References
- K. Acharya, D. Werner, J. Dolfing, M. Barycki, P. Meynet, W. Mrozik, O. Komolafe, T. Puzyn, and R.J. Davenport, A quantitative structure-biodegradation relationship (QSBR) approach to predict biodegradation rates of aromatic chemicals, Water Res. 157 (2019), pp. 181–190. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.03.086.
- J.R. Baker, D. Gamberger, J.R. Mihelcic, and A. Sabljic, Evaluation of artificial intelligence based models for chemical biodegradability prediction, Molecules 9 (2004), pp. 989–1003. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/91200989.
- Z. Zhan, L. Li, S. Tian, X. Zhen, and Y. Li, Prediction of chemical biodegradability using computational methods, Mol. Simul. 43 (2017), pp. 1277–1290. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08927022.2017.1328556.
- W.F.C. Rocha and D.A. Sheen, Classification of biodegradable materials using QSAR modelling with uncertainty estimation, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 27 (2016), pp. 799–811. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1062936X.2016.1238010.
- S. Gupta, N. Basant, and K.P. Singh, Qualitative and quantitative structure-activity relationship modelling for predicting blood-brain barrier permeability of structurally diverse chemicals, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 26 (2015), pp. 95–124. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1062936X.2014.994562.
- C. Nantasenamat, T. Monnor, A. Worachartcheewan, P. Mandi, C. Isarankura-Na-Ayudhya, and V. Prachayasittikul, Predictive QSAR modeling of aldose reductase inhibitors using Monte Carlo feature selection, Eur. J. Med. Chem. 76 (2014), pp. 352–359. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2014.02.043.
- E. Pourbasheer, R. Aalizadeh, T.S. Shokouhi, M.R. Ganjali, P. Norouzi, and J. Shadmanesh, 2D and 3D quantitative structure–activity relationship study of hepatitis C virus NS5B polymerase inhibitors by comparative molecular field analysis and comparative molecular similarity indices analysis methods, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 54 (2014), pp. 2902–2914. doi:https://doi.org/10.1021/ci500216c.
- A.M. Al-Fakih, Z.Y. Algamal, M.H. Lee, H.H. Abdallah, H. Maarof, and M. Aziz, Quantitative structure-activity relationship model for prediction study of corrosion inhibition efficiency using two-stage sparse multiple linear regression, J. Chemom. 30 (2016), pp. 361–368. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/cem.2800.
- M. Eklund, U. Norinder, S. Boyer, and L. Carlsson, Benchmarking variable selection in QSAR, Mol. Inf. 31 (2012), pp. 173–179.
- A.M. Al-Fakih, Z.Y. Algamal, M.H. Lee, M. Aziz, and H.T.M. Ali, QSAR classification model for diverse series of antifungal agents based on improved binary differential search algorithm, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 30 (2019), pp. 131–143. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1062936X.2019.1568298.
- A.M. Al-Fakih, M. Aziz, H.H. Abdallah, Z.Y. Algamal, M.H. Lee, and H. Maarof, High dimensional QSAR study of mild steel corrosion inhibition in acidic medium by furan derivatives, Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 10 (2015), pp. 3568–3583.
- Z. Algamal, An efficient gene selection method for high-dimensional microarray data based on sparse logistic regression, Electron. J. Appl. Stat. Anal. 10 (2017), pp. 242–256.
- Z.Y. Algamal and M.H. Lee, Penalized logistic regression with the adaptive LASSO for gene selection in high-dimensional cancer classification, Expert Syst. Appl. 42 (2015), pp. 9326–9332. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.08.016.
- Z.Y. Algamal and M.H. Lee, A two-stage sparse logistic regression for optimal gene selection in high-dimensional microarray data classification, Adv. Data Anal. Classif. 13 (2018), pp. 753–771. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11634-018-0334-1.
- Z.Y. Algamal, M.K. Qasim, and H.T.M. Ali, A QSAR classification model for neuraminidase inhibitors of influenza A viruses (H1N1) based on weighted penalized support vector machine, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 28 (2017), pp. 415–426. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1062936X.2017.1326402.
- M.K. Qasim, Z.Y. Algamal, and H.T.M. Ali, A binary QSAR model for classifying neuraminidase inhibitors of influenza A viruses (H1N1) using the combined minimum redundancy maximum relevancy criterion with the sparse support vector machine, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 29 (2018), pp. 517–527. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1062936X.2018.1491414.
- O.S. Qasim and Z.Y. Algamal, Feature selection using particle swarm optimization-based logistic regression model, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 182 (2018), pp. 41–46. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2018.08.016.
- M. Eklund, U. Norinder, S. Boyer, and L. Carlsson, Choosing feature selection and learning algorithms in QSAR, J. Chem Inf. Model. 54 (2014), pp. 837–843. doi:https://doi.org/10.1021/ci400573c.
- M. Goodarzi, B. Dejaegher, and Y.V. Heyden, Feature selection methods in QSAR studies, J. AOAC Int. 95 (2012), pp. 636–651. doi:https://doi.org/10.5740/jaoacint.SGE_Goodarzi.
- Z.Y. Algamal and M.H. Lee, Regularized logistic regression with adjusted adaptive elastic net for gene selection in high dimensional cancer classification, Comput. Biol. Med. 67 (2015), pp. 136–145. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2015.10.008.
- Z. Algamal and M. Lee, A new adaptive L1-norm for optimal descriptor selection of high-dimensional QSAR classification model for anti-hepatitis C virus activity of thiourea derivatives, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 28 (2017), pp. 75–90. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1062936X.2017.1278618.
- A. Fernandez, R. Rallo, and F. Giralt, Prioritization of in silico models and molecular descriptors for the assessment of ready biodegradability, Environ. Res. 142 (2015), pp. 161–168. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2015.06.031.
- K. Mansouri, T. Ringsted, D. Ballabio, R. Todeschini, and V. Consonni, Quantitative structure-activity relationship models for ready biodegradability of chemicals, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 53 (2013), pp. 867–878. doi:https://doi.org/10.1021/ci4000213.
- Q. Cao and K. Leung, Prediction of chemical biodegradability using support vector classifier optimized with differential evolution, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 54 (2014), pp. 2515–2523. doi:https://doi.org/10.1021/ci500323t.
- L. Ceriani, E. Papa, S. Kovarich, R. Boethling, and P. Gramatica, Modeling ready biodegradability of fragrance materials, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 34 (2015), pp. 1224–1231. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.2926.
- A.K. Singh, M. Bilal, H.M.N. Iqbal, and A. Raj, Trends in predictive biodegradation for sustainable mitigation of environmental pollutants: Recent progress and future outlook, Sci. Total Environ. 770 (2021), pp. 144561. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144561.
- Z. Algamal, M. Lee, A. Al-Fakih, and M. Aziz, High-dimensional QSAR modelling using penalized linear regression model with L 1/2-norm, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 27 (2016), pp. 703–719. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1062936X.2016.1228696.
- Z.Y. Algamal and M.H. Lee, A novel molecular descriptor selection method in QSAR classification model based on weighted penalized logistic regression, J. Chemom. 31 (2017), pp. e2915. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/cem.2915.
- Z.Y. Algamal, M.H. Lee, and A.M. Al‐Fakih, High‐dimensional quantitative structure–activity relationship modeling of influenza neuraminidase a/PR/8/34 (H1N1) inhibitors based on a two‐stage adaptive penalized rank regression, J. Chemom. 30 (2016), pp. 50–57. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/cem.2766.
- Z.Y. Algamal, M.H. Lee, A.M. Al‐Fakih, and M. Aziz, High‐dimensional QSAR classification model for anti‐hepatitis C virus activity of thiourea derivatives based on the sparse logistic regression model with a bridge penalty, J. Chemom. 31 (2017), pp. e2889. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/cem.2889.
- D. Ballabio, F. Biganzoli, R. Todeschini, and V. Consonni, Qualitative consensus of QSAR ready biodegradability predictions, Toxicol. Environ. Chem. 99 (2017), pp. 1193–1216.
- F. Cheng, Y. Ikenaga, Y. Zhou, Y. Yu, W. Li, J. Shen, Z. Du, L. Chen, C. Xu, G. Liu, P.W. Lee, and Y. Tang, In silico assessment of chemical biodegradability, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 52 (2012), pp. 655–669. doi:https://doi.org/10.1021/ci200622d.
- G.I. Sayed, A.E. Hassanien, and A.T. Azar, Feature selection via a novel chaotic crow search algorithm, Neural Comput. Appl. 31 (2017), pp. 171–188. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-2988-6.
- S. Ouadfel and M. Abd Elaziz, Enhanced crow search algorithm for feature selection, Expert Syst. Appl. 159 (2020), pp. 113572. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113572.
- A.Y. Abdelaziz and A. Fathy, A novel approach based on crow search algorithm for optimal selection of conductor size in radial distribution networks, Eng. Sci. Technol. 20 (2017), pp. 391–402.
- A. Askarzadeh, A novel metaheuristic method for solving constrained engineering optimization problems: Crow search algorithm, Comput. Struct. 169 (2016), pp. 1–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2016.03.001.
- A.A. Ewees and M.A. Elaziz, Performance analysis of chaotic multi-verse harris hawks optimization: A case study on solving engineering problems, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 88 (2020), pp. 103370. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2019.103370.
- M.A. Elaziz, A.A. Ewees, R.A. Ibrahim, and S. Lu, Opposition-based moth-flame optimization improved by differential evolution for feature selection, Math. Comput. Simul. 168 (2020), pp. 48–75. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2019.06.017.
- A.M. Anter, A.E. Hassenian, and D. Oliva, An improved fast fuzzy c-means using crow search optimization algorithm for crop identification in agricultural, Expert Syst. Appl. 118 (2019), pp. 340–354. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.10.009.
- D. Gupta, S. Sundaram, A. Khanna, A. Ella Hassanien, and V.H.C. de Albuquerque, Improved diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease using optimized crow search algorithm, Comput. Electr. Eng. 68 (2018), pp. 412–424. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2018.04.014.
- R. Todeschini and V. Consonni, Molecular Descriptors for Chemoinformatics, 2nd ed., Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 2009.
- B. Bhhatarai, W. Teetz, T. Liu, T. Öberg, N. Jeliazkova, N. Kochev, O. Pukalov, I.V. Tetko, S. Kovarich, and E. Papa, CADASTER QSPR models for predictions of melting and boiling points of perfluorinated chemicals, Mol. Inf. 30 (2011), pp. 189–204. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/minf.201000133.
- T.M. Nolte, G. Chen, C.S. Van Schayk, K. Pinto-Gil, A.J. Hendriks, W.J. Peijnenburg, and A.M. Ragas, Disentanglement of the chemical, physical, and biological processes aids the development of quantitative structure-biodegradation relationships for aerobic wastewater treatment, Sci. Total Environ. 708 (2020), pp. 133863. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133863.
- W. Guo, J. Tao, C. Yang, C. Song, W. Geng, Q. Li, Y. Wang, M. Kong, and S. Wang, Introduction of environmentally degradable parameters to evaluate the biodegradability of biodegradable polymers, PLoS One 7 (2012), pp. e38341. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038341.
- L. Pogliani, Modeling with molecular pseudoconnectivity descriptors. A useful extension of the intrinsic I-state concept, J. Phys. Chem. A 104 (2000), pp. 9029–9045. doi:https://doi.org/10.1021/jp001191v.
- M. Cvetnic, D.J. Perisic, M. Kovacic, S. Ukic, T. Bolanca, B. Rasulev, H. Kusic, and A.L. Bozic, Toxicity of aromatic pollutants and photooxidative intermediates in water: A QSAR study, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 169 (2019), pp. 918–927. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.10.100.