In silico package models for deriving values of solute parameters in linear solvation energy relationships

References

• B.C. Kelly, M.G. Ikonomou, J.D. Blair, A.E. Morin, and F.A.P.C. Gobas, Food web-specific biomagnification of persistent organic pollutants, Science 317 (2007), pp. 236–239. doi:10.1126/science.1138275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.R. Duchowicz, QSPR studies on water solubility, octanol-water partition coefficient and vapour pressure of pesticides, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 31 (2020), pp. 135–148. doi:10.1080/1062936X.2019.1699602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Modarresi, H. Modarress, and J.C. Dearden, Henry’s law constant of hydrocarbons in air–water system: The cavity ovality effect on the non-electrostatic contribution term of solvation free energy, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 16 (2005), pp. 461–482. doi:10.1080/10659360500319869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Zhang, J. Chen, Q. Zhao, Q. Xie, and X. Wei, Unveiling self-sensitized photodegradation pathways by DFT calculations: A case of sunscreen p-aminobenzoic acid, Chemosphere 163 (2016), pp. 227–233. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.08.028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.D. David, N.J. Fendinger, and V.C. Hand, Determination of Henry’s law constants for organosilicones in actual and simulated wastewater, Environ. Sci. Technol. 34 (2000), pp. 4554–4559. doi:10.1021/es991204m.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.C. Dearden, P. Rotureau, and G. Fayet, QSPR prediction of physico-chemical properties for reach, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 24 (2013), pp. 279–318. doi:10.1080/1062936X.2013.773372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.J. Kamlet, R.M. Doherty, J. Abboud, M.H. Abraham, and R.W. Taft, Solubility – A new look, Chemtech 16 (1986), pp. 566–576.
   Google Scholar
• M.H. Abraham, A. Ibrahim, and A.M. Zissimos, Determination of sets of solute descriptors from chromatographic measurements, J. Chromatogr. A 1037 (2004), pp. 29–47. doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2003.12.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.H. Abraham, R.E. Smith, R. Luchtefeld, A.J. Boorem, R. Luo, and W.E. Acree, Prediction of solubility of drugs and other compounds in organic solvents, J. Pharm. Sci.-US 99 (2010), pp. 1500–1515. doi:10.1002/jps.21922.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T.N. Brown, QSPRs for predicting equilibrium partitioning in solvent–air systems from the chemical structures of solutes and solvents, J. Solut. Chem. 45 (2022), pp. 255–268.
   Google Scholar
• X. Jin, Z. Fu, X. Li, and J. Chen, Development of polyparameter linear free energy relationship models for octanol-air partition coefficients of diverse chemicals, Environ. Sci. Proc. Imp. 19 (2017), pp. 300–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.J. Kamlet, R.M. Doherty, P.W. Carr, D. Mackay, M.H. Abraham, and R.W. Taft, Linear solvation energy relationships. 44. Parameter estimation rules that allow accurate prediction of octanol/water partition coefficients and other solubility and toxicity properties of polychlorinated biphenyls and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, Environ. Sci. Technol. 22 (1988), pp. 503–509. doi:10.1021/es00170a003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Wang, J. Chen, X. Wei, A.J. Hernandez Maldonado, and Z. Chen, Unveiling adsorption mechanisms of organic pollutants onto carbon nanomaterials by density functional theory computations and linear free energy relationship modeling, Environ. Sci. Technol. 51 (2017), pp. 11820–11828. doi:10.1021/acs.est.7b02707.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Stenzel, K. Goss, and S. Endo, Experimental determination of polyparameter linear free energy relationship (pp-LFER) substance descriptors for pesticides and other contaminants: New measurements and recommendations, Environ. Sci. Technol. 47 (2013), pp. 14204–14214. doi:10.1021/es404150e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.D. Weckwerth, M.F. Vitha, and P.W. Carr, The development and determination of chemically distinct solute parameters for use in linear solvation energy relationships, Fluid Phase Equilibr. 183 (2001), pp. 143–157. doi:10.1016/S0378-3812(01)00428-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Ulrich, S. Endo, T.N. Brown, N. Watanabe, G. Bronner, M.H. Abraham, and K.U. Goss, UFZ-LSER database, 2017; available at http://www.ufz.de/lserd.
   Google Scholar
• ACD/percepta. Advanced Chemistry Development Inc, Toronto, Canada, 2015; software available at https://www.acdlabs.com.
   Google Scholar
• J.A. Platts, D. Butina, M.H. Abraham, and A. Hersey, Estimation of molecular linear free energy relation descriptors using a group contribution approach, J. Chem. Inf. Comp. Sci. 39 (1999), pp. 835–845. doi:10.1021/ci980339t.
   Google Scholar
• N. Ulrich and A. Ebert, Can deep learning algorithms enhance the prediction of solute descriptors for linear solvation energy relationship approaches?, Fluid Phase Equilibr. 555 (2022), pp. 113349. doi:10.1016/j.fluid.2021.113349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.M. Zissimos, M.H. Abraham, A. Klamt, F. Eckert, and J. Wood, A comparison between the two general sets of linear free energy descriptors of Abraham and Klamt, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 42 (2002), pp. 1320–1331. doi:10.1021/ci025530o.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• T.N. Brown, Predicting hexadecane–air equilibrium partition coefficients (L) using a group contribution approach constructed from high quality data, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 25 (2014), pp. 51–71. doi:10.1080/1062936X.2013.841286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.L. Card, V. Gomez-Alvarez, W.H. Lee, D.G. Lynch, N.S. Orentas, M.T. Lee, E.M. Wong, and R.S. Boethling, History of EPI suite and future perspectives on chemical property estimation in us toxic substances control act new chemical risk assessments, Environ. Sci. Proc. Imp. 19 (2017), pp. 203–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Liang, R. Xiong, S.I. Sandler, and D.M. Di Toro, Quantum chemically estimated Abraham solute parameters using multiple solvent–water partition coefficients and molecular polarizability, Environ. Sci. Technol. 51 (2017), pp. 9887–9898. doi:10.1021/acs.est.7b01737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Wang, W.H. Tang, Z.J. Xiao, W. Yang, Y. Peng, J.W. Chen, and J. Li, Novel quantitative structure activity relationship models for predicting hexadecane/air partition coefficients of organic compounds, J. Environ. Sci.-China 124 (2023), pp. 98–104. doi:10.1016/j.jes.2021.10.033.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• M.H. Abraham and J. Le, The correlation and prediction of the solubility of compounds in water using an amended solvation energy relationship, J. Pharm. Sci.-US 88 (1999), pp. 868–880. doi:10.1021/js9901007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.U. Goss, Predicting the equilibrium partitioning of organic compounds using just one linear solvation energy relationship (LSER), Fluid Phase Equilibr. 233 (2005), pp. 19–22. doi:10.1016/j.fluid.2005.04.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.R. Katritzky, Y.L. Wang, S. Sild, T. Tamm, and M. Karelson, QSPR studies on vapor pressure, aqueous solubility, and the prediction of water-air partition coefficients, J Chem. Inf. Comp. Sci. 38 (1998), pp. 720–725. doi:10.1021/ci980022t.
   Google Scholar
• D. Fourches, E. Muratov, and A. Tropsha, Trust, but verify: On the importance of chemical structure curation in cheminformatics and QSAR modeling research, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 50 (2010), pp. 1189–1204. doi:10.1021/ci100176x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G.A. Petersson and M.A. Al Laham, A complete basis set model chemistry. Ii. Open‐shell systems and the total energies of the first‐row atoms, J Chem. Phys. 94 (1991), pp. 6081–6090. doi:10.1063/1.460447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W.R. Wadt and P.J. Hay, Ab initio effective core potentials for molecular calculations. Potentials for main group elements Na to Bi, J. Chem. Phys. 82 (1985), pp. 284–298. doi:10.1063/1.448800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Frisch, G. Trucks, H.B. Schlegel, G. Scuseria, M. Robb, J. Cheeseman, G. Scalmani, and V. Barone, Gaussian 09; software available at http://www.gaussian.com/g_prod/g09.htm.
   Google Scholar
• A.L. Hickey and C.N. Rowley, Benchmarking quantum chemical methods for the calculation of molecular dipole moments and polarizabilities, J. Phys. Chem. A 118 (2014), pp. 3678–3687. doi:10.1021/jp502475e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.J.P. Stewart, Optimization of parameters for semiempirical methods v: Modification of Nddo approximations and application to 70 elements, J. Mol. Model. 13 (2007), pp. 1173–1213. doi:10.1007/s00894-007-0233-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Lu and F. Chen, Multiwfn: A multifunctional wavefunction analyzer, J. Comput. Chem. 33 (2012), pp. 580–592. doi:10.1002/jcc.22885.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Srl, Dragon (software for molecular descriptor calculation) ver. 6.0; software available at http://www.talete.mi.it/.
   Google Scholar
• P.R. Duchowicz, J.F. Aranda, D.E. Bacelo, and S.E. Fioressi, QSPR study of the Henry’s law constant for heterogeneous compounds, Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 154 (2020), pp. 115–121. doi:10.1016/j.cherd.2019.12.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Rácz, D. Bajusz, and K. Héberger, Intercorrelation limits in molecular descriptor preselection for QSAR/QSPR, Mol. Inform. 38 (2019), pp. 1800154. doi:10.1002/minf.201800154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Roy, P. Ambure, S. Kar, and P.K. Ojha, Is it possible to improve the quality of predictions from an “intelligent” use of multiple QSAR/QSPR/QSTR models? J. Chemom. 32 (2018), pp. e2992. doi:10.1002/cem.2992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Tropsha, Best practices for QSAR model development, validation, and exploitation, Mol. Inform. 29 (2010), pp. 476–488. doi:10.1002/minf.201000061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD, Guidance Document on the Validation of (Quantitative) Structure-Activity Relationship [(Q)SAR] Models, OECD Series on Testing and Assessment, No. 69, OECD Publishing, Paris, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• C.Y. Zhao, R.S. Zhang, H.X. Zhang, C.X. Xue, H.X. Liu, M.C. Liu, Z.D. Hu, and B.T. Fan, QSAR study of natural, synthetic and environmental endocrine disrupting compounds for binding to the androgen receptor, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 16 (2005), pp. 349–367. doi:10.1080/10659360500204368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Mitra, A. Saha, and K. Roy, Exploring quantitative structure-activity relationship studies of antioxidant phenolic compounds obtained from traditional Chinese medicinal plants, Mol. Simulat. 36 (2010), pp. 1067–1079. doi:10.1080/08927022.2010.503326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Gramatica, E. Giani, and E. Papa, Statistical external validation and consensus modeling: A QSAR case study for KOCprediction, J. Mol. Graph. Model. 25 (2007), pp. 755–766. doi:10.1016/j.jmgm.2006.06.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Core Team, Vienna, Austria, 2015; software available at https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• P.C.M. van Noort, J.J.H. Haftka, and J.R. Parsons, Updated Abraham solvation parameters for polychlorinated biphenyls, Environ. Sci. Technol. 44 (2010), pp. 7037–7042. doi:10.1021/es102210g.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Caron, V. Digiesi, S. Solaro, and G. Ermondi, Flexibility in early drug discovery: Focus on the beyond-rule-of-5 chemical space, Drug Discov. Today 25 (2020), pp. 621–627. doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2020.01.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.P. Feynman, R.B. Leighton, and M. Sands, The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Volume III: Quantum Mechanics, Addison-Wesley, New York, 1965.
   Google Scholar
• X. Cao, B.C. Hancock, N. Leyva, J. Becker, W. Yu, and V.M. Masterson, Estimating the refractive index of pharmaceutical solids using predictive methods, Int. J. Pharmaceut. 368 (2009), pp. 16–23. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2008.09.044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.H. Abraham and W.E. Acree, Descriptors for fluorotelomere alcohols. Calculation of physicochemical properties, Phys. Chem. Liq. 59 (2021), pp. 932–937. doi:10.1080/00319104.2021.1888094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Opperhuizen, P. Serne, and J.M. Van der Steen, Thermodynamics of fish/water and octan-1-ol/water partitioning of some chlorinated benzenes, Environ. Sci. Technol. 22 (1988), pp. 286–292. doi:10.1021/es00168a008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Kuleshova, P.R. Birkin, and J.M. Elliott, Contribution of the double layer to transient faradaic processes: Implications for hydrodynamic modulated voltammetry of nanostructures, J. Phys. Chem. C 114 (2010), pp. 13442–13450. doi:10.1021/jp102308p.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.V. Marenich, C.J. Cramer, and D.G. Truhlar, Universal solvation model based on solute electron density and on a continuum model of the solvent defined by the bulk dielectric constant and atomic surface tensions, J. Phys. Chem. B 113 (2009), pp. 6378–6396. doi:10.1021/jp810292n.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Wild, A. Cabrerizo, J. Dachs, and K.C. Jones, Clustering of nonpolar organic compounds in lipid media: Evidence and implications, J. Phys. Chem. A 112 (2008), pp. 11699–11703. doi:10.1021/jp804751f.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Guo, X. Jin, X. Lv, Y. Pu, and F. Bai, Real-time visualization of perylene nanoclusters in water and their partitioning to graphene surface and macrophage cells, Environ. Sci. Technol. 49 (2015), pp. 7926–7933. doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b01880.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.M. Parnis and D. Mackay, Multimedia Environmental Models: The Fugacity Approach, 3rd ed., CRC press, Boca Raton, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• W.R. Li, G.H. Ding, H. Gao, Y. Zhuang, X. Gu, and W.J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Prediction of octanol-air partition coefficients for PCBs at different ambient temperatures based on the solvation free energy and the dimer ratio, Chemosphere 242 (2020), pp. 125246. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Chen, T. Harner, G. Ding, Q. Xie, K. Schramm, and A. Kettrup, Universal predictive models on octanol-air partition coefficients at different temperatures for persistent organic pollutants, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 23 (2010), pp. 2309–2317. doi:10.1897/03-341.
   Google Scholar
• M.H. Abraham, P.L. Grellier, D.V. Prior, P.P. Duce, J.J. Morris, and P.J. Taylor, Hydrogen bonding. Part 7. A scale of solute hydrogen-bond acidity based on log k values for complexation in tetrachloromethane, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Tran. 6 (1989), pp. 699–711. doi:10.1039/p29890000699.
   Google Scholar
• H.C. Tuelp, K. Goss, R.P. Schwarzenbach, and K. Fenner, Experimental determination of LSER parameters for a set of 76 diverse pesticides and pharmaceuticals, Environ. Sci. Technol. 42 (2008), pp. 2034–2040. doi:10.1021/es702473f.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.H. Abraham, C.M. Du, and J.A. Platts, Lipophilicity of the nitrophenols, J. Org. Chem. 65 (2000), pp. 7114–7118. doi:10.1021/jo000840w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Jover, R. Bosque, and J. Sales, Neural network based QSAR study for predicting pKa of phenols in different solvents, QSAR Comb. Sci. 26 (2007), pp. 385–397. doi:10.1002/qsar.200610088.
   Google Scholar
• M.H. Abraham, Hydrogen-bonding. 27. Solvation parameters for functionally-substituted aromatic-compounds and heterocyclic-compounds, from gas-liquid-chromatographicdata, J. Chromatogr. 644 (1993), pp. 95–139. doi:10.1016/0021-9673(93)80123-P.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.H. Abraham, L. Honcharova, S.A. Rocco, J.W.E. Acree, and K.M. De Fina, The lipophilicity and hydrogen bond strength of pyridine-n-oxides and protonated pyridine-n-oxides, New J. Chem. 35 (2011), pp. 930–936. doi:10.1039/c0nj00893a.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.H. Abraham and W.E. Acree, Descriptors for the prediction of partition coefficients and solubilities of organophosphorus compounds, Sep. Sci. Technol. 48 (2013), pp. 884–897. doi:10.1080/01496395.2012.721043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Alin, Multicollinearity, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Stat. 2 (2010), pp. 370–374. doi:10.4330/wjc.v2.i11.370.
   Google Scholar
• J.W. Johnson, A heuristic method for estimating the relative weight of predictor variables in multiple regression, Multivar. Behav. Res. 35 (2000), pp. 1–19. doi:10.1207/S15327906MBR3501_1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Zhang and H.C. Zhang, Predicting solute descriptors for organic chemicals by a deep neural network (DNN) using basic chemical structures and a surrogate metric, Environ. Sci. Technol. 36 (2022), pp. 171–185.
   Google Scholar
• A.H. Vo, T.R. Van Vleet, R.R. Gupta, M.J. Liguori, and M.S. Rao, An overview of machine learning and big data for drug toxicity evaluation, Chem. Res. Toxicol. 33 (2020), pp. 20–37. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrestox.9b00227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar