Supercomputer docking with a large number of degrees of freedom

References

• G. Sliwoski, S. Kothiwale, J. Meiler, and E.W. Lowe, Computational methods in drug discovery, Pharmacol. Rev. 66 (2014), pp. 334–395. doi:10.1124/pr.112.007336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V.A. Sadovnichy and V.B. Sulimov, Supercomputer technologies in medicine, in Supercomputer Technologies in Science, Education, and Industry, V.A. Sadovnichii, G.I. Savin, and Vl.V. Voevodin, eds., Moscow University Publishing, Moscow, 2009, pp. 16–23
   Google Scholar
• Y.C. Chen, Beware of docking!, Trends. Pharmacol. Sci. 36 (2015), pp. 78–95. doi:10.1016/j.tips.2014.12.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V.B. Sulimov, D.C. Kutov, and A.V. Sulimov, Advances in docking, Curr. Med. Chem. 26 (2019), pp. 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Yuriev, J. Holien, and P.A. Ramsland, Improvements, trends, and new ideas in molecular docking: 2012–2013 in review, J. Mol. Recognit. 28 (2015), pp. 581–604. doi:10.1002/jmr.2471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.V. Sulimov, D.C. Kutov, I.V. Oferkin, E.V. Katkova, and V.B. Sulimov, Application of the docking program SOL for CSAR benchmark, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 53 (2013), pp. 1946–1956. doi:10.1021/ci400094h.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.A. Antunes, D. Devaurs, and L.E. Kavraki, Understanding the challenges of protein flexibility in drug design, Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 10 (2015), pp. 1301–1313. doi:10.1517/17460441.2015.1094458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.V. Lushchekina, G.F. Makhaeva, D.A. Novichkova, I.V. Zueva, N.V. Kovaleva, and R.R. Richardson, Supercomputer modeling of dual-site acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibition, Supercomp. Front. Innov. 5 (2018), pp. 89–97.
   Google Scholar
• I.V. Oferkin, E.V. Katkova, A.V. Sulimov, D.C. Kutov, S.I. Sobolev, V.V. Voevodin, and V.B. Sulimov, Evaluation of docking target functions by the comprehensive investigation of protein-ligand energy minima, Adv. Bioinf. 2015 (2015), pp. 126858. doi:10.1155/2015/126858.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• A.V. Sulimov, D.C. Kutov, E.V. Katkova, and V.B. Sulimov, Combined docking with classical force field and quantum chemical semiempirical method PM7, Adv. Bioinf. 2017 (2017), pp. 7167691. doi:10.1155/2017/7167691.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• A.V. Sulimov, D.C. Kutov, E.V. Katkova, I.S. Ilin, and V.B. Sulimov, New generation of docking programs: Supercomputer validation of force fields and quantum-chemical methods for docking, J. Mol. Graph. Model. 78 (2017), pp. 139–147. doi:10.1016/j.jmgm.2017.10.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.C. Kutov, A.V. Sulimov, and V.B. Sulimov, Supercomputer docking: Investigation of low energy minima of protein-ligand complexes, Supercomp. Front. Innov. 5 (2018), pp. 134–137.
   Google Scholar
• A.V. Sulimov, D.A. Zheltkov, I.V. Oferkin, D.C. Kutov, E.V. Katkova, E.E. Tyrtyshnikov, and V.B. Sulimov, Evaluation of the novel algorithm of flexible ligand docking with moveable target-protein atoms, Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 15 (2017), pp. 275–285. doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2017.02.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.V. Sulimov, D.A. Zheltkov, I.V. Oferkin, D.C. Kutov, E.V. Katkova, E.E. Tyrtyshnikov, and V.B. Sulimov, Tensor train global optimization: Application to docking in the configuration space with a large number of dimensions, in Communications in Computer and Information Science, V. Voevodin and S. Sobolev, eds., Vol. 793, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2017, pp. 151–167.
   Google Scholar
• E. Nikitina, V. Sulimov, F. Grigoriev, O. Kondakova, and S. Luschekina, Mixed implicit/explicit solvation models in quantum mechanical calculations of binding enthalpy for protein-ligand complexes International, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 106 (2006), pp. 1943–1963. doi:10.1002/qua.20943.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N.S. Pagadala, K. Syed, and J. Tuszynski, Software for molecular docking: A review, Biophys. Rev. 9 (2017), pp. 91–102. doi:10.1007/s12551-016-0247-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• E. Perola, W.P. Walters, and P.S. Charifson, A detailed comparison of current docking and scoring methods on systems of pharmaceutical relevance, Proteins 56 (2004), pp. 235–249. doi:10.1002/prot.20088.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T.A. Halgren, Merck molecular force field. I. Basis, form, scope, parameterization, and performance of MMFF94, J. Comput. Chem. 17 (1996), pp. 490–519. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(199604)17:5/6<>1.0.CO;2-C.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T.A. Halgren, Merck molecular force field. II. MMFF94 van der Waals and electrostatic parameters for intermolecular interactions, J. Comput. Chem. 17 (1996), pp. 520–552. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(199604)17:5/6<520::AID-JCC2>3.0.CO;2-W.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T.A. Halgren, Merck molecular force field. III. Molecular geometries and vibrational frequencies for MMFF94, J. Comput. Chem. 17 (1996), pp. 553–586. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(199604)17:5/6<553::AID-JCC3>3.0.CO;2-T.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T.A. Halgren and R.B. Nachbar, Merck molecular force field. IV. Conformational energies and geometries for MMFF94, J. Comput. Chem. 17 (1996), pp. 587–615. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(199604)17:5/6<587::AID-JCC4>3.0.CO;2-Q.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.D. Beachy, D. Chasman, R.B. Murphy, T.A. Halgren, and R.A. Friesner, Accurate ab initio quantum chemical determination of the relative energetics of peptide conformations and assessment of empirical force fields, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119 (1997), pp. 5908–5920. doi:10.1021/ja962310g.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Oseledets and E. Tyrtyshnikov, Breaking the curse of dimensionality, or how to use svd in many dimensions, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 31 (2009), pp. 3744–3759. doi:10.1137/090748330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Oseledets, Tensor-train decomposition, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 33 (2011), pp. 2295–2317. doi:10.1137/090752286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Oseledets and E. Tyrtyshnikov, TT-cross approximation for multidimensional arrays, Linear Algebra Appl. 432 (2010), pp. 70–88. doi:10.1016/j.laa.2009.07.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Goreinov and E. Tyrtyshnikov, The maximal-volume concept in approximation by low-rank matrices, Contemp. Math. 268 (2001), pp. 47–51.
   Google Scholar
• D.A. Zheltkov, I.V. Oferkin, E.V. Katkova, A.V. Sulimov, V.B. Sulimov, and E.E. Tyrtyshnikov, TTDock: A docking method based on tensor train decompositions, Num. Meth. Prog. 14 (2013), pp. 279–291.
   Google Scholar
• I.V. Oferkin, D.A. Zheltkov, E.E. Tyrtyshnikov, A.V. Sulimov, D.C. Kutov, and V.B. Sulimov, Evaluation of the docking algorithm based on Tensor Train global optimization, Bull. SUSU MMCS 8 (2015), pp. 83–99. doi:10.14529/mmp150407.
   Google Scholar
• A.S. Hauser and B. Windshügel, LEADS-PEP: A benchmark data set for assessment of peptide docking performance, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 56 (2016), pp. 188–200. doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.L. Lau and M.K. Dunn, Therapeutic peptides: Historical perspectives, current development trends, and future directions, Bioorg. Med. Chem. 26 (2018), pp. 2700–2707. doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2017.06.052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.F. Wong, Flexible receptor docking for drug discovery, Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 10 (2015), pp. 1189–1200. doi:10.1517/17460441.2015.1078308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Fujino, K. Fukushima, T. Kubota, T. Kosugi, and M. Takimoto-Kamimura, Crystal structure of human cyclin-dependent kinase-2 complex with MK2 inhibitor TEI-I01800: Insight into the selectivity, J. Synchrotron Radiat. 20 (2013), pp. 905–909. doi:10.1107/S0909049513020736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Glaab, Building a virtual ligand screening pipeline using free software: A survey, Brief. Bioinf 17 (2016), pp. 352–366. doi:10.1093/bib/bbv037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Hostaš, J. Řezáč, and P. Hobza, On the performance of the semiempirical quantum mechanical PM6 and PM7 methods for noncovalent interactions, Chem. Phys. Lett. 568–569 (2013), pp. 161–166. doi:10.1016/j.cplett.2013.02.069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.J. Bordner, C.N. Cavasotto, and R.A. Abagyan, Accurate transferable model for water, n-octanol, and n-hexadecane solvation free energies, Russ. J. Phys. Chem. B 106 (2002), pp. 11009–11015. doi:10.1021/jp0264477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Sadovnichy, A. Tikhonravov, V. Voevodin, and V. Opanasenko, “lomonosov”: Supercomputing at Moscow State University in Contemporary High Performance Computing: From Petascale toward Exascale, J.S. Vetter, ed., Boca Raton, United States, 2013.
   Google Scholar