Predicting normal densities of amines using quantitative structure-property relationship (QSPR)

References

• R.R. Tarakad, C.F. Spencer, and S.B. Adler, A comparison of eight equations of state to predict gas-phase density and fugacity, Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev. 18 (1979), pp. 726–739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Piacenza, G. Legsaï, B. Blaive, and R. Gallo, Molecular volumes and densities of liquids and solids by molecular mechanics—estimation and analysis, J. Phys. Org. Chem. 9 (1996), pp. 427–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H.G. Rackett, Equation of state for saturated liquids, J. Chem. Eng. Data. 15 (1970), pp. 514–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H.S. Elbro, A. Fredenslund, and P. Rasmussen, Group contribution method for the prediction of liquid densities as a function of temperature for solvents, oligomers, and polymers, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 30 (1991), pp. 2576–2582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E.C. Ihmels and J. Gmehling, Extension and revision of the group contribution method gcvol for the prediction of pure compound liquid densities, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 42 (2003), pp. 408–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Palomar, V.R. Ferro, J.S. Torrecilla, and F. Rodríguez, Density and molar volume predictions using COSMO-RS for Ionic Liquids. An approach to solvent design, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 46 (2007), pp. 6041–6048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.-R. Fatehi, S. Raeissi, and D. Mowla, An artificial neural network to calculate pure ionic liquid densities without the need for any experimental data, J. Supercrit. Fluids. 95 (2014), pp. 60–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Karelson and A. Perkson, QSPR prediction of densities of organic liquids, Comput. Chem. 23 (1999), pp. 49–59.
   Google Scholar
• A. Tatarczuk, M. Ściążko, M. Stec, S. Tokarski, and J. Janikowski, Carbon capture, towards comprehensive knowledge – our common objective, Chem. Int. 67 (2013), pp. 897–902.
   Google Scholar
• A. Wilk, L. Więcław-Solny, A. Krótki, and D. Śpiewak, Impact of the composition of absorption blend on the efficiency of CO2 removal, Chem. Int. 67 (2013), pp. 399–406.
   Google Scholar
• S. Ajmani, S.C. Rogers, M.H. Barley, and D.J. Livingstone, Application of QSPR to mixtures, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 46 (2006), pp. 2043–2055.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Stec, A. Tatarczuk, T. Spietz, and A. Wilk, Estimation of density for partially carbonated alkanolamine solutions using quantitative structure-property relationships (QSPR), 10th European Conference on Coal Research and its Applications, Hull, UK, September 2014.
   Google Scholar
• A.R. Katritzky, U. Maran, V.S. Lobanov, and M. Karelson, Structurally diverse quantitative structure−property relationship correlations of technologically relevant physical properties, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 40 (2000), pp. 1–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• D. Weininger, SMILES, a chemical language and information system. 1. Introduction to methodology and encoding rules, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 28 (1988), pp. 31–36.
   Google Scholar
• P.G.R. Achary, Simplified molecular input line entry system-based optimal descriptors: QSAR modelling for voltage-gated potassium channel subunit Kv7.2, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 25 (2014), pp. 73–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.G.R. Achary, QSPR modelling of dielectric constants of π-conjugated organic compounds by means of the CORAL software, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 25 (2014), pp. 507–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Begum and P.G.R. Achary, Simplified molecular input line entry system-based: QSAR modelling for MAP kinase-interacting protein kinase (MNK1), SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 26 (2015), pp. 343–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Todeschini and V. Consonni, Handbook of Molecular Descriptors, John Wiley & Sons, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• A.P. Toropova, A.A. Toropov, A. Lombardo, A. Roncaglioni, E. Benfenati, and G. Gini, A new bioconcentration factor model based on SMILES and indices of presence of atoms, Eur. J. Med. Chem. 45 (2010), pp. 4399–4402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Liu and W. Long, Current mathematical methods used in QSAR/QSPR studies, Int. J. Mol. Sci. 10 (2009), pp. 1978–1998.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Kiralj and M.M.C. Ferreira, Basic validation procedures for regression models in qsar and qspr studies: Theory and application, J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 20 (2009), p. 770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.R. Lide, CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Sigma Aldrich Co, Aldrich Catalog of Fine Chemicals, Aldrich Chemical Company, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• C.W. Yap, PaDEL-descriptor: An open source software to calculate molecular descriptors and fingerprints, J. Comput. Chem. 32 (2011), pp. 1466–1474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scilab Enterprises, Scilab: Free and open source software for numerical computation, Scilab Enterprises, Orsay, France, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• V. Consonni, D. Ballabio, and R. Todeschini, Comments on the definition of the Q2 parameter for QSAR validation, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 49 (2009), pp. 1669–1678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y.H. Zhao, M.H. Abraham, and A.M. Zissimos, Fast calculation of van der Waals Volume as a sum of atomic and bond contributions and its application to drug compounds, J. Org. Chem. 68 (2003), pp. 7368–7373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Consonni, D. Ballabio, and R. Todeschini, Evaluation of model predictive ability by external validation techniques, J. Chemom. 24 (2010), pp. 194–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L.H. Hall and L.B. Kier, Electrotopological state indices for atom types: A novel combination of electronic, topological, and valence state information, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 35 (1995), pp. 1039–1045.
   Google Scholar
• M.H. Abraham, Scales of solute hydrogen-bonding: Their construction and application to physicochemical and biochemical processes, Chem. Soc. Rev. 22 (1993), pp. 73–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar