Machine learning-based models for accessing thermal conductivity of liquids at different temperature conditions

References

• J.J. Healy, J.J. de Groot, and J. Kestin, The theory of the transient hot-wire method for measuring thermal conductivity, Physica B+C 82 (1976), pp. 392–408. doi:10.1016/0378-4363(76)90203-5.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Nagasaka and A. Nagashima, Simultaneous measurement of the thermal conductivity and the thermal diffusivity of liquids by the transient hot-wire method, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 52 (1981), pp. 229–232. doi:10.1063/1.1136577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Oudebrouckx, T. Vandenryt, S. Bormans, P.H. Wagner, and R. Thoelen, Measuring thermal conductivity in a microfluidic device with the transient thermal offset (TTO) method, IEEE Sens. J. 21 (2021), pp. 7298–7307. doi:10.1109/JSEN.2020.3047475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Moreno Jimenez, B. Creton, C. Marliere, L. Teule-Gay, O. Nguyen, and S. Marre, A microfluidic strategy for accessing the thermal conductivity of liquids at different temperatures, Microchem. J. 193 (2023), pp. 109030. doi:10.1016/j.microc.2023.109030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X.-Q. Guo, C.-Y. Sun, S.-X. Rong, G.-J. Chen, and T.-M. Guo, Equation of state analog correlations for the viscosity and thermal conductivity of hydrocarbons and reservoir fluids, J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 30 (2001), pp. 15–27. doi:10.1016/S0920-4105(01)00098-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Khosharay, K. Khosharay, G. Di Nicola, and M. Pierantozzi, Modelling investigation on the thermal conductivity of pure liquid, vapour, and supercritical refrigerants and their mixtures by using Heyen EOS, Phys. Chem. Liq. 56 (2017), pp. 124–140. doi:10.1080/00319104.2017.1306859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L.F. Cardona, L.A. Forero, and J.A. Velásquez, A group contribution method to model the thermal conductivity of pure substances, Fluid Ph. Equilibria 564 (2023), pp. 113592. doi:10.1016/j.fluid.2022.113592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W.A. Malatesta and B. Yang, Aviation turbine fuel thermal conductivity: A predictive approach using entropy scaling-guided machine learning with experimental validation, ACS omega 6 (2021), pp. 28579–28586. doi:10.1021/acsomega.1c02934.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Lu, W. Liu, F. Yang, H. Zhou, F. Liu, H. Yuan, G. Chen, and Y. Jiao, Thermal conductivity estimation of diverse liquid aliphatic oxygen-containing organic compounds using the quantitative structure-property relationship method, ACS omega 5 (2020), pp. 8534–8542. doi:10.1021/acsomega.9b04190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Creton, Chemoinformatics at IFP Energies Nouvelles: Applications in the fields of energy, transport, and environment, Mol. Inf. 36 (2017), pp. 1700028. doi:10.1002/minf.201700028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Hall, B. Creton, B. Rauch, U. Bauder, and M. Aigner, Probabilistic mean quantitative structure–property relationship modeling of jet fuel properties, Energy Fuels 36 (2022), pp. 463–479. doi:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c03334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Nieto-Draghi, G. Fayet, B. Creton, X. Rozanska, P. Rotureau, J.-C. de Hemptinne, P. Ungerer, B. Rousseau, and C. Adamo, A general guidebook for the theoretical prediction of physicochemical properties of chemicals for regulatory purposes, Chem. Rev. 115 (2015), pp. 13093–13164. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.R. Katritzky, M. Kuanar, S. Slavov, C.D. Hall, M. Karelson, I. Kahn, and D.A. Dobchev, Quantitative correlation of physical and chemical properties with chemical structure: Utility for prediction, Chem. Rev. 110 (2010), pp. 5714–5789. doi:10.1021/cr900238d.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.C. Bloxham, M.E. Redd, N.F. Giles, T.A. Knotts, and W.V. Wilding, Proper use of the DIPPR 801 database for creation of models, methods, and processes, J. Chem. Eng. Data 66 (2021), pp. 3–10. doi:10.1021/acs.jced.0c00641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.L. Rowley, W.V. Wilding, A. Congote, and N.F. Giles, The use of database influence factors to maintain currency in an evaluated chemical database, Int. J. Thermophys. 31 (2010), pp. 860–874. doi:10.1007/s10765-010-0706-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.F. Ilten, DETHERM: Thermophysical property data for the optimization of heat-transfer equipment, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 31 (1991), pp. 160–167. doi:10.1021/ci00001a029.
   Google Scholar
• D.T. Jamieson, Thermal conductivity of liquids, J. Chem. Eng. Data 24 (1979), pp. 244–246. doi:10.1021/je60082a037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Villanueva, B. Flaconnèche, and B. Creton, Prediction of alternative gasoline sorption in a semicrystalline Poly(Ethylene), ACS Comb. Sci. 17 (2015), pp. 631–640. doi:10.1021/acscombsci.5b00094.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.A. Saldana, B. Creton, P. Mougin, N. Jeuland, B. Rousseau, and L. Starck, Rational formulation of alternative fuels using QSPR methods: Application to jet fuels, Oil Gas Sci. Technol. – Rev. IFP Energ. Nouv. 68 (2012), pp. 651–662. doi:10.2516/ogst/2012034.
   Google Scholar
• B. Creton, B. Veyrat, and M.-H. Klopffer, Fuel sorption into polymers: Experimental and machine learning studies, Fluid Ph. Equilibria 556 (2022), pp. 113403. doi:10.1016/j.fluid.2022.113403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.A. Saldana, L. Starck, P. Mougin, B. Rousseau, L. Pidol, N. Jeuland, and B. Creton, Flash point and cetane number predictions for fuel compounds using quantitative structure property relationship (QSPR) methods, Energy Fuels 25 (2011), pp. 3900–3908. doi:10.1021/ef200795j.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RDKit: Open-source cheminformatics software, Accessed in 2023. http://www.rdkit.org/.
   Google Scholar
• SMARTS - a language for describing molecular patterns; daylight chemical information systems inc.: Laguna niguel, ca, Accessed in 2023. http://www.daylight.com/dayhtml/doc/theory/theory.smarts.html.
   Google Scholar
• P. Gramatica, Principles of QSAR models validation: Internal and external, QSAR Comb. Sci. 26 (2006), pp. 694–701. doi:10.1002/qsar.200610151.
   Google Scholar
• E.N. Muratov, E.V. Varlamova, A.G. Artemenko, P.G. Polishchuk, and V.E. Kuz’min, Existing and developing approaches for QSAR analysis of mixtures, Mol. Inf. 31 (2011), pp. 202–221. doi:10.1002/minf.201100129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.A. Saldana, L. Starck, P. Mougin, B. Rousseau, and B. Creton, On the rational formulation of alternative fuels: Melting point and net heat of combustion predictions for fuel compounds using machine learning methods, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 24 (2013), pp. 259–277. doi:10.1080/1062936X.2013.766634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.C. Chang and C.J. Lin, LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines, ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 2 (2011), pp. 1–27. doi:10.1145/1961189.1961199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L.M. Hiot, Y.S. Ong, Y. Tenne, and C.-K. Goh, Computational Intelligence in Expensive Optimization Problems, Adaptation, learning, and optimization Vol. 2, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• P. Gantzer, B. Creton, and C. Nieto-Draghi, Comparisons of molecular structure generation methods based on fragment assemblies and genetic graphs, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 61 (2021), pp. 4245–4258. doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.1c00803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Sinoquet, H. Langouët, and S. Da Veiga, A new spring for geoscience: EAGE conference and exhibition, Barcelona 14–17 June 2010, 72, Conference Proceedings & Exhibitors’ Catalogue, DB Houten, NL, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• L.I.-K. Lin, A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility, Biometrics 45 (1989), p. 255. doi:10.2307/2532051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Chirico and P. Gramatica, Real external predictivity of QSAR models: How to evaluate it? Comparison of different validation criteria and proposal of using the concordance correlation coefficient, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 51 (2011), pp. 2320–2335. doi:10.1021/ci200211n.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.A. Saldana, L. Starck, P. Mougin, B. Rousseau, N. Ferrando, and B. Creton, Prediction of density and viscosity of biofuel compounds using machine learning methods, Energy Fuels 26 (2012), pp. 2416–2426. doi:10.1021/ef3001339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Riedel, Thermal Conductivity of Liquids (in German), Mitt. Kaltetech. Inst. Karlsruhe 2 1948.
   Google Scholar