An exploratory study using QICAR models for prediction of adsorption capacity of multi-walled carbon nanotubes for heavy metal ions

References

• P.B. Tchounwou, C.G. Yedjou, A.K. Patlolla, and D.J. Sutton, Heavy Metals Toxicity and the Environment, Vol, 101, Springer, Basel, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• L. Charerntanyarak, Heavy metals removal by chemical coagulation and precipitation, Water Sci. Technol. 39 (1999), pp. 135–138.
   Google Scholar
• M. Barakat and E. Schmidt, Polymer-enhanced ultrafiltration process for heavy metals removal from industrial wastewater, Desalination 256 (2010), pp. 90–93.
   Google Scholar
• T.A. Kurniawan, G.Y. Chan, W.-H. Lo, and S. Babel, Physico–chemical treatment techniques for wastewater laden with heavy metals, Chem. Eng. J. 118 (2006), pp. 83–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.K. Uddin, A review on the adsorption of heavy metals by clay minerals, with special focus on the past decade, Chem. Eng. J. 308 (2017), pp. 438–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H.A. Hegazi, Removal of heavy metals from wastewater using agricultural and industrial wastes as adsorbents, HBRC Journal 9 (2013), pp. 276–282.
   Google Scholar
• A.P. Lim and A.Z. Aris, A review on economically adsorbents on heavy metals removal in water and wastewater, Rev. Environ. Sci. Bio. 13 (2014), pp. 163–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Samiey, C.H. Cheng, and J. Wu, Organic-inorganic hybrid polymers as adsorbents for removal of heavy metal ions from solutions: A review, Materials 7 (2014), pp. 673–726.
   Google Scholar
• A.E. Burakov, E.V. Galunin, I.V. Burakova, A.E. Kucherova, S. Agarwal, A.G. Tkachev, and V.K. Gupta, Adsorption of heavy metals on conventional and nanostructured materials for wastewater treatment purposes: A review, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 148 (2018), pp. 702–712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Ren, C. Chen, M. Nagatsu, and X. Wang, Carbon nanotubes as adsorbents in environmental pollution management: A review, Chem. Eng. J. 170 (2011), pp. 395–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Sadegh, R. Shahryari Ghoshekandi, A. Masjedi, Z. Mahmoodi, and M. Kazemi, A review on carbon nanotubes adsorbents for the removal of pollutants from aqueous solutions, Int. J. Nano Dimens. 7 (2016), pp. 109–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.A. Salam, Removal of heavy metal ions from aqueous solutions with multi-walled carbon nanotubes: Kinetic and thermodynamic studies, Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 10 (2013), pp. 677–688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G.P. Rao, C. Lu, and F. Su, Sorption of divalent metal ions from aqueous solution by carbon nanotubes: A review, Sep. Purif. Technol. 58 (2007), pp. 224–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Abbas, A.M. Al-Amer, T. Laoui, M.J. Al-Marri, M.S. Nasser, M. Khraisheh, and M.A. Atieh, Heavy metal removal from aqueous solution by advanced carbon nanotubes: Critical review of adsorption applications, Sep. Purif. Technol. 157 (2016), pp. 141–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Roy, Advances in QSAR Modeling: Pharmaceutical, Chemical Applications in, Food, Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Vol. 24, Springer, Switzerland, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• K.P. Singh and S. Gupta, Nano-QSAR modeling for predicting biological activity of diverse nanomaterials, RSC Adv. 4 (2014), pp. 13215–13230.
   Google Scholar
• J.D. Walker, M.C. Newman, and M. Enache, Fundamental QSARs for Metal Ions, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• T. Puzyn, A. Mostrag-Szlichtyng, A. Gajewicz, M. Skrzyński, and A.P. Worth, Investigating the influence of data splitting on the predictive ability of QSAR/QSPR models, Struct. Chem. 22 (2011), pp. 795–804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Ekberg and P.L. Brown, Hydrolysis of Metal Ions, Wiley Online Library, Germany, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• W.M. Haynes, CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Database on properties of chemical elements, 2017. Available at http://phases.imet-db.ru/elements/main.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• RSC Periodic Table, 2017. Available at http://www.rsc.org/periodic-table.
   Google Scholar
• E. Nieboer and W. McBryde, Free-energy relationships in coordination chemistry. III. A comprehensive index to complex stability, Can. J. Chem. 51 (1973), pp. 2512–2524.
   Google Scholar
• J.H. Holland, Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence, MIT Press, Mexico, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• N. Sukumar, G. Prabhu, and P. Saha, Applications of genetic algorithms in QSAR/QSPR modeling, in Applications of Metaheuristics in Process Engineering, eds., J. Valadi, P. Siarry, Springer, Switzerland, 2014, pp. 315–324.
   Google Scholar
• R. Leardi, Application of genetic algorithm–PLS for feature selection in spectral data sets, J. Chemom. 14 (2000), pp. 643–655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.R. Duchowicz, E.A. Castro, and F.M. Fernández, Alternative algorithm for the search of an optimal set of descriptors in QSAR-QSPR studies, MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem 55 (2006), pp. 179–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.R. Duchowicz, M. Fernández, J. Caballero, E.A. Castro and F.M. Fernández, QSAR for non-nucleoside inhibitors of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase, Biorg. Med. Chem. 14 (2006), pp. 5876–5889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.G. Mercader, P.R. Duchowicz, F.M. Fernández, and E.A. Castro, Modified and enhanced replacement method for the selection of molecular descriptors in QSAR and QSPR theories, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 92 (2008), pp. 138–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.G. Mercader, P.R. Duchowicz, F.M. Fernández, and E.A. Castro, Advances in the replacement and enhanced replacement method in QSAR and QSPR theories, J. Chem. Inform. Model. 51 (2011), pp. 1575–1581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.C.U. Araújo, T.C.B. Saldanha, R.K.H. Galvão, T. Yoneyama, H.C. Chame, and V. Visani, The successive projections algorithm for variable selection in spectroscopic multicomponent analysis, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 57 (2001), pp. 65–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Fearn, On orthogonal signal correction, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 50 (2000), pp. 47–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Wold, H. Antti, F. Lindgren, and J. Öhman, Orthogonal signal correction of near-infrared spectra, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 44 (1998), pp. 175–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Laref, D. Ahmadou, E. Losson, and M. Siadat, Orthogonal signal correction to improve stability regression model in gas sensor systems, J. Sens. (2017), pp. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• A.Y. Heidari, Yoctosecond quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) and quantitative structure–property relationship (QSPR) under synchrotron radiations studies for prediction of solubility of anti–cancer nano drugs in aqueous solutions using genetic function approximation (GFA) algorithm, J. Pharm. Pharm. Res. 1 (2017), p. 6.
   Google Scholar
• M. Boháč, B. Loeprecht, J. Damborský, and G. Schüürmann, Impact of orthogonal signal correction (OSC) on the predictive ability of CoMFA models for the ciliate toxicity of nitrobenzenes, Quant. Struct.‐Act. Rel. 21 (2002), pp. 3–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Rücker, G. Rücker, and M. Meringer, y-Randomization and its variants in QSPR/QSAR, J. Chem. Inform. Model. 47 (2007), pp. 2345–2357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Golbraikh and A. Tropsha, Beware of q 2!, J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 20 (2002), pp. 269–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.K. Ojha, I. Mitra, R.N. Das, and K. Roy, Further exploring r m 2 metrics for validation of QSPR models, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 107 (2011), pp. 194–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Roy, R.N. Das, P. Ambure, and R.B. Aher, Be aware of error measures. Further studies on validation of predictive QSAR models, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 152 (2016), pp.18–33.
   Google Scholar
• N. Chirico and P. Gramatica, Real external predictivity of QSAR models: How to evaluate it? Comparison of different validation criteria and proposal of using the concordance correlation coefficient, J. Chem. Inform. Model. 51 (2011), pp. 2320–2335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T.I. Netzeva, A. Worth, T. Aldenberg, R. Benigni, M.T. Cronin, P. Gramatica, J.S. Jaworska, S. Kahn, G. Klopman, C.A. Marchant, G. Myatt, N. Nikolova-Jeliazkova, G.Y. Patlewicz, R. Perkins, D. Roberts, T. Schultz, D.W. Stanton, J.J. van de Sandt, W. Tong, G. Veith, and C. Yang, Current status of methods for defining the applicability domain of (quantitative) structure-activity relationships, ATLA 33 (2005), pp. 155–173.
   Google Scholar
• A.G. Mercader, P.R. Duchowicz, F.M. Fernández, and E.A. Castro, Replacement method and enhanced replacement method versus the genetic algorithm approach for the selection of molecular descriptors in QSPR/QSAR theories, J. Chem. Inform. Model. 50 (2010), pp. 1542–1548.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Ambure and K. Roy, Understanding the structural requirements of cyclic sulfone hydroxyethylamines as hBACE1 inhibitors against Aβ plaques in Alzheimer’s disease: A predictive QSAR approach, RSC Adv. 6 (2016), pp. 28171–28186.
   Google Scholar
• D.L.J. Alexander, A. Tropsha, and D.A. Winkler, Beware of R(2): Simple, unambiguous assessment of the prediction accuracy of QSAR and QSPR models, J. Chem. Inform. Model. 55 (2015), pp. 1316–1322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Farrés, S. Platikanov, S. Tsakovski, and R. Tauler, Comparison of the variable importance in projection (VIP) and of the selectivity ratio (SR) methods for variable selection and interpretation, J. Chemom. 29 (2015), pp. 528–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Clementi, D. Raimondi, and W. Reinhardt, Atomic screening constants from SCF functions. II. Atoms with 37 to 86 electrons, J. Chem. Phys. 47 (1967), pp. 1300–1307.
   Google Scholar
• S.S. Zamil, S. Ahmad, M.H. Choi, J.Y. Park, and S.C. Yoon, Correlating metal ionic characteristics with biosorption capacity of Staphylococcus saprophyticus BMSZ711 using QICAR model, Bioresour. Technol. 100 (2009), pp. 1895–1902.
   Google Scholar
• C.P. Tatara, M.C. Newman, J.T. McCloskey, and P.L. Williams, Use of ion characteristics to predict relative toxicity of mono-, di-and trivalent metal ions: Caenorhabditis elegans LC50, Aquat. Toxicol. 42 (1998), pp. 255–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Chen and J. Wang, Influence of metal ionic characteristics on their biosorption capacity by Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 74 (2007), pp. 911–917.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Q. Meng, J. Richmond-Bryant, S. Lu, B. Buckley, W.J. Welsh, E.A. Whitsel, A. Hanna, K.B. Yeatts, J. Warren, A.H. Herring, and A. Xiu, Cardiovascular outcomes and the physical and chemical properties of metal ions found in particulate matter air pollution: A QICAR study, Environ. Health Perspect. 121 (2013), pp. 558.
   Google Scholar
• C. Yoo and M. Shahlaei, The applications of PCA in QSAR studies: A case study on CCR5 antagonists, Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 91 (2018), pp. 137–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar