High-dimensional QSAR modelling using penalized linear regression model with L_1/2-norm

References

• A.M. Al-Fakih, M. Aziz, H.H. Abdallah, Z.Y. Algamal, M.H. Lee, and H. Maarof, High dimensional QSAR study of mild steel corrosion inhibition in acidic medium by furan derivatives, Int. J. Electrochemsc. 10 (2015), pp. 3568–3583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z.Y. Algamal, M.H. Lee, A.M. Al-Fakih, and M. Aziz, High-dimensional QSAR prediction of anticancer potency of imidazo[4,5-b]pyridine derivatives using adjusted adaptive LASSO, J. Chemom. 29 (2015), pp. 547–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Huang and X. Fan, Reliably assessing prediction reliability for high dimensional QSAR data, Mol. Divers. 17 (2013), pp. 63–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Zhang, J.M. Hughes-Oliver, and S.S. Young, Analysis of high-dimensional structure-activity screening datasets using the optimal bit string tree, Technometrics 55 (2013), pp. 161–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Todeschini, V. Consonni, A. Mauri, and M. Pavan, Dragon 6, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• S. Gupta, N. Basant, and K.P. Singh, Qualitative and quantitative structure-activity relationship modelling for predicting blood-brain barrier permeability of structurally diverse chemicals, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 26 (2015), pp. 95–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.M. Al-Fakih, Z.Y. Algamal, M.H. Lee, H.H. Abdallah, H. Maarof, and M. Aziz, Quantitative structure-activity relationship model for prediction study of corrosion inhibition efficiency using two-stage sparse multiple linear regression, J. Chemom. 30 (2016), pp. 361–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Nantasenamat, T. Monnor, A. Worachartcheewan, P. Mandi, C. Isarankura-Na-Ayudhya, and V. Prachayasittikul, Predictive QSAR modeling of aldose reductase inhibitors using Monte Carlo feature selection, Eur. J. Med. Chem. 76 (2014), pp. 352–359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Pourbasheer, R. Aalizadeh, T.S. Shokouhi, M.R. Ganjali, P. Norouzi, and J. Shadmanesh, 2D and 3D quantitative structure–activity relationship study of hepatitis C virus NS5B polymerase inhibitors by comparative molecular field analysis and comparative molecular similarity indices analysis methods, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 54 (2014), pp. 2902–2914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z.Y. Algamal, M.H. Lee, and A.M. Al-Fakih, High-dimensional quantitative structure–activity relationship modeling of influenza neuraminidase A/PR/8/34 (H1N1) inhibitors based on a two-stage adaptive penalized rank regression, J. Chemom. 30 (2016), pp. 50–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Filzmoser, M. Gschwandtner, and V. Todorov, Review of sparse methods in regression and classification with application to chemometrics, J. Chemom. 26 (2012), pp. 42–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I.E. Frank and J.H. Friedman, A statistical view of some chemometrics regression tools, Technometrics 35 (1993), pp. 109–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Tibshirani, Regression shrinkage and selection via the Lasso, J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 58 (1996), pp. 267–288.
   Google Scholar
• J. Fan and R. Li, Variable selection via nonconcave penalized likelihood and its oracle properties, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 96 (2001), pp. 1348–1360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Zou and T. Hastie, Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net, J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 67 (2005), pp. 301–320.
   Google Scholar
• H. Zou, The adaptive lasso and its oracle properties, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 101 (2006), pp. 1418–1429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.J.F. Ter Braak, Regression by L1 regularization of smart contrasts and sums (ROSCAS) beats PLS and elastic net in latent variable model, J. Chemom. 23 (2009), pp. 217–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.A. Rasmussen and R. Bro, A tutorial on the Lasso approach to sparse modeling, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 119 (2012), pp. 21–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Zou and H.H. Zhang, On the adaptive elastic-net with a diverging number of parameters, Ann. Stat. 37 (2009), pp. 1733–1751.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Park and Y.J. Yoon, Bridge regression- adaptivity and group selection, J. Stat. Plan. Infer. 141 (2011), pp. 3506–3519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W.J. Fu, Penalized regressions: The bridge versus the Lasso, J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 7 (1998), pp. 397–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Knight and W. Fu, Asymptotics for Lasso-type estimators, Ann. Stat. 28 (2000), pp. 1356–1378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Huang, J.L. Horowitz, and S. Ma, Asymptotic properties of bridge estimators in sparse high-dimensional regression models, Ann. Stat. 36 (2008), pp. 587–613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Huang, S. Ma, H. Xie, and C.-H. Zhang, A group bridge approach for variable selection, Biometrika 96 (2009), pp. 339–355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Wang, L. Song, and X. Wang, Bridge estimation for generalized linear models with a diverging number of parameters, Stat. Prob. Lett. 80 (2010), pp. 1584–1596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Liang, C. Liu, X.-Z. Luan, K.-S. Leung, T.-M. Chan, Z.-B. Xu, and H. Zhang, Sparse logistic regression with a L1/2 penalty for gene selection in cancer classification, BMC Bioinformatics 14 (2013), pp. 198–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Zou and R. Li, One-step sparse estimates in nonconcave penalized likelihood models, Ann. Stat. 36 (2008), pp. 1509–1533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Efron, T. Hastie, I. Johnstone, and R. Tibshirani, Least angle regression, Ann. Stat. 32 (2004), pp. 407–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Kawano, Selection of tuning parameters in bridge regression models via Bayesian information criterion, Statis. Paper. 55 (2014), pp. 1207–1223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z.Y. Algamal and M.H. Lee, Regularized logistic regression with adjusted adaptive elastic net for gene selection in high dimensional cancer classification, Comput. Biol. Med. 67 (2015), pp. 136–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z.Y. Algamal and M.H. Lee, Penalized logistic regression with the adaptive LASSO for gene selection in high-dimensional cancer classification, Expe. Syst. Appl. 42 (2015), pp. 9326–9332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.R. Garcia-Jacas, E. Contreras-Torres, Y. Marrero-Ponce, M. Pupo-Merino, S.J. Barigye, and L. Cabrera-Leyva, Examining the predictive accuracy of the novel 3D N-linear algebraic molecular codifications on benchmark datasets, J. Cheminform. 8 (2016), p. 10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.J. Sutherland, L.A. O'Brien, and D.F. Weaver, A comparison of methods for modeling quantitative structure–activity relationships, J. Med. Chem. 47 (2004), pp. 5541–5554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B.M. Bababdani and M. Mousavi, Gravitational search algorithm: A new feature selection method for QSAR study of anticancer potency of imidazo[4,5-b]pyridine derivatives, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 122 (2013), pp. 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Bavetsias, S. Crumpler, C. Sun, S. Avery, B. Atrash, A. Faisal, A.S. Moore, M. Kosmopoulou, N. Brown, P.W. Sheldrake, K. Bush, A. Henley, G. Box, M. Valenti, A. De Haven Brandon, F.I. Raynaud, P. Workman, S.A. Eccles, R. Bayliss, S. Linardopoulos, and J. Blagg, Optimization of imidazo[4,5-B]pyridine-based kinase inhibitors: Identification of a dual FLT3/Aurora kinase inhibitor as an orally bioavailable preclinical development candidate for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia, J. Med. Chem. 55 (2012), pp. 8721–8734.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Bavetsias, A. Faisal, S. Crumpler, N. Brown, M. Kosmopoulou, A. Joshi, B. Atrash, Y. Pérez-Fuertes, J.A. Schmitt, K.J. Boxall, R. Burke, C. Sun, S. Avery, K. Bush, A. Henley, F.I. Raynaud, P. Workman, R. Bayliss, S. Linardopoulos, and J. Blagg, Aurora isoform selectivity: Design and synthesis of imidazo[4,5-B]pyridine derivatives as highly selective inhibitors of Aurora-A kinase in cells, J. Med. Chem. 56 (2013), pp. 9122–9135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Bavetsias, J.M. Large, C. Sun, N. Bouloc, M. Kosmopoulou, M. Matteucci, N.E. Wilsher, V. Martins, J.H. Reynisson, B. Atrash, A. Faisal, F. Urban, M. Valenti, A. De Haven Brandon, G. Box, F.I. Raynaud, P. Workman, S.A. Eccles, R. Bayliss, J. Blagg, S. Linardopoulos, and E. Mcdonald, Imidazo[4,5-B]pyridine derivatives as inhibitors of aurora kinases: Lead optimization studies toward the identification of an orally bioavailable preclinical development candidate, J. Med. Chem. 53 (2010), pp. 5213–5228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Lan, W.-N. Chen, and W.-M. Chen, Molecular modeling studies on imidazo[4,5-B]pyridine derivatives as aurora A kinase inhibitors using 3D-QSAR and docking approaches, Eur. J. Med. Chem. 46 (2011), pp. 77–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Khazaei, N. Sarmasti, J.Y. Seyf, Z. Rostami, and M.A. Zolfigol, QSAR study of the non-peptidic inhibitors of procollagen C-proteinase based on multiple linear regression, principle component regression, and partial least squares, Arabian J. Chem. (2015), pp. 151–164.
   Google Scholar
• E. Turtle, N. Chow, C. Yang, S. Sosa, U. Bauer, M. Brenner, D. Solow-Cordero, and W.B. Ho, Design and synthesis of procollagen C-proteinase inhibitors, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 22 (2012), pp. 7397–7401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Gramatica and A. Sangion, A historical excursus on the statistical validation parameters for QSAR models: A clarification concerning metrics and terminology, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 56 (2016), pp. 1127–1131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Fan and J. Lv, Sure independence screening for ultra-high-dimensional feature space, J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 70 (2008), pp. 849–911.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Borges De Melo and J.P. Ataide Martins, T.C. Marinho Jorge, M.C. Friozi, and M.M. Castro Ferreira, Multivariate QSAR study on the antimutagenic activity of flavonoids against 3-NFA on Salmonella typhimurium TA98, Eur. J. Med. Chem. 45 (2010), pp. 4562–4569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Kiralj and M.M.C. Ferreira, Basic validation procedures for regression models in QSAR And QSPR studies – Theory and application, J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 20 (2009), pp. 770–787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Kiralj and M.M.C. Ferreira, Is your QSAR/QSPR descriptor real or trash?, J. Chemom. 24 (2010), pp. 681–693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Gramatica, Principles of QSAR models validation: Internal and external, QSAR Comb. Sci. 26 (2007), pp. 694–701.
   Google Scholar
• C. Rücker, G. Rücker, and M. Meringer, Y-randomization and its variants in QSPR/QSAR, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 47 (2007), pp. 2345–2357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar