QSPR modelling for intrinsic viscosity in polymer–solvent combinations based on density functional theory

References

• D.W. Van Krevelen, Properties of Polymers, 3rd ed., Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• S. Khaheshi, S. Riahi, M. Mohammadi-Khanaposhtani, and H. Shokrollahzadeh, Prediction of amines capacity for carbon dioxide absorption based on structural characteristics, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 58 (2019), pp. 8763–8771. doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b00567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Afantitis, G. Melagraki, H. Sarimveis, P.A. Koutentis, J. Markopoulos, and O. Igglessi-Markopoulou, Prediction of intrinsic viscosity in polymer-solvent combinations using a QSPR model, Polymer 47 (2006), pp. 3240–3248. doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2006.02.060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Ghanshyam, N.I. Carl, L. Turab, and L.M. Babetta, Machine-learning-based predictive modeling of glass transition temperatures: A case of polyhydroxyalkanoate homopolymers and copolymers, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 59 (2019), pp. 5013–5025. doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00807.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.P. Toropova, A.A. Toropov, D. Leszczynska, and J. Leszczynski, The index of ideality of correlation: Hierarchy of Monte Carlo models for glass transition temperatures of polymers, J. Polym. Res. 25 (2018), pp. 221. doi:10.1007/s10965-018-1618-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Chen, J. Farukh, B. Rasulev, M. Ossowski, and P. Boudjouk, A computational structure-property relationship study of glass transition temperatures for a diverse set of polymers, J. Polym. Sci. Part B Polym. Phys. 56 (2018), pp. 877–885. doi:10.1002/polb.24602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Venkatraman and B.K. Alsberg, Designing high-refractive index polymers using materials informatic, Polymers 10 (2018), pp. 103. doi:10.3390/polym10010103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Jabeen, M. Chen, B. Rasulev, M. Ossowski, and P. Boudjouk, Refractive indices of diverse data set of polymers: A computational QSPR based study, Comput. Mater. Sci. 137 (2017), pp. 215–224. doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2017.05.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.P. Mohsin, R. Bakhtiyor, and R. Kunal, QSPR modeling of the refractive index for diverse polymers using 2D descriptors, ACS Omega 3 (2018), pp. 13374–13386. doi:10.1021/acsomega.8b01834.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.G. Krishna, P.K. Ojha, S. Kar, K. Roy, and J. Leszczynski, Chemometric modeling of power conversion efficiency of organic dyes in dye sensitized solar cells for the future renewable energy, Nano Energy 70 (2020), pp. 104537. doi:10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.104537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Li, Z. Zhong, L. Li, R. Gao, J. Cui, T. Gao, L.H. Hu, Y. Lu, Z.-M. Su, and H. Li, A cascaded QSAR model for efficient prediction of overall power conversion efficiency of all-organic dye-sensitized solar cells, J. Comput. Chem. 36 (2015), pp. 1036–1046. doi:10.1002/jcc.23886.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.V. Lyulin, G.R. Davies, and D.B. Adolf, Brownian dynamics simulations of dendrimers under shear flow, Macromolecules 33 (2000), pp. 3294–3304. doi:10.1021/ma992128a.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Johannesson and B. Schaub, Intrinsic viscosity for a polymer chain with self-avoiding interactions, Phys. Rev. A 35 (1987), pp. 3571–3574. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.35.3571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.S. Boucher, Solubility parameters and solvent affinities for polycaprolactone: A comparison of methods, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 137 (2020), pp. 48908. doi:10.1002/app.48908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Weerachanchai, Y. Wong, K.H. Lim, T.T.Y. Tan, and J.-M. Lee, Determination of solubility parameters of ionic liquids and ionic liquid/solvent mixtures from intrinsic viscosity, ChemPhysChem 15 (2014), pp. 3580–3591. doi:10.1002/cphc.201402345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.H. Han, G.S. Jeon, I.K. Hong, and S.B. Lee, Prediction of solubility parameter from intrinsic viscosity, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 19 (2013), pp. 1130–1136. doi:10.1016/j.jiec.2012.12.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W.U. Nyalaliska, N. Behzad, D. Parisi, and H.C. Ralph, Determination of intrinsic viscosity of native cellulose solutions in ionic liquids, J. Rheol. 64 (2020), pp. 1063–1073. doi:10.1122/8.0000015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Perevyazko, A. Gubarev, L. Tauhardt, A. Dobrodumov, G. Pavlov, and U. Schubert, Linear poly(ethylene imine)s: True molar masses, solution properties and conformation, Polym. Chem. 8 (2017), pp. 7169–7179. doi:10.1039/C7PY01634D.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Kurdziel, K. Królikowska, M. Łabanowska, S. Pietrzyk, and M. Michalec, The effect of thermal and irradiation treatments on structural and physicochemical properties of octenyl succinate maize starches, Food Chem. 330 (2020), pp. 127242. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Eom, H. Ju, Y. Park, D.W. Chae, Y.M. Jung, B.C. Kim, and H.G. Chae, Effect of dissolution pathways of polyacrylonitrile on the solution homogeneity thermodynamic- or kinetic-controlled dissolution, Polymer 205 (2020), pp. 122697. doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2020.122697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Gharagheizi, QSPR analysis for intrinsic viscosity of polymer solutions by means of GA-MLR and RBFNN, Comput. Mater. Sci. 40 (2007), pp. 159–167. doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2006.11.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Mortazavi, S. Mortazavi, and A. Troncoso, Wrapper-based feature selection using regression trees to predict intrinsic viscosity of polymer, Eng. Comput. 2 (2021), pp. 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• I. Alisi, A. Uzairu, S. Abechi, and S. Idris, Quantitative structure activity relationship analysis of coumarins as free radical scavengers by genetic function algorithm, Phys. Chem. Res. 6 (2018), pp. 209–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Luo, Z. Wei, R. Spinney, Z. Yang, L. Chai, and R. Xiao, A novel model to predict gas-phase hydroxyl radical oxidation kinetics of polychlorinated compounds, Chemosphere 172 (2017), pp. 333–340. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.01.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Dang and S. Zhang, DFT-based theoretical prediction of intrinsic viscosity of polymer solutions, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 29 (2018), pp. 1011–1021. doi:10.1080/1062936X.2018.1539035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Bicerano, Prediction of Polymer Properties, 3rd ed., Marcel Dekker, New York, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• J. Xu, B. Chen, Q. Zhang, and B. Guo, Prediction of refractive indices of linear polymers by a four-descriptor QSPR model, Polymer 45 (2004), pp. 8651–8659. doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2004.10.057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Maouz, L. Khaouane, S. Hanini, Y. Ammi, M. Hamadache, and M. Laidi, QSPR studies of carbonyl, hydroxyl, polyene indices, and viscosity average molecular weight of polymers under photostabilization using ANN and MLR approaches, Kem. Ind. 69 (2020), pp. 1–16. doi:10.15255/KUI.2019.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Weininger, SMILES: A chemical language and information system, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 28 (1988), pp. 31–36. doi:10.1021/ci00057a005.
   Google Scholar
• R. Todeschini and V. Consonni, Molecular Descriptors for Chemoinformatics, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• G. Landrum, RDKit: Open-source cheminformatics; software. Available at http://www.rdkit.org.
   Google Scholar
• C.W. Yap, PaDEL-descriptor: An open source software to calculate molecular descriptors and fingerprints, J. Comput. Chem. 32 (2011), pp. 1466–1474. doi:10.1002/jcc.21707.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.M. Parrish, L.A. Burns, D.G.A. Smith, A.C. Simmonett, A.E. Deprince, E.G. Hohenstein, U. Bozkaya, A.Y. Sokolov, R. Di Remigio, R.M. Richard, J.F. Gonthier, A.M. James, H.R. Mcalexander, A. Kumar, M. Saitow, X. Wang, B.P. Pritchard, P. Verma, H.F. Schaefer, K. Patkowski, R.A. King, E.F. Valeev, F.A. Evangelista, J.M. Turney, T.D. Crawford, and C.D. Sherrill, Psi4 1.1: An open-source electronic structure program emphasizing automation, advanced libraries, and interoperability, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 13 (2017), pp. 3185–3197. doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Moriwaki, Y.-S. Tian, N. Kawashita, and T. Takagi, Mordred: A molecular descriptor calculator, J. Cheminf. 10 (2018), pp. 4. doi:10.1186/s13321-018-0258-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Rogers and A.J. Hopfinger, Application of genetic function approximation to quantitative structure-activity relationships and quantitative structure-property relationships, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 34 (1994), pp. 854–866. doi:10.1021/ci00020a020.
   Google Scholar
• V. Vapnik, Statistical Learning Theory, Wiley, New York, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• B. Wang, H. Yi, K. Xu, and Q. Wang, Prediction of the self-accelerating decomposition temperature of organic peroxides using QSPR models, J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 128 (2017), pp. 399–406. doi:10.1007/s10973-016-5922-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Pan, J. Jiang, R. Wang, and H. Cao, Advantages of support vector machine in QSPR studies for predicting auto-ignition temperatures of organic compounds, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 92 (2008), pp. 169–178. doi:10.1016/j.chemolab.2008.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Smola and B. Schölkopf, A tutorial on support vector regression, Stat. Comput. 14 (2004), pp. 199–222. doi:10.1023/B:STCO.0000035301.49549.88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Wen, B. Liu, J. Wolfgang, T.E. Long, R. Odle, and S. Cheng, Determination of glass transition temperature of polyimides from atomistic molecular dynamics simulations and machine-learning algorithms, J. Polym. Sci. 58 (2020), pp. 1521–1534. doi:10.1002/pol.20200050.
   Google Scholar
• P. Gramatica, Principles of QSAR models validation: Internal and external, QSAR Comb. Sci. 26 (2007), pp. 694–701. doi:10.1002/qsar.200610151.
   Google Scholar
• H. Smith, Applied Regression Analysis, Springer, Berlin, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• A. Golbraikh and A. Tropsha, Beware of q2!, J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 20 (2002), pp. 269–276. doi:10.1016/S1093-3263(01)00123-1.
   Google Scholar
• R. Christoph, R. Gerta, and M. Markus, Y-randomization and its variants in QSPR/QSAR, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 47 (2007), pp. 2345–2357. doi:10.1021/ci700157b.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.A. Berlin, Determination of the intrinsic viscosity of polymers in solution, Polym. Sci. U.S.S.R. 8 (1966), pp. 1465–1472. doi:10.1016/0032-3950(66)90156-0.
   Google Scholar
• P. Parrini, F. Sebastiano, and G. Messina, Intrinsic viscosity and molecular weight of isotactic polypropylene, Macromol. Chem. Phys. 38 (1960), pp. 27–38. doi:10.1002/macp.1960.020380103.
   Google Scholar
• R. Chiang, Intrinsic viscosities of isotactic polypropylene in various solvents, J. Phys. Chem. 70 (1966), pp. 929–930. doi:10.1021/j100875a504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T.G. Fox and P.J. Flory, Intrinsic viscosity relationships for polystyrene, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 73 (1951), pp. 1915–1920. doi:10.1021/ja01149a004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.M. Barrales-Rienda and D.C. Pepper, Intrinsic viscosities and dimensions of poly(phenylene oxide), J. Polym. Sci. B Polym. Lett. 4 (1966), pp. 939–941.
   Google Scholar
• G.S. Misra and P.K. Mukherjee, The relation between the molecular weight and intrinsic viscosity of polymethyl acrylate, Colloid Polym. Sci. 258 (1980), pp. 464–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Lowell and K. Lemont, Electrotopological state indices for atom types: A novel combination of electronic, topological, and valence state information, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 35 (1995), pp. 1039–1045. doi:10.1021/ci00028a014.
   Google Scholar