A comprehensive QSPR model for dielectric constants of binary solvent mixtures

References

• A. Jouyban, S. Soltanpour, and H.-K. Chan, A simple relationship between dielectric constant of mixed solvents with solvent composition and temperature, Int. J. Pharm. 269 (2004), pp. 353–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Zhang, J. Yang, and Y.-X. Yu, Dielectric constant and density dependence of the structure of supercritical carbon dioxide using a new modified empirical potential model: A Monte Carlo simulation study, J. Phys. Chem. B 109 (2005), pp. 13375–13382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Graf, A. Nitzan, M.G. Kurnikova, and R.D. Coalson, A dynamic lattice Monte Carlo model of ion transport in inhomogeneous dielectric environments: Method and implementation, J. Phys. Chem. B 104 (2000), pp. 12324–12338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Louhi-Kultanen, A.L. Arnalot, L. Nyström, and J. Kallas, An insight into interparticle forces and filterability of potassium sulphate crystals precipitated with ethanol and acetone, Proceedings of European Congress of Chemical Engineering (ECCE-6), R. Gani and K. Dam-Johansen, eds., Copenhagen, 16-20 September (2007), Kongens Lyngby, Technical University of Denmark, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• G. Larsen and M. Skotak, Co-solvent mediated fiber diameter and fiber morphology control in electrospinning of sol–gel formulations, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 354 (2008), pp. 5547–5554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Graf, M.G. Kurnikova, R.D. Coalson, and A. Nitzan, Comparison of dynamic lattice Monte Carlo simulations and the dielectric self-energy Poisson−Nernst−Planck continuum theory for model ion channels, J. Phys. Chem. B 108 (2004), pp. 2006–2015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.L. Kelly, E. Coronado, L.L. Zhao, and G.C. Schatz, The optical properties of metal nanoparticles: The influence of size, shape, and dielectric environment, J. Phys. Chem. B 107 (2002), pp. 668–677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.H. Bhatt and O.D. Velev, Control and modeling of the dielectrophoretic assembly of on-chip nanoparticle wires, Langmuir 20 (2003), pp. 467–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.R. Katritzky, M. Kuanar, S. Slavov, C.D. Hall, M. Karelson, I. Kahn, and D.A. Dobchev, Quantitative correlation of physical and chemical properties with chemical structure: Utility for prediction, Chem. Rev. 110 (2010), pp. 5714–5789.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Wang and A. Anderko, Computation of dielectric constants of solvent mixtures and electrolyte solutions, Fluid Phase Equilib. 186 (2001), pp. 103–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Le, V.C. Epa, F.R. Burden, and D.A. Winkler, Quantitative structure–property relationship modeling of diverse materials properties, Chem. Rev. 112 (2012), pp. 2889–2919.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.C. Schweitzer and J.B. Morris, The development of a quantitative structure property relationship (QSPR) for the prediction of dielectric constants using neural networks, Anal. Chim. Acta 384 (1999), pp. 285–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.C. Schweitzer and J.B. Morris, Improved Quantitative structure property relationships for the prediction of dielectric constants for a set of diverse compounds by subsetting of the data set, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 40 (2000), pp. 1253–1261.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• M. Cocchi, P.G. De Benedetti, R. Seeber, L. Tassi, and A. Ulrici, Development of quantitative structure−property relationships using calculated descriptors for the prediction of the physicochemical properties (nD, ρ, bp, ε, η) of a series of organic solvents, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 39 (1999), pp. 1190–1203.
   Google Scholar
• S. Sild and M. Karelson, A general QSPR treatment for dielectric constants of organic compounds, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 42 (2002), pp. 360–367.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• J. Liu, W.V. Wilding, N.F. Giles, and R.L. Rowley, A quantitative structure property relation correlation of the dielectric constant for organic chemicals, J. Chem. Eng. Data 55 (2010), pp. 41–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Liu, W.V. Wilding, and R.L. Rowley, A local-composition model for the prediction of mixture dielectric constants, J. Chem. Eng. Data 56 (2011), pp. 2430–2437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Lee, D. Kim, K.-H. Kim, S.-H. Choi, K. Choi, and D. Jung, Elucidation of specific aspects of dielectric constants of conjugated organic compounds: A QSPR approach, J. Mol. Model. 18 (2012), pp. 251–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Gharagheizi, QSPR studies for solubility parameter by means of genetic algorithm-based multivariate linear regression and generalized regression neural network, QSAR Comb. Sci. 27 (2008), pp. 165–170.
   Google Scholar
• J. Xu, L. Wang, G. Liang, L. Wang, and X. Shen, A general quantitative structure–property relationship treatment for dielectric constants of polymers, Polym. Eng. Sci. 51 (2011), pp. 2408–2416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Liang, J. Xu, and L. Liu, QSPR analysis for melting point of fatty acids using genetic algorithm based multiple linear regression (GA-MLR), Fluid Phase Equilib. 353 (2013), pp. 15–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Hemmateenejad and M. Yazdani, QSPR models for half-wave reduction potential of steroids: A comparative study between feature selection and feature extraction from subsets of or entire set of descriptors, Anal. Chim. Acta 634 (2009), pp. 27–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Alves de Lima Ribeiro, and M.M.C. Ferreira, QSPR models of boiling point, octanol–water partition coefficient and retention time index of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, J. Mol. Struct. THEOCHEM 663 (2003), pp. 109–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Sârbu, C. Onişor, M. Posa, S. Kevresan, and K. Kuhajda, Modeling and prediction (correction) of partition coefficients of bile acids and their derivatives by multivariate regression methods, Talanta 75 (2008), pp. 651–657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Shamsipur, R. Ghavami, H. Sharghi, and B. Hemmateenejad, Highly correlating distance/connectivity-based topological indices: 5. Accurate prediction of liquid density of organic molecules using PCR and PC-ANN, J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 27 (2008), pp. 506–511.
   Google Scholar
• Z. Daren, QSPR studies of PCBs by the combination of genetic algorithms and PLS analysis, Comput. Chem. 25 (2001), pp. 197–204.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• L. Li, S. Xie, H. Cai, X. Bai, and Z. Xue, Quantitative structure–property relationships for octanol–water partition coefficients of polybrominated diphenyl ethers, Chemosphere 72 (2008), pp. 1602–1606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Golmohammadi and Z. Dashtbozorgi, Quantitative structure–property relationship studies of gas-to-wet butyl acetate partition coefficient of some organic compounds using genetic algorithm and artificial neural network, Struct. Chem. 21 (2010), pp. 1241–1252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.H. Fatemi and F. Karimian, Prediction of micelle–water partition coefficient from the theoretical derived molecular descriptors, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 314 (2007), pp. 665–672.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Yu, B. Yi, F. Liu, and X. Wang, Prediction of the dielectric dissipation factor tan δ of polymers with an ANN model based on the DFT calculation, React. Funct. Polym. 68 (2008), pp. 1557–1562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Zhang, An improved QSPR study of standard formation enthalpies of acyclic alkanes based on artificial neural networks and genetic algorithm, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 98 (2009), pp. 162–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Tetteh, E. Metcalfe, and S.L. Howells, Optimisation of radial basis and backpropagation neural networks for modelling auto-ignition temperature by quantitative-structure property relationships, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 32 (1996), pp. 177–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X.J. Yao, A. Panaye, J.P. Doucet, H.F. Chen, R.S. Zhang, B.T. Fan, M.C. Liu, and Z.D. Hu, Comparative classification study of toxicity mechanisms using support vector machines and radial basis function neural networks, Anal. Chim. Acta 535 (2005), pp. 259–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Afantitis, G. Melagraki, K. Makridima, A. Alexandridis, H. Sarimveis, and O. Iglessi-Markopoulou, Prediction of high weight polymers glass transition temperature using RBF neural networks, J. Mol. Struct. THEOCHEM 716 (2005), pp. 193–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Nantasenamat, C. Isarankura-Na-Ayudhya, T. Naenna, and V. Prachayasittikul, Prediction of bond dissociation enthalpy of antioxidant phenols by support vector machine, J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 27 (2008), pp. 188–196.
   Google Scholar
• A. Niazi, S. Jameh-Bozorghi, and D. Nori-Shargh, Prediction of toxicity of nitrobenzenes using ab initio and least squares support vector machines, J. Hazard. Mater. 151 (2008), pp. 603–609.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Yang, W. Lu, N. Chen, and Q. Hu, Support vector regression based QSPR for the prediction of some physicochemical properties of alkyl benzenes, J. Mol. Struct. THEOCHEM 719 (2005), pp. 119–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Toubaei, H. Golmohammadi, Z. Dashtbozorgi, and W.E. Acree Jr, QSPR studies for predicting gas to acetone and gas to acetonitrile solvation enthalpies using support vector machine, J. Mol. Liq. 175 (2012), pp. 24–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.W. Holland and R.E. Welsch, Robust regression using iteratively reweighted least-squares, Commun. Stat. Theory Methods 6 (1977), pp. 813–827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Kompany-Zareh and N. Omidikia, Jackknife-based selection of Gram−Schmidt orthogonalized descriptors in QSAR, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 50 (2010), pp. 2055–2066.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Shahlaei, Descriptor selection methods in quantitative structure–activity relationship studies: A review study, Chem. Rev. 113 (2013), pp. 8093–8103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Leardi, Genetic algorithms, in Comprehensive Chemometrics, S.D. Brown, R. Tauler, and B. Walczak, eds., Elsevier, Oxford, 2009, pp. 631–653.
   Google Scholar
• R. Leardi, R. Boggia, and M. Terrile, Genetic algorithms as a strategy for feature selection, J. Chemom. 6 (1992), pp. 267–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Kubinyi, Evolutionary variable selection in regression and PLS analyses, J. Chemom. 10 (1996), pp. 119–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Hemmateenejad, R. Miri, M. Akhond, and M. Shamsipur, QSAR study of the calcium channel antagonist activity of some recently synthesized dihydropyridine derivatives. An application of genetic algorithm for variable selection in MLR and PLS methods, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 64 (2002), pp. 91–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Sagrado and M.T.D. Cronin, Application of the modelling power approach to variable subset selection for GA-PLS QSAR models, Anal. Chim. Acta 609 (2008), pp. 169–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Tang and T. Li, Combining PLS with GA-GP for QSAR, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 64 (2002), pp. 55–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Hasegawa, T. Kimura, and K. Funatsu, GA Strategy for variable selection in QSAR studies: Enhancement of comparative molecular binding energy analysis by GA-Based PLS method, Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 18 (1999), pp. 262–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.B. Flanagan, K.R. Hoover, O. Garza, A. Hizon, T. Soto, N. Villegas, W.E. Acree, and M.H. Abraham, Mathematical correlation of 1-chloroanthraquinone solubilities in organic solvents with the Abraham solvation parameter model, Phys. Chem. Liq. 44 (2006), pp. 377–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.H. Hildebrand and R.L. Scott, The Solubility of Nonelectrolytes, 3rd ed., Reinhold, New York, NY, 1950.
   Google Scholar
• C.M. Hansen, Hansen Solubility Parameters: A User's Handbook, 2nd ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• A. Jouyban and S. Soltanpour, Prediction of dielectric constants of binary solvents at various temperatures, J. Chem. Eng. Data 55 (2010), pp. 2951–2963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E.R. Malinowski, Factor Analysis in Chemistry, 3rd ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• V. Consonni, D. Ballabio, and R. Todeschini, Comments on the definition of the Q2 parameter for QSAR validation, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 49 (2009), pp. 1669–1678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Kiralj and M.M.C. Ferreira, Is your QSAR/QSPR descriptor real or trash?, J. Chemom. 24 (2010), pp. 681–693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Omidikia and M. Kompany-Zareh, Uninformative variable elimination assisted by Gram-Schmidt Orthogonalization/successive projection algorithm for descriptor selection in QSAR, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 128 (2013), pp. 56–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Baranowski, Non-equilibrium thermodynamics as applied to membrane transport, J. Membr. Sci. 57 (1991), pp. 119–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Simonson and C.L. Brooks, Charge screening and the dielectric constant of proteins: Insights from molecular dynamics, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118 (1996), pp. 8452–8458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar