QSAR models for biocides: The example of the prediction of Daphnia magna acute toxicity

References

• H.C. Flemming and M. Greenhalgh, Concept and consequences of the EU biocide guideline, in Marine and Industrial Biofouling, H.C. Flemming, P.S. Murthy, R. Venkatesan, and K. Cooksey, eds., Springer Series on Biofilms, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009, pp. 189–199. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-69796-1_10
   Google Scholar
• A. Coors, P. Vollmar, J. Heim, F. Sacher, and A. Kehrer, Environmental risk assessment of biocidal products: Identification of relevant components and reliability of a component-based mixture assessment, Environ. Sci. Eur. 30 (2018), pp. 3. doi:10.1186/s12302-017-0130-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Amara, W. Miled, R.B. Slama, and N. Ladhari, Antifouling processes and toxicity effects of antifouling paints on marine environment. A review, Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 57 (2018), pp. 115–130. doi:10.1016/j.etap.2017.12.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biocidal product regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament of the Council of 22: Concerning the making available on the market and use of biocidal products, Off. J. 167 (2012), pp. 1–123.
   Google Scholar
• T. Backhaus, R. Altenburger, M. Faust, D. Frein, T. Frische, P. Johansson, A. Kehrer, and E.T. Porsbring, Proposal for environmental mixture risk assessment in the context of the biocidal product authorization in the EU, Environ. Sci. Eur. 25 (2013), pp. 4. doi:10.1186/2190-4715-25-4
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, Report from the commission to the European parliament and the council on the implementation of the Union authorisation of biocidal products in accordance with Article 42 (3)of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the making available on the market and use of biocidal products (2018). Available at https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/health/files/biocides/docs/com2018342_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Chemical Agency, Biocidal active substance. Available at https://echa.europa.eu/it/information-on-chemicals/biocidal-active-substances.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, Assessment of different options to address risks from the use phase of biocides (2009). Available at https://ec.europa.eu/environment/archives/ppps/pdf/final_report0309.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• H. Singer, S. Jaus, I. Hanke, A. Lück, J. Hollender, and A.C. Alder, Determination of biocides and pesticides by on-line solid phase extraction coupled with mass spectrometry and their behaviour in wastewater and surface water, Environ. Pollut. 158 (2010), pp. 3054–3064. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2010.06.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T.P. Wangler, S. Zuleeg, R. Vonbank, K. Bester, M. Boller, J. Carmeliet, and M. Burkhardt, Laboratory scale studies of biocide leaching from façade coatings, Build. Environ. 54 (2012), pp. 168–173. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.02.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Burkhardt, M. Junghans, S. Zuleeg, M. Boller, U. Schoknecht, X. Lamani, K. Bester, R. Vonbank, and H. Simmler, Biozide in Gebäudefassaden – ökotoxikologische Effekte, Auswaschung und Belastungsabschätzung für Gewässer, Environ. Sci. Eur. 21 (2009), pp. 36–47. doi:10.1007/s12302-008-0033-1
   Google Scholar
• I.K. Konstantinou and T.A. Albanis, Worldwide occurrence and effects of antifouling paint booster biocides in the aquatic environment: A review, Environ. Int. 30 (2004), pp. 235–248. doi:10.1016/S0160-4120(03)00176-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.P.M. Ventura, A.M.M. Gonçalves, T. Sintra, J.L. Pereira, F. Gonçalves, and J.A.P. Coutinho, Designing ionic liquids: The chemical structure role in the toxicity, Ecotoxicology 22 (2013), pp. 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.431
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD, Test No. 202: Daphnia Sp. Acute Immobilisation Test, OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 2, OECD Publishing, Paris, 2004. doi:10.1787/9789264069947-en
   Google Scholar
• M. Vighi and E. Bacci, Ecotossicologia, Edizione UTET, Collana, 2006. ( Trattato di farmacologia e terapia).
   Google Scholar
• S. Tao, X. Xi, F. Xu, B. Li, J. Cao, and R. Dawson, A fragment constant QSAR model for evaluating the EC50 values of organic chemicals to Daphnia magna, Environ. Pollut. 116 (2002), pp. 57–64. doi:10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00119-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Zvinavashe, T. Du, T. Griff, H.H.J. van den Berg, A.E.M.F. Soffers, J. Vervoort, A.J. Murk, and I.M.C.M. Rietjens, Quantitative structure–activity relationship modelling of the toxicity of organothiophosphate pesticides to Daphnia magna and Cyprinus carpio, Chemosphere 75 (2009), pp. 1531–1538. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.01.081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Benfenati, Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships (QSAR) for Pesticide Regulatory Purposes, Ed. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• C. Porcelli, E. Boriani, A. Roncaglioni, A. Chana, and E. Benfenati, Regulatory perspectives in the use and validation of QSAR. a case study: DEMETRA model for Daphnia toxicity, Environ. Sci. Technol. 42 (2008), pp. 491–496. doi:10.1021/es071430t
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.P. Toropova, A.A. Toropov, A.M. Veselinović, J.B. Veselinović, D. Leszczynska, and J. Leszczynski, Monte Carlo–based quantitative structure–activity relationship models for toxicity of organic chemicals to Daphnia magna, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 35 (2016), pp. 2691–2697. doi:10.1002/etc.3466
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Young, D. Martin, R. Venkatapathy, and P. Harten, Are the chemical structures in your QSAR correct? QSAR Comb. Sci. 27 (2008), pp. 1337–1345. doi:10.1002/qsar.200810084
   Google Scholar
• ECHA, Biocidal active substances. Active substance/product-type combinations submitted under Directive 98/8/EC or Regulation (EU) No 528/2012, including “existing” active substances included in the review programme and “new” active substances (2015). Available at https://echa.europa.eu/information-on-chemicals/biocidal-active-substances.
   Google Scholar
• M.R. Berthold, N. Cebron, F. Dill, T.R. Gabriel, T. Kotter, T. Meinl, P. Ohl, K. Thiel, and B. Wiswedel, KNIME – The Konstanz Information Miner, Version 2.0 and Beyond, Acm Sigkdd 11 (2009), pp. 26–31. doi:10.1145/1656274.1656280.
   Google Scholar
• SANCO/10597/2003, Guidance document on the assessment of the equivalence of technical materials of substances regulated under regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, Rev. 10.1 (2009). Available at https://ec.europa.eu/food/sites/food/files/plant/docs/pesticides_guidance_415equivalence-chem-substances_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• K. Khan, P.M. Khan, G. Lavado, C. Valsecchi, J. Pasqualini, D. Baderna, M. Marzo, A. Lombardo, K. Roy, and E. Benfenati, QSAR modeling of Daphnia magna and fish toxicities of biocides using 2D descriptors, Chemosphere 229 (2019), pp. 8–17. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.04.204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kode srl, Dragon (software for molecular descriptor calculation) version 7.0.8 (2017). Available at https://chm.kode-solutions.net.
   Google Scholar
• A. Mauri, V. Consonni, M. Pavan, and R. Todeschini, Dragon software: An easy approach to molecular descriptor calculations, Match 56 (2006), pp. 237–248.
   Google Scholar
• R. Todeschini, V. Consonni, A. Mauri, and M. Pavan, DRAGON-software for the Calculation of Molecular Descriptors. Web Version 3, Università degli Studi di Milano Bicocca, Milano, Italy, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• R. Silipo, I. Adae, A. Hart, and M. Berthold. Seven techniques for dimensionality reduction. Available at https://www.knime.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/knime_seventechniquesdatadimreduction.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• H. Golmohammadi, Z. Dashtbozorgi, and W.E. Acree Jr., Quantitative structure-activity relationship prediction of blood-to-brain partitioning behavior using support vector machine, Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 47 (2012), pp. 421–429. doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2012.06.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.A. Toropov, A.P. Toropova, M. Marzo, J.L. Dorne, N. Georgiadis, and E. Benfenati, QSAR models for predicting acute toxicity of pesticides in rainbow trout using the CORAL software and EFSA’s OpenFoodTox database, Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. (2017), pp. 158–163. doi:10.1016/j.etap.2017.05.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.P. Toropova, A.A. Toropov, E. Benfenati, and G. Gini, QSAR models for toxicity of organic substances to Daphnia magna built up by using the CORAL freeware, Chem. Biol. Drug. Des. 79 (2012), pp. 332–338. doi:10.1111/j.1747-0285.2011.01279.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.P. Toropova, A.A. Toropov, S.E. Martyanov, E. Benfenati, G. Gini, D. Leszczynska, and J. Leszczynski, CORAL: QSAR modeling of toxicity of organic chemicals towards Daphnia magna, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 110 (2012), pp. 177–181. doi:10.1016/j.chemolab.2011.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.A. Toropov, A.P. Toropova, E. Benfenati, and R. Fanelli, QSAR as a random event: Selecting of the molecular structure for potential anti-tuberculosis agents, Anti-Infective Agents 14 (2016), pp. 3–10. doi:10.2174/221135251401160302120554
   Google Scholar
• E. Benfenati, Q. Chaudhry, G. Gini, and J.L. Dorne, Integrating in silico models and read-across methods for predicting toxicity of chemicals: A step-wise strategy, Environ. Int. 131 (2019), pp. 105060. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2019.105060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Environment in Japan, Results of aquatic toxicity tests of chemicals conducted by Ministry of the Environment in Japan (March 2016). Available at https://www.env.go.jp/en/chemi/sesaku/aquatic_Mar_2016.pdf.
   Google Scholar