Study for the binding affinity of thyroid hormone receptors based on machine learning algorithm

References

• A. Aranda and A. Pascual, Nuclear hormone receptors and gene expression, Physiol. Rev. 81 (2001), pp. 1269–1304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.C. Ribeiro, P.J. Kushner, and J.D. Baxter, The nuclear hormone receptor gene superfamily, Annu. Rev. Med. 46 (1995), pp. 443–453. doi:10.1146/annurev.med.46.1.443.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• D.J. Mangelsdorf, C. Thummel, M. Beato, P. Herrlich, G. Schütz, K. Umesono, B. Blumberg, P. Kastner, M. Mark, P. Chambon, and R.M. Evans, The nuclear receptor superfamily: The second decade, Cell 83 (1995), pp. 835–839. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(95)90199-X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.C. Ribeiro, J.W. Apriletti, R.L. Wagner, W. Feng, P.J. Kushner, S. Nilsson, T.S. Scanlan, B.L. West, R.J. Fletterick, and J.D. Baxter, X-ray crystallographic and functional studies of thyroid hormone receptor, J. Steroid Biochem. Molec. Biol. 65 (1995), pp. 133–141. doi:10.1016/S0960-0760(98)00029-6.
   Google Scholar
• R.M. Evans, The steroid and thyroid hormone receptor superfamily, Science 240 (1988), pp. 889–895. doi:10.1126/science.3283939.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.Y. Cheng, Multiple mechanisms for regulation of the transcriptional activity of thyroid hormone receptors, Rev. Endocr. Metab. Dis. 1 (2000), pp. 9–18. doi:10.1023/A:1010052101214.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• C. Weinberger, C.C. Thompson, E.S. Ong, R. Lebo, D.J. Gruol, and R.M. Evans, The c-erb-A gene encodes a thyroid hormone receptor, Nature 324 (1998), pp. 641–646. doi:10.1038/324641a0.
   Google Scholar
• P.M. Yen, Physiological and molecular basis of thyroid hormone action, Physiol. Rev. 81 (2001), pp. 1097–1142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Forrest and B. Vennström, Functions of thyroid hormone receptors in mice, Thyroid 10 (2000), pp. 41–52. doi:10.1089/thy.2000.10.41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Takeda, A. Sakurai, L.J. DeGroot, and S. Refetoff, Recessive inheritance of thyroid hormone resistance caused by complete deletion of the protein-coding region of the thyroid hormone receptor-beta gene, J. Clin. Endocr. Metab. 74 (1992), pp. 49–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.B. Harvey and G.R. Williams, Mechanism of thyroid hormone action, Thyroid 12 (2002), pp. 441–446. doi:10.1089/105072502760143791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y.F. Zhang, X.M. Ren, Y.Y. Li, X.F. Yao, C.H. Li, Z.F. Qin, and L.H. Guo, Bisphenol A alternatives bisphenol S and bisphenol F interfere with thyroid hormone signaling pathway in vitro and in vivo, Environ. Pollut. 237 (2018), pp. 1072–1079. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2017.11.027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Freitas, P. Cano, C. Craig-Veit, M.L. Goodson, J.D. Furlow, and A.J. Murk, Detection of thyroid hormone receptor disruptors by a novel stable in vitro reporter gene assay, Toxicol. Vitro 25 (2011), pp. 257–266. doi:10.1016/j.tiv.2010.08.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Boas, U. Feldt-Rasmussen, and K.M. Main, Thyroid effects of endocrine disrupting chemicals, Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 355 (2012), pp. 240–248. doi:10.1016/j.mce.2011.09.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Katarzynska, A. Hrabia, K. Kowalik, and A. Sechman, Comparison of the in vitro effects of TCDD, PCB 126 and PCB 153 on thyroid-restricted gene expression and thyroid hormone secretion by the chicken thyroid gland, Environ. Toxicol. Phar. 39 (2015), pp. 496–503. doi:10.1016/j.etap.2015.01.016.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• L. Birgersson, J. Jouve, E. Jonsson, N. Asker, F. Andreasson, O. Golovko, L. Ahrens, and J. Sturve, Thyroid function and immune status in perch (Perca fluviatilis) from lakes contaminated with PFASs or PCBs, Ecotox. Environ. Safe. 222 (2021), pp. 112495. doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112495.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• M. Boas, U. Feldt-Rasmussen, N.E. Skakkebaek, and K.M. Main, Environmental chemicals and thyroid function, Eur. J. Endocrinol. 154 (2006), pp. 599–611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Ren, L.H. Guo, Y. Gao, B.T. Zhang, and B. Wan, Hydroxylated polybrominated diphenyl ethers exhibit different activities on thyroid hormone receptors depending on their degree of bromination, Toxicol. Appl. Pharm. 268 (2013), pp. 256–263. doi:10.1016/j.taap.2013.01.026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Melzer, N. Rice, M.H. Depledge, W.E. Henley, and T.S. Galloway, Association between serum perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and thyroid disease in the U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, Environ. Health Persp. 118 (2010), pp. 686–692. doi:10.1289/ehp.0901584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.G. Harley, A.R. Marks, J. Chevrier, A. Bradman, A. Sjodin, and B. Eskenazi, PBDE concentrations in women’s serum and fecundability, Environ. Health Persp. 118 (2010), pp. 699–704. doi:10.1289/ehp.0901450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Judson, A. Richard, D.J. Dix, K. Houck, M. Martin, R. Kavlock, V. Dellarco, T. Henry, T. Holderman, P. Sayre, S. Tan, T. Carpenter, and E. Smith, The toxicity data landscape for environmental chemicals, Environ. Health Persp. 117 (2009), pp. 685–695. doi:10.1289/ehp.0800168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Cronin, Chapter 10: Quantitative structure-activity relationships (Qsars) — Applications and methodology, in Challenges and Advances in Computational Chemistry and Physics, Springer Press, Heidelberg, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• X. Bai, L. Yan, C. Ji, Q. Zhang, X. Dong, A. Chen, and M. Zhao, A combination of ternary classification models and reporter gene assays for the comprehensive thyroid hormone disruption profiles of 209 polychlorinated biphenyls, Chemosphere 210 (2018), pp. 312–319. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.07.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Wang and J. Xing, Classification of thyroid hormone receptor agonists and antagonists using statistical learning approaches, Mol. Divers. 23 (2019), pp. 85–92.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• A.P. Toropova, A.A. Toropov, and E. Benfenati, CORAL: Prediction of binding affinity and efficacy of thyroid hormone receptor ligands, Eur. J. Med. Chem. 101 (2015), pp. 452–461. doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2015.07.012.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• F. Wang, Y. Shi, and G. Le, Statistical methods and molecular docking for the prediction of thyroid hormone receptor subtype binding affinity and selectivity, Struct. Chem. 28 (2016), pp. 833–847.
   Google Scholar
• F. Li, Q. Xie, X. Li, N. Li, P. Chi, J. Chen, Z. Wang, and C. Hao, Hormone activity of hydroxylated polybrominated diphenyl ethers on human thyroid receptor-beta: In vitro and in silico investigations, Environ. Health Persp. 118 (2010), pp. 602–606. doi:10.1289/ehp.0901457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N.F. Valadares, M.S. Castilho, I. Polikarpov, and R.C. Garratt, 2D QSAR studies on thyroid hormone receptor ligands, Bioorg. Med. Chem. 15 (2007), pp. 4609–4617.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• G. Azimi, S. Afiuni-Zadeh, and A. Karami, A QSAR study for modeling of thyroid receptors β1 selective ligands by application of adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system and radial basis function, J. Chemom. 26 (2012), pp. 135–142. doi:10.1002/cem.2421.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Wang, Y. Li, J. Ding, Y. Wang, and Y. Chang, Prediction of binding affinity for estrogen receptor alpha modulators using statistical learning approaches, Mol. Divers. 12 (2008), pp. 93–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.A. Marill, Advanced statistics: Linear regression, part II: Multiple linear regression, Acad. Emerg. Med. 11 (2004), pp. 94–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.A. Paltseva, M. Deeb, E. Di Iorio, L. Circelli, Z. Cheng, and C. Colombo, Prediction of bioaccessible lead in urban and suburban soils with Vis-NIR diffuse reflectance spectroscopy, Sci. Total Environ. 809 (2022), pp. 151107. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151107.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• J. Xu, W. Yang, Z. Bai, R. Zhang, J. Zheng, M. Wang, and T. Zhu, Modeling spatial variation of gaseous air pollutants and particulate matters in a Metropolitan area using mobile monitoring data, Environ. Res. 210 (2022), pp. 112858.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• G. Ding, J. Chen, X. Qiao, L. Huang, J. Lin, and X. Chen, Quantitative relationships between molecular structures, environmental temperatures and solid vapor pressures of PCDD/Fs, Chemosphere 62 (2006), pp. 1057–1063. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.04.110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Wold, M. Sjostrom, and L. Eriksson, PLS-regression: A basic tool of chemometrics, Chemom. Intell. Lab. 58 (2001), pp. 109–130. doi:10.1016/S0169-7439(01)00155-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Wold, A. Ruhe, H. Wold, and W.J. Dunn III, The collinearity problem in linear regression. the partial least squares (PLS) approach to generalized inverses, SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput. 5 (1984), pp. 735–743. doi:10.1137/0905052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H.X. Liu, C.X. Xue, R.S. Zhang, X.J. Yao, M.C. Liu, Z.D. Hu, and B.T. Fan, Quantitative prediction of logk of peptides in high-performance liquid chromatography based on molecular descriptors by using the heuristic method and support vector machine, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 44 (2004), pp. 1979–1986. doi:10.1021/ci049891a.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• C. Cortes and V. Vapnik, Support-vector networks, Mach. Learn. 20 (1995), pp. 273–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Cherkassky, The nature of statistical learning theory, IEEE Trans. Neural. Net. 8 (1997), pp. 1564. doi:10.1109/TNN.1997.641482.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• A.J. Smola and B. Schölkopf, A tutorial on support vector regression, Stat. Comput. 14 (2004), pp. 199–222. doi:10.1023/B:STCO.0000035301.49549.88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Tang, Y. Li, Y. Yu, Z. Wang, T. Xu, J. Chen, J. Lin, and X. Li, Development of models predicting biodegradation rate rating with multiple linear regression and support vector machine algorithms, Chemosphere 253 (2020), pp. 126666. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126666.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• E. Scornet, Random forests and kernel methods, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 62 (2016), pp. 1485–1500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.G. Polishchuk, E.N. Muratov, A.G. Artemenko, O.G. Kolumbin, N.N. Muratov, and V.E. Kuz’min, Application of random forest approach to QSAR prediction of aquatic toxicity, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 49 (2009), pp. 2481–2488. doi:10.1021/ci900203n.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Chen, J. Chen, B. Yao, and Z. Li, QSAR study on antioxidant tripeptides and the antioxidant activity of the designed tripeptides in free radical systems, Molecules 23 (2018), pp. 1407. doi:10.3390/molecules23061407.
   Google Scholar
• N. Chirico,and and P. Gramatica, Real external predictivity of QSAR models. Part 2. New intercomparable thresholds for different validation criteria and the need for scatter plot inspection, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 52 (2012), pp. 2044–2058. doi:10.1021/ci300084j.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• P. Gramatica and A. Sangion, A historical excursus on the statistical validation parameters for QSAR models: A clarification concerning metrics and terminology, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 56 (2016), pp. 1127–1131. doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00088.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Liu, X. Yang, and R. Lu, Development of classification model and QSAR model for predicting binding affinity of endocrine disrupting chemicals to human sex hormone-binding globulin, Chemosphere 156 (2016), pp. 1–7. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.04.077.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E.M. de Haas, T. Eikelboom, and T. Bouwman, Internal and external validation of the long-term QSARs for neutral organics to fish from ECOSAR, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 22 (2011), pp. 545–559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T.I. Netzeva, A. Worth, T. Aldenberg, R. Benigni, M.T. Cronin, P. Gramatica, J.S. Jaworska, S. Kahn, G. Klopman, C.A. Marchant, G. Myatt, N. Nikolova-Jeliazkova, G.Y. Patlewicz, R. Perkins, D. Roberts, T. Schultz, D.W. Stanton, J.J. van de Sandt, W. Tong, G. Veith, and C. Yang, Current status of methods for defining the applicability domain of (quantitative) structure-activity relationships, the report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 52. Altern. Lab. Anim. 33(2005), pp. 155–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Hamadache, O. Benkortbi, S. Hanini, A. Amrane, L. Khaouane, and C. Si Moussa, A quantitative structure activity relationship for acute oral toxicity of pesticides on rats: Validation, domain of application and prediction, J. Hazard. Mater. 303 (2016), pp. 28–40. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.09.021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Jiang, T. Lei, Z. Wang, C. Shen, D. Cao, and T. Hou, ADMET evaluation in drug discovery. 20. Prediction of breast cancer resistance protein inhibition through machine learning, J. Cheminf. 12 (2020), pp. 16. doi:10.1186/s13321-020-00421-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Roy, S. Kar, and P. Ambure, On a simple approach for determining applicability domain of QSAR models, Chemom. Intell. Lab. 145 (2015), pp. 22–29. doi:10.1016/j.chemolab.2015.04.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Puri, O. Prakash, R. Manoharlal, M. Sharma, I. Ghosh, and R. Prasad, Analysis of physico-chemical properties of substrates of ABC and MFS multidrug transporters of pathogenic Candida albicans, Eur. J. Med. Chem. 45 (2010), pp. 4813–4826. doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2010.07.050.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• G.J. Lavado, D. Baderna, D. Gadaleta, M. Ultre, K. Roy, and E. Benfenati, Ecotoxicological QSAR modeling of the acute toxicity of organic compounds to the freshwater crustacean Thamnocephalus platyurus, Chemosphere 280 (2021), pp. 130652. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130652.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• J. He, T. Peng, X. Yang, and H. Liu, Development of QSAR models for predicting the binding affinity of endocrine disrupting chemicals to eight fish estrogen receptor, Ecotox. Environ. Safe. 148 (2018), pp. 211–219. doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.10.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Zare-Shahabadi, M. Lotfizadeh, A.R.A. Gandomani, and M.M. Papari, Determination of boiling points of azeotropic mixtures using quantitative structure–property relationship (QSPR) strategy, J. Mol. Liq. 188 (2013), pp. 222–229. doi:10.1016/j.molliq.2013.09.037.
   Google Scholar
• M.T. Ibrahim, A. Uzairu, S. Uba, and G.A. Shallangwa, Computational modeling of novel quinazoline derivatives as potent epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors, Heliyon 6 (2020), pp. e03289. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.K. Mukherjee, V. Kumar, and K. Roy, Ecotoxicological QSTR and QSTTR modeling for the prediction of acute oral toxicity of pesticides against multiple avian species, Environ. Sci. Technol. 56 (2022), pp. 335–348. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c05732.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Papa, A. Sangion, J.A. Arnot, and P. Gramatica, Development of human biotransformation QSARs and application for PBT assessment refinement, Food Chem. Toxicol. 112 (2018), pp. 535–543. doi:10.1016/j.fct.2017.04.016.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• -F.-F. Wang, W. Yang, Y.-H. Shi, and G.-W. Le, Probing the structural requirements for thyroid hormone receptor inhibitory activity of sulfonylnitrophenylthiazoles (SNPTs) using 2D-QSAR and 3D-QSAR approaches, Med. Chem. Res. 26 (2016), pp. 344–360.
   Google Scholar
• F.F. Wang, W. Yang, Y.H. Shi, and G.W. Le, In silico study on beta-aminoketone derivatives as thyroid hormone receptor inhibitors: A combined 3D-QSAR and molecular docking study, J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 34 (2016), pp. 2619–2631.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Liu and P. Gramatica, QSAR study of selective ligands for the thyroid hormone receptor beta, Bioorg. Med. Chem. 15 (2007), pp. 5251–5261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Du, J. Qin, H. Liu, and X. Yao, 3D-QSAR and molecular docking studies of selective agonists for the thyroid hormone receptor β, J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 27 (2008), pp. 95–104. doi:10.1016/j.jmgm.2008.03.003.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Ren, H. Liu, S. Li, X. Yao, and M. Liu, Prediction of binding affinities to beta1 isoform of human thyroid hormone receptor by genetic algorithm and projection pursuit regression, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 17 (2007), pp. 2474–2482. doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2007.02.025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar