QSAR/QSPR models based on quantum chemistry for risk assessment of pesticides according to current European legislation

References

• EC (European Commission), Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, Off. J. Eur. Union L309 (2009), pp. 1–50.
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission), Directive 2009/128/EC, Off. J. Eur. Union L309 (2009), pp. 71–86. doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2009.309.eng
   Google Scholar
• D. Chandler, A.S. Bailey, G.M. Tatchell, G. Davidson, J. Greaves, and W.P. Grant, The development, regulation and use of biopesticides for integrated pest management, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 366 (2011), pp. 1987–1998. doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0390
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.J. Villaverde, B. Sevilla-Morán, P. Sandín-España, C. López-Goti, and J.L. Alonso-Prados, Challenges of biopesticides under the European regulation (EC) No. 1107/2009: An overview of new trends in residue analysis, in Studies in Natural Products Chemistry, F. Atta-ur-Rahman, ed., Elsevier, Oxford, 2014, pp. 437–482. doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-63430-6.00015-1
   Google Scholar
• J.J. Villaverde, B. Sevilla-Morán, C. López-Goti, J.L. Alonso-Prados, and P. Sandín-España, Computational methodologies for the risk assessment of pesticides in the European Union, J. Agric. Food Chem. 65 (2017), pp. 2017–2018. doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.7b00516
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.J. Villaverde, B. Sevilla-Morán, C. López-Goti, L.J. Alonso-Prados, and P. Sandín-España, Computational-based study of QuEChERS extraction of cyclohexanedione herbicide residues in soil by chemometric modeling, Molecules 23 (2018), pp. 1–16. doi:10.3390/molecules23082009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.J. Villaverde, J. Li, P. Ligero, M. Ek, and A. de Vega, Mild peroxyformic acid fractionation of Miscanthus x giganteus bark. Behaviour and structural characterization of lignin, Ind. Crops Prod. 35 (2012), pp. 261–268. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2011.07.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.J. Villaverde, P. Ligero, and A.D. Vega, Bleaching Miscanthus x giganteus acetosolv pulps with hydrogen peroxide/acetic acid. Part 1: Behaviour in aqueous alkaline media, Biores. Technol. 100 (2009), pp. 4731–4735. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2009.04.052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Benfenati, F. Como, M. Manzo, D. Gadaleta, A. Toropov, and A. Toropova, Developing innovative in silico models with EFSA’s OpenFoodTox database, EFSA Support. Publ. 14 (2017), pp. 1206E. doi:10.2903/sp.efsa.2017.EN-1206
   Google Scholar
• EFSA, Modern methodologies and tools for human hazard assessment of chemicals, EFSA J. 12 (2014), pp. 3638. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3638
   Google Scholar
• WUR, RIVM, and PBL, PesticideModels, Wageningen University and Research Centre, the National Institute of Public Health and the Environment and the Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency. Available at www.pesticidemodels.eu (accessed November 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Z. Li, Z. Hui, A. Haixin, H. Huan, L. Shimeng, Z. Jian, and L. Hongsheng, Applications of machine learning methods in drug toxicity prediction, Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 18 (2018), pp. 987–997. doi:10.2174/1568026618666180727152557
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Merlot, Computational toxicology—A tool for early safety evaluation, Drug Discov. Today 15 (2010), pp. 16–22. doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2009.09.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.J. Villaverde, B. Sevilla-Morán, C. López-Goti, J.L. Alonso-Prados, and P. Sandín-España, Considerations of nano-QSAR/QSPR models for nanopesticide risk assessment within the European legislative framework, Sci. Tot. Environ. 634 (2018), pp. 1530–1539. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Devillers, Methods for building QSARs, Methods Mol. Biol. 930 (2013), pp. 3–27. doi:10.1007/978-1-62703-059-5_1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• EFSA, OECD metapath — incorporation of pesticide residue data, European Food Safety Authority. Available at https://etendering.ted.europa.eu/cft/cft-display.html?cftId=5307 (accessed November 2019).
   Google Scholar
• E.J. Calabrese, L.A. Baldwin, P.T. Kostecki, and T.L. Potter, A toxicologically based weight-of-evidence methodology for the relative ranking of chemicals of endocrine disruption potential, Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 26 (1997), pp. 36–40. doi:10.1006/rtph.1997.1115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Pedersen, J. de Bruijn, S. Munn, and K. van Leeuwen, Assessment of additional testing needs under REACH effects of (Q)SARS, risk based testing and voluntary industry initiatives, EC 9 (2003), pp. 1–36.
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission), Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, Off. J. Eur. Union L396 (2006), pp. 1–101.
   Google Scholar
• S. Scholz, E. Sela, L. Blaha, T. Braunbeck, M. Galay-Burgos, M. García-Franco, J. Guinea, N. Klüver, K. Schirmer, K. Tanneberger, M. Tobor-Kapłon, H. Witters, S. Belanger, E. Benfenati, S. Creton, M.T.D. Cronin, R.I.L. Eggen, M. Embry, D. Ekman, A. Gourmelon, M. Halder, B. Hardy, T. Hartung, B. Hubesch, D. Jungmann, M.A. Lampi, L. Lee, M. Léonard, E. Küster, A. Lillicrap, T. Luckenbach, A.J. Murk, J.M. Navas, W. Peijnenburg, G. Repetto, E. Salinas, G. Schüürmann, H. Spielmann, K.E. Tollefsen, S. Walter-Rohde, G. Whale, J.R. Wheeler, and M.J. Winter, A European perspective on alternatives to animal testing for environmental hazard identification and risk assessment, Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 67 (2013), pp. 506–530. doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2013.10.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Hartung and C. Rovida, Chemical regulators have overreached, Nature 460 (2009), pp. 1080–1081. doi:10.1038/4601080a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission), Directive 2010/63/EC, Off. J. Eur. Union L276 (2010), pp. 33–79. doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.276.eng
   Google Scholar
• E. Benfenati, G. Gini, S. Hoffmann, and R. Luttik, Comparing in vivo, in vitro and in silico methods and integrated strategies for chemical assessment: Problems and prospects, Altern. Lab. Anim. 38 (2010), pp. 153–166. doi:10.1177/026119291003800201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Menzie, M.H. Henning, J. Cura, K. Finkelstein, J. Gentile, J. Maughan, D. Mitchell, S. Petron, B. Potocki, S. Svirsky, and P. Tyler, Special report of the Massachusetts weight-of-evidence workgroup A weight-of-evidence approach for evaluating ecological risks, Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 2 (1996), pp. 277–304. doi:10.1080/10807039609383609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Schirmer, Proposal to improve vertebrate cell cultures to establish them as substitutes for the regulatory testing of chemicals and effluents using fish, Toxicology 224 (2006), pp. 163–183. doi:10.1016/j.tox.2006.04.042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Castaño, N. Bols, T. Braunbeck, P. Dierickx, M. Halder, B. Isomaa, K. Kawahara, L.E.J. Lee, C. Mothersill, P. Pärt, G. Repetto, J.R. Sintes, H. Rufli, R. Smith, C. Wood, and H. Segner, The use of fish cells in ecotoxicology: The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 47, Altern. Lab. Anim. 31 (2003), pp. 317–351. doi:10.1177/026119290303100314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Galbis-Martínez, M.L. Fernández-Cruz, L. Alte, A. Valdehita, I. Rucandio, and J.M. Navas, Development of a new tool for the long term in vitro ecotoxicity testing of nanomaterials using a rainbow-trout cell line (RTL-W1), Toxicol. in Vitro 50 (2018), pp. 305–317. doi:10.1016/j.tiv.2018.04.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Punt, W. Brand, A.J. Murk, A.P. van Wezel, M. Schriks, and M.B. Heringa, Effect of combining in vitro estrogenicity data with kinetic characteristics of estrogenic compounds on the in vivo predictive value, Toxicol. in Vitro 27 (2013), pp. 44–51. doi:10.1016/j.tiv.2012.09.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.W. Nichols, I.R. Schultz, and P.N. Fitzsimmons, In vitro-in vivo extrapolation of quantitative hepatic biotransformation data for fish: I. A review of methods, and strategies for incorporating intrinsic clearance estimates into chemical kinetic models, Aquat. Toxicol. 78 (2006), pp. 74–90. doi:10.1016/j.aquatox.2006.01.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Fent, Fish cell lines as versatile tools in ecotoxicology: Assessment of cytotoxicity, cytochrome P4501A induction potential and estrogenic activity of chemicals and environmental samples, Toxicol. in Vitro 15 (2001), pp. 477–488. doi:10.1016/S0887-2333(01)00053-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Zahn, C. Hauck, J. Holzschuh, and T. Braunbeck, Acute and sublethal toxicity of seepage waters from garbage dumps to permanent cell lines and primary cultures of hepatocytes from rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): A novel approach to environmental risk assessment for chemicals and chemical mixtures, Zentralbl. Hyg. Umweltmed. 196 (1995), pp. 455–479.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• A. Castaño, M.J. Cantarino, P. Castillo, and J.V. Tarazona, Correlations between the RTG-2 cytotoxicity test EC50 and in vivo LC50 rainbow trout bioassay, Chemosphere 32 (1996), pp. 2141–2157. doi:10.1016/0045-6535(96)00126-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Young, T. Martin, R. Venkatapathy, and P. Harten, Are the chemical structures in your QSAR correct? QSAR Comb. Sci. 27 (2008), pp. 1337–1345. doi:10.1002/qsar.200810084
   Google Scholar
• D. Fourches, E. Muratov, and A. Tropsha, Trust, but verify: On the importance of chemical structure curation in cheminformatics and QSAR modeling research, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 50 (2010), pp. 1189–1204. doi:10.1021/ci100176x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.J. Villaverde, P. Sandín-España, J.L. Alonso-Prados, A.M. Lamsabhi, and M. Alcamí, Computational study of the structure and degradation products of alloxydim herbicide, J. Phys. Chem. A 122 (2018), pp. 3909–3918. doi:10.1021/acs.jpca.8b00865
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.J. Villaverde, P. Sandín-España, J.L. Alonso-Prados, A.M. Lamsabhi, and M. Alcamí, Pesticide byproducts formation: Theoretical study of the protonation of alloxydim degradation products, Comput. Theor. Chem. 1143 (2018), pp. 9–19. doi:10.1016/j.comptc.2018.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ILSI, International Life Sciences Institute. Available at https://ilsi.org (accessed November 2019).
   Google Scholar
• HELSI, Health and Environmental Sciences Institute. Available at https://hesiglobal.org (accessed November 2019).
   Google Scholar
• A. Takei, ILSI Health and Environmental Sciences Institute (HESI), global leader in advancing translational science to create science-based solutions for a sustainable, healthier world, Genes Environ. 37 (2015), pp. 1–6. doi:10.1186/s41021-015-0001-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lhasa, Lhasa Limited. Available at www.lhasalimited.org (accessed November 2019).
   Google Scholar
• R.D. Combes and R.A. Rodford, The use of expert systems for toxicity prediction – Illustrated with reference to the DEREK program, in Predicting Chemical Toxicity and Fate, M.T.D. Cronin and D.J. Livingstone, eds.,CRC Press Boca Ratón, 2004, pp. 193–204.
   Google Scholar
• IUCLID6, International Uniform ChemicaL Information Database, European Chemicals Agency in association with the OECD. Available at https://iuclid6.echa.europa.eu (accessed November 2019).
   Google Scholar
• CRADAs, Cooperative research and development agreements, Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Available at www.fda.gov/science-research/cooperative-research-and-development-agreements-cradas/fda-cradas (accessed November 2019).
   Google Scholar
• FDA, Food and drug administration. Available at www.fda.gov (accessed November 2019).
   Google Scholar
• MultiCASE, MultiCASE Inc. Available at www.multicase.com (accessed November 2019).
   Google Scholar
• OECD, Guidance Document on the Validation of (Quantitative)structure-activity Relationships [(Q)SAR] Models, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• K. Bellifa and S.M. Mekelleche, QSAR study of the toxicity of nitrobenzenes to Tetrahymena pyriformis using quantum chemical descriptors, Arab. J. Chem. 9 (2016), pp. S1683–S1689. doi:10.1016/j.arabjc.2012.04.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Šarlauskas, E. Polmickaitė-Smirnova, N. Čėnas, K. Krikštopaitis, and Ž. Anusevičius, The QSAR study for antibacterial activity of structurally diverse nitroaromatics, Chemija 30 (2019), pp. 41–48. doi:10.6001/chemija.v30i1.3924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Larsson, B. Kumar Mishra, M. Tysklind, A. Linusson, and P.L. Andersson, On the use of electronic descriptors for QSAR modelling of PCDDs, PCDFs and dioxin-like PCBs, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 24 (2013), pp. 461–479. doi:10.1080/1062936x.2013.791719
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Xi, Z. Yu, C. Niu, S. Ban, and G. Yang, Development of a general quantum-chemical descriptor for steric effects: Density functional theory based QSAR study of herbicidal sulfonylurea analogues, J. Comput. Chem. 27 (2006), pp. 1571–1576. doi:10.1002/jcc.20464
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.A. Toropov, D. Leszczynska, and J. Leszczynski, Predicting water solubility and octanol water partition coefficient for carbon nanotubes based on the chiral vector, Comput. Biol. Chem. 31 (2007), pp. 127–128. doi:10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2007.02.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.R. Katritzky, O.V. Kulshyn, I. Stoyanova-Slavova, D.A. Dobchev, M. Kuanar, D.C. Fara, and M. Karelson, Antimalarial activity: A QSAR modeling using CODESSA PRO software, Bioorg. Med. Chem. 14 (2006), pp. 2333–2357. doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2005.11.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E.B. Alencar Filho, A.A. Santos, and B.G. Oliveira, A quantum chemical study of molecular properties and QSPR modeling of oximes, amidoximes and hydroxamic acids with nucleophilic activity against toxic organophosphorus agents, J. Mol. Struct. 1133 (2017), pp. 338–347. doi:10.1016/j.molstruc.2016.12.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Puzyn and J. Falandysz, Application and comparison of different chemometric approaches in QSPR modelling of supercooled liquid vapour pressures for chloronaphthalenes, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 18 (2007), pp. 299–313. doi:10.1080/10629360701303875
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Schrödinger, Quantisierung als Eigenwertproblem, Ann. Phys. 384 (1926), pp. 361–376. doi:10.1002/andp.19263840404
   Google Scholar
• A. Dreuw and M. Head-Gordon, Single-reference ab initio methods for the calculation of excited states of large molecules, Chem. Rev. 105 (2005), pp. 4009–4037. doi:10.1021/cr0505627
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L.B. Harding, S.J. Klippenstein, and A.W. Jasper, Ab initio methods for reactive potential surfaces, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 9 (2007), pp. 4055–4070. doi:10.1039/B705390H
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Pokluda, M. Černý, M. Šob, and Y. Umeno, Ab initio calculations of mechanical properties: Methods and applications, Prog. Mater. Sci. 73 (2015), pp. 127–158. doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.S. Christensen, T. Kubař, Q. Cui, and M. Elstner, Semiempirical quantum mechanical methods for noncovalent interactions for chemical and biochemical applications, Chem. Rev. 116 (2016), pp. 5301–5337. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00584
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Thiel, Semiempirical quantum-chemical methods in computational chemistry, in Theory and Applications of Computational Chemistry, C.E. Dykstra, G. Frenking, K.S. Kim, and G.E. Scuseria, eds., Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2005, pp. 559–580. doi:10.1016/B978-044451719-7/50064-0
   Google Scholar
• J.J. Villaverde, C. López-Goti, M. Alcamí, A.M. Lamsabhi, J.L. Alonso-Prados, and P. Sandín-España, Quantum chemistry in environmental pesticide risk assessment, Pest Manag. Sci. 73 (2017), pp. 2199–2202. doi:10.1002/ps.4641
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E.G. Hohenstein and C.D. Sherrill, Wavefunction methods for noncovalent interactions, WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 2 (2012), pp. 304–326. doi:10.1002/wcms.84
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Fulde, Wavefunction methods in electronic-structure theory of solids, Adv. Phys. 51 (2002), pp. 909–948. doi:10.1080/00018730110116371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Callaway and N.H. March, Density functional methods: Theory and applications, in Solid State Physics, H. Ehrenreich, D. Turnbull, and F. Seitz, eds., Academic Press, London, 1984, pp. 135–221. doi:10.1016/S0081-1947(08)60313-6
   Google Scholar
• R.G. Parr and W. Yang, Density-Functional Theory of Atoms and Molecules, Oxford University Press, New York, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• W. Koch and M.C. Holthausen, A Chemist’s Guide to Density Functional Theory, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH, Weinheim, 2001. doi:10.1002/3527600043
   Google Scholar
• A.J. Cohen, P. Mori-Sánchez, and W. Yang, Challenges for density functional theory, Chem. Rev. 112 (2012), pp. 289–320. doi:10.1021/cr200107z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Fock, Näherungsmethode zur lösung des quantenmechanischen mehrkörperproblems, Z. Physik 61 (1930), pp. 126–148. doi:10.1007/BF01340294
   Google Scholar
• P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn, Inhomogeneous electron gas, Phys. Rev. 136 (1964), pp. B864–B871. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.136.B864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Puzyn, N. Suzuki, M. Haranczyk, and J. Rak, Calculation of quantum-mechanical descriptors for QSPR at the DFT level: Is it necessary? J. Chem. Inf. Model. 48 (2008), pp. 1174–1180. doi:10.1021/ci800021p
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Hmamouchi, M. Larif, S. Chtita, A. Adad, M. Bouachrine, and T. Lakhlifi, Predictive modelling of the LD50 activities of coumarin derivatives using neural statistical approaches: Electronic descriptor-based DFT, J. Taibah Univ. Sci. 10 (2016), pp. 451–461. doi:10.1016/j.jtusci.2015.06.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Ghamali, S. Chtita, A. Aouidate, A. Ghaleb, M. Bouachrine, and T. Lakhlifi, Combining DFT and QSAR computation to predict the interaction of flavonoids with the GABA (A) receptor using electronic and topological descriptors, J. Taibah Univ. Sci. 11 (2017), pp. 422–433. doi:10.1016/j.jtusci.2016.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Kohn and L.J. Sham, Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects, Phys. Rev. 140 (1965), pp. A1133–A1138. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.140.A1133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996), pp. 3865–3868. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Wang and J.P. Perdew, Correlation hole of the spin-polarized electron gas, with exact small-wave-vector and high-density scaling, Phys. Rev. B 44 (1991), pp. 13298–13307. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.44.13298
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Lee, W. Yang, and R.G. Parr, Development of the Colle-Salvetti correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electron density, Phys. Rev. B 37 (1988), pp. 785–789. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.37.785
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.D. Becke, Density-functional exchange-energy approximation with correct asymptotic behavior, Phys. Rev. A 38 (1988), pp. 3098–3100. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.38.3098
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.H. Vosko, L. Wilk, and M. Nusair, Accurate spin-dependent electron liquid correlation energies for local spin density calculations: A critical analysis, Can. J. Phys. 58 (1980), pp. 1200–1211. doi:10.1139/p80-159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.J. Stephens, F.J. Devlin, C.F. Chabalowski, and M.J. Frisch, Ab Initio calculation of vibrational absorption and circular dichroism spectra using density functional force fields, J. Phys. Chem. 98 (1994), pp. 11623–11627. doi:10.1021/j100096a001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.D. Becke, Density‐functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange, J. Chem. Phys. 98 (1993), pp. 5648–5652. doi:10.1063/1.464913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Kaur, V. Kumar, M. Chawla, L. Cavallo, A. Poater, and N. Upadhyay, Pesticides curbing soil fertility: Effect of complexation of free metal ions, Front. Chem. 5 (2017), pp. 43. doi:10.3389/fchem.2017.00043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Jiang, N. Zhang, H. Zhang, J. Wang, and M. Qian, Investigation on the gas-phase decomposition of trichlorfon by GC-MS and theoretical calculation, PLoS One 10 (2015), pp. e0121389. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0121389
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I.V. Tetko, I. Sushko, A.K. Pandey, H. Zhu, A. Tropsha, E. Papa, T. Öberg, R. Todeschini, D. Fourches, and A. Varnek, Critical assessment of QSAR models of environmental toxicity against Tetrahymena pyriformis: Focusing on applicability domain and overfitting by variable selection, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 48 (2008), pp. 1733–1746. doi:10.1021/ci800151m
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Zhu, A. Tropsha, D. Fourches, A. Varnek, E. Papa, P. Gramatica, T. Öberg, P. Dao, A. Cherkasov, and I.V. Tetko, Combinatorial QSAR modeling of chemical toxicants tested against Tetrahymena pyriformis, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 48 (2008), pp. 766–784. doi:10.1021/ci700443v
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.G. Parr, R.A. Donnelly, M. Levy, and W.E. Palke, Electronegativity: The density functional viewpoint, J. Chem. Phys. 68 (1978), pp. 3801–3807. doi:10.1063/1.436185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.G. Parr and R.G. Pearson, Absolute hardness: Companion parameter to absolute electronegativity, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 105 (1983), pp. 7512–7516. doi:10.1021/ja00364a005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.G. Parr, L.V. Szentpály, and S. Liu, Electrophilicity index, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121 (1999), pp. 1922–1924. doi:10.1021/ja983494x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L.R. Domingo, M. Ríos-Gutiérrez, and P. Pérez, Applications of the conceptual density functional theory indices to organic chemistry reactivity, Molecules 21 (2016), pp. 748. doi:10.3390/molecules21060748
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Chakraborty, S. Duley, S. Giri, and P.K. Chattaraj, An understanding of the origin of chemical reactivity from a conceptual DFT approach, in A Matter of Density: Exploring the Electron Density Concept in the Chemical, Biological, and Materials Sciences, N. Sukumar, ed., Wiley New York, 2012, pp. 157–201. doi:10.1002/9781118431740.ch7
   Google Scholar
• Reenu and Vikas, Exploring the role of quantum chemical descriptors in modeling acute toxicity of diverse chemicals to Daphnia magna, J. Mol. Graph. Model. 61 (2015), pp. 89–101. doi:10.1016/j.jmgm.2015.06.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vikas, Reenu, and Chayawan, Does electron-correlation has any role in the quantitative structure–Activity relationships? J. Mol. Graph. Model. 42 (2013), pp. 7–16. doi:10.1016/j.jmgm.2013.02.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reenu and Vikas, Electron-correlation based externally predictive QSARs for mutagenicity of nitrated-PAHs in Salmonella typhimurium TA100, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 101 (2014), pp. 42–50. doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2013.11.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reenu and Vikas, Role of exchange and correlation in the real external prediction of mutagenicity: Performance of hybrid and meta-hybrid exchange–Correlation functionals, RSC Adv. 5 (2015), pp. 29238–29251. doi:10.1039/C4RA14262D
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vikas and Chayawan, Externally predictive quantitative modeling of supercooled liquid vapor pressure of polychlorinated-naphthalenes through electron-correlation based quantum-mechanical descriptors, Chemosphere 95 (2014), pp. 448–454. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.09.093
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chayawan and Vikas, Externally predictive single-descriptor based QSPRs for physico-chemical properties of polychlorinated-naphthalenes: Exploring relationships of log SW, log KOA, and log KOW with electron-correlation, J. Hazard. Mater. 296 (2015), pp. 68–81. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.04.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vikas and Chayawan, Single-descriptor based quantum-chemical QSPRs for physico-chemical properties of polychlorinated-dibenzo-p-dioxins and -dibenzo-furans (PCDD/Fs): Exploring the role of electron-correlation, Chemosphere 118 (2015), pp. 239–245. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.08.072
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.H. Al-Fahemi, The use of quantum-chemical descriptors for predicting the photoinduced toxicity of PAHs, J. Mol. Model. 18 (2012), pp. 4121–4129. doi:10.1007/s00894-012-1417-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Eroglu and H. Türkmen, A DFT-based quantum theoretic QSAR study of aromatic and heterocyclic sulfonamides as carbonic anhydrase inhibitors against isozyme, CA-II, J. Mol. Graph. Model. 26 (2007), pp. 701–708. doi:10.1016/j.jmgm.2007.03.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Pan, A.K. Gupta, V. Subramanian, and P.K. Chattaraj, Quantitative structure-activity/property/toxicity relationships through conceptual density functional theory-based reactivity descriptors, in Pharmaceutical Sciences: Breakthroughs in Research and Practice, I.R.M. Association, ed., IGI Global, Hershey, 2017, pp. 1517–1572. doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-1762-7.ch058
   Google Scholar
• S. Pan, A. Gupta, D. Roy, R. Sharma, V. Subramanian, A. Mitra, and P. Chattaraj, Application of conceptual density functional theory in developing QSAR models and their usefulness in the prediction of biological activity and toxicity of molecules: QSAR in medicinal chemistry, in Chemometrics Applications and Research: QSAR in Medicinal Chemistry, A.G. Mercader, P.R. Duchowicz, and P.M. Sivakumar, eds., Apple Academic Press, New York, 2016, pp. 183–214. doi:10.1201/b19853-7
   Google Scholar
• A. Chakraborty, S. Pan, and P.K. Chattaraj, Biological activity and toxicity: A conceptual DFT approach, in Applications of Density Functional Theory to Biological and Bioinorganic Chemistry, M.V. Putz and D.M.P. Mingos, eds., Springer, Berlin, 2013, pp. 143–179. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-32750-6_5
   Google Scholar
• G. Santanab, C. Arindam, G. Ashutosh Kumar, R. Debesh Ranjan, V. Ramadoss, P. Ramakrishnan, S. Venkatesan, and C. Pratim, Modeling ecotoxicity as applied to some selected aromatic compounds: A conceptual DFT based quantitative-structure-toxicity-relationship (QSTR) analysis, in Advanced Methods and Applications in Chemoinformatics: Research Progress and New Applications, E.A. Castro and A.K. Haghi, eds., IGI Global, Hershey, 2012, pp. 1–24. doi:10.4018/978-1-60960-860-6.ch001
   Google Scholar
• OECD, Revised Guidance Document on Developing and Assessing Adverse Outcome Pathways, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• E. Berggren, P. Amcoff, R. Benigni, K. Blackburn, E. Carney, M. Cronin, H. Deluyker, F. Gautier, R.S. Judson, G.E.N. Kass, D. Keller, D. Knight, W. Lilienblum, C. Mahony, I. Rusyn, T. Schultz, M. Schwarz, G. Schüürmann, A. White, J. Burton, A.M. Lostia, S. Munn, and A. Worth, Chemical safety assessment using read-across: Assessing the use of novel testing methods to strengthen the evidence base for decision making, Environ. Health Perspect. 123 (2015), pp. 1232–1240. doi:10.1289/ehp.1409342
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Metruccio, I. Castelli, C. Civitella, C. Galbusera, F. Galimberti, L. Tosti, and A. Moretto, Compilation of a database, specific for the pesticide active substance and their metabolites, comprising the main genotoxicity endpoints, EFSA Support. Publ. 14 (2017), pp. 1229E. doi:10.2903/sp.efsa.2017.EN-1229
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission), Regulation (EC) No 2018/605, Off. J. Eur. Union L101 (2018), pp. 33–36.
   Google Scholar
• ECHA, QSARs and Grouping of Chemicals, in Guidance on Information Requirements and Chemical Safety Assessment, European Chemicals Agency, Helsinki, 2008, pp. 1–134.
   Google Scholar
• ECHA, Practical Guide 5: How to Use and Report (Q)sars, European Chemicals Agency, Helsinki, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• ECHA, Practical Guide: How to Use Alternatives to Animal Testing to Fulfil Your Information Requirements for REACH Registration, European Chemicals Agency, Helsinki, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• JRC, Joint Research Centre. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/eurl/ecvam (accessed November 2019).
   Google Scholar
• JRC, Applicability of QSAR analysis to the evaluation of the toxicological relevance of metabolites and degradates of pesticide active substances for dietary risk assessment, EFSA Support. Publ. 7 (2010), pp. 50E. doi:10.2903/sp.efsa.2010.EN-50
   Google Scholar
• B. Sevilla-Morán, L. Calvo, C. López-Goti, J.L. Alonso-Prados, and P. Sandín-España, Photodegradation behaviour of sethoxydim and its comercial formulation Poast® under environmentally-relevant conditions in aqueous media. Study of photoproducts and their toxicity, Chemosphere 168 (2017), pp. 501–507. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.11.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Sandín-España, B. Sevilla-Morán, C. López-Goti, M.M. Mateo-Miranda, and J.L. Alonso-Prados, Rapid photodegradation of clethodim and sethoxydim herbicides in soil and plant surface model systems, Arab. J. Chem. 9 (2016), pp. 694–703. doi:10.1016/j.arabjc.2015.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Sevilla-Morán, M.M. Mateo-Miranda, J.L. Alonso-Prados, J.M. García-Baudín, and P. Sandín-España, Sunlight transformation of sethoxydim-lithium in natural waters and effect of humic acids, Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 90 (2010), pp. 487–496. doi:10.1080/03067310903199500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.J. Villaverde, I. Santín-Montanyá, B. Sevilla-Morán, J. Alonso-Prados, and P. Sandín-España, Assessing the effects of alloxydim phototransformation products by QSAR models and a phytotoxicity study, Molecules 23 (2018), pp. 993. doi:10.3390/molecules23050993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.J. Villaverde, B. Sevilla-Morán, C. López-Goti, L. Calvo, J.L. Alonso-Prados, and P. Sandín-España, Photolysis of clethodim herbicide and a formulation in aquatic environments: Fate and ecotoxicity assessment of photoproducts by QSAR models, Sci. Tot. Environ. 615 (2018), pp. 643–651. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.300
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Worth, A. Bassan, A. Gallegos, T. Netzeva, G. Patlewicz, M. Pavan, I. Tsakovska, and M. Vracko, The Characterisation of (Quantitative) Structure-Activity Relationships: Preliminary Guidance, European Commission, Ispra, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• ECETOC, Category approaches, read-across, (Q)SAR, Technical Report No. 116, European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals, Brussels, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• ECETOC, Alternative testing approaches in environmental safety assessment, Technical Report No. 97, European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals, Brussels, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• G. Patlewicz, N. Ball, E.D. Booth, E. Hulzebos, E. Zvinavashe, and C. Hennes, Use of category approaches, read-across and (Q)SAR: General considerations, Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 67 (2013), pp. 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2013.06.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ECETOC, (Q)SARs: Evaluation of the commercially available software for human health and environmental endpoints with respect to chemical managment applications, Technical Report No. 89, European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals, Brussels, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• OECD, Report of the Workshop on Using Mechanistic Information in Forming Chemical Categories, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Arlington, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• OECD, QSAR toolbox, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Available at https://qsartoolbox.org (accessed November 2019).
   Google Scholar
• OECD, The OECD QSAR toolbox, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. www.oecd.org/chemicalsafety/risk-assessment/oecd-qsar-toolbox.htm#Guidance_Documents_and_Training_Materials_for_Using_the_Toolbox (accessed November 2019).
   Google Scholar
• OECD, (Q)SARs: Guidance documents and reports, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Available at www.oecd.org/chemicalsafety/risk-assessment/guidancedocumentsandreportsrelatedtoqsars.htm (accessed November 2019).
   Google Scholar
• OECD, Report of the Workshop on Structural Alerts for the OECD (Q)SAR Application Toolbox, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• C. Kneuer, A. Charistou, P. Craig, D. Eleftheriadou, N. Engel, M. Kjaerstad, S. Krishnan, V. Laskari, K. Machera, D. Nikolopoulou, C. Pieper, E. Schoen, E. Spilioti, and H. Buist, Applicability of in silico tools for the prediction of dermal absorption for pesticides, EFSA Support. Publ. 15 (2018), pp. 1493E. doi:10.2903/sp.efsa.2018.EN-1493
   Google Scholar
• R. Benigni, C. Laura Battistelli, C. Bossa, A. Giuliani, E. Fioravanzo, A. Bassan, M. Fuart Gatnik, J. Rathman, C. Yang, and O. Tcheremenskaia, Evaluation of the applicability of existing (Q)SAR models for predicting the genotoxicity of pesticides and similarity analysis related with genotoxicity of pesticides for facilitating of grouping and read across, EFSA Support. Publ. 16 (2019), pp. 1598E. doi:10.2903/sp.efsa.2019.EN-1598
   Google Scholar
• A. Bassan, E. Fioravanzo, M. Pavan, and M. Stocchero, Applicability of physicochemical data, QSARs and read-across in threshold of toxicological concern assessment, EFSA Support. Publ. 8 (2011), pp. 159E. doi:10.2903/sp.efsa.2011.EN-159
   Google Scholar
• A. Worth, M. Fuart-Gatnik, S. Lapenna, and R. Serafimova, Applicability of QSAR analysis in the evaluation of developmental and neurotoxicity effects for the assessment of the toxicological relevance of metabolites and degradates of pesticide active substances for dietary risk assessment, EFSA Support. Publ. 8 (2011), pp. 169E. doi:10.2903/sp.efsa.2011.EN-169
   Google Scholar
• J. Devillers and H. Devillers, Prediction of acute mammalian toxicity from QSARs and interspecies correlations, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 20 (2009), pp. 467–500. doi:10.1080/10629360903278651
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.D. Rasinger, F. Frenzel, A. Braeuning, and A. Lampen, Identification and evaluation of potentially mutagenic and carcinogenic food contaminants, EFSA J. 16 (2018), pp. e16085. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2018.e16085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Zhao, E. Boriani, A. Chana, A. Roncaglioni, and E. Benfenati, A new hybrid system of QSAR models for predicting bioconcentration factors (BCF), Chemosphere 73 (2008), pp. 1701–1707. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.09.033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Gissi, O. Nicolotti, A. Carotti, D. Gadaleta, A. Lombardo, and E. Benfenati, Integration of QSAR models for bioconcentration suitable for REACH, Sci. Tot. Environ. 456–457 (2013), pp. 325–332. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.03.104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Hillebrecht, W. Muster, A. Brigo, M. Kansy, T. Weiser, and T. Singer, Comparative evaluation of in silico systems for Ames test mutagenicity prediction: Scope and limitations, Chem. Res. Toxicol. 24 (2011), pp. 843–854. doi:10.1021/tx2000398
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E.J. Matthews, N.L. Kruhlak, R.D. Benz, J.F. Contrera, C.A. Marchant, and C. Yang, Combined use of MC4PC, MDL-QSAR, BioEpisteme, Leadscope PDM, and Derek for windows software to achieve high-performance, high-confidence, mode of action–Based predictions of chemical carcinogenesis in rodents, Toxicol. Mech. Methods 18 (2008), pp. 189–206. doi:10.1080/15376510701857379
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Pradeep, R.J. Povinelli, S. White, and S.J. Merrill, An ensemble model of QSAR tools for regulatory risk assessment, J. Cheminform. 8 (2016), pp. 48. doi:10.1186/s13321-016-0164-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Frenzel, T. Buhrke, I. Wenzel, J. Andrack, J. Hielscher, and A. Lampen, Use of in silico models for prioritization of heat-induced food contaminants in mutagenicity and carcinogenicity testing, Arch. Toxicol. 91 (2017), pp. 3157. doi:10.1007/s00204-016-1924-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.J. Villaverde, B. Sevilla-Morán, C. López-Goti, J.L. Alonso-Prados, and P. Sandín-España, Contributions of computer-based chemical modeling technologies on the risk assessment and the environmental fate study of (nano)pesticides, in Environmental Concerns and Sustainable Development: Volume 1: Air, Water and Energy Resources, V. Shukla and N. Kumar, eds., Springer, Singapore, 2020, pp. 1–27. doi:10.1007/978-981-13-5889-0_1
   Google Scholar
• WOS, ISI web of knowledge. Thomson Reuters. Available at https://apps.webofknowledge.com (accessed November 2019).
   Google Scholar