Binding modes of GDP, GTP and GNP to NRAS deciphered by using Gaussian accelerated molecular dynamics simulations

References

• A.D. Cox and C.J. Der, Ras history, Small GTPases 1 (2010), pp. 2–27. doi:10.4161/sgtp.1.1.12178.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• C.W. Johnson, D. Reid, J.A. Parker, S. Salter, R. Knihtila, P. Kuzmic, and C. Mattos, The small GTPases K-Ras, N-Ras, and H-Ras have distinct biochemical properties determined by allosteric effects, J. Biol. Chem. 292 (2017), pp. 12981–12993. doi:10.1074/jbc.M117.778886.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Lu, H. Jang, S. Muratcioglu, A. Gursoy, O. Keskin, R. Nussinov, and J. Zhang, Ras conformational ensembles, allostery, and signaling, Chem. Rev. 116 (2016), pp. 6607–6665. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Lu, H. Jang, S. Gu, J. Zhang, and R. Nussinov, Drugging Ras GTPase: A comprehensive mechanistic and signaling structural view, Chem. Soc. Rev. 45 (2016), pp. 4929–4952. doi:10.1039/C5CS00911A.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N.I. Nicely, J. Kosak, V. de Serrano, and C. Mattos, Crystal structures of Ral-GppNHp and Ral-GDP reveal two binding sites that are also present in Ras and Rap, Structure 12 (2004), pp. 2025–2036. doi:10.1016/j.str.2004.08.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Shima, Y. Ijiri, S. Muraoka, J. Liao, M. Ye, M. Araki, K. Matsumoto, N. Yamamoto, T. Sugimoto, Y. Yoshikawa, T. Kumasaka, M. Yamamoto, A. Tamura, and T. Kataoka, Structural basis for conformational dynamics of GTP-bound Ras protein, J. Biol. Chem. 285 (2010), pp. 22696–22705. doi:10.1074/jbc.M110.125161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.M.G. Dias and R.A. Cerione, X-ray crystal structures reveal two activated states for RhoC, Biochemistry 46 (2007), pp. 6547–6558. doi:10.1021/bi700035p.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Sultana, Y. Jin, C. Dregger, E. Franklin, L.S. Weisman, and A.R. Khan, The activation cycle of Rab GTPase Ypt32 reveals structural determinants of effector recruitment and GDI binding, FEBS Lett. 585 (2011), pp. 3520–3527. doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2011.10.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Xu, B.N. Long, G.H. Boris, A. Chen, S. Ni, and M.A. Kennedy, Structural insight into the rearrangement of the switch I region in GTP-bound G12A K-Ras, Acta Crystallogr. D 73 (2017), pp. 970–984. doi:10.1107/S2059798317015418.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Sasson, L. Navon-Perry, D. Huppert, and J.A. Hirsch, RGK family G-domain: GTP analog complex structures and nucleotide-binding properties, J. Mol. Biol. 413 (2011), pp. 372–389. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2011.08.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Chen, W. Wang, L. Pang, and W. Zhu, Unveiling conformational dynamics changes of H-Ras induced by mutations based on accelerated molecular dynamics, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 22 (2020), pp. 21238–21250. doi:10.1039/D0CP03766D.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.Y. Ting, C.W. Johnson, C. Fang, X. Cao, T.G. Graeber, C. Mattos, and J. Colicelli, Tyrosine phosphorylation of RAS by ABL allosterically enhances effector binding, FASEB J. 29 (2015), pp. 3750–3761. doi:10.1096/fj.15-271510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.W. Johnson, H.-S. Seo, E.M. Terrell, M.-H. Yang, F. KleinJan, T. Gebregiworgis, G.M.C. Gasmi-Seabrook, E.A. Geffken, J. Lakhani, K. Song, P. Bashyal, O. Popow, J.A. Paulo, A. Liu, C. Mattos, C.B. Marshall, M. Ikura, D.K. Morrison, S. Dhe-Paganon, and K.M. Haigis, Regulation of GTPase function by autophosphorylation, Mol. Cell 82 (2022), pp. 950–968.e914. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2022.02.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.M. Ostrem, U. Peters, M.L. Sos, J.A. Wells, and K.M. Shokat, K-Ras(G12C) inhibitors allosterically control GTP affinity and effector interactions, Nature 503 (2013), pp. 548–551. doi:10.1038/nature12796.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Kessler, M. Gmachl, A. Mantoulidis, L.J. Martin, A. Zoephel, M. Mayer, A. Gollner, D. Covini, S. Fischer, T. Gerstberger, T. Gmaschitz, C. Goodwin, P. Greb, D. Häring, W. Hela, J. Hoffmann, J. Karolyi-Oezguer, P. Knesl, S. Kornigg, M. Koegl, R. Kousek, L. Lamarre, F. Moser, S. Munico-Martinez, C. Peinsipp, J. Phan, J. Rinnenthal, J. Sai, C. Salamon, Y. Scherbantin, K. Schipany, R. Schnitzer, A. Schrenk, B. Sharps, G. Siszler, Q. Sun, A. Waterson, B. Wolkerstorfer, M. Zeeb, M. Pearson, S.W. Fesik, and D.B. McConnell, Drugging an undruggable pocket on KRAS, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116 (2019), pp. 15823–15829. doi:10.1073/pnas.1904529116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Hansen, U. Peters, A. Babbar, Y. Chen, J. Feng, M.R. Janes, L.-S. Li, P. Ren, Y. Liu, and P.P. Zarrinkar, The reactivity-driven biochemical mechanism of covalent KRASG12C inhibitors, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 25 (2018), pp. 454–462. doi:10.1038/s41594-018-0061-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Kessler, A. Bergner, J. Böttcher, G. Fischer, S. Döbel, M. Hinkel, B. Müllauer, A. Weiss-Puxbaum, and D.B. McConnell, Drugging all RAS isoforms with one pocket, Future Med. Chem. 12 (2020), pp. 1911–1923. doi:10.4155/fmc-2020-0221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.W. Johnson, Y.-J. Lin, D. Reid, J. Parker, S. Pavlopoulos, P. Dischinger, C. Graveel, A.J. Aguirre, M. Steensma, K.M. Haigis, and C. Mattos, Isoform-specific destabilization of the active site reveals a molecular mechanism of intrinsic activation of KRas G13D, Cell Rep. 28 (2019), pp. 1538–1550.e1537. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2019.07.026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.C. Nelson, T.J. Turbyville, S. Dharmaiah, M. Rigby, R. Yang, T.-Y. Wang, J. Columbus, R. Stephens, T. Taylor, D. Sciacca, G. Onsongo, A. Sarver, S. Subramanian, D.V. Nissley, D.K. Simanshu, and E. Lou, RAS internal tandem duplication disrupts GTPase-activating protein (GAP) binding to activate oncogenic signaling, J. Biol. Chem. 295 (2020), pp. 9335–9348. doi:10.1074/jbc.RA119.011080.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Yu, H. Su, J. Chen, and G. Hu, Deciphering conformational changes of the GDP-bound NRAS Induced by mutations G13D, Q61R, and C118S through Gaussian accelerated molecular dynamic simulations, Molecules 27 (2022), pp. 5596. doi:10.3390/molecules27175596.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.S. Fraser, H. van den Bedem, A.J. Samelson, P.T. Lang, J.M. Holton, N. Echols, and T. Alber, Accessing protein conformational ensembles using room-temperature X-ray crystallography, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108 (2011), pp. 16247–16252. doi:10.1073/pnas.1111325108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Spoerner, C. Herrmann, I.R. Vetter, H.R. Kalbitzer, and A. Wittinghofer, Dynamic properties of the ras switch I region and its importance for binding to effectors, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98 (2001), pp. 4944–4949. doi:10.1073/pnas.081441398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.A. Gorfe, B.J. Grant, and J.A. McCammon, Mapping the nucleotide and isoform-dependent structural and dynamical features of Ras proteins, Structure 16 (2008), pp. 885–896. doi:10.1016/j.str.2008.03.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Wittinghofer and E.F. Pal, The structure of Ras protein: A model for a universal molecular switch, Trends Biochem. Sci. 16 (1991), pp. 382–387. doi:10.1016/0968-0004(91)90156-P.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I.G. Serebriiskii, C. Connelly, G. Frampton, J. Newberg, M. Cooke, V. Miller, S. Ali, J.S. Ross, E. Handorf, S. Arora, C. Lieu, E.A. Golemis, and J.E. Meyer, Comprehensive characterization of RAS mutations in colon and rectal cancers in old and young patients, Nat. Commun. 10 (2019), pp. 3722. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-11530-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Chen, S. Zhang, W. Wang, L. Pang, Q. Zhang, and X. Liu, Mutation-induced impacts on the switch transformations of the GDP- and GTP-bound K-Ras: Insights from multiple replica Gaussian accelerated molecular dynamics and free energy analysis, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 61 (2021), pp. 1954–1969. doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.0c01470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Chen, L. Wang, W. Wang, H. Sun, L. Pang, and H. Bao, Conformational transformation of switch domains in GDP/K-Ras induced by G13 mutants: An investigation through Gaussian accelerated molecular dynamics simulations and principal component analysis, Comput. Biol. Med. 135 (2021), pp. 104639. doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Neumann, E. Zeindl-Eberhart, T. Kirchner, and A. Jung, Frequency and type of KRAS mutations in routine diagnostic analysis of metastatic colorectal cancer, Pathol. Res. Pract. 205 (2009), pp. 858–862. doi:10.1016/j.prp.2009.07.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Eren, N. Tuncbag, H. Jang, R. Nussinov, A. Gursoy, and O. Keskin, Normal mode analysis of KRas4B reveals partner specific dynamics, J. Phys. Chem. B 125 (2021), pp. 5210–5221. doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.1c00891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G.A. Hobbs, N.M. Baker, A.M. Miermont, R.D. Thurman, M. Pierobon, T.H. Tran, A.O. Anderson, A.M. Waters, J.N. Diehl, B. Papke, R.G. Hodge, J.E. Klomp, C.M. Goodwin, J.M. DeLiberty, J. Wang, R.W.S. Ng, P. Gautam, K.L. Bryant, D. Esposito, S.L. Campbell, E.F. Petricoin III, D.K. Simanshu, A.J. Aguirre, B.M. Wolpin, K. Wennerberg, U. Rudloff, A.D. Cox, and C.J. Der, Atypical KRASG12R mutant is impaired in PI3K signaling and macropinocytosis in pancreatic cancer, Cancer Discov. 10 (2020), pp. 104–123. doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-19-1006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Chen, S. Zhang, Q. Zeng, W. Wang, Q. Zhang, and X. Liu, Free energy profiles relating with conformational transition of the switch domains induced by G12 mutations in GTP-bound KRAS, Front. Mol. Biosci. 9 (2022). doi:10.3389/fmolb.2022.912518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Scheffzek, M.R. Ahmadian, W. Kabsch, L. Wiesmüller, A. Lautwein, F. Schmitz, and A. Wittinghofer, The Ras-RasGAP complex: Structural basis for GTPase activation and its loss in oncogenic ras mutants, Science 277 (1997), pp. 333–339. doi:10.1126/science.277.5324.333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.K. Simanshu, D.V. Nissley, and F. McCormick, RAS proteins and their regulators in human disease, Cell 170 (2017), pp. 17–33. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.06.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Sun, Y. Li, M. Shen, S. Tian, L. Xu, P. Pan, Y. Guan, and T. Hou, Assessing the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 5. Improved docking performance using high solute dielectric constant MM/GBSA and MM/PBSA rescoring, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16 (2014), pp. 22035–22045. doi:10.1039/C4CP03179B.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y.X. Yu, W.T. Liu, H.Y. Li, W. Wang, H.B. Sun, L.L. Zhang, and S.L. Wu, Decoding molecular mechanism underlying binding of drugs to HIV-1 protease with molecular dynamics simulations and MM-GBSA calculations, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 32 (2021), pp. 889–915. doi:10.1080/1062936X.2021.1979647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Xue, P. Wang, G. Tu, F. Yang, G. Zheng, X. Li, X. Li, Y. Chen, X. Yao, and F. Zhu, Computational identification of the binding mechanism of a triple reuptake inhibitor amitifadine for the treatment of major depressive disorder, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20 (2018), pp. 6606–6616. doi:10.1039/C7CP07869B.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Sun, Z. Gong, F. Xia, and X. He, Ion dynamics and selectivity of Nav channels from molecular dynamics simulation, Chem. Phys. 548 (2021), pp. 111245. doi:10.1016/j.chemphys.2021.111245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Xiong, J. Zeng, F. Xia, Q. Cui, X. Deng, and X. Xu, Conformations and binding pockets of HRas and its guanine nucleotide exchange factors complexes in the guanosine triphosphate exchange process, J. Comput. Chem. 43 (2022), pp. 906–916. doi:10.1002/jcc.26846.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Devillers and H. Devillers, Toxicity profiling and prioritization of plant-derived antimalarial agents, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 30 (2019), pp. 801–824. doi:10.1080/1062936X.2019.1665844.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Wang, D. Lu, Y. Wang, X. Xu, P. Zhong, and Z. Yang, Binding selectivity-dependent molecular mechanism of inhibitors towards CDK2 and CDK6 investigated by multiple short molecular dynamics and free energy landscapes, J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 38 (2023), pp. 84–99. doi:10.1080/14756366.2022.2135511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Zeng, J. Chen, F. Xia, Q. Cui, X. Deng, and X. Xu, Identification of functional substates of KRas during GTP hydrolysis with enhanced sampling simulations, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 24 (2022), pp. 7653–7665. doi:10.1039/D2CP00274D.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Liang, X. Liu, S. Zhang, M. Li, Q. Zhang, and J. Chen, Binding mechanism of inhibitors to SARS-CoV-2 main protease deciphered by multiple replica molecular dynamics simulations, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 24 (2022), pp. 1743–1759. doi:10.1039/D1CP04361G.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Sun, Y. Li, S. Tian, L. Xu, and T. Hou, Assessing the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 4. Accuracies of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methodologies evaluated by various simulation protocols using PDBbind data set, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16 (2014), pp. 16719–16729. doi:10.1039/C4CP01388C.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Hou and R. Yu, Molecular dynamics and free energy studies on the wild-type and double mutant HIV-1 protease complexed with amprenavir and two amprenavir-related inhibitors:  Mechanism for binding and drug resistance, J. Med. Chem. 50 (2007), pp. 1177–1188. doi:10.1021/jm0609162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Xue, F. Yang, P. Wang, G. Zheng, Y. Chen, X. Yao, and F. Zhu, What contributes to serotonin–norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors’ dual-targeting mechanism? The key role of transmembrane domain 6 in human serotonin and norepinephrine transporters revealed by molecular dynamics simulation, ACS Chem. Neurosci. 9 (2018), pp. 1128–1140. doi:10.1021/acschemneuro.7b00490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Sun, Z. Huai, Q. He, and Z. Liu, A general picture of cucurbit[8]uril host–guest binding, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 61 (2021), pp. 6107–6134. doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.1c01208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.L. Wu, J. Zhao, H.B. Sun, H.Y. Li, Y.Y. Yin, and L.L. Zhang, Insights into interaction mechanism of inhibitors E3T, E3H and E3B with CREB binding protein by using molecular dynamics simulations and MM-GBSA calculations, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 32 (2021), pp. 221–246. doi:10.1080/1062936X.2021.1887351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Devillers and H. Devillers, Prediction of acute mammalian toxicity from QSARs and interspecies correlations, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 20 (2009), pp. 467–500. doi:10.1080/10629360903278651.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L.C.T. Pierce, R. Salomon-Ferrer, C. Augusto, F. de Oliveira, J.A. McCammon, and R.C. Walker, Routine access to millisecond time scale events with accelerated molecular dynamics, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 8 (2012), pp. 2997–3002. doi:10.1021/ct300284c.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Chen, B. Yin, W. Wang, and H. Sun, Effects of disulfide bonds on binding of inhibitors to β-amyloid cleaving enzyme 1 decoded by multiple replica accelerated molecular dynamics simulations, ACS Chem. Neurosci. 11 (2020), pp. 1811–1826. doi:10.1021/acschemneuro.0c00234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Miao, V.A. Feher, and J.A. McCammon, Gaussian accelerated molecular dynamics: Unconstrained enhanced sampling and free energy calculation, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 11 (2015), pp. 3584–3595. doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Wang, P.R. Arantes, A. Bhattarai, R.V. Hsu, S. Pawnikar, Y.-M.M. Huang, G. Palermo, and Y. Miao, Gaussian accelerated molecular dynamics: Principles and applications, Wires Comput. Mol. Scimol. Sci. 11 (2021), pp. e1521. doi:10.1002/wcms.1521.
   Google Scholar
• J. Wang and Y. Miao, Peptide Gaussian accelerated molecular dynamics (Pep-GaMD): Enhanced sampling and free energy and kinetics calculations of peptide binding, J. Chem. Phys. 153 (2020), pp. 154109. doi:10.1063/5.0021399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Wang and Y. Miao, Mechanistic insights into specific g protein interactions with adenosine receptors, J. Phys. Chem. B 123 (2019), pp. 6462–6473. doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.9b04867.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Miao and J.A. McCammon, Mechanism of the G-protein mimetic nanobody binding to a muscarinic G-protein-coupledreceptor, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115 (2018), pp. 3036–3041. doi:10.1073/pnas.1800756115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Chen, J. Wang, Q. Zeng, W. Wang, H. Sun, and B. Wei, Exploring the deactivation mechanism of human β2 adrenergic receptor by accelerated molecular dynamic simulations, Front. Mol. Biosci. 9 (2022), pp. 972463. doi:10.3389/fmolb.2022.972463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Wang, L. Lan, X. Wu, L. Xu, and Y. Miao, Mechanism of RNA recognition by a Musashi RNA-binding protein, Curr. Res. Struct. Biol. 4 (2022), pp. 10–20. doi:10.1016/j.crstbi.2021.12.002.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Y. Wang, M. Li, W. Liang, X. Shi, J. Fan, R. Kong, Y. Liu, J. Zhang, T. Chen, and S. Lu, Delineating the activation mechanism and conformational landscape of a class B G protein-coupled receptor glucagon receptor, Comput. Struct. Biotec. 20 (2022), pp. 628–639. doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2022.01.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Chen, S. Zhang, W. Wang, H. Sun, Q. Zhang, and X. Liu, Binding of inhibitors to BACE1 affected by pH-dependent protonation: An exploration from multiple replica Gaussian accelerated molecular dynamics and MM-GBSA calculations, ACS Chem. Neurosci. 12 (2021), pp. 2591–2607. doi:10.1021/acschemneuro.0c00813.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Li, X. Liu, S. Zhang, S. Liang, Q. Zhang, and J. Chen, Deciphering the binding mechanism of inhibitors of the SARS-CoV-2 main protease through multiple replica accelerated molecular dynamics simulations and free energy landscapes, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 24 (2022), pp. 22129–22143. doi:10.1039/D2CP03446H.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Chen, Q. Zeng, W. Wang, H. Sun, and G. Hu, Decoding the identification mechanism of an SAM-III riboswitch on ligands through multiple independent Gaussian-accelerated molecular dynamics simulations, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 62 (2022), pp. 6118–6132. doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.2c00961.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• A. Amadei, A.B.M. Linssen, and H.J.C. Berendsen, Essential dynamics of proteins, Proteins 17 (1993), pp. 412–425. doi:10.1002/prot.340170408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.M. Levy, A.R. Srinivasan, W.K. Olson, and J.A. McCammon, Quasi-harmonic method for studying very low frequency modes in proteins, Biopolymers 23 (1984), pp. 1099–1112. doi:10.1002/bip.360230610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Wang, R.M. Wolf, J.W. Caldwell, P.A. Kollman, and D.A. Case, Development and testing of a general amber force field, J. Comput. Chem. 25 (2004), pp. 1157–1174. doi:10.1002/jcc.20035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. He, V.H. Man, W. Yang, T.-S. Lee, and J. Wang, A fast and high-quality charge model for the next generation general AMBER force field, J. Chem. Phys. 153 (2020), pp. 114502. doi:10.1063/5.0019056.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Jakalian, D.B. Jack, and C.I. Bayly, Fast, efficient generation of high-quality atomic charges. AM1-BCC model: II. Parameterization and validation, J. Comput. Chem. 23 (2002), pp. 1623–1641. doi:10.1002/jcc.10128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Jakalian, B.L. Bush, D.B. Jack, and C.I. Bayly, Fast, efficient generation of high-quality atomic charges. AM1-BCC model: I method, J. Comput. Chem. 21 (2000), pp. 132–146. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(20000130)21:2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Wang, W. Wang, P.A. Kollman, and D.A. Case, Automatic atom type and bond type perception in molecular mechanical calculations, J. Mol. Graph. Model. 25 (2006), pp. 247–260. doi:10.1016/j.jmgm.2005.12.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Anandakrishnan, B. Aguilar, and A.V. Onufriev, H++ 3.0: Automating pK prediction and the preparation of biomolecular structures for atomistic molecular modeling and simulations, Nucleic Acids Res. 40 (2012), pp. W537–W541. doi:10.1093/nar/gks375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Salomon-Ferrer, D.A. Case, and R.C. Walker, An overview of the Amber biomolecular simulation package, WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 3 (2013), pp. 198–210. doi:10.1002/wcms.1121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.A. Case, T.E. Cheatham III, T. Darden, H. Gohlke, R. Luo, K.M. Merz Jr, A. Onufriev, C. Simmerling, B. Wang, and R.J. Woods, The Amber biomolecular simulation programs, J. Comput. Chem. 26 (2005), pp. 1668–1688. doi:10.1002/jcc.20290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Tian, K. Kasavajhala, K.A.A. Belfon, L. Raguette, H. Huang, A.N. Migues, J. Bickel, Y. Wang, J. Pincay, Q. Wu, and C. Simmerling, ff19SB: Amino-acid-specific protein backbone parameters trained against quantum mechanics energy surfaces in solution, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 16 (2020), pp. 528–552. doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00591.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W.L. Jorgensen, J. Chandrasekhar, J.D. Madura, R.W. Impey, and M.L. Klein, Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water, J. Chem. Phys. 79 (1983), pp. 926–935. doi:10.1063/1.445869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I.S. Joung and T.E. Cheatham III, Determination of alkali and halide monovalent ion parameters for use in explicitly solvated biomolecular simulations, J. Phys. Chem. B 112 (2008), pp. 9020–9041. doi:10.1021/jp8001614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I.S. Joung and T.E. Cheatham III, Molecular dynamics simulations of the dynamic and energetic properties of alkali and halide ions using water-model-specific ion parameters, J. Phys. Chem. B 113 (2009), pp. 13279–13290. doi:10.1021/jp902584c.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U. Essmann, L. Perera, M.L. Berkowitz, T. Darden, H. Lee, and L.G. Pedersen, A smooth particle mesh ewald method, J. Chem. Phys. 103 (1995), pp. 8577–8593. doi:10.1063/1.470117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Miao, W. Sinko, L. Pierce, D. Bucher, R.C. Walker, and J.A. McCammon, Improved reweighting of accelerated molecular dynamics simulations for free energy calculation, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 10 (2014), pp. 2677–2689. doi:10.1021/ct500090q.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.-P. Ryckaert, G. Ciccotti, and H.J.C. Berendsen, Numerical integration of the cartesian equations of motion of a system with constraints: Molecular dynamics of n-alkanes, J. Comput. Phys. 23 (1977), pp. 327–341. doi:10.1016/0021-9991(77)90098-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.A. Izaguirre, D.P. Catarello, J.M. Wozniak, and R.D. Skeel, Langevin stabilization of molecular dynamics, J. Chem. Phys. 114 (2001), pp. 2090–2098. doi:10.1063/1.1332996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Salomon-Ferrer, A.W. Götz, D. Poole, S. Le Grand, and R.C. Walker, Routine microsecond molecular dynamics simulations with AMBER on GPUs. 2. Explicit solvent particle mesh ewald, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 9 (2013), pp. 3878–3888. doi:10.1021/ct400314y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.W. Götz, M.J. Williamson, D. Xu, D. Poole, S. Le Grand, and R.C. Walker, Routine microsecond molecular dynamics simulations with AMBER on GPUs. 1. Generalized born, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 8 (2012), pp. 1542–1555. doi:10.1021/ct200909j.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Humphrey, A. Dalke, and K. Schulten, VMD: Visual molecular dynamics, J. Mol. Graph. 14 (1996), pp. 33–38. doi:10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.R. Roe and T.E. Cheatham III, PTRAJ and CPPTRAJ: Software for processing and analysis of molecular dynamics trajectory data, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 9 (2013), pp. 3084–3095. doi:10.1021/ct400341p.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Ichiye and M. Karplus, Collective motions in proteins: A covariance analysis of atomic fluctuations in molecular dynamics and normal mode simulations, Proteins 11 (1991), pp. 205–217. doi:10.1002/prot.340110305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.S. Liang, X.G. Liu, Y.X. Cui, S.L. Zhang, Q.G. Zhang, and J.Z. Chen, Molecular mechanism concerning conformational changes of CDK2 mediated by binding of inhibitors using molecular dynamics simulations and principal component analysis, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 32 (2021), pp. 573–594. doi:10.1080/1062936X.2021.1934896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Yan, X. Liu, S. Zhang, J. Su, Q. Zhang, and J. Chen, Molecular dynamics exploration of selectivity of dual inhibitors 5M7, 65X, and 65Z toward fatty acid binding proteins 4 and 5, Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19 (2018), pp. 2496. doi:10.3390/ijms19092496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Vatansever, B. Erman, and Z.H. Gümüş, Comparative effects of oncogenic mutations G12C, G12V, G13D, and Q61H on local conformations and dynamics of K-Ras, Comput. Struct. Biotec. 18 (2020), pp. 1000–1011. doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2020.04.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Prakash, J.F. Hancock, and A.A. Gorfe, Binding hotspots on K-Ras: Consensus ligand binding sites and other reactive regions from probe-based molecular dynamics analysis, Proteins 83 (2015), pp. 898–909. doi:10.1002/prot.24786.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Wang, Conformational fluctuations in GTP-bound K-Ras: A metadynamics perspective with harmonic linear discriminant analysis, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 61 (2021), pp. 5212–5222. doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.1c00844.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar