An evaluation of selected (Q)SARs/expert systems for predicting skin sensitisation potential

References

• C.K. Smith Pease, From xenobiotic chemistry and metabolism to better prediction and risk assessment of skin allergy, Toxicology 192 (2003), pp. 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• G.S. Dotson, A. Maier, P.D. Siegel, S.E. Anderson, B.J. Green, A.B. Stefaniak, C.D. Codispoti, and I. Kimber, Setting occupational exposure limits for chemical allergens—Understanding the challenges, J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 12 (2015), pp. S82–S89.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• M. Peiser, T. Tralau, J. Heidler, A.M. Api, J.H.E. Arts, D.A. Basketter, J. English, T.L. Diepgen, R.C. Fuhlbrigge, A.A. Gaspari, J.D. Johansen, A.T. Karlberg, I. Kimber, J.P. Lepoittevin, M. Liebsch, H.I. Maibach, S.F. Martin, H.F. Merk, T. Platzek, T. Rustemeyer, A. Schnuch, R.J. Vandebriel, I.R. White, and A. Luch, Allergic contact dermatitis: Epidemiology, molecular mechanisms, in vitro methods and regulatory aspects: Current knowledge assembled at an international workshop at BfR, Germany, Cell. Molec. Life Sci. 69 (2012), pp. 763–781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union, Corrigendum to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC, OJEU. Communities. L136(2007), pp. 3–280.
   Google Scholar
• OECD, Test No. 429: Skin Sensitisation, OECD Publishing (2010), pp. 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• OECD, Test No. 406: Skin Sensitisation, OECD Publishing (1992), pp. 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union, Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on Cosmetic Products, OJEU L342(2009), pp. 59–209.
   Google Scholar
• OECD, The adverse outcome pathway for skin sensitisation initiated by covalent binding to proteins part 1: Scientific evidence. Series on Testing and Assessment No. 168 ENV/JM/MONO(2012)10/PART1. 2012.
   Google Scholar
• OECD, The adverse outcome pathway for skin sensitisation initiated by covalent binding to proteins part 2: Use of the AOP to develop chemical categories and integrated assessment and testing approaches. Series on Testing and Assessment No. 168 ENV/JM/MONO(2012)10/PART2. 2012.
   Google Scholar
• K. Reisinger, S. Hoffmann, N. Alépée, T. Ashikaga, J. Barroso, C. Elcombe, N. Gellatly, V. Galbiati, S. Gibbs, H. Groux, J. Hibatallah, D. Keller, P. Kern, M. Klaric, S. Kolle, J. Kuehnl, N. Lambrechts, M. Lindstedt, M. Millet, S. Martinozzi-Teissier, A. Natsch, D. Petersohn, I. Pike, H. Sakaguchi, A. Schepky, M. Tailhardat, M. Templier, E. van Vliet, and G. Maxwell, Systematic evaluation of non-animal test methods for skin sensitisation safety assessment, Toxicol. in Vitro 29 (2015), pp. 259–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Casati, K. Aschberger, J. Barroso, W. Casey, I. Delgado, T.S. Kim, N. Kleinstreuer, H. Kojima, J.K. Lee, A. Lowit, H.K. Park, M.J. Régimbald-Krnel, J. Strickland, M. Whelan, Y. Yang, and V. Zuang, Standardisation of defined approaches for skin sensitisation testing to support regulatory use and international adoption: position of the International Cooperation on Alternative Test Methods, Arch. Toxicol. 92 (2017), pp. 611–617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Ramirez, N. Stein, A. Aumann, T. Remus, A. Edwards, K.G. Norman, C. Ryan, J.E. Bader, M. Fehr, F. Burleson, L. Foertsch, X. Wang, F. Gerberick, P. Beilstein, S. Hoffmann, A. Mehling, B. van Ravenzwaay, and R. Landsiedel, Intra- and inter-laboratory reproducibility and accuracy of the LuSens assay: A reporter gene-cell line to detect keratinocyte activation by skin sensitizers, Toxicol. in Vitro 32 (2016), pp. 278–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Cottrez, E. Boitel, J.-C. Ourlin, J.-L. Peiffer, I. Fabre, I.-S. Henaoui, B. Mari, A. Vallauri, A. Paquet, P. Barbry, C. Auriault, P. Aeby, and H. Groux, SENS-IS, a 3D reconstituted epidermis based model for quantifying chemical sensitization potency: Reproducibility and predictivity results from an inter-laboratory study, Toxicol. in Vitro 32 (2016), pp. 248–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD, Test No. 442E: In Vitro Skin Sensitisation, OECD Publishing (2017), pp.1–68.
   Google Scholar
• ECHA, Guidance on Information Requirements and Chemical Safety Assessment Chapter R.7a: Endpoint Specific Guidance, ECHA (2017), pp. 271–314.
   Google Scholar
• G. Patlewicz, A.O. Aptula, D.W. Roberts, and E. Uriarte, A minireview of available skin sensitization (Q)SARs/expert systems, QSAR Comb. Sci. 27 (2008), pp. 60–76.
   Google Scholar
• G. Patlewicz, A.O. Aptula, E. Uriarte, D.W. Roberts, P.S. Kern, G.F. Gerberick, I. Kimber, R.J. Dearman, C.A. Ryan, and D.A. Basketter, An evaluation of selected global (Q)SARs/expert systems for the prediction of skin sensitisation potential, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 18 (2007), pp. 515–541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Teubner, A. Mehling, P.X. Schuster, K. Guth, A. Worth, J. Burton, B. van Ravenzwaay, and R. Landsiedel, Computer models versus reality: How well do in silico models currently predict the sensitization potential of a substance, Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 67 (2013), pp. 468–485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Patlewicz and J.M. Fitzpatrick, Current and future perspectives on the development, evaluation, and application of in silico approaches for predicting toxicity, Chem. Res. Toxicol. 29 (2016), pp. 438–451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F.G. Gerberick, C.A. Ryan, P.S. Kern, H. Schlatter, R.J. Dearman, I. Kimber, G.Y. Patlewicz, and D.A. Basketter, Compilation of historical local lymph node data for evaluation of skin sensitization alternative methods, Dermatitis 16 (2005), pp. 157–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Q. Chaudhry, N. Piclin, J. Cotterill, M. Pintore, N.R. Price, J.R. Chrétien, and A. Roncaglioni, Global QSAR models of skin sensitisers for regulatory purposes, Chem. Cent. J. 4 (2010), p. S5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.D. Barratt, D.A. Basketter, M. Chamberlain, M.P. Payne, G.D. Admans, and J.J. Langowski, Development of an expert system rulebase for identifying contact allergens, Toxicol. in Vitro 8 (1994), pp. 837–839.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.P. Payne and P.T. Walsh, Structure–activity relationships for skin sensitization potential: Development of structural alerts for use in knowledge-based toxicity prediction systems, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 34 (1994), pp. 154–161.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• K. Langton, G.Y. Patlewicz, A. Long, C.A. Marchant, and D.A. Basketter, Structure–activity relationships for skin sensitization: Recent improvements to Derek for Windows, Cont. Derm. 55 (2006), pp. 342–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Patlewicz, S.D. Dimitrov, L.K. Low, P.S. Kern, G.D. Dimitrova, M.I. Comber, A.O. Aptula, R.D. Phillips, J. Niemela, C. Madsen, E.B. Wedebye, D.W. Roberts, P.T. Bailey, and O.G. Mekenyan, TIMES-SS—A promising tool for the assessment of skin sensitization hazard. A characterization with respect to the OECD validation principles for (Q)SARs and an external evaluation for predictivity, Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 48 (2007), pp. 225–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.T.D. Cronin and D.A. Basketter, Multivariate Qsar analysis of a skin sensitization database, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 2 (1994), pp. 159–179.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• E. Schlede, W. Aberer, T. Fuchs, I. Gerner, H. Lessmann, T. Maurer, R. Rossbacher, G. Stropp, E. Wagner, and D. Kayser, Chemical substances and contact allergy—244 substances ranked according to allergenic potency, Toxicology 193 (2003), pp. 219–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Patlewicz, C. Kuseva, A. Mehmed, Y. Popova, G. Dimitrova, G. Ellis, R. Hunziker, P. Kern, L. Low, S. Ringeissen, D.W. Roberts, and O. Mekenyan, TIMES-SS – Recent refinements resulting from an industrial skin sensitisation consortium, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 25 (2014), pp. 367–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H.J. Klimisch, M. Andreae, and U. Tillmann, A systematic approach for evaluating the quality of experimental toxicological and ecotoxicological data, Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 25 (1997), pp. 1–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Dimitrov, G. Dimitrova, T. Pavlov, N. Dimitrova, G. Patlewicz, J. Niemela, and O. Mekenyan, A stepwise approach for defining the applicability domain of SAR and QSAR models, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 45 (2005), pp. 839–849.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICCVAM, The murine local lymph node assay: A test method for assessing the allergic contact dermatitis potential of chemicals/compounds, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Public Health Service, Department of Health and Human Services (1999) p. 13.
   Google Scholar
• H. Bundgaard, The possible implication of steroid-glyoxal degradation products in allergic reactions to corticosteroids, Arch. Pharm. Chemi, Sci. 8 (1980), pp. 83–90.
   Google Scholar
• D.W. Roberts, A.O. Aptula, and G. Patlewicz, Mechanistic applicability domains for non-animal based prediction of toxicological endpoints. QSAR analysis of the schiff base applicability domain for skin sensitization, Chem. Res. Toxicol. 19 (2006), pp. 1228–1233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.W. Roberts, A.O. Aptula, and G. Patlewicz, Electrophilic chemistry related to skin sensitization. reaction mechanistic applicability domain classification for a published data set of 106 chemicals tested in the mouse local lymph node assay, Chem. Res. Toxicol. 20 (2007), pp. 44–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.W. Roberts and A.O. Aptula, Electrophilic reactivity and skin sensitization potency of SNAr electrophiles, Chem. Res. Toxicol. 27 (2014), pp. 240–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.W. Roberts, A. Aptula, and A.M. Api, Structure–potency relationships for epoxides in allergic contact dermatitis, Chem. Res. Toxicol. 30 (2017), pp. 524–531.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G.R. Verheyen, E. Braeken, K. Van Deun, and S. Van Miert, Evaluation of in silico tools to predict the skin sensitization potential of chemicals, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 28 (2017), pp. 59–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar