2D and 3D structure–activity modelling of mosquito repellents: a review^$

References

• D. Fontenille, C. Lagneau, S. Lecollinet, R. Lefait-Robin, M. Setbon, B. Tirel, and A. Yébakima, La lutte Antivectorielle en France, IRD Edition, Marseille, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• D. Charlwood, Did Herodotus describe the first airborne use of mosquito repellents?, Trends Parasitol. 19 (2003), pp. 555–556.
   Google Scholar
• X. Valderrama, J.G. Robinson, A.B. Attygale, and T. Eisner, Seasonal anointment with millipedes in a wild primate: A chemical defense against insects?, J. Chem. Ecol. 26 (2000), pp. 2781– 2790.
   Google Scholar
• P.J. Weldon, J.R. Aldrich, J.A. Klun, J.E. Oliver, and M. Debboun, Benzoquinones from millipedes deter mosquitoes and elicit self-anointing in capuchin monkeys (Cebus spp.), Naturwissenschaften 90 (2003), pp. 301–304.
   Google Scholar
• Anonymous, Mosquito repellent market by source (synthetic chemical derived market and plant derived chemical) by product (coil, spray, cream & oil, vaporizer mat and others), and by distribution channel (large retail stores, small retail stores, specialty stores and online distribution channel): Global industry perspective, comprehensive analysis and forecast, 2016–2022, Zion Market Research, Report 890, 2017, p. 110.
   Google Scholar
• Anonymous, N,N-diethyl-meta-toluamide (DEET). Risk characterization document, California EPA, Department of Pesticide Regulation, RCD 00-01, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• V. Chen-Hussey, R. Behrens, and J.G. Logan, Assessment of methods used to determine the safety of the topical insect repellent N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide (DEET), Parasites Vectors 7 (2014), p. 173.
   Google Scholar
• R.E. Coleman, L.L. Robert, L.W. Roberts, J.A. Glass, D.C. Seeley, A. Laughinghouse, P.V. Perkins, and R.A. Wirtz, Laboratory evaluation of repellents against four anopheline mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) and two phlebotomine sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae), J. Med. Entomol. 30 (1993), pp. 499–502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N.M. Stanczyk, J.F.Y. Brookfield, L.M. Field, and J.G. Logan, Aedes aegypti mosquitoes exhibit decreased repellency by DEET following previous exposure, PLoS ONE 8 (2013), p. e54438.
   Google Scholar
• L. Goodyer and R.H. Behrens, Short report: The safety and toxicity of insect repellents, Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 59 (1998), pp. 323–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Koren, D. Matsui, and B. Bailey, DEET-based insect repellents: Safety implications for children and pregnant and lactating women, Can. Med. Assoc. J. 169 (2003), pp. 209–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Goislard, Les répulsifs anti-moustiques à l’officine, Thèse Pharmacie, UFR Sciences Pharmaceutiques et Ingéniérie de la Santé, Université d’Angers, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• W. Karcher and J. Devillers, Practical Applications of Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationships (QSAR) in Environmental Chemistry and Toxicology, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• J. Devillers, Endocrine Disruption Modeling, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• J. Devillers, Juvenile Hormones and Juvenoids: Modeling Biological Effects and Environmental Fate, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• C.M. Chang, Y.H. Ou, T.C. Liu, S.Y. Lu, and M.K. Wang, A quantitative structure–activity relationship approach for assessing toxicity of mixture of organic compounds, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 27 (2016), pp. 441–453.
   Google Scholar
• J.P. Doucet, E. Papa, A. Doucet-Panaye, and J. Devillers, QSAR models for predicting the toxicity of piperidine derivatives against Aedes aegypti, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 28 (2017), pp. 451–470.
   Google Scholar
• S. Bhargava, N. Adhikari, S.A. Amin, K. Das, S. Gayen, and T. Jha, Hydroxyethylamine derivatives as HIV-1 protease inhibitors: A predictive QSAR modelling study based on Monte Carlo optimization, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 28 (2017), pp. 991–1009.
   Google Scholar
• L.A.O. Roadhouse, Laboratory studies on insect repellency, Can. J. Zool. 31 (1953), pp. 535–546.
   Google Scholar
• E.T. McCabe, W.F. Barthel, S.I. Gertler, and S.A. Hall, Insect repellents. III. N,N-diethylamides, J. Org. Chem.19 (1954), pp. 493–498.
   Google Scholar
• H.K. Gouck, S.A. Hall, C.N. Smith, and I.H. Gilbert, Repellency of homologous series of cyclohexane aliphatic acids and amides, J. Econ. Entomol. 50 (1957), pp. 175–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B.H. Alexander and M. Beroza, Aliphatic amides of cyclic amines and tolyl maleimides as mosquito repellents, J. Econ. Entomol. 56 (1963), pp. 58–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W.F. Barthel, J. Leon, and S.A. Hall, Insect repellents. I. Esters of mandelic and substituted mandelic acids, J. Org. Chem. 19 (1954), pp. 485–489.
   Google Scholar
• J. Leon, W.F. Barthel, and S.A. Hall, Insect repellents. II. Esters of 1- hydroxycyclohexanecarboxylic acid, J. Org. Chem. 19 (1954), pp. 490–492.
   Google Scholar
• C.W.O. Bunker and A.D. Hirschfelder, Mosquito repellents, Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 5 (1925), pp. 359–383.
   Google Scholar
• H.L. Johnson, W.A. Skinner, H.I. Maibach, and T.R. Pearson, Repellent activity and physical properties of ring-substituted N,N-diethylbenzamides, J. Econ. Entomol. 60 (1967), pp. 173–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H.L. Johnson, W.A. Skinner, D. Skidmore, and I. Maibach, Topical mosquito repellents. II. Repellent potency and duration in ring-substituted N,N-dialkyl- and –aminoalkylbenzamides, J. Med. Chem. 11 (1968), pp 1265–1268.
   Google Scholar
• P. Tsakotellis, H.L. Johnson, W.A. Skinner, D. Skidmore, and H.I. Maibach, Topical mosquito repellents III: Carboxamide acetals and ketals and related carbonyl addition derivatives, J. Pharm. Sci. 60 (1971), pp. 84–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Gualtieri, H. Johnson, H. Maibach, D. Skidmore, and W. Skinner, Topical mosquito repellents IV: Alicyclic, bicyclic, and unsaturated acetals, aminoacetals, and carboxamide acetals, J. Pharm. Sci. 61 (1972), pp. 577–580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Gualtieri, H. Johnson, H. Tong, H. Maibach, D. Skidmore, W. Skinner, Topical mosquito repellents V: Benzyl ethers, J. Pharm. Sci. 62 (1973), pp. 487–489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Gualtieri, P. Tsakotellis, W. Skinner, H. Johnson, D. Skidmore, and H.I. Maibach, Topical mosquito repellents VI: Sulfanamides and quinolone-4-carboxylic acid derivatives, J. Pharm. Sci. 62 (1973), pp. 849–851.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Johnson, J. DeGraw, J. Engstrom, W.A. Skinner, V.H. Brown, D. Skidmore, and H.I. Maibach, Topical mosquito repellents VII: Alkyl triethylene glycol monoethers, J. Pharm. Sci. 64 (1975), pp. 693–695.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H.C. Tong, D. Skidmore, H.I. Maibach, and W.A. Skinner, Topical mosquito repellents VIII: Substituted 2-thio-4-thiazolidineones and 2,4-thiazolidinediones, Mosq. News 35 (1975), pp. 76–82.
   Google Scholar
• W.A. Skinner, H.T. Crawford, L.C. Rutledge, and M.A. Moussa, Topical mosquito repellents XI: Carbamates derived from N,N’-disubstituted diamines, J. Pharm. Sci. 68 (1979), pp. 390–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W.A. Skinner, H.T. Crawford, L.C. Rutledge, and M.A. Moussa, Topical mosquito repellents XII: N-substituted ureas and cyclic ureas, J. Pharm. Sci. 68 (1979), pp. 391–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W.A. Skinner, H.T. Crawford, H. Tong, D. Skidmore, and H.I. Maibach, Topical mosquito repellents IX: Quinolines, isoquinolines, and quinoxalines, J. Pharm. Sci. 65 (1976), pp. 1404–1407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W.A. Skinner, H.T. Crawford, D. Skidmore, and H.I. Maibach, Topical mosquito repellents X: 2-oxazolidones, J. Pharm. Sci. 66 (1977), pp. 587–589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H.B. Rayner and R.H. Wright, Far infrared spectra of mosquito repellents, Can. Entomol. 98 (1966), pp. 76–80.
   Google Scholar
• L.R. Garson and M.E. Winnike, Relationships between insect repellency and chemical and physical parameters. A review, J. Med. Ent. 5 (1968), pp. 339–352.
   Google Scholar
• L.C. Rutledge, Some corrections to the record on insect repellents and attractants, J. Am. Mosq. Cont. Assoc. 4 (1988), pp. 414–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.V.S. Suryanarayana, K.S. Pandey, S. Prakash, C.D. Raghuveeran, R.S. Dangi, R.V. Swamy, and K.M. Rao, Structure activity relationship studies with mosquito repellent amides, J. Pharm. Sci. 80 (1991), pp. 1055–1057.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.C. Dearden, M.T.D. Cronin, and K.L.E. Kaiser, How not to develop a quantitative structure–activity or structure–property relationship (QSAR/QSPR), SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 20 (2009), pp. 241–266.
   Google Scholar
• A.R. Katritzky, D.A. Dobchev, I. Tulp, M. Karelson, and D.A. Carlson, QSAR study of mosquito repellents using CODESSA Pro, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 16 (2006), pp. 2306–2311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.R. Katritzky, CODESSA PRO User’s Manual, University of Florida, Gainesville, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• R. Natarajan, S.C. Basak, D. Mills, J.J. Kraker, and D.M. Hawkins, Quantitative structure–activity relationship modeling of mosquito repellents using calculated descriptors, Croat. Chem. Acta 81 (2008), pp. 333–340.
   Google Scholar
• A.R. Katritzky, Z. Wang, S. Slavov, D. Dobchev, C.D. Hall, M. Tsikolia, U.R. Bernier, N.M. Elejalde, G.G. Clark, and K.J. Linthicum, Novel carboxamides as potential mosquito repellents, J. Med. Ent. 47 (2010), pp. 924–938.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Devillers, Neural Networks in QSAR and Drug Design, Academic Press, London, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• J. Devillers, D. Domine, C. Guillon, and W. Karcher, Simulating lipophilicity of organic molecules with a back-propagation neural network, J. Pharm. Sci. 87 (1998), pp. 1086–1090.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Devillers, Prediction of toxicity of organophosphorus insecticides against the midge, Chironomus riparius, via a QSAR neural network model integrating environmental variables, Toxicol. Methods 10 (2000), pp. 69–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Devillers, M.H. Pham-Delègue, A. Decourtye, H. Budzinski, S. Cluzeau, and G. Maurin, Modeling the acute toxicity of pesticides to Apis mellifera, Bull. Insect. 56 (2003), pp. 103–109.
   Google Scholar
• J. Devillers, Linear versus nonlinear QSAR modeling of the toxicity of phenol derivatives to Tetrahymena pyriformis, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 15 (2004), pp. 237–249.
   Google Scholar
• J. Devillers, A. Doucet-Panaye, and J.P. Doucet, Structure–activity relationship (SAR) modelling of mosquito larvicides, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 26 (2015), pp. 263–278.
   Google Scholar
• S. Bitam, M. Hamadache, and S. Hanini, QSAR model for prediction of the therapeutic potency of N-benzylpiperidine derivatives as AChE inhibitors, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 28 (2017), pp. 471–489.
   Google Scholar
• P. Wang, X. Xu, S. Liao, J. Song, G. Fan, S. Chen, and Z. Wang, Quantitative structure–activity relationship study of amide mosquito repellents, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 28 (2017), pp. 341–353.
   Google Scholar
• A.R. Katritzky, Z. Wang, S. Slavov, M. Tsikolia, D. Dobchev, N.G. Akhmedov, C.D. Hall, U.R. Bernier, G.G. Clark, and K.J. Linthicum, Synthesis and bioassay of improved mosquito repellents predicted from chemical structure, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105 (2008), pp. 7359–7364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Sukumar, M.J. Perich, and L.R. Boobar, Botanical derivatives in mosquito control: A review, J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 7 (1991), pp. 210–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.F. Maia and S.J. Moore, Plant-based insect repellents: A review of their efficacy, development and testing, Malaria J. 10 (2011), pp. 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• J.U. Rehman, A. Ali, and I.A. Khan, Plant based products: Use and development as repellents against mosquitoes: A review, Fitoterapia 95 (2014), pp. 65–74.
   Google Scholar
• R. Tisgratog, U. Sanguanpong, J.P. Grieco, R. Ngoen-Kluan, and T. Chareonviriyaphap, Plants traditionally used as mosquito repellents and the implication for their use in vector control, Acta Trop. 157 (2016), pp. 136–144.
   Google Scholar
• R. Pavela and G. Benelli, Ethnobotanical knowledge on botanical repellents employed in the African region against mosquito vectors – A review, Experim. Parasitol. 167 (2016), pp. 103–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Trongtokit, Y. Rongsriyam, N. Komalamisra, and C. Apiwathnasorn, Comparative repellency of 38 essential oils against mosquito bites, Phytother. Res. 19 (2005), pp. 303–309.
   Google Scholar
• B.S. Park, W.S. Choi, J.H. Kim, K.H. Kim, and S.E. Lee, Monoterpenes from thyme (Thymus vulgaris) potential mosquito repellents, J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 21 (2005), pp. 80–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L.S. Nerio, J. Olivero-Verbel, and E. Stashenko, Repellent activity of essential oils: A review, Bioresource Technol. 101 (2010), pp. 372–378.
   Google Scholar
• Z. Wang, J. Song, J. Chen, Z. Song, S. Shang, Z. Jiang, and Z. Han, QSAR study of mosquito repellents from terpenoid with a six-member ring, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Let. 18 (2008), pp. 2854–2859.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Song, Z. Wang, A. Findlater, Z. Han, Z. Jiang, J. Chen, W. Zheng, and S. Hyde, Terpenoid mosquito repellents: A combined DFT and QSAR study, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Let. 23 (2013), pp. 1245–1248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. García-Domenech, J. Aguliera, A. El Moncef, S. Pocovi, and J. Gálvez, Application of molecular topology to the prediction of mosquito repellents of a group of terpenoid compounds, Mol. Divers. 14 (2010), pp. 321–329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Devillers and A.T. Balaban, Topological Indices and Related Descriptors in QSAR and QSPR, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, The Netherlands, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• G. Paluch, J. Grodnitzky, L. Bartholomay, and J. Coats, Quantitative structure–activity relationship of botanical sesquiterpenes: Spatial and contact repellency to the yellow fever mosquito Aedes aegypti, J. Agric. Food Chem. 57 (2009), pp. 7618–7625.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. García-Domenech, P. García-Mujica, Ú. Gil, C. Casanova, J. Mireilli Beltrán, and J. Gálvez, Búsqueda de modelos QSAR para la actividad repelente de sesquiterpenos naturales frente al mosquito de la Fiebre Amarilla, Aedes aegypti, AFINIDAD 67 (2010), pp. 187–192.
   Google Scholar
• A.K. Bhattacharjee, Pharmacophore modeling applied to mosquito-borne diseases, in Computational Design of Chemicals for the Control of Mosquitoes and Their Diseases, J. Devillers, ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2018, pp. 139–170.
   Google Scholar
• F. Caporuscio and A. Tafi, Pharmacophore modelling: A forty year old approach and its modern synergies, Curr. Med. Chem. 18 (2011), pp. 2543–2553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.A. Azam and J. Thathan, Pharmacophore generation, atom-based 3D-QSAR and molecular dynamics simulation analyses of pyridine-3-carboxamide-6-yl-urea analogues as potential gyrase B inhibitors, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 28 (2017), pp. 275–296.
   Google Scholar
• P.K. Singh and O. Silakari, Molecular dynamics and pharmacophore modelling studies of different subtype (ALK and EGFR (T790M)) inhibitors in NSCLC, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 28 (2017), pp. 221–223.
   Google Scholar
• M. Muchtaridi, H.N. Syahidah, A. Subarnas, M. Yusuf, S.D. Bryant, and T. Langer, Molecular docking and 3D-pharmacophore modeling to study the interactions of chalcone derivatives with estrogen receptor alpha, Pharmaceuticals 10 (2017), p. 81.
   Google Scholar
• R.B. Aher and K. Roy, Exploring the structural requirements in multiple chemical scaffolds for the selective inhibition of Plasmodium falciparum calcium-dependent protein kinase-1 (PfCDPK-1) by 3D-pharmacophore modelling, and docking studies, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 28 (2017), pp. 390–414.
   Google Scholar
• K. Sangeetha, R.P. Sasikala, and K.S. Meena, Pharmacophore modeling, virtual screening and molecular docking of ATPase inhibitors of HSP70, Comput. Biol. Chem. 70 (2017), pp. 164–174.
   Google Scholar
• S.E. Radhakrishnan, M.F.A. Rosli, A.M. Romli, T.N. Nyawai, and M.R. Asaruddin, Antioxidant properties of 5 herbal plants based of pharmacophore modelling, J. Innov. Appl. Pharm. Sci. 1 (2016), pp. 26–33.
   Google Scholar
• S.S. Bhayye, K. Roy, and A. Saha, Pharmacophore generation, atom-based 3D-QSAR, HQSAR and activity cliff analyses of benzothiazine and deazaxanthine derivatives as dual A2A antagonists/MAO‑B inhibitors, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 27 (2016), pp. 183–202.
   Google Scholar
• T. Kaserer, K.R. Beck, M.Akram, A. Odermatt, and D. Schuster, Pharmacophore models and pharmacophore-based virtual screening: Concepts and applications exemplified on hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases, Molecules 20 (2015), pp. 22799–22832.
   Google Scholar
• A.K. Saxena, J. Devillers, A.R.R. Pery, R. Beaudouin, V.M. Balaramnavar, and S. Ahmed, Modelling the binding affinity of steroids to zebrafish sex hormone-binding globulin, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 25 (2014), pp. 407–421.
   Google Scholar
• D. Ma, A.K. Bhattacharjee, R.K. Gupta, and J.M. Karle, Predicting mosquito repellent potency of N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide (DEET) analogs from molecular electronic properties, Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 60 (1999), pp. 1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.K. Bhattacharjee, R.K. Gupta, D. Ma, and J.M. Karle, Molecular similarity analysis between insect juvenile hormone and N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide (DEET) analogs may aid design of novel insect repellents, J. Mol. Recognit. 13 (2000), pp. 213–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.K. Bhattacharjee and R.K. Gupta, Analysis of molecular stereoelectronic similarity between N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide (DEET) analogs and insect juvenile hormone to develop a model pharmacophore for insect repellent activity, J. Am. Mosq. Contr. Assoc. 21 (2005), pp. 23–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.K. Bhattacharjee, In silico stereoelectronic profile and pharmacophore similarity analysis of juvenile hormone, juvenile hormone mimics (IGRs) and insect repellents may aid discovery and design of novel arthropod repellents, in Juvenile Hormones and Juvenoids. Modeling Biological Effects and Environmental Fate, J. Devillers, ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2013, pp. 297–331.
   Google Scholar
• A.K. Bhattacharjee, W. Dheranetra, D.A. Nichols, and R.K. Gupta, 3D pharmacophore model for insect repellent activity and discovery of new repellent candidates, QSAR Comb. Sci. 24 (2005), pp. 593–602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.B. Bhonsle, A.K. Bhattacharjee, and R.K. Gupta, Novel semi-automated methodology for developing highly predictive QSAR models: Application for development of QSAR models for insect repellent amides, J. Mol. Model. 13 (2007), pp. 179–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Bhattacharjee, In silico stereo-electronic analysis of PMD (p-menthane-3-8-diol) and its derivatives for pharmacophore development may aid discovery of novel insect repellents, Curr. Comput. Aided Drug Des. 9 (2013), pp. 308–316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.A. Klun, W.F. Schmidt, and M. Debboun, Stereochemical effects in an insect repellent, J. Med. Entomol. 38 (2001), pp. 809–812.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.A. Klun, A. Khrimian, A. Margaryan, M. Kramer, and M. Debboun, Synthesis and repellent efficacy of a new chiral piperidine analog: Comparison with Deet and Bayrepel activity in human-volunteer laboratory assays against Aedes aegypti and Anopheles stephensi, J. Med. Entomol. 40 (2003), pp. 293–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Natarajan, S.C. Basak, A.T. Balaban, J.A. Klun, and W.F. Schmidt, Chirality index, molecular overlay and biological activity of diastereoisomeric mosquito repellents, Pest. Manag. Sci. 61 (2005), pp. 1193–1201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Natarajan, S.C. Basak, and T.S. Neumann, Novel approach for the numerical characterization of molecular chirality, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 47 (2007), pp. 771–775.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.C. Basak, R. Natarajan, W. Nowak, P. Miszta, and J.A. Klun, Three dimensional structure–activity relationships (3D-QSAR) for insect repellency of diastereoisomeric compounds: A hierarchical molecular overlay approach, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 18 (2007), pp. 237–250.
   Google Scholar
• J. Fan, F. Francis, Y. Liu, J.L. Chen, and D.F. Cheng, An overview of odorant-binding protein functions in insect peripheral olfactory reception, Genet. Mol. Res. 10 (2011), pp. 3056–3069.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W.S. Leal, Odorant receptors in insects: Roles of receptors, binding proteins, and degrading enzymes, Ann. Rev. Entomol. 58 (2013), pp. 373–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N.F. Brito, M.F. Moreira, and A.C.A. Melo, A look inside odorant-binding proteins in insect chemoreception, J. Insect Physiol. 95 (2016), pp. 51–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Montell and L.J. Zwiebel, Mosquito sensory systems in Advances in Insect Physiology, A.S. Raikhel, ed., Academic Press, London, 2016, pp. 293–326.
   Google Scholar
• M. Manoharan, M. Ng Fuk Chong, A. Vaitinadapoule, E. Frumence, R. Sowdhamini, and B. Offmann, Comparative genomics of odorant binding proteins in Anopheles gambiae, Aedes aegypti, and Culex quinquefasciatus, Genome Biol. Evol. 5 (2013), pp. 163–180.
   Google Scholar
• F. Lombardo, M. Salvemini, C. Fiorillo, T. Nolan, L.J. Zwiebel, J.M. Ribeiro, and B. Arcà, Deciphering the olfactory repertoire of the tiger mosquito Aedes albopictus, BMC Genom. 18 (2017), p. 770.
   Google Scholar
• H. Biessmann, Q.K. Nguyen, D. Le, and M.F. Walter, Microarray-based survey of a subset of putative olfactory genes in the mosquito Anopheles gambiae, Insect Mol. Biol. 14 (2005), pp. 575–589.
   Google Scholar
• M.S. Sengul and Z. Tu, Identification and characterization of odorant-binding protein 1 gene from the Asian malaria mosquito, Anopheles stephensi, Insect Mol. Biol. 19 (2010), pp. 1365–2583.
   Google Scholar
• K.E. Tsitsanou, T. Thireou, C.E. Drakou, K. Koussis, M.V. Keramioti, D.D. Leonidas, E. Eliopoulos, K. Iatrou, and S.E. Zographos, Anopheles gambiae odorant binding protein crystal complex with the synthetic repellent DEET: Implication for structure-based design of novel mosquito repellents, Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 69 (2012), pp. 283–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.E. Zographos, E. Eliopoulos, T. Thireou, and K.E. Tsitsanou, OBP structure-aided repellent discovery: An emerging tool for prevention of mosquito-borne diseases, in Computational Design of Chemicals for the Control of Mosquitoes and Their Diseases, J. Devillers, ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2018, pp. 65–105.
   Google Scholar
• E.J. Murphy, J.C. Booth, F. Davrazou, A.M. Port, and D.N. Jones, Interactions of Anopheles gambiae odorant-binding proteins with a human-derived repellent: Implications for the mode of action of n,n-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide (DEET), J. Biol. Chem. 288 (2013), pp. 4475–4485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.S. Affonso, A.P. Guimarães, A.A. Oliveira, G.B.C. Slana, and T.C.C. França, Applications of molecular modeling in the design of new insect repellents targeting the odorant binding protein of Anopheles gambiae, J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 24 (2013), pp. 473–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.E. Drakou, K.E. Tsitsanou, C. Potamitis, D. Fessas, M. Zervou, and S.E. Zographos, The crystal structure of the AgamOBP1•Icaridin complex reveals alternative binding modes and stereo-selective repellent recognition, Cell Mol. Life Sci. 74 (2017), pp. 319–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Thireou, G. Kythreoti, K.E. Tsitsanou, K. Koussis, C.E. Drakou, J. Kinnersley, T. Kröber, P.M. Guerin, J.J. Zhou, K. Iatrou, E. Eliopoulos, and S.E. Zographos, Identification of novel bioinspired synthetic mosquito repellents by combined ligand-based screening and OBP-structure-based molecular docking, Insect Biochem. Molec. Biol. 98 (2018), pp. 48–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G.M. Morris, R. Huey, W. Lindstrom, M.F. Sanner, R.K. Belew, D.S. Goodsell, and A.J. Olson, AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility, J. Comput. Chem. 30 (2009), pp. 2785–2791.
   Google Scholar
• P.V. Oliferenko, A.A. Oliferenko, G.I. Poda, D.I. Osolodkin, G.G. Pillai, U.R. Bernier, M. Tsikolia, N.M. Agramonte, G.G. Clark, K.L. Linthicum, and A.R. Katritzky, Promising Aedes aegypti repellent chemotypes identified through integrated QSAR, virtual screening, synthesis, and bioassay, PLoS ONE 8 (2013), p. e64547.
   Google Scholar
• P.V. Oliferenko, A.A. Oliferenko, G. Poda, G.G. Pillai, U.R. Bernier, N.M. Agramonte, and K.J. Linthicum, Insect olfactory system as target for computer-aided design of mosquito repellents, in Computational Design of Chemicals for the Control of Mosquitoes and their Diseases, J. Devillers, ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2018, pp. 39–63.
   Google Scholar
• V.A. Palyulin, E.V. Radchenko, and N.S. Zefirov, Molecular field topology analysis method in QSAR studies of organic compounds, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 40 (2000), pp. 659–667.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• B.X. Shi, F.R. Chen, and X. Sun, Structure-based modelling, scoring, screening, and in vitro kinase assay of anesthetic pkc inhibitors against a natural medicine library, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 28 (2017), pp. 151–163.
   Google Scholar
• A.K. Saxena, J. Devillers, S.S. Bhunia, and E. Bro, Modelling inhibition of avian aromatase by azole pesticides, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 26 (2015), pp. 757–782.
   Google Scholar
• J.P. Doucet and A. Panaye, Three Dimensional QSAR: Applications in Pharmacology and Toxicology, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• P. Miszta, S.C. Basak, R. Natarajan, and W. Nowak, How computational studies of mosquito repellents contribute to the control of vector-borne diseases, Curr. Comput.-Aided Drug Design 9 (2013), pp. 300–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Paluch, L. Bartholomay, and J. Coats, Mosquito repellents: A review of chemical structure diversity and olfaction, Pest. Manag. Sci. 66 (2010), pp. 925–935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G.M. Attardo, I.A. Hansen, and A.S. Raikhel, Nutritional regulation of vitellogenesis in mosquitoes: Implications for anautogeny, Insect Biochem. Molec. Biol. 35 (2005), pp. 661–675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.F. Bowen, The sensory physiology of host-seeking behavior in mosquitoes, Annu. Rev. Entomol. 36 (1991), pp. 139–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.G. Logan, M.A. Birkett, S.J. Clark, S. Powers, N.J. Seal, L.J. Wadhams, A.J. Mordue (Luntz), and J.A. Pickett, Identification of human-derived volatile chemicals that interfere with attraction of Aedes aegypti mosquitoes, J. Chem. Ecol. 34 (2008), pp. 308–322.
   Google Scholar
• U.R. Bernier, D.L. Kline, D.R. Barnard, C.E. Schreck, and R.A. Yost, Analysis of human skin emanations by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. 2. Identification of volatile compounds that are candidate attractants for the yellow fever mosquito (Aedes aegypti), Anal. Chem. 72 (2000), pp. 747–756.
   Google Scholar
• B. de Lacy Costello, A. Amann, H. Al-Kateb, C. Flynn, W. Filipiak, T. Khalid, D. Osborne, and N.M. Ratcliffe, A review of the volatiles from the healthy human body, J. Breath Res. 8 (2014), p. 014001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.B.F. Vogels, J.J. Fros, G.P. Pijlman, J.J.A. van Loon, G. Gort, and C.J.M. Koenraadt, Virus interferes with host-seeking behaviour of mosquito, J. Exp. Biol. 220 (2017), pp. 3598–3603.
   Google Scholar
• A. Robinson, A.O. Busula, M.A. Voets, K.B. Beshir, J.C. Caulfield, S.J. Powers, N.O. Verhulst, P. Winskill, J. Muwanguzi, M.A. Birkett, R.C. Smallegange, D.K. Masiga, W.R. Mukabana, R.W. Sauerwein, C.J. Sutherland, T. Bousema, J.A. Pickett, W. Takken, J.G. Logan, and J.G. de Boer, Plasmodium-associated changes in human odor attract mosquitoes, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115 (2018), pp. E4209–E4218.
   Google Scholar
• J. Lee, D.B. Choi, F. Liu, J.P. Grieco, and N.L. Achee, Effect of the topical repellent para-menthane-3,8-diol on blood feeding behavior and fecundity of the dengue virus vector Aedes aegypti, Insects 9 (2018), p. 60.
   Google Scholar
• A. Afify, B. Horlacher, J. Roller, and C.G. Galizia, Different repellents for Aedes aegypti against blood-feeding and oviposition, PLoS ONE 9 (2014), p. e103765.
   Google Scholar
• Y.S. Hwang, W.L. Kramer, and M.S. Mulla, Oviposition attractants and repellents of mosquitoes, J. Chem. Ecol. 6 (1980), pp 71–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y.S. Hwang, G.W. Schultz, H. Axelrod, W.L. Kramer, and M.S. Mulla, Ovipositional repellency of fatty acids and their derivatives against Culex and Aedes mosquitoes, Environ. Entomol. 11 (1982), pp. 223–226.
   Google Scholar
• S.N. Tikar, R. Yadav, M.J. Mendki, A.N. Rao, D. Sukumaran, and B.D. Parashar, Oviposition deterrent activity of three mosquito repellents diethyl phenyl acetamide (DEPA), diethyl m toluamide (DEET), and diethyl benzamide (DEB) on Aedes aegypti, Aedes albopictus, and Culex quinquefasciatus, Parasitol. Res. 113 (2014), pp. 101–106.
   Google Scholar
• M.A. Navarro-Silva, F.A. Marques, and J.E. Duque Luna, Review of semiochemicals that mediate the oviposition of mosquitoes: A possible sustainable tool for the control and monitoring of Culicidae, Rev. Brasil. Entomol. 53 (2009), pp. 1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Afify and C.G. Galizia, Chemosensory cues for mosquito oviposition site selection, J. Med. Entomol. 52 (2015), pp. 120–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.A. Downes, The swarming and mating flight of Diptera, Annu. Rev. Entomol. 14 (1969), pp. 271–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E.Y. Fawaz, S.A. Allan, U.R. Bernier, P.J. Obenauer, and J.W. Diclaro II., Swarming mechanisms in the yellow fever mosquito: Aggregation pheromones are involved in the mating behavior of Aedes aegypti, J. Vector Ecol. 39 (2014), pp. 347–354.
   Google Scholar
• R.J. Pitts, R. Mozūraitis, A. Gauvin-Bialecki, and G. Lempérière, The roles of kairomones, synomones and pheromones in the chemically-mediated behaviour of male mosquitoes, Acta Trop. 132 (2014), pp. S26–S34.
   Google Scholar
• L. Vaníčková, A. Canale, and G. Benelli, Sexual chemoecology of mosquitoes (Diptera, Culicidae): Current knowledge and implications for vector control programs, Parasitol. Int. 66 (2017), pp. 190–195.
   Google Scholar
• S.H. Said, J.P. Grieco, and N.L. Achee, Evaluation of contact irritant and spatial repellent behavioural responses of male Aedes aegypti to vector control compounds, J. Am. Mosq. Assoc. 25 (2009), pp. 436–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Kongmee, D. Nimmo, G. Labbe, C. Beech, J. Grieco, L. Alphey, and N. Achee, Irritant and repellent behavioural responses of Aedes aegypti male populations developed for RIDL disease control strategies, J. Med. Entomol. 47 (2010), pp. 1092–1098.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Syed and W.S. Leal, Mosquitoes smell and avoid the insect repellent DEET, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105 (2008), pp. 13598–13603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.D. Costanzo, A.J. Watkinson, E.J. Murby, D.W. Kolpin, and M.W. Sandstrom, Is there a risk associated with the insect repellent DEET (N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide) commonly found in aquatic environments?, Sci. Tot. Environ. 384 (2007), pp. 214–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.I. Abramson, T. Giray, T.A. Mixson, S.L. Nolf, H. Wells, A. Kence, and M. Kence Proboscis conditioning experiments with honeybees, Apis mellifera caucasica, with butyric acid and DEET mixture as conditioned and unconditioned stimuli, J. Insect Sci. 10 (2010), p. 122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.A. Weeks, P.D. Guiney, and A.I. Nikiforov, Assessment of the environmental fate and ecotoxicity of N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide (DEET), Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag. 8 (2012), pp. 120–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Aronson, J. Weeks, B. Meylan, P.D. Guiney, and P.H. Howard, Environmental release, environmental concentrations, and ecological risk of N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide (DEET), Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag. 8 (2012), pp. 135–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Nendza, U. Klaschka, and R. Berghahn, Suitable test substances for proof of concept regarding infochemical effects in surface waters, Environ. Sci. Eur. 25 (2013), p. 21.
   Google Scholar
• D. Campos, C. Gravato, C. Quintaneiro, A.M.V.M. Soares, and J.L.T. Pestana, Responses of the aquatic midge Chironomus riparius to DEET exposure, Aquat. Toxicol. 172 (2016), pp. 80–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Campos, C. Gravato, C. Quintaneiro, O. Koba, T. Randak, A.M.V.M. Soares, and J.L.T. Pestana, Are insect repellents toxic to freshwater insects? A case study using caddisflies exposed to DEET, Chemosphere 149 (2016), pp. 177–182.
   Google Scholar
• P. Fink and E. von Elert, No effect of insect repellents on the behaviour of Lymnaea stagnalis at environmentally relevant concentrations, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 24 (2017), pp. 26120–26124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Fink, J.Moelzner, R. Berghahn, and E. von Elert, Do insect repellents induce drift behaviour in aquatic non-target organisms?, Water Res. 108 (2017), pp. 32–38.
   Google Scholar
• C. Carraher, J. Dalziel, M.D. Jordan, D.L. Christie, R.D. Newcomb, and A.V. Kralicek, Towards an understanding of the structural basis for insect olfaction by odorant receptors, Insect Biochem. Molec. Biol. 66 (2015), pp. 31–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.L. Jones, G.M. Pask, D.C. Rinker, and L.J. Zwiebel, Functional agonism of insect odorant receptor ion channels, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108 (2011), pp. 8821–8825.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.W. Taylor, I.M. Romaine, C. Liu, P. Murthi, P.L. Jones, A.G. Waterson, G.A. Sulikowski, and L.J. Zwiebel, Structure–activity relationship of a broad–spectrum insect odorant receptor agonist, ACS Chem. Biol. 7 (2012), pp. 1647–1652.
   Google Scholar
• P.L. Jones, G.M. Pask, I.M. Romaine, R.W. Taylor, P.R. Reid, A.G. Waterson, G.A. Sulikowski, and L.J. Zwiebel, Allosteric antagonism of insect odorant receptor ion channels, PLoS ONE 7 (2012), p. e30304.
   Google Scholar
• S. Chen and C.W. Luetje, Identification of new agonists and antagonists of the insect odorant receptor co-receptor subunit, PLoS ONE 7 (2012), p. e36784.
   Google Scholar
• I.M. Romaine, R.W. Taylor, S.P. Saidu, K. Kim, G.A. Sulikowski, L.J. Zwiebel, and A.G. Waterson, Narrow SAR in odorant sensing Orco receptor agonists, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 24 (1014), pp. 2613–2616.
   Google Scholar
• D. Kepchia, S. Moliver, K. Chohan, C. Phillips, and C.W. Luetje, Inhibition of insect olfactory behavior by an airborne antagonist of the insect odorant receptor co-receptor subunit, PLoS ONE 12 (2017), p. e0177454.
   Google Scholar
• J. Devillers and M.H. Pham-Delègue, Honey Bees: Estimating the Environmental Impact of Chemicals, Taylor & Francis, London, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• M.N. Andersson and R.D. Newcomb, Pest control compounds targeting insect chemoreceptors: Another silent spring?, Front. Ecol. Evol. (2017), doi:10.3389/fevo.2017.00005.
   Google Scholar
• G.J. Devine, E.Z. Perea, G.F. Killeen, J.D. Stancil, S.J. Clark, and A.C. Morrison, Using adult mosquitoes to transfer insecticides to Aedes aegypti larval habitats, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106 (2009), pp. 11530–11534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Devillers, H. Devillers, A. Decourtye, J. Fourrier, P. Aupinel, and D. Fortini, Agent-based modeling of the long term effects of pyriproxyfen on honey bee population, in In Silico Bees, J. Devillers, ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2014, pp. 179–208.
   Google Scholar
• WHO, Guidelines for Efficacy Testing of Mosquito Repellents for Human Skin, WHO/HTM/NTD/WHOPES/2009.4, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• D.R. Barnard, Biological assay methods for mosquito repellents, J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 21 (2005), pp. 12–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Deng, N. Zhu, and J. Mo, In vitro bioassay methods for laboratory screening of novel mosquito repellents, Entomol. Sci. 17 (2014), pp. 365–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USDA, Chemicals Evaluated as Insecticides and Repellents at Orlando, Fla, compiled by King WV, Agriculture Handbook No 69, USDA, Washington, DC, 1954.
   Google Scholar
• USDA, Materials Evaluated as Insecticides, Repellents, and Chemosterilants at Orlando and Gainesville, Fla., 1952–1964, Agriculture Handbook No 340, USDA, Washington, DC., 1967.
   Google Scholar
• USDA, Repellent Activity of Compounds Submitted by Walter Reed Army Institute of Research. I. Protection Time and Minimum Effective Dosage Against Aedes aegypti Mosquitoes, Technical Bulletin No. 1549, USDA, Washington, DC, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• K. Mansouri, C.M. Grulke, A.M. Richard, R.S. Judson, and A.J. Williams, An automated curation procedure for addressing chemical errors and inconsistencies in public datasets used in QSAR modelling, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 27 (2016), pp. 911–937.
   Google Scholar
• M. DeGennaro, The mysterious multi-modal repellency of DEET, Fly 9 (2015), pp. 45–51.
   Google Scholar
• E.J. Dennis and L.B. Vossha, DEET feet: Aedes aegypti mosquitoes use their tarsi to sense DEET on contact, bioRxiv (2018), http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/360222.
   Google Scholar
• M. Tavares, M.R.M. da Silva, L.B. de Oliveira de Siqueira, R.A.S. Rodrigues, L. Bodjolle-d’Almeida, E.P. Dos Santos, and E. Ricci-Júnior, Trends in insect repellent formulations: A review, Int. J. Pharm. 539 (2018), pp. 190–209.
   Google Scholar