Quantitative structure-property relationship modelling for predicting retention indices of essential oils based on an improved horse herd optimization algorithm

References

• D.B. Resende, H.H.D.A. Martins, T.B.D. Souza, D.T. Carvalho, R.H. Piccoli, R.F. Schwan, and D.R. Dias, Synthesis and in vitro evaluation of peracetyl and deacetyl glycosides of eugenol, isoeugenol and dihydroeugenol acting against food-contaminating bacteria, Food Chem. 237 (2017), pp. 1025–1029. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.06.056.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Tohidi, M. Rahimmalek, and A. Arzani, Essential oil composition, total phenolic, flavonoid contents, and antioxidant activity of thymus species collected from different regions of Iran, Food Chem. 220 (2017), pp. 153–161. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.09.203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Al-Fakih, Z. Algamal, M. Lee, and M. Aziz, A sparse QSRR model for predicting retention indices of essential oils based on robust screening approach, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 28 (2017), pp. 691–703. doi:10.1080/1062936X.2017.1375010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.R. Duchowicz, D.O. Bennardi, E.V. Ortiz, and N.C. Comelli, QSAR models for the fumigant activity prediction of essential oils, J. Mol. Graph. Model. 101 (2020), pp. 107751. doi:10.1016/j.jmgm.2020.107751.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L.-T. Qin, S.-S. Liu, F. Chen, Q.-F. Xiao, and Q.-S. Wu, Chemometric model for predicting retention indices of constituents of essential oils, Chemosphere 90 (2013), pp. 300–305. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.07.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O.O. Okoh, A.P. Sadimenko, and A.J. Afolayan, Comparative evaluation of the antibacterial activities of the essential oils of Rosmarinus officinalis L. obtained by hydrodistillation and solvent free microwave extraction methods, Food Chem. 120 (2010), pp. 308–312. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.09.084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Riahi, M.R. Ganjali, E. Pourbasheer, and P. Norouzi, QSRR study of GC retention indices of essential-oil compounds by multiple linear regression with a genetic algorithm, Chromatographia 67 (2008), pp. 917–922. doi:10.1365/s10337-008-0608-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T.A. Ibrahim, A.A. El-Hela, H.M. El-Hefnawy, A.M. Al-Taweel, and S. Perveen, Chemical composition and antimicrobial activities of essential oils of some coniferous plants cultivated in Egypt, Iran. J. Pharm. Res. 16 (2017), pp. 328–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Riahi, E. Pourbasheer, M.R. Ganjali, and P. Norouzi, Investigation of different linear and nonlinear chemometric methods for modeling of retention index of essential oil components: Concerns to support vector machine, J. Hazard. Mater. 166 (2009), pp. 853–859. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.11.097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Deng, B. He, D. He, and Z. Chen, A potential biopreservative: Chemical composition, antibacterial and hemolytic activities of leaves essential oil from Alpinia guinanensis, Ind. Crop. Prod. 94 (2016), pp. 281–287. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.09.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Fisher and C. Phillips, Potential antimicrobial uses of essential oils in food: Is citrus the answer? Trends. Food Sci. Technol. 19 (2008), pp. 156–164. doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2007.11.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.M. Al-Fakih, Z.Y. Algamal, M.H. Lee, H.H. Abdallah, H. Maarof, and M. Aziz, Quantitative structure–activity relationship model for prediction study of corrosion inhibition efficiency using two-stage sparse multiple linear regression, J. Chemometr. 30 (2016), pp. 361–368. doi:10.1002/cem.2800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.G. Fragkaki, M.A. Koupparis, and C.G. Georgakopoulos, Quantitative structure–retention relationship study of α-, β1-, and β2-agonists using multiple linear regression and partial least-squares procedures, Anal. Chim. Acta 512 (2004), pp. 165–171. doi:10.1016/j.aca.2004.02.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Lu, W. Guo, and C. Yin, Quantitative structure-retention relationship study of the gas chromatographic retention indices of saturated esters on different stationary phases using novel topological indices, Anal. Chim. Acta 561 (2006), pp. 96–102. doi:10.1016/j.aca.2005.12.058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Goodarzi, R. Jensen, and Y. Vander Heyden, QSRR modeling for diverse drugs using different feature selection methods coupled with linear and nonlinear regressions, J. Chromatogr. B 910 (2012), pp. 84–94. doi:10.1016/j.jchromb.2012.01.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Durcekova, K. Boronova, J. Mocak, J. Lehotay, and J. Cizmarik, QSRR models for potential local anaesthetic drugs using high performance liquid chromatography, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 59 (2012), pp. 209–216. doi:10.1016/j.jpba.2011.09.035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Kritikos, A. Tsantili-Kakoulidou, Y.L. Loukas, and Y. Dotsikas, Liquid chromatography coupled to quadrupole-time of flight tandem mass spectrometry based quantitative structure–retention relationships of amino acid analogues derivatized via n-propyl chloroformate mediated reaction, J. Chromatogr. A 1403 (2015), pp. 70–80. doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2015.05.028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Gieleciak, D. Hager, and N.E. Heshka, Application of a quantitative structure retention relationship approach for the prediction of the two-dimensional gas chromatography retention times of polycyclic aromatic sulfur heterocycle compounds, J. Chromatogr. A 1437 (2016), pp. 191–202. doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2016.02.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Filipic, D. Ruzic, J. Vucicevic, K. Nikolic, and D. Agbaba, Quantitative structure-retention relationship of selected imidazoline derivatives on α1-acid glycoprotein column, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 127 (2016), pp. 101–111. doi:10.1016/j.jpba.2016.02.053.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Hosseinalipour and R. Ghanbarzadeh, A novel approach for spam detection using horse herd optimization algorithm, Neural. Comput. Appl. 34 (2022), pp. 13091–13105. doi:10.1007/s00521-022-07148-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.A. Awadallah, A.I. Hammouri, M.A. Al-Betar, M.S. Braik, and M.A. Elaziz, Binary horse herd optimization algorithm with crossover operators for feature selection, Comput. Biol. Med. 141 (2022), pp. 105152. doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.105152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Conforti, F. Menichini, C. Formisano, D. Rigano, F. Senatore, N.A. Arnold, and F. Piozzi, Comparative chemical composition, free radical-scavenging and cytotoxic properties of essential oils of six Stachys species from different regions of the Mediterranean area, Food Chem. 116 (2009), pp. 898–905. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.03.044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Luo, H. Chen, A.A. Heidari, Y. Xu, Q. Zhang, and C. Li, Multi-strategy boosted mutative whale-inspired optimization approaches, Appl. Math. Model. 73 (2019), pp. 109–123. doi:10.1016/j.apm.2019.03.046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Zhang, J. Wang, and H. Lu, Research and application of a novel combined model based on multiobjective optimization for multistep-ahead electric load forecasting, Energies 12 (2019), pp. 1931. doi:10.3390/en12101931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Moldovan, Binary horse optimization algorithm for feature selection, Algorithms 15 (2022), pp. 156. doi:10.3390/a15050156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. MiarNaeimi, G. Azizyan, and M. Rashki, Horse herd optimization algorithm: A nature-inspired algorithm for high-dimensional optimization problems, Knowledge-Based Syst. 213 (2021), pp. 106711. doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2020.106711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Sarwar, M.A. Hafeez, M.Y. Javed, A.B. Asghar, and K. Ejsmont, A horse herd optimization algorithm (HOA)-based MPPT technique under partial and complex partial shading conditions, Energies 15 (2022), pp. 1880. doi:10.3390/en15051880.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E.A. Zaimoğlu, N. Yurtay, H. Demirci, and Y. Yurtay, A binary chaotic horse herd optimization algorithm for feature selection, Eng. Sci. Technol. 44 (2023), pp. 101453. doi:10.1016/j.jestch.2023.101453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Anjali and G. Venkatesan, Optimization of mechanical properties and composition of M-sand and pet particle added concrete using hybrid deep neural network-horse herd optimization algorithm, Constr. Build. Mater. 347 (2022), pp. 128334. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. He, F. Zhang, S. Mirjalili, and T. Zhang, Novel binary differential evolution algorithm based on taper-shaped transfer functions for binary optimization problems, Swarm Evol. Comput. 69 (2022), pp. 101022. doi:10.1016/j.swevo.2021.101022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.J. Islam, X. Li, and Y. Mei, A time-varying transfer function for balancing the exploration and exploitation ability of a binary PSO, Appl. Soft Comput. 59 (2017), pp. 182–196. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2017.04.050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Mirjalili and A. Lewis, S-shaped versus V-shaped transfer functions for binary particle swarm optimization, Swarm Evol. Comput. 9 (2013), pp. 1–14. doi:10.1016/j.swevo.2012.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.-S. Guo, J.-S. Wang, and M.-W. Guo, Z-shaped transfer functions for binary particle swarm optimization algorithm, Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2020 (2020), pp. 6502807. doi:10.1155/2020/6502807.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z.Y. Algamal and M.H. Lee, A new adaptive L1-norm for optimal descriptor selection of high-dimensional QSAR classification model for anti-hepatitis C virus activity of thiourea derivatives, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 28 (2017), pp. 75–90. doi:10.1080/1062936X.2017.1278618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Kim, H. Choi, and H.-S. Oh, Smoothly clipped absolute deviation on high dimensions, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 103 (2008), pp. 1665–1673. doi:10.1198/016214508000001066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z.Y. Algamal, M.K. Qasim, M.H. Lee, and H.T. Mohammad Ali, High-dimensional QSAR/QSPR classification modeling based on improving pigeon optimization algorithm, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 206 (2020), pp. 104170. doi:10.1016/j.chemolab.2020.104170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O.S. Qasim, N.A. Al-Thanoon, and Z.Y. Algamal, Feature selection based on chaotic binary black hole algorithm for data classification, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 204 (2020), pp. 104104. doi:10.1016/j.chemolab.2020.104104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O.M. Ismael, O.S. Qasim, and Z.Y. Algamal, Improving Harris hawks optimization algorithm for hyperparameters estimation and feature selection in v-support vector regression based on opposition-based learning, J. Chemom. 34 (2020), pp. e3311. doi:10.1002/cem.3311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar