Predicting the aquatic toxicity mode of action using logistic regression and linear discriminant analysis

References

• E. Papa, F. Battaini, and P. Gramatica, Ranking of aquatic toxicity of esters modelled by QSAR, Chemosphere 58 (2005), pp. 559–570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.N. Moorea, M.H. Depledge, J.W. Readmana, and P. Leonard, An integrated biomarker-based strategy for ecotoxicological evaluation of risk in environmental management, Mutat. Res. 552 (2004), pp. 247–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.R. Seward, G.D. Sinks, and T.W. Schultz, Reproducibility of toxicity across mode of toxic action in the Tetrahymena population growth impairment assay, Aquat. Toxicol. 53 (2001), pp. 33–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.L. Russom, S.P. Bradbury, S.J. Broderius, D.E. Hammereister, and R.A. Drummond, Predicting modes of toxic action from chemical structure: Acute toxicity in the fathead minnow (Pimephales Promelas), Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 16 (1997), pp. 948–967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T.W. Schultz, G.D. Sinks, and A.P. Bearden, QSAR in aquatic toxicology: A mechanism of action approach comparing toxic potency to Pimephales promelas, Tetrahymena pyriformis, and Vibrio fischeri, in Comparative QSAR, J. Devillers, ed., Taylor & Francis, New York, NY, 1998, pp. 51–109.
   Google Scholar
• H.J.M. Verhaar, C.J.V. Leeuwen, and J.L.M. Hermens, Classifying environmental pollutants part 1: Structural activity relationship for prediction of aquatic toxicity, Chemosphere 25 (1992), pp. 471–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W.H.J. Vaes, E.U. Ramos, H.J.M. Verhaar, and J.L.M. Hermens, Acute toxicity of nonpolar versus polar narcosis: Is there a difference?, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 17 (1998), pp. 1380–1384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B.I. Escher, R.I.L. Eggen, U. Schreiber, Z. Schreiber, E. Vye, B. Wisner, and R.P. Schwarzenbach, Baseline toxicity (narcotics) of organic chemicals determined by in-vitro membrane potential measurements in energy-transducing membranes, Environ. Sci. Technol. 36 (2002), pp. 1971–1979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.C. Dearden, M.T.D. Cronin, Y. Zhao, and O.A. Raevsky, QSAR studies of compounds acting by polar and non-polar narcotics: An examination of the role of polarisability, Quant. Struct. Act. Relat. 19 (2000), pp. 3–9.
   Google Scholar
• D.W. Roberts and J.F. Costello, Mechanisms of action for general and polar narcosis: A difference in dimension, QSAR Comb. Sci. 22 (2003), pp. 226–233.
   Google Scholar
• C.M. Auer, J.V. Nabholz, and K.P. Baetcke, Mode of action and the assessment of chemical hazards in the presence of limited data: Use of structure activity relationships (SAR) under TSCA Section 5, Environ. Health Perspect. 87 (1990), pp. 183–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.C. Basak, G.D. Grunwald, G.E. Host, G.J. Niemi, and S.P. Bradbury, A comparative study of molecular similarity, statistical, and neural methods for predicting toxic modes of action, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 17 (1998), pp. 1056–1064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.P. Bradbury, Predicting modes of toxic action from chemical structure: An overview, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 2 (1994), pp. 89–104.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• T.I. Netzeva, M. Pavan, and A.P. Worth, Review of (quantitative) structure - activity relationships for acute aquatic toxicity, QSAR Comb. Sci. 27 (2008), pp. 77–90.
   Google Scholar
• T.W. Schultz, G.D. Sinks, and M.T.D. Cronin, Identification of mechanisms of toxic action of phenols to Tetrahymena pyriformis from molecular descriptors, in Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships in Environmental Sciences – VII, F. Chen and G. Schüürmann, eds., SETAC Press, Pensacola, FL, 1997, pp. 329–342.
   Google Scholar
• A.O. Aptula, T.I. Netzeva, I.V. Valkova, M.T.D. Cronin, T.W. Schultz, R. Kühne, and G. Schüürmann, Multivariate discrimination between modes of toxic action of phenols, Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 21 (2002), pp. 12–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Schüürmann, A.O. Aptula, R. Kühne, and R.-U. Ebert, Stepwise discrimination between four modes of toxic action of phenols in the Tetrahymena pyriformis assay, Chem. Res. Toxicol. 16 (2003), pp. 974–987.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X.J. Yao, A. Panaye, J.P. Doucet, H.F. Chen, R.S. Zhang, B.T. Fan, M.C. Liu, and Z.D. Hu, Comparative classification study of toxicity mechanisms using support vector machines and radial basis function neural networks, Anal. Chim. Acta 535 (2005), pp. 259–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U. Norinder, P. Lidén, and H. Boström, Discrimination between modes of toxic action of phenols using rule based methods, Mol. Divers. 10 (2006), pp. 207–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Niu, Y. Jin, W. Lu, and G. Li, Predicting toxic action mechanisms of phenols using AdaBoost Learner, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 96 (2009), pp. 43–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Nendza and M. MQlle, Discriminating toxicant classes by mode of action: 2. Physico-chemical descriptors, Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 19 (2000), pp. 581–598.
   Google Scholar
• S. Ren and T.W. Schultz, Identifying the mechanism of aquatic toxicity of selected compounds by hydrophobicity and electrophilicity descriptors, Toxicol. Lett. 129 (2002), pp. 151–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Ren, Predicting three narcosis mechanisms of aquatic toxicity, Toxicol. Lett. 133 (2002), pp. 127–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Ren, P.D. Fraymer, and T.W. Schultz, An exploratory study of the use of multivariate techniques to determine mechanisms of toxic action, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 55 (2003), pp. 86–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.C. Von der Ohe, R. KQhne, R.-U. Ebert, R. Altenburger, M. Liess, and G. Schüürmann, Structural alerts – a new classification model to discriminate excess toxicity from narcotic effect levels of organic compounds in the acute daphnid assay, Chem. Res. Toxicol. 18 (2005), pp. 536–555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Nendza and M. Müller, Discriminating toxicant classes by mode of action: 3, Substructure indicator, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 18 (2007), pp. 155–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.G. Polishchuk, E.N. Muratov, A.G. Artemenko, O.G. Kolumbin, N.N. Muratov, and V.E. Kuz’min, Application of random forest approach to QSAR prediction of aquatic toxicity, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 49 (2009), pp. 2481–2488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Michielan, L. Pireddu, M. Floris, and S. Moro, Support vector machine (SVM) as alternative tool to assign acute aquatic toxicity warning labels to chemicals, Mol. Inf. 29 (2010), pp. 51–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T.M. Martin, C.M. Grulke, D.M. Young, C.L. Russom, N.Y. Wang, C.R. Jackson, and M.G. Barron, Prediction of aquatic toxicity mode of action using linear discriminant and random forest models, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 53 (2013), pp. 2229–2239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.P. Singh, S. Gupta, A. Kumar, and D. Mohan, Multispecies QSAR modeling for predicting the aquatic toxicity of diverse organic chemicals for regulatory toxicology, Chem. Res. Toxicol. 27 (2014), pp. 741–753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD principles for the validation, for regulatory purposes, of (quantitative) structure-activity relationship models. Available at http://www.oecd.org/env/ehs/risk-assessment/37849783.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• A.R. Katritzky, V.S. Lobanov, and M. Karelson, CODESSA (COmprehensive DEscriptors for Structural and Statistical Analysis), Version 2.0, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Talete srl, Dragon (Software for Molecular Descriptor Calculation), Version 6.0, 2013; software available at http://www.talete.mi.it/.
   Google Scholar
• A.P. Worth and M.T.D. Cronin, The use of discriminant analysis, logistic regression and classification tree analysis in the development of classification models for human health effects, Mol. Struct. (Theochem) 622 (2003), pp. 97–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Gramatica, Principles of QSAR models validation: Internal and external, QSAR Comb. Sci. 26 (2007), pp. 694–701.
   Google Scholar
• A. Tropsha, P. Gramatica, and V.K. Gombar, The importance of being earnest: Validation is the absolute essential for successful application and interpretation of QSPR models, QSAR Comb. Sci. 22 (2003), pp. 69–76.
   Google Scholar
• A. Golbraikh and A. Tropsha, Beware of q2!, J. Mol. Graph. Model. 20 (2002), pp. 269–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Eriksson, J. Jaworska, A.P. Worth, M.T.D. Cronin, R.M. McDowell, and P. Gramatica, Methods for reliability and uncertainty assessment and for applicability evaluations of classification- and regression-based QSARs, Environ. Health Perspect. 111 (2003), pp. 1361–1375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Gramatica, P. Pilutti, and E. Papa, Validated QSAR prediction of OH tropospheric degradation of VOCs: Splitting into training-test sets and consensus modeling, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 44 (2004), pp. 1794–1802.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• T. Oberg, A QSAR for baseline toxicity: Validation, domain of application and prediction, Chem. Res. Toxicol. 17 (2004), pp. 1630–1637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Papa, F. Villa, and P. Gramatica, Statistically validated QSARs based on theoretical descriptors for modeling aquatic toxicity of organic chemicals in Pimephales promelas (fathead minnow), J. Chem. Inf. Model. 45 (2005), pp. 1256–1266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Papa and P. Gramatica, Screening of persistent organic pollutants by QSPR classification models: A comparative study, J. Mol. Graph. Model. 27 (2008), pp. 59–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Bhhatarai and P. Gramatica, Prediction of aqueous solubility, vapor pressure and critical micelle concentration for aquatic partitioning of perfluorinated chemicals, Environ. Sci. Technol. 45 (2010), pp. 8120–8128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y.Y. Ren, B.W. Zhao, Q. Chang, and X.J. Yao, QSPR modeling of nonionic surfactant cloud points: An update, J. Colloid. Interf. Sci. 358 (2011), pp. 202–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChemDraw (Chemical Structure Drawing Standard), Cambridge Soft Corporation, MA, USA, 1985–2003.
   Google Scholar
• HyperChem, Release 6.0 for Windows; Hypercube, Inc. Canada, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• I. Valkova, M. Vračko, and S.C. Basak, Modeling of structure–mutagenicity relationships: Counter propagation neural network approach using calculated structural descriptors, Anal. Chim. Acta 509 (2004), pp. 179–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y.Y. Ren, J. Qin, H.X. Liu, X.J. Yao, and M.C. Liu, QSPR study on the melting points of a diverse set of potential ionic liquids by projection pursuit regression, QSAR Comb. Sci. 28 (2009), pp. 1237–1244.
   Google Scholar
• Y.Y. Ren, B.W. Zhao, and X.J. Yao, Use of advanced statistical learning methods and principal component analysis in quantitative structure-genotoxicity relationship study of amines, Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. 74 (2009), pp. 217–241.
   Google Scholar
• J.A. Nelder and R.W.M. Wedderburn, Generalized linear models, J. R. Stat. Soc. A. Stat. 135 (1972), pp. 370–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. McCullagh and J.A. Nelder (eds.), Generalized Linear Models, 2nd ed., Chapman & Hall/CRC, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• J. Fox, Applied Regression analysis and Generalized Linear Models, 3rd ed., Sage Publications, Inc., 2008.
   Google Scholar
• R.I. Kabacoff, R in Action: Data analysis and graphics with R, Manning, Shelter Island, NY, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• A.J. Dobson and A.G. Barnett, An Introduction to Generalized Linear Models, 3rd ed., Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• J.J. Faraway, Extending the Linear Model with R: Generalized Linear, Mixed Effects and Nonparametric Regression Models, Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• J. Fox and S. Weisberg, An R Companion to Applied Regression, 2nd ed., Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 2011. Available at: http://socserv.socsci.mcmaster.ca/jfox/Books/Companion.
   Google Scholar
• D. Collett, Modelling Binary Data, 2nd ed., Chapman & Hall/CRC, London, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• R 3.2.0; software available at http://cran.R-project.org.
   Google Scholar
• O.G. Mekenyan and G.D. Veith, Relationships between descriptors for hydrophobicity and soft electrophilicity in predicting toxicity, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 1 (1993), pp. 335–344.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• V.R. Magnuson, D.K. Harriss and S.C. Basak, Topological indices based on neighborhood symmetry: Chemical and biological applications, in Studies in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, R.B. King, ed., Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1983, pp. 178–191.
   Google Scholar
• R. Todeschini and V. Consonni (eds.), Handbook of Molecular Descriptors, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• P.A.P. Moran, Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena, Biometrika 37 (1950), pp. 17–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Ferguson, The use of chemical potentials as indices of toxicity, P. Roy. Soc. Lon. 848 (1939), pp. 387–404.
   Google Scholar
• J.W. McFarland, On the parabolic relationship between drug potency and hydrophobicity, J. Med. Chem. 13 (1970), pp. 1192–1196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Reichenberg and P. Mayer, Two complementary sides of bioavailability: Accessibility and chemical activity of organic contaminants in sediments and soils, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 25 (2006), pp. 1239–1245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.T. Stanton and P.C. Jurs, Development and use of charged partial surface area structural descriptors in computer-assisted quantitative structure–property relationship studies, Anal. Chem. 62 (1990), pp. 2323–2329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Butina, Performance of Kier-Hall E-state descriptors in quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) studies of multifunctional molecules, Molecules 9 (2004), pp. 1004–1009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Labute, A widely applicable set of descriptors, J. Mol. Graph. Model. 18 (2000), pp. 464–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.M. Richard, Commercial toxicology prediction systems: A regulatory perspective, Toxicol. Lett. 102–103 (1998), pp. 611–616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar