Development of a read-across workflow for skin irritation and corrosion predictions

References

• J.H. Draize, G. Woodard, and H.O. Calvery, Methods for the study of imitation and toxicity of substances applied topically to the skin and mucous membranes, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Therap. 82 (1944), pp. 377–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Basketter, D. Jírova, and H. Kandárová, Review of skin irritation/corrosion hazards on the basis of human data: A regulatory perspective, Interdiscip. Toxicol. 5 (2012), pp. 98–104.
   Google Scholar
• A. Worth, J. Barroso, S. Bremer, J. Burton, S. Casati, S. Coecke, R. Corvi, B. Desprez, C. Dumont, V. Gouliarmou, M. Goumenou, R Gräpel, C. Griesinger, M. Halder, A. Janusch Roi, A. Kienzler, F. Madia, S. Munn, M. Nepelska, A. Paini, A. Price, P. Prieto, A. Rolaki, M. Schäffer, J. Triebe, M. Whelan, C. Wittwehr, and V. Zuang, Alternative methods for regulatory toxicology – A state-of-the-art review, JRC Science Reports, European Commission Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), OECD environment health and safety publications series on testing and assessment No. 260, Guidance document for the use of adverse outcome pathways in developing integrated approaches to testing and assessment (IATA), OECD, Paris, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), OECD environment health and safety publications series on testing and assessment No. 203, New guidance document on an integrated approach on testing and assessment (IATA) for skin corrosion and irritation, OECD, Paris, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), OECD guidelines for the testing of chemicals, section 4, test no. 404: Acute dermal irritation/corrosion, OECD, Paris, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment. Chapter R.7a: Endpoint specific guidance, Version 6.0 ECHA, 2017, pp. 188. Available at https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/13632/information_requirements_r7a_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment. Chapter R.6: QSARs and grouping of chemicals, ECHA, 2008, pp. 62. Available at https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/13632/information_requirements_r6_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• G. Patlewicz, G. Helman, P. Pradeep, and I. Shah, Navigating through the minefield of read-across tools: A review of in silico tools for grouping, Comput. Toxicol. 3 (2017), pp. 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• OECD QSAR Toolbox, Laboratory of Mathematical Chemistry (LMC), Burgas, Bulgaria. Available at http://www.oecd.org/chemicalsafety/risk-assessment/oecd-qsar-toolbox.htm.
   Google Scholar
• S.D. Dimitrov, R. Diderich, T. Sobanski, T.S. Pavlov, G.V. Chankov, A.S. Chapkanov, Y.H. Karakolev, S.G. Temelkov, R.A. Vasilev, K.D. Gerova, C.D. Kuseva, N.D. Todorova, A.M. Mehmed, M. Rasenberg, and O.G. Mekenyan, QSAR Toolbox – Workflow and major functionalities, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 27 (2016), pp. 203–219.
   Google Scholar
• OECD QSAR Toolbox Support, Toolbox 4.0 tutorials: Tutorial on how to predict skin sensitisation potential by automated workflow, 2017, Laboratory of Mathematical Chemistry (LMC), Burgas, Bulgaria. Available at http://oasis-lmc.org/media/73958/Tutorial_1_Automated_workflow_for_Skin_sensitization.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• OECD QSAR Toolbox Support, Toolbox 4.1 tutorials: Step-by-step example on how to predict the skin sensitisation potential approach of a chemical by read-across based on an analogue approach, 2017, Laboratory of Mathematical Chemistry (LMC), Burgas, Bulgaria. Available at http://oasis-lmc.org/media/74759/Tutorial_1_TB%204.1_Predicting%20SS%20by%20making%20use%20of%20read-across.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• E. Hulzebos, J.D. Walker, I. Gerner, and K. Schlegel, Use of structural alerts to develop rules for identifying chemical substances with skin irritation or skin corrosion potential, QSAR Comb. Sci. 24 (2005), pp. 332–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.D. Barratt, Quantitative structure–activity relationships for skin permeability, Toxic. In vitro 9 (1995), pp. 27–37.
   Google Scholar
• S. Farahmand and H.I. Maibach, Transdermal drug pharmacokinetics in man: Interindividual variability and partial prediction, Int. J. Pharma. 367 (2009), pp. 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Similarity in parameters, 2D in OECD QSAR Toolbox v.4.2. Laboratory of Mathematical Chemistry (LMC), Bourgas, Bulgaria.
   Google Scholar
• European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), C&L Inventory, ECHA, Helsinki, Finland. Available at https://www.echa.europa.eu/information-on-chemicals/cl-inventory-database.
   Google Scholar
• R.O. Potts and R.H. Guy, Predicting skin permeability, Pharm. Res. 9 (1992), pp. 663–669.
   Google Scholar
• E. Rorije and E. Hulzebos, Evaluation of (Q)SARs for the prediction of skin irritation/corrosion potential, physicochemical exclusion rules, Tech. Rep., National Institute of Public Health and Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, the Netherlands, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Online MPBPWIN(TM) User’s Guide in EPI Suite v.4.11, 7.2.2. Estimation Accuracy, 2012, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• US EPA Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention – Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, High Production Volume Information System (HPVIS), Cyclic Anhydrides, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA. Available at https://ofmpub.epa.gov/oppthpv/Public_Search.PublicTabs?section=1&SubmissionId=24959423&epcount=6&epname=Skin+Irritation&epdiscp=Mammalian+Health+Effects+Other&selchemid=null&CategorySingle=null.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), SIDS initial assessment report, phthalic anhydride, 2006, OECD, Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• Mean Melting Point in Parameters, 2D in OECD QSAR Toolbox v.4.2, MPBPWIN v.1.43. US Environmental Protection Agency, 2012, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Exp Melting Point in Parameters, 2D in OECD QSAR Toolbox v.4.2. US Environmental Protection Agency, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• ‘Skin Irritation’ database in OECD QSAR Toolbox v.4.2, Netherlands National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, Netherlands; European Center for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM), Ispra, Italy; European Center of Ecotoxicology and Toxicology (ECETOC), Brussels, Belgium; School of Pharmacy and Chemistry, Liverpool John Moores University, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Microsoft® Excel® 2016, Microsoft Visual Basic for Applications 7.1.
   Google Scholar
• Log Kow in Parameters, 2D in OECD QSAR Toolbox v.4.2, KOWWIN v1.68, US Environmental Protection Agency, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• K. Kodithala, A.J. Hopfinger, E.D. Thompson, and M.K. Robinson, Prediction of skin irritation from organic chemicals using membrane-interaction QSAR analysis, Toxicol. Sci. 66 (2002), pp. 336–346.
   Google Scholar
• A. Gallegos Saliner, I. Tsakovska, M. Pavan, G. Patlewicz, and A.P. Worth, Evaluation of SARs for the prediction of skin irritation/corrosion potential – Structural inclusion rules in the BfR decision support system, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 18 (2007), pp. 331–342.
   Google Scholar
• S. Wu, K. Blackburn, J. Amburgey, J. Jaworska, and T. Federle, A framework for using structural, reactivity, metabolic and physicochemical similarity to evaluate the suitability of analogs for SAR-based toxicological assessments, Regul. Toxicol. Pharm. 56 (2010), pp. 67–81.
   Google Scholar
• K. Blackburn and S.B. Stuard, A framework to facilitate consistent characterization of read across uncertainty, Regul. Toxicol. Pharm. 68 (2010), pp. 353–362.
   Google Scholar
• G. Patlewicz, N. Ball, P.J. Boogaard, R.A. Becker, and B. Hubesch, Building scientific confidence in the development and evaluation of read-across, Regul. Toxicol. Pharm. 72 (2010), pp. 117–133.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Guidance on grouping of chemicals, Second edition, Integrated approaches to testing and assessment (IATA), series on testing & assessment No. 194, OECD, Paris, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• T.W. Schultz, P. Amcoff, E. Berggren, F. Gautier, M. Klaric, D.J. Knight, C. Mahony, M. Schwarz, A. White, and M.T.D. Cronin, A strategy for structuring and reporting a read-across prediction of toxicity, Regul. Toxicol. Pharm. 72 (2010), pp. 586–601.
   Google Scholar
• European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), Read-Across Assessment Framework (RAAF), ECHA, ECHA, Helsinki, Finland. (2017). Available at https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/13628/raaf_en.pdf/614e5d61-891d-4154-8a47-87efebd1851a .
   Google Scholar