QSAR assessment of aquatic toxicity potential of diverse agrochemicals

References

• S. Bin and H. Dowlatabadi, Consumer lifestyle approach to US energy use and the related CO2 emissions, Energy Policy 33 (2005), pp. 197–208. doi:10.1016/S0301-4215(03)00210-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Bharadwaj, D. Yadav, and S. Varshney, Non-biodegradable waste–its impact & safe disposal, Int. J. Adv. Technol. Eng. Sci. 3 (2015), pp. 184–191.
   Google Scholar
• F. Corradini, P. Meza, R. Eguiluz, F. Casado, E. Huerta-Lwanga, and V. Geissen, Evidence of microplastic accumulation in agricultural soils from sewage sludge disposal, Sci. Total Environ. 671 (2019), pp. 411–420. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.W. Kweku, O. Bismark, A. Maxwell, K.A. Desmond, K.B. Danso, E.A. Oti-Mensah, A.T. Quachie, and B.B. Adormaa, Greenhouse effect: Greenhouse gases and their impact on global warming, J. Sci. Res. Rep. 17 (2018), pp. 1–9. doi:10.9734/JSRR/2017/39630.
   Google Scholar
• X. Zhu, W. Liu, J. Chen, L.A. Bruijnzeel, Z. Mao, X. Yang, R. Cardinael, F.R. Meng, R.C. Sidle, S. Seitz, V.D. Nair, K. Nanko, X. Zou, C. Chen, and X.J. Jiang, Reductions in water, soil and nutrient losses and pesticide pollution in agroforestry practices: A review of evidence and processes, Plant Soil 453 (2020), pp. 45–86. doi:10.1007/s11104-019-04377-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.O. Aptula and D.W. Roberts, Mechanistic applicability domains for nonanimal-based prediction of toxicological end points: General principles and application to reactive toxicity, Chem. Res. Toxicol. 19 (2006), pp. 1097–1105. doi:10.1021/tx0601004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.T. Cronin, J.S. Jaworska, J.D. Walker, M.H. Comber, C.D. Watts, and A.P. Worth, Use of QSARs in international decision-making frameworks to predict health effects of chemical substances, Environ. Health Perspect. 111 (2003), pp. 1391–1401. doi:10.1289/ehp.5760.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.A. Saghir, M.J. Bartels, D.L. Rick, A.T. McCoy, R.J. Rasoulpour, R.G. Ellis-Hutchings, M.S. Marty, C. Terry, J.P. Bailey, R. Billington, and J.S. Bus, Assessment of diurnal systemic dose of agrochemicals in regulatory toxicity testing–an integrated approach without additional animal use, Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 63 (2012), pp. 321–332. doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2012.03.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Ebert, Ecology, Epidemiology, and Evolution of Parasitism in Daphnia, National Center for Biotechnology, Bethesda, MD, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• W. Gu, X. Li, M. Du, Z. Ren, Q. Li, and Y. Li, Identification and regulation of ecotoxicity of polychlorinated naphthalenes to aquatic food Chain (green algae-Daphnia magna-fish), Aquat. Toxicol. 233 (2021), pp. 105774. doi:10.1016/j.aquatox.2021.105774.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Nath, P.K. Ojha, and K. Roy, Computational modeling of aquatic toxicity of polychlorinated naphthalenes (PCNs) employing 2D-QSAR and chemical read-across, Aquat. Toxicol. 257 (2023), pp. 106429. doi:10.1016/j.aquatox.2023.106429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.S. Sidhu, Health benefits and potential risks related to consumption of fish or fish oil, Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 38 (2003), pp. 336–344. doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2003.07.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.H. Thorp and D.C. Rogers (Eds.), Field Guide to Freshwater Invertebrates of North America, Academic Press, London, UK, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• S. Martinez-Morcillo, J.L. Rodríguez-Gil, J. Fernández-Rubio, S. Rodriguez-Mozaz, M.P. Míguez-Santiyán, M.E. Valdes, D. Barceló, and Y. Valcárcel, Presence of pharmaceutical compounds, levels of biochemical biomarkers in seafood tissues and risk assessment for human health: Results from a case study in North-Western Spain, Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 223 (2020), pp. 10–21. doi:10.1016/j.ijheh.2019.10.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.G. Tacon, D. Lemos, and M. Metian, Fish for health: Improved nutritional quality of cultured fish for human consumption, Rev. Fish. Sci. Aquac. 28 (2020), pp. 449–458. doi:10.1080/23308249.2020.1762163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Bownik, Physiological endpoints in daphnid acute toxicity tests, Sci. Total Environ. 700 (2020), pp. 134400. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Villegas-Navarro, E. Rosas-L, and J.L. Reyes, The heart of Daphnia magna: Effects of four cardioactive drugs, Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C Toxicol. Pharmacol. 136 (2003), pp. 127–134. doi:10.1016/S1532-0456(03)00172-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Ebert, A genome for the environment, Science 331 (2011), pp. 539–540. doi:10.1126/science.1202092.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD, Test No. 202: Daphnia sp. Acute Immobilisation Test, OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 2, OECD Publishing, Paris, 2004. doi:10.1787/9789264069947-en.
   Google Scholar
• OECD, Test No. 211: Daphnia magna Reproduction Test, OECD Publishing, Paris, 2008. doi:10.1787/9789264070127-en.
   Google Scholar
• A. Lombardo, A. Roncaglioni, E. Benfenati, M. Nendza, H. Segner, S. Jeram, E. Pauné, and G. Schüürmann, Optimizing the aquatic toxicity assessment under REACH through an integrated testing strategy (ITS), Environ. Res. 135 (2014), pp. 156–164. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2014.09.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Union (EU), Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Protection of Animals Used for Scientific Purposes, (2010). Available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32010L0063&from=EN. (accessed March, 2023).
   Google Scholar
• H. Sanderson and K. Solomon, Contaminants of emerging concern challenge ecotoxicology, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 28 (2009), pp. 1359. doi:10.1897/09-119.1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ECHA, The Use Of Alternatives To Testing On Animals For The REACH Regulation, 2020. Available at https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/0/alternatives_test_animals_2020_en.pdf. (accessed March, 2023).
   Google Scholar
• CEPA, Background Paper: Evolution Of The Existing Substances Risk Assessment Program Under The Canadian Environmental Protection Act, (1999). Available at https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/chemical-substances/chemicals-management-plan/science-committee/meeting-records-reports/background-paper-evolution-existing-substances-risk-assessment-program-canadian-environmental-protection-act-1999.html#shr-pg0. (accessed March, 2023).
   Google Scholar
• US TSCA, Toxic Substances Control Act, 1976. Available at https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/COMPS-895/pdf/COMPS-895.pdf. (accessed March, 2023).
   Google Scholar
• P. Gramatica, S. Cassani, and A. Sangion, Aquatic ecotoxicity of personal care products: QSAR models and ranking for prioritization and safer alternatives’ design, Green Chem. 18 (2016), pp. 4393–4406. doi:10.1039/C5GC02818C.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O. Nicolotti, E. Benfenati, A. Carotti, D. Gadaleta, A. Gissi, G.F. Mangiatordi, and E. Novellino, REACH and in silico methods: An attractive opportunity for medicinal chemists, Drug Discov. Today 19 (2014), pp. 1757–1768. doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2014.06.027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Zeeman, C.M. Auer, R.G. Clements, J.V. Nabholz, and R.S. Boethling, US EPA regulatory perspectives on the use of QSAR for new and existing chemical evaluations, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 3 (1995), pp. 179–201. doi:10.1080/10629369508234003.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• J.C. Dearden, The history and development of quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs), in Oncology: Breakthroughs in Research and Practice, Intern. J. Quant. Struct.-Prop. Relat. 1 (2017), pp. 1–44.
   Google Scholar
• K. Roy (Ed.), Chemometrics and Cheminformatics in Aquatic Toxicology, John Wiley & Sons Inc, Hoboken, NJ, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• OECD, OECD Principles For The Validation, For Regulatory Purposes, Of (Quantitative) Structure-Activity Relationship Models, 2004. Available at https://www.oecd.org/chemicalsafety/risk-assessment/37849783.pdf. (accessed March, 2023).
   Google Scholar
• L.S. McCarty, The relationship between aquatic toxicity QSARs and bioconcentration for some organic chemicals, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 5 (1986), pp. 1071–1080. doi:10.1002/etc.5620051207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US EPA, KABAM Version 1.0 User’s Guide And Technical Documentation - Appendix F -Description Of Equations Used To Calculate The BCF, BAF, BMF, And BSAF Values, 2009. Available at https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-assessing-pesticide-risks/kabam-version-10-users-guide-and-technical-3#:~:text=Bioconcentration%20factors%20(BCFs)%20are%20calculated,which%20the%20pesticide%20was%20taken. (accessed March, 2023).
   Google Scholar
• M. Vighi, M.M. Garlanda, and D. Calamari, QSARs for toxicity of organophosphorous pesticides to Daphnia and honeybees, Sci. Total Environ. 109 (1991), pp. 605–622. doi:10.1016/0048-9697(91)90213-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Zvinavashe, T. Du, T. Griff, H.H. van den Berg, A.E. Soffers, J. Vervoort, A.J. Murk, and I.M. Rietjens, Quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling of the toxicity of organothiophosphate pesticides to Daphnia magna and Cyprinus carpio, Chemosphere 75 (2009), pp. 1531–1538. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.01.081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W.X. Wang, Bioaccumulation and biomonitoring, in Marine Ecotoxicology, J.Blasco (Eds.), Academic Press (Elsevier), London, UK, 2016, pp. 99–119.
   Google Scholar
• H.J. Geyer, I. Scheunert, R. Brüggemann, C. Steinberg, F. Korte, and A. Kettrup, QSAR for organic chemical bioconcentration in Daphnia, algae, and mussels, Sci. Total Environ. 109 (1991), pp. 387–394. doi:10.1016/0048-9697(91)90193-I.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L.S. McCarty and D. Mackay, Enhancing ecotoxicological modeling and assessment. Body residues and modes of toxic action, Environ. Sci. Technol. 27 (1993), pp. 1718–1728. doi:10.1021/es00046a001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Wen, L. Su, W. Qin, Y. Zhao, J.C. Madden, F.P. Steinmetz, and M.T. Cronin, Investigation of critical body residues and modes of toxic action based on injection and aquatic exposure in fish, Wat. Air Soil Pollut. 226 (2015), pp. 1–11. doi:10.1007/s11270-015-2427-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Wang, Y. Yang, Y. Huang, X. Zhang, Y. Huang, W.C. Qin, Y. Wen, and Y.H. Zhao, Evaluation of modes of action of pesticides to Daphnia magna based on QSAR, excess toxicity and critical body residues, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 203 (2020), pp. 111046. doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Todeschini and V. Consonni, Handbook of Molecular Descriptors, Vol. 11, John Wiley & Sons, Weinheim, Germany, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• A. Mauri, alvaDesc: A tool to calculate and analyze molecular descriptors and fingerprints, in Ecotoxicological QSARs, Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods, K. Roy, ed., Humana, New York, 2020. pp. 801–820.
   Google Scholar
• T.M. Martin, P. Harten, D.M. Young, E.N. Muratov, A. Golbraikh, H. Zhu, and A. Tropsha, Does rational selection of training and test sets improve the outcome of QSAR modeling? J. Chem. Inf. Model. 52 (2012), pp. 2570–2578. doi:10.1021/ci300338w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Roy, S. Kar, and R.N. Das, Understanding the Basics of QSAR for Applications in Pharmaceutical Sciences and Risk Assessment, Academic Press (Elsevier), London, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• A.K. Saxena and P. Prathipati, Comparison of MLR, PLS and GA-MLR in QSAR analysis, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 14 (2003), pp. 433–445. doi:10.1080/10629360310001624015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Cai, J. Luo, S. Wang, and S. Yang, Feature selection in machine learning: A new perspective, Neurocomputing 300 (2018), pp. 70–79. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2017.11.077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Devillers, Genetic Algorithms in Molecular Modeling, Academic Press, London, UK, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• M. Mitchell, An Introduction to Genetic Algorithms, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• K. Roy, R.N. Das, P. Ambure, and R.B. Aher, Be aware of error measures. Further studies on validation of predictive QSAR models, Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst. 152 (2016), pp. 18–33. doi:10.1016/j.chemolab.2016.01.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Wold, M. Sjöström, and L. Eriksson, PLS-regression: A basic tool of chemometrics, Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst. 58 (2001), pp. 109–130. doi:10.1016/S0169-7439(01)00155-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Roy and I. Mitra, On various metrics used for validation of predictive QSAR models with applications in virtual screening and focused library design, Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screening. 14 (2011), pp. 450–474. doi:10.2174/138620711795767893.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Wu, D. Li, J. Meng, and H. Wang, Introduction to SIMCA-P and its application, in Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications, V. Esposito Vinzi, W. Chin, J. Henseler and H. Wang, eds., Springer Handbooks of Computational Statistics, Springer, Berlin, Heidelber, 2010, pp. 757–774.
   Google Scholar
• A. Nath and K. Roy, Chemometric modeling of acute toxicity of diverse aromatic compounds against Rana japonica, Toxicol. Vitro 83 (2022), pp. 105427. doi:10.1016/j.tiv.2022.105427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Khan, P.M. Khan, G. Lavado, C. Valsecchi, J. Pasqualini, D. Baderna, M. Marzo, A. Lombardo, K. Roy, and E. Benfenati, QSAR modeling of Daphnia magna and fish toxicities of biocides using 2D descriptors, Chemosphere. 229 (2019), pp. 8–17. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.04.204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Estrada, Physicochemical interpretation of molecular connectivity indices, J. Phys. Chem. A. 106 (2002), pp. 9085–9091. doi:10.1021/jp026238m.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L.B. Kier and L.H. Hall, Molecular connectivity VII: Specific treatment of heteroatoms, J. Pharm. Sci. 65 (1976), pp. 1806–1809. doi:10.1002/jps.2600651228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L.H. Hall and L.B. Kier, Electrotopological state indices for atom types: A novel combination of electronic, topological, and valence state information, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. 35 (1995), pp. 1039–1045. doi:10.1021/ci00028a014.
   Google Scholar
• L.M. Saavedra and P.R. Duchowicz, Predicting zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryo developmental toxicity through a non-conformational QSAR approach, Sci. Total Environ. 796 (2021), pp. 148820. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148820.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar