.
   Google Scholar
• S.L. Chiu, Fuzzy model identification based on cluster estimation, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 2, (1994), 267–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Yager and D. Filev, Approximate clustering via the mountain method, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man. Cybernet. 24, (1994), 1279–1284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Khajeh and H. Modarress, QSPR prediction of flash point of esters by means of GFA and ANFIS, J. Hazard. Mater. 179, (2010), 715–720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Khajeh and H. Modarress, Quantitative structure-property relationship for flash point of alcohols, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 50, (2011), 11337–11342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Mitra, A. Saha and K. Roy, Exploring quantitative structure–activity relationship studies of antioxidant phenolic compounds obtained from traditional Chinese medicinal plants, Mol. Simulat. 36, (2010), 1067–1079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Golbraikh and A. Tropsha, Beware of q2!, J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 20, (2002), 269–276.
   Google Scholar
• P.P. Roy and K. Roy, On some aspects of variable selection for partial least squares regression models, QSAR Comb. Sci. 27, (2008), 302–313.
   Google Scholar
• P. Gramatica, Principles of QSAR models validation: Internal and external, QSAR Comb. Sci. 26, (2007), 694–701.
   Google Scholar