QSPR models to predict the physical hazards of mixtures: a state of art

References

• A. Krutof and K. Hawboldt, Blends of pyrolysis oil, petroleum, and other bio-based fuels: A review, Renew. Sustain. Energy. Rev. 59 (2016), pp. 406–419. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O.I. Awad, R. Mamat, T.K. Ibrahim, A.T. Hammid, I.M. Yusri, M.A. Hamidi, A.M. Humada, and A.F. Yusop, Overview of the oxygenated fuels in spark ignition engine: Environmental and performance, Renew. Sustain. Energy. Rev. 91 (2018), pp. 394–408. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Centrella, M. Portarapillo, G. Luciani, R. Sanchirico, and A. Di Benedetto, Synergistic behavior of flammable dust mixtures: A novel classification, J. Hazard. Mater. 397 (2020), pp. 122784. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122784.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.G. Zabetakis, Flammability Characteristics of Combustible Gases and Vapors - Bulletin 627, Bureau of Mines, United States, 1964.
   Google Scholar
• O. Dufaud, L. Perrin, D. Bideau, and A. Laurent, When solids meet solids: A glimpse into dust mixture explosions, J. Loss Prevent. Proc. Ind. 25 (2012), pp. 853–861. doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2012.04.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H.J. Liaw, T.P. Lee, J.S. Tsai, W.H. Hsiao, M.H. Chen, and T.T. Hsu, Binary liquid solutions exhibiting minimum flash-point behavior, J. Loss Prevent. Proc. Ind. 16 (2003), pp. 173–186. doi:10.1016/S0950-4230(03)00004-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H.-J. Liaw and H.-Y. Chen, Study of two different types of minimum flash-point behavior for ternary mixtures, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 52 (2013), pp. 7579–7585. doi:10.1021/ie400585k.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Pénelon, V. Debuy, B. Truchot, C. Wagner, L. Donnat, and J.-F. Lechaudel, Pool evaporation: experimental tests at medium-scale with gasoline, J. Loss Prevent. Proc. Ind. 65 (2020), pp. 104072. doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2020.104072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Le Chatelier, Estimation of firedamp by flammability limits, Ann. Mines 19 (1891), pp. 388–395.
   Google Scholar
• J. Gmehling and P. Rasmussen, Flash points of flammable liquid mixtures using UNIFAC, Ind. Eng. Chem. Fund. 21 (1982), pp. 186–188. doi:10.1021/i100006a016.
   Google Scholar
• H.-J. Liaw and Y.-Y. Chiu, A general model for predicting the flash point of miscible mixtures, J. Hazard. Mater. 137 (2006), pp. 38–46. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.01.078.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manual of Tests and Criteria, ST/SG/AC.10/11/Rev.7, ed., United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Globally harmonized system of classification and labelling of chemicals (GHS), ST/SG/AC.10/30/Rev.8, United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Regulation (EC) N° 1907/2006 of the European parliament and of the council of 18 December 2006 concerning the registration, evaluation, authorisation and restriction of chemicals (REACH), European Commission, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• OECD principles for the validation, for regulatory purpose, of (Q)SAR models, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2004.
   Google Scholar
• E.N. Muratov, E.V. Varlamova, A.G. Artemenko, P.G. Polishchuk, and V.E. Kuz’min, Existing and developing approaches for QSAR analysis of mixtures, Mol. Inform. 31 (2012), pp. 202–221. doi:10.1002/minf.201100129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Mombelli, État de l’art sur la modélisation QSAR de la toxicité des mélanges chimiques, Ineris (2022). https://www.ineris.fr/fr/etat-art-modelisation-qsar-toxicite-melanges-chimiques
   Google Scholar
• S.J. Belfield, J.W. Firman, S.J. Enoch, J.C. Madden, K. Erik Tollefsen, and M.T.D. Cronin, A review of quantitative structure-activity relationship modelling approaches to predict the toxicity of mixtures, Comput. Tox. 25 (2023), pp. 100251. doi:10.1016/j.comtox.2022.100251.
   Google Scholar
• Z. Jiao, H.U. Escobar-Hernandez, T. Parker, and Q. Wang, Review of recent developments of quantitative structure-property relationship models on fire and explosion-related properties, Process Saf. Environ. Protect. 129 (2019), pp. 280–290. doi:10.1016/j.psep.2019.06.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Nieto-Draghi, G. Fayet, B. Creton, X. Rozanska, P. Rotureau, J.-C. De Hemptinne, P. Ungerer, B. Rousseau, and C. Adamo, A general guidebook for the theoretical prediction of physico-chemical properties of chemicals for regulatory purposes, Chem. Rev. 115 (2015), pp. 13093–13164. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Fayet and P. Rotureau, Chemoinformatics for the safety of energetic and reactive materials at Ineris, Mol. Inform. 41 (2022), pp. 2000190. doi:10.1002/minf.202000190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F.A. Quintero, S.J. Patel, F. Munoz, and M.S. Mannan, Review of existing QSAR/QSPR models developed for properties used in hazardous chemicals classification system, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 51 (2012), pp. 16101–16115. doi:10.1021/ie301079r.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Gaudin, P. Rotureau, and G. Fayet, Combining mixing rules with QSPR models for pure chemicals to predict the flash points of binary organic liquid mixtures, Fire Saf. J. 74 (2014), pp. 61–70. doi:10.1016/j.firesaf.2015.04.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.A. Saldana, L. Starck, P. Mougin, B. Rousseau, and B. Creton, Prediction of flash points for fuel mixtures using machine learning and a novel equation, Energy Fuels 27 (2013), pp. 3811–3820. doi:10.1021/ef4005362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Gaudin, P. Rotureau, and G. Fayet, Mixture descriptors toward the development of quantitative structure–property relationship models for the flash points of organic mixtures, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 54 (2015), pp. 6596–6604. doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.5b01457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Web of Science, Clarivate, https://www.webofscience.com.
   Google Scholar
• G. Cai, Z. Liu, L. Zhang, Q. Shi, S. Zhao, and C. Xu, Systematic performance evaluation of gasoline molecules based on quantitative structure-property relationship models, Chem. Eng. Sci. 229 (2021), pp. 116077. doi:10.1016/j.ces.2020.116077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.A. Mirkhani, F. Gharagheizi, and M. Sattari, A QSPR model for prediction of diffusion coefficient of non-electrolyte organic compounds in air at ambient condition, Chemosphere 86 (2012), pp. 959–966. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.11.021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L.-T. Ye, Y. Pan, and J.-C. Jiang, Experimental determination and calculation of auto-ignition temperature of binary flammable liquid mixtures, Acta Petro. Sin. (Petroleum Proc. Section) 31 (2015), pp. 753–759. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-8719.2015.03.021.
   Google Scholar
• L. Jiao, X. Zhang, Y. Qin, X. Wang, and H. Li, QSPR study on the flash point of organic binary mixtures by using electrotopological state index, Chemom. Intell. Lab. 156 (2016), pp. 211–216. doi:10.1016/j.chemolab.2016.05.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Wang, H. Park, K. Xu, and Q. Wang, Prediction of lower flammability limits of blended gases based on quantitative structure–property relationship, J. Therm. Anal. Calori. 132 (2018), pp. 1125–1130. doi:10.1007/s10973-017-6941-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Wang, F. Yan, Q. Jia, and Q. Wang, Distributive structure-properties relationship for flash point of multiple components mixture, Fluid Phase Equil. 474 (2018), pp. 1–5. doi:10.1016/j.fluid.2018.07.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Fayet and P. Rotureau, New QSPR models to predict the flammability of binary liquid mixtures, Mol. Inform. 38 (2019), pp. 1800122. doi:10.1002/minf.201800122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Pan, X. Ji, L. Ding, and J. Jiang, Prediction of lower flammability limits for binary hydrocarbon gases by quantitative structure—property relationship approach, Molecules 24 (2019), pp. 748. doi:10.3390/molecules24040748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Shen, Y. Pan, X. Ji, Y. Ni, and J. Jiang, Prediction of the auto-ignition temperatures of binary miscible liquid mixtures from molecular structures, Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20 (2019), pp. 2084. doi:10.3390/ijms20092084.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Torabian and M. Amin Sobati, New structure-based models for the prediction of flash point of multi-component organic mixtures, Thermochim. Acta 672 (2019), pp. 162–172. doi:10.1016/j.tca.2018.11.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Wang, K. Xu, and Q. Wang, Prediction of upper flammability limits for fuel mixtures using quantitative structure–property relationship models, Chem. Eng. Comm. 206 (2019), pp. 247–253. doi:10.1080/00986445.2018.1483350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Cao, Y. Pan, Y. Liu, and J. Jiang, A novel method for predicting the flash points of binary mixtures from molecular structures, Saf. Sci. 126 (2020), pp. 104680. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Jiao, C. Ji, S. Yuan, Z. Zhang, and Q. Wang, Development of machine learning based prediction models for hazardous properties of chemical mixtures, J. Loss Prevent. Proc. Ind. 67 (2020), pp. 104226. doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2020.104226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Jiao, S. Yuan, Z. Zhang, and Q. Wang, Machine learning prediction of hydrocarbon mixture lower flammability limits using quantitative structure-property relationship models, Process Saf. Prog. 39 (2020), pp. e12103. doi:10.1002/prs.12103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Jin, J. Jiang, Y. Pan, and L. Ni, Prediction of the auto-ignition temperature of binary liquid mixtures based on the quantitative structure–property relationship approach, J. Therm. Anal. Calori. 140 (2020), pp. 397–409. doi:10.1007/s10973-019-08774-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Shen, X. Ji, Y. Pan, R. Qi, and J. Jiang, A new method for predicting the upper flammability limits of fuel mixtures, J. Loss Prevent. Proc. Ind. 64 (2020), pp. 104074. doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2020.104074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.P. Toropova, A.A. Toropov, E. Carnesecchi, E. Benfenati, and J.L. Dorne, The index of ideality of correlation: Models for flammability of binary liquid mixtures, Chem. Pap. 74 (2020), pp. 601–609. doi:10.1007/s11696-019-00903-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.P. Toropova, A.A. Toropov, D. Leszczynska, and J. Leszczynski, The index of ideality of correlation: Models of the flash points of ternary mixtures, New J. Chem. 44 (2020), pp. 4858–4868. doi:10.1039/D0NJ00121J.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Yao, R. Qi, Y. Pan, H. He, Y. Fan, J. Jiang, and J. Jiang, Prediction of the flash points of binary biodiesel mixtures from molecular structures, J. Loss Prevent. Proc. Ind. 65 (2020), pp. 104137. doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2020.104137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Zhou, B. Wang, J. Jiang, G. Reniers, and L. Liu, A mathematical method for predicting flammability limits of gas mixtures, Process Saf. Environ. Protect. 136 (2020), pp. 280–287. doi:10.1016/j.psep.2020.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. He, Y. Pan, J. Meng, Y. Li, J. Zhong, W. Duan, and J. Jiang, Predicting thermal decomposition temperature of binary imidazolium ionic liquid mixtures from molecular structures, ACS Omega 6 (2021), pp. 13116–13123. doi:10.1021/acsomega.1c00846.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Ni, Y. Pan, J. Jiang, Y. Liu, and C.-M. Shu, Predicting both lower and upper flammability limits for fuel mixtures from molecular structures with same descriptors, Process Saf. Environ. Protect. 155 (2021), pp. 177–183. doi:10.1016/j.psep.2021.09.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Aljaman, U. Ahmed, U. Zahid, V.M. Reddy, S.M. Sarathy, and A.G. Abdul Jameel, A comprehensive neural network model for predicting flash point of oxygenated fuels using a functional group approach, Fuel 317 (2022), pp. 123428. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2022.123428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EChemPortal, OECD, https://www.echemportal.org/echemportal/.
   Google Scholar
• Chemsafe - Database for Safety Characteristics in Explosion Protection, BAM, Dechema, PTB, https://www.chemsafe.ptb.de/
   Google Scholar
• V. Kuz’min, A. Artemenko, L. Ognichenko, A. Hromov, A. Kosinskaya, S. Stelmakh, Z.L. Sessions, and E.N. Muratov, Simplex representation of molecular structure as universal QSAR/QSPR tool, Struct. Chem. 32 (2021), pp. 1365–1392. doi:10.1007/s11224-021-01793-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Weininger, SMILES, a chemical language and information system. 1. Introduction to methodology and encoding rules, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 28 (1988), pp. 31–36. doi:10.1021/ci00057a005.
   Google Scholar
• M. Chatterjee and K. Roy, Application of cross-validation strategies to avoid overestimation of performance of 2D-QSAR models for the prediction of aquatic toxicity of chemical mixtures, SAR QSAR Environ Res. 33 (2022), pp. 463–484. doi:10.1080/1062936X.2022.2081255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Chirico and P. Gramatica, Real external predictivity of QSAR models: how to evaluate It? Comparison of different validation criteria and proposal of using the concordance correlation coefficient, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 51 (2011), pp. 2320–2335. doi:10.1021/ci200211n.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Chirico and P. Gramatica, Real external predictivity of QSAR models. Part 2. New intercomparable thresholds for different validation criteria and the need for scatter plot inspection, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 52 (2012), pp. 2044–2058. doi:10.1021/ci300084j.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.R. Rowley, R.L. Rowley, and W.V. Wilding, Estimation of the flash point of pure organic chemicals from structural contributions, Proc. Saf. Prog. 29 (2010), pp. 353–358. doi:10.1002/prs.10401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.C. Atkinson, Plots, Transformations and Regression - an Introduction to Graphical Methods of Diagnostic Regression Analysis, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• A.P. Toropova, A.A. Toropov, M. Marzo, S.E. Escher, J.L. Dorne, N. Georgiadis, and E. Benfenati, The application of new HARD-descriptor available from the CORAL software to building up NOAEL models, Food Chem. Toxicol. 112 (2018), pp. 544–550. doi:10.1016/j.fct.2017.03.060.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar