A large comparison of integrated SAR/QSAR models of the Ames test for mutagenicity^$

References

• B.N. Ames, Charles S. Mott prize. The detection of environmental mutagens and potential carcinogens, Cancer 53 (1984), pp. 2034–2040.
   Google Scholar
• W. Piegorsch and E. Zeiger, Measuring intra-assay agreement for the Ames Salmonella assay, in Statistical Methods in Toxicology, Lecture Notes in Medical Informatics, L. Hothorn, ed., Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 1991, pp. 35–41.
   Google Scholar
• E. Benfenati, R.G. Diaza, A. Cassano, S. Pardoe, G. Gini, C. Mays, R. Knauf, and L. Benighaus, The acceptance of in silico models for REACH: Requirements, barriers, and perspectives, Chem. Cent. J. 5 (2011), pp. 58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Benigni and C. Bossa, Structure alerts for carcinogenicity, and the Salmonella assay system: A novel insight through the chemical relational databases technology. Mutat. Res. 659 (2008), pp. 248–261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Ferrari, D. Cattaneo, G. Gini, N. Golbamaki Bakhtyari, A. Manganaro, and E. Benfenati, Automatic knowledge extraction from chemical structures: The case of mutagenicity prediction, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 24 (2013), pp. 365–383.
   Google Scholar
• T. Martin, User’s Guide for T.E.S.T. (Toxicity Estimation Software Tool), U.S. EPA/National Risk Management Research Laboratory/Sustainable Technology Division, Cincinnati, OH (2016). Available at https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-05/documents/600r16058.pdf
   Google Scholar
• E. Benfenati, A. Manganaro, and G. Gini, VEGA-QSAR: AI Inside a platform for predictive toxicology, in PAI@ AI* IA. (2013), pp. 21–28. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1107/
   Google Scholar
• A. Cassano, G. Raitano, E. Mombelli, A. Fernández, J. Cester, A. Roncaglioni, and E. Benfenati, Evaluation of QSAR models for the prediction of Ames genotoxicity: A retrospective exercise on the chemical substances registered under the EU REACH regulation, J. Environ. Sci. Health Part C 32 (2014), pp. 273–298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Benigni, The Benigni/Bossa rulebase for mutagenicity and carcinogenicity–a module of Toxtree, JRC Sci. Tech. Rep. (2008), pp. 1–78.
   Google Scholar
• K. Hansen, S. Mika, T. Schroeter, A. Sutter, A. ter Laak, T. Steger-Hartmann, N. Heinrich, and K.R. Müller, Benchmark data set for in silico prediction of Ames mutagenicity, J. Chem. Inf. Model 49 (2009), pp. 2077–2081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.P. Toropova, A.A. Toropov, A. Lombardo, A. Roncaglioni, E. Benfenati, and G. Gini, A new bioconcentration factor model based on SMILES and indices of presence of atoms, Eur. J. Med. Chem. 45 (2010), pp. 4399–4402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.A. Toropov, A.P. Toropova, S.E. Martyanov, E. Benfenati, G. Gini, D. Leszczynska, and J. Leszczynski, Comparison of SMILES and molecular graphs as the representation of the molecular structure for QSAR analysis for mutagenic potential of polyaromatic amines, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 109 (2011), pp. 94–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Ferrari and G. Gini, An open source multistep model to predict mutagenicity from statistical analysis and relevant structural alerts, Chem. Cent. J. 4 Suppl. 1, S2 (2010), pp. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• A. Manganaro, F. Pizzo, A. Lombardo, A. Pogliaghi, and E. Benfenati, Predicting persistence in the sediment compartment with a new automatic software based on the k-Nearest Neighbor (k-NN) algorithm, Chemosphere 144 (2016), pp. 1624–1630.
   Google Scholar
• P. Mazzatorta, L.A. Tran, B. Schilter, and M. Grigorov, Integration of structure-activity relationship and artificial intelligence systems to improve in silico prediction of Ames test mutagenicity, J. Chem. Inf. Model 47 (2007), pp. 34–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Carlsson, M. Eklund, and U. Norinder, Aggregated conformal prediction, in IFIP International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Applications and Innovations, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg (2014), pp. 231–240.
   Google Scholar
• U. Norinder, L. Carlsson, S. Boyer, and M. Eklund, Introducing conformal prediction in predictive modeling. A transparent and flexible alternative to applicability domain determination, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 54 (2014), pp. 1596–1603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U. Norinder and S. Boyer, Binary classification of imbalanced datasets using conformal prediction, J. Mol. Graph. Model. 72 (2017), pp. 256–265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Kittler, M. Hatef, R.P. Duin, and J. Matas, On combining classifiers, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 20 (1998), pp. 226–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.A. Jacobs, M.I. Jordan, S.J. Nowlan, and G.E. Hinton, Adaptive mixtures of local experts, Neural Comput. 3 (1991), pp. 79–87.
   Google Scholar
• E. Bauer and R. Kohavi, An empirical comparison of voting classification algorithms: Bagging, boosting, and variants, Mach. Learn. 36 (1991), pp. 105–139.
   Google Scholar
• G.N. Cerruela García, N. García-Pedrajas, I. Luque Ruiz, and M.A. Gómez-Nieto, An ensemble approach for in silico prediction of Ames mutagenicity, J. Math. Chem. (2018), pp. 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• E. Benfenati, P. Mazzatorta, D. Neagu, and G. Gini, Combining classifiers of pesticides toxicity through a neuro-fuzzy approach, in International Workshop on Multiple Classifier Systems, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg (2002), pp. 293–303.
   Google Scholar
• H. Jeffreys, Scientific Inference (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1973, pp. 31.
   Google Scholar
• G. Shafer, A mathematical Theory of Evidence, Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• L.A. Zadeh, A simple view of the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence and its implication for the rule of combination, AI Mag. 7 (1986), pp. 85.
   Google Scholar
• J. Kazius, R. McGuire, and R. Bursi, Derivation and validation of toxicophores for mutagenicity prediction, J. Med. Chem. 48 (2005), pp. 312–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Helma, T. Cramer, S. Kramer, and L. De Raedt, Data mining and machine learning techniques for the identification of mutagenicity inducing substructures and structure activity relationships of noncongeneric compounds, J. chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 44 (2004), pp. 1402–1411.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• S.J. Farlow, Self-Organizing Methods in Modeling: GMDH Type Algorithms, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• A.G. Ivakhnenko, The group method of data of handling; A rival of the method of stochastic approximation, Sov. Autom. Control 13 (1968), pp. 43–55.
   Google Scholar
• A.G. Ivakhnenko, Heuristic self-organization in problems of engineering cybernetics, Automatica 6 (1970), pp. 207–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.G. Ivakhnenko, Polynomial theory of complex systems, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. (1971), pp. 364–378.
   Google Scholar
• H.R. Madala and A.G. Ivakhnenko, Inductive Learning Algorithms for Complex Systems Modelling, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• J.A. Mueller and F. Lemke, Self-Organizing Data Mining. Extracting Knowledge From Data, Libri BoD Hamburg, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• J. Schmidhuber, Deep learning in neural networks: An overview, Neural Net. 61 (2015), pp: 85–117.
   Google Scholar
• V.S. Stepashko, Potential noise immunity of modelling using a combinatorial GMDH algorithm without information regarding the noise, Sov. Autom. Control, 16 (1983), pp. 15–25.
   Google Scholar
• J. Pearl, Reasoning with belief functions: An analysis of compatibility, Int. J. Approx. Reason. 4 (1990), pp. 363–389.
   Google Scholar
• J. Gordon and E.H. Shortliffe, A method for managing evidential reasoning in a hierarchical hypothesis space, Artif. Intell. 26 (1985), pp. 323–357.
   Google Scholar
• J.F. Rathman, C. Yang, and H. Zhou, Dempster-Shafer theory for combining in silico evidence and estimating uncertainty in chemical risk assessment, Comput. Toxicol. 6 (2018), pp. 16–31.
   Google Scholar
• C. Drummond and R.C. Holte, What ROC curves can’t do (and Cost Curves Can), ROCAI (2004), pp. 19–26.
   Google Scholar
• G.-E. Yap, A.-H. Tan, and H.-H. Pang, Discovering causal dependencies in mobile context-aware recommenders, in Mobile Data Management, MDM 2006, 7th International Conference On. IEEE Piscataway, NJ (2006), pp. 1630540-1–1630540-4.
   Google Scholar
• P. Yang, Y. Hwa Yang, B. B Zhou, and A. Y Zomaya, A review of ensemble methods in bioinformatics, Curr. Bioinforma. 5 (2010), pp. 296–308.
   Google Scholar
• G.B. Goh, C. Siegel, and A. Vishnu, An interpretable general-purpose deep neural network for predicting chemical properties, Stat. 1050 (2018), pp. 18.
   Google Scholar