References
- B. O’Regan and M. Grätzel, A low-cost, high-efficiency solar cell based on dye-sensitized colloidal TiO2 films, Nature 353 (1991), pp. 737–740. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/353737a0.
- K. Sharma, V. Sharma, and S.S. Sharma, Dye-sensitized solar cells: Fundamentals and current status, Nanoscale Res. Lett. 13 (2018), pp. 381.
- M. Grätzel, Recent advances in sensitized mesoscopic solar cells, Acc. Chem. Res. 42 (2009), pp. 1788–1798. doi:https://doi.org/10.1021/ar900141y.
- Z. Xu, Y. Li, Y. Li, S. Yuan, L. Hao, S. Gao, and X. Lu, Theoretical study of T shaped phenothiazine/carbazole based organic dyes with naphthalimide as π-spacer for DSSCs, Spectrochim. Acta Part A Molec. Biomol. Spect. 233 (2020), pp. 118201. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2020.118201.
- Y. Li, J. Liu, D. Liu, X. Li, and Y. Xu, D-A-π-A based organic dyes for efficient DSSCs: A theoretical study on the role of π-spacer, Comput. Mat. Sci. 161 (2019), pp. 163–176. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2019.01.033.
- J.G. Krishna, P.K. Ojha, S. Kar, K. Roy, and J. Leszczynski, Chemometric modeling of power conversion efficiency of organic dyes in dye sensitized solar cells for the future renewable energy, Nano Energy 70 (2020), pp. 104537. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.104537.
- A. Slodek, D. Zych, G. Szafraniec-Gorol, P. Gnida, M. Vasylieva, and E. Schab-Balcerzak, Investigations of new phenothiazine-based compounds for dye-sensitized solar cells with theoretical insight, Materials (Basel) 13 (2020), pp. 2292. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13102292.
- J.-S. Luo, Z.-Q. Wan, and C.-Y. Jia, Recent advances in phenothiazine-based dyes for dye-sensitized solar cells, Chinese Chem. Lett. 27 (2016), pp. 1304–1318. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2016.07.002.
- Z. Wu, M. Zhu, Y. Kang, E.L. Leung, T. Lei, C. Shen, D. Jiang, Z. Wang, D. Cao, and T. Hou, Do we need different machine learning algorithms for QSAR modeling? A comprehensive assessment of 16 machine learning algorithms on 14 QSAR data sets, Brief. Bioinform. 22 (2021), pp. 1–17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbaa321.
- E.N. Muratov, J. Bajorath, R.P. Sheridan, I.V. Tetko, D. Filimonov, V. Poroikov, T.I. Oprea, I.I. Baskin, A. Varnek, A. Roitberg, O. Isayev, S. Curtarolo, D. Fourches, Y. Cohen, A. Aspuru-Guzik, D.A. Winkler, D. Agrafiotis, A. Cherkasov, and A. Tropsha, QSAR without borders, Chem. Soc. Rev. 49 (2020), pp. 3525–3564.
- C. Yang, J. Chen, R. Wang, M. Zhang, C. Zhang, and J. Liu, Density prediction models for energetic compounds merely using molecular topology, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 61 (2021), pp. 2582–2593. doi:https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.0c01393.
- T. Le, V.C. Epa, F.R. Burden, and D.A. Winkler, Quantitative structure-property relationship modeling of diverse materials properties, Chem. Rev. 112 (2012), pp. 2889–2919. doi:https://doi.org/10.1021/cr200066h.
- A. Kumar and P. Kumar, Cytotoxicity of quantum dots: Use of quasiSMILES in development of reliable models with index of ideality of correlation and the consensus modelling, J. Hazard Mater. 402 (2021), pp. 123777. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123777.
- A. Kumar and P. Kumar, Identification of good and bad fragments of tricyclic triazinone analogues as potential PKC-θ inhibitors through SMILES–based QSAR and molecular docking, Struct. Chem. 32 (2020), pp. 149–165. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-020-01629-2.
- A.P. Toropova, A.A. Toropov, J. Leszczynski, and N. Sizochenko, Using quasi-SMILES for the predictive modeling of the safety of 574 metal oxide nanoparticles measured in different experimental conditions, Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 86 (2021), pp. 103665. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2021.103665.
- A. Kumarand and P. Kumar, Quantitative structure toxicity analysis of ionic liquids toward acetylcholinesterase enzyme using novel QSTR models with index of ideality of correlation and correlation contradiction index, J. Mol. Liqu. 318 (2020), pp. 114055. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2020.114055.
- A.P. Toropova and A.A. Toropov, Can the Monte Carlo method predict the toxicity of binary mixtures? Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 28 (2021), pp. 39493–39500. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13460-1.
- A.A. Toropov, A.P. Toropova, A. Lombardo, A. Roncaglioni, G.J. Lavado, and E. Benfenati, The Monte Carlo method to build up models of the hydrolysis half-lives of organic compounds, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. (2021), pp. 1–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1062936X.2021.1952649.
- M. Duhan, R. Singh, M. Devi, J. Sindhu, R. Bhatia, A. Kumar, and P. Kumar, Synthesis, molecular docking and QSAR study of thiazole clubbed pyrazole hybrid as alpha-amylase inhibitor, J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 39 (2021), pp. 91–107. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2019.1704885.
- S. Ahmadi, H. Ghanbari, S. Lotfi, and N. Azimi, Predictive QSAR modeling for the antioxidant activity of natural compounds derivatives based on Monte Carlo method, Mol. Divers. 25 (2021), pp. 87–97. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11030-019-10026-9.
- A. Kumar, J. Sindhu, and P. Kumar, In-silico identification of fingerprint of pyrazolyl sulfonamide responsible for inhibition of N-myristoyltransferase using Monte Carlo method with index of ideality of correlation, J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 39 (2021), pp. 5014–5025. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2020.1784286.
- S. Jain, S.A. Amin, N. Adhikari, T. Jha, and S. Gayen, Good and bad molecular fingerprints for human rhinovirus 3C protease inhibition: Identification, validation, and application in designing of new inhibitors through Monte Carlo-based QSAR study, J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 38 (2020), pp. 66–77. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2019.1566093.
- M. Duhan, J. Sindhu, P. Kumar, M. Devi, R. Singh, R. Kumar, S. Lal, A. Kumar, S. Kumar, and K. Hussain, Quantitative structure activity relationship studies of novel hydrazone derivatives as α-amylase inhibitors with index of ideality of correlation, J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 38 (2020), pp. 1–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2020.1863861.
- A.A. Toropov, I. Raska Jr., A.P. Toropova, M. Raskova, A.M. Veselinovic, and J.B. Veselinovic, The study of the index of ideality of correlation as a new criterion of predictive potential of QSPR/QSAR-models, Sci. Total Environ. 659 (2019), pp. 1387–1394. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.439.
- J.B. Veselinovic, A.A. Toropov, A.P. Toropova, G.M. Nikolic, and A.M. Veselinovic, Monte carlo method-based QSAR modeling of penicillins binding to human serum proteins, Arch. Pharm. (Weinheim) 348 (2015), pp. 62–67. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ardp.201400259.
- A. Kumar and P. Kumar, Construction of pioneering quantitative structure activity relationship screening models for abuse potential of designer drugs using index of ideality of correlation in Monte Carlo optimization, Arch. Toxicol. 94 (2020), pp. 3069–3086. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-020-02828-w.
- S. Ahmadi, Mathematical modeling of cytotoxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles using the index of ideality correlation criteria, Chemosphere 242 (2020), pp. 125192. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125192.
- P.G.R. Achary, A.P. Toropova, and A.A. Toropov, Combinations of graph invariants and attributes of simplified molecular input-line entry system (SMILES) to build up models for sweetness, Food Res. Int. 122 (2019), pp. 40–46. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2019.03.067.
- P. Kumar and A. Kumar, Correlation intensity index (CII) as a benchmark of predictive potential: Construction of quantitative structure activity relationship models for anti-influenza single-stranded DNA aptamers using Monte Carlo optimization, J. Molec. Struct. 1246 (2021), pp. 131205. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2021.131205.
- A.P. Toropova, A.A. Toropov, S.E. Martyanov, E. Benfenati, G. Gini, D. Leszczynska, and J. Leszczynski, CORAL: QSAR modeling of toxicity of organic chemicals towards Daphnia magna, Chemom. Intel. Lab. Syst. 110 (2012), pp. 177–181. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2011.10.005.
- A.P. Toropova and A.A. Toropov, CORAL: QSAR models for carcinogenicity of organic compounds for male and female rats, Comput. Biol. Chem. 72 (2018), pp. 26–32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2017.12.012.
- P.G. Achary, QSPR modelling of dielectric constants of π-conjugated organic compounds by means of the CORAL software, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 25 (2014), pp. 507–526. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1062936X.2014.899267.
- P. Kumar and A. Kumar, In silico enhancement of azo dye adsorption affinity for cellulose fibre through mechanistic interpretation under guidance of QSPR models using Monte Carlo method with index of ideality correlation, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 31 (2020), pp. 697–715. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1062936X.2020.1806105.
- S. Ahmadi, A.P. Toropova, and A.A. Toropov, Correlation intensity index: Mathematical modeling of cytotoxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles, Nanotoxicology 14 (2020), pp. 1118–1126. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17435390.2020.1808252.
- A.P. Toropova, A.A. Toropov, E. Carnesecchi, E. Benfenati, and J.L. Dorne, The using of the Index of Ideality of Correlation (IIC) to improve predictive potential of models of water solubility for pesticides, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 27 (2020), pp. 13339–13347. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-07820-6.
- A.P. Toropova, P.R. Duchowicz, L.M. Saavedra, E.A. Castro, and A.A. Toropov, The use of the index of ideality of correlation to build up models for bioconcentration factor, Mol. Inform. 39 (2020), pp. e1900070. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/minf.201900070.
- A.P. Toropova and A.A. Toropov, The index of ideality of correlation: Improvement of models for toxicity to algae, Nat. Prod. Res. 33 (2019), pp. 2200–2207. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14786419.2018.1493591.
- A.A. Toropov, A.P. Toropova, G. Selvestrel, and E. Benfenati, Idealization of correlations between optimal simplified molecular input-line entry system-based descriptors and skin sensitization, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 30 (2019), pp. 447–455.
- P. Kumar and A. Kumar, CORAL: QSAR models of CB1 cannabinoid receptor inhibitors based on local and global SMILES attributes with the index of ideality of correlation and the correlation contradiction index, Chemom. Intel. Lab. Syst. 200 (2020), pp. 103982.
- K. Roy, R.N. Das, P. Ambure, and R.B. Aher, Be aware of error measures. Further studies on validation of predictive QSAR models, Chemom. Intel. Lab. Syst. 152 (2016), pp. 18–33.
- N. Chirico and P. Gramatica, Real external predictivity of QSAR models: How to evaluate it? Comparison of different validation criteria and proposal of using the concordance correlation coefficient, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 51 (2011), pp. 2320–2335. doi:https://doi.org/10.1021/ci200211n.
- S. Kar, K. Roy, and J. Leszczynski, Applicability domain: A step toward confident predictions and decidability for QSAR modeling, in Computational Toxicology: Methods and Protocols, O. Nicolotti, ed., Springer New York, New York, 2018, pp. 141–169.
- S. Ahmadi, S. Lotfi, and P. Kumar, A Monte Carlo method based QSPR model for prediction of reaction rate constants of hydrated electrons with organic contaminants, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 31 (2020), pp. 935–950. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1062936X.2020.1842495.
- P. Kumar, A. Kumar, and J. Sindhu, In silico design of diacylglycerol acyltransferase-1 (DGAT1) inhibitors based on SMILES descriptors using Monte-Carlo method, SAR QSAR Environ. Res 30 (2019), pp. 525–541. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1062936X.2019.1629998.
- P. Kumar, A. Kumar, and J. Sindhu, Design and development of novel focal adhesion kinase (FAK) inhibitors using Monte Carlo method with index of ideality of correlation to validate QSAR, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 30 (2019), pp. 63–80.
- A. Golbraikh and A. Tropsha, Beware of q2!, J. Mol. Graph Model. 20 (2002), pp. 269–276. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1093-3263(01)00123-1.
- P.K. Ojha, I. Mitra, R.N. Das, and K. Roy, Further exploring rm2 metrics for validation of QSPR models, Chemom. Intel. Lab. Syst. 107 (2011), pp. 194–205. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2011.03.011.
- K. Roy, S. Kar, and P. Ambure, On a simple approach for determining applicability domain of QSAR models, Chemom. Intel. Lab. Syst. 145 (2015), pp. 22–29. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2015.04.013.
- M. Nimbhal, K. Bagri, P. Kumar, and A. Kumar, The index of ideality of correlation: A statistical yardstick for better QSAR modeling of glucokinase activators, Struct. Chem. 31 (2019), pp. 831–839. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-019-01468-w.
- C. Rücker, G. Rücker, and M. Meringer, y-Randomization and its variants in QSPR/QSAR, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 47 (2007), pp. 2345–2357. doi:https://doi.org/10.1021/ci700157b.
- A.M. Veselinovic, J.B. Milosavljevic, A.A. Toropov, and G.M. Nikolic, SMILES-based QSAR models for the calcium channel-antagonistic effect of 1,4-dihydropyridines, Arch. Pharm. (Weinheim) 346 (2013), pp. 134–139. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ardp.201200373.
- A.M. Veselinovic, J.B. Veselinovic, A.A. Toropov, A.P. Toropova, and G.M. Nikolic, QSAR models for the reactivation of sarin inhibited acetylcholinesterase by quaternary pyridinium oximes based on Monte Carlo method, Curr. Comput. Aided Drug Des. 10 (2014), pp. 266–273. doi:https://doi.org/10.2174/1574886309666141126144848.
- J.V. Zivkovic, N.V. Trutic, J.B. Veselinovic, G.M. Nikolic, and A.M. Veselinovic, Monte Carlo method based QSAR modeling of maleimide derivatives as glycogen synthase kinase-3beta inhibitors, Comput. Biol. Med. 64 (2015), pp. 276–282.
- V. Venkatraman and B.K. Alsberg, A quantitative structure-property relationship study of the photovoltaic performance of phenothiazine dyes, Dyes Pigm. 114 (2015), pp. 69–77. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dyepig.2014.10.026.
- G. Yan, X. Yang, B. Albijanic, Y. Zhou, Y. Zhou, and X. Zhu, A new tool to rationally design highly efficient organic sensitizers for dye-sensitized solar cells: A three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (3D-QSAR) perspective, Solar Energy 184 (2019), pp. 187–194. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2019.03.092.