The Role of Social Media in Green Infrastructure Planning: A Case Study of Neighborhood Participation in Park Siting

Bibliography

• J.H. Adler, “Jurisdictional Mismatch in Environmental Federalism,” New York University Environmental Law Journal 14 (2005) 130–178.
   Google Scholar
• K. Bäckstrand and E. Lövbrand, “Planting Trees to Mitigate Climate Change: Contested Discourses of Ecological Modernization, Green Governmentality and Civic environmentalism,” Global Environmental Politics 6: 1 (2006) 50–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Benedict and E. McMahon, Green Infrastructure: Linking Landscapes and Communities (Washington, DC: Island Press, 2006).
   Google Scholar
• U. Bhandary and B. Muller, “Land Use Planning and Wildfire Risk Mitigation: An Analysis of Wildfire-Burned Subdivisions Using High-resolution Remote Sensing Imagery and GIS Data,” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 52: 7 (2009) 939–955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Budthimedhee, J. Li, and R. George, “ePlanning: A Snapshot of the Literature on Using the World Wide Web in Urban Planning,” Journal of Planning Literature 17: 2 (2002) 227–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• City of Eugene Neighborhood Services, 2011 Neighborhood Analysis (Eugene: City of Eugene, 2011) <https://www.eugene-or.gov/index.aspx?NID=1373> Accessed September 28, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• F. Cona, “Application of Online Systems in Alternative Dispute Resolution,” Buffalo Law Review 45 (1997) 975–1000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Conroy and S. Gordon, “Utility of Interactive Computer-Based Materials for Enhancing Public Participation,” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 47: 1 (2004) 19–33.
   Google Scholar
• C. Cornelius and M. Boos, “Enhancing Mutual Understanding in Synchronous Computer-Mediated Communication by Training Trade-Offs in Judgmental Tasks,” Communication Research 30: 2 (2003) 147–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Craig, “The Internet Aids Community Participation in the Planning Process,” Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 22: 4 (1998) 393–404.
   Google Scholar
• W. Cukier, R. Bauer, and C. Middleton, “Applying Habermas’ Validity Claims as a Standard for Critical Discourse Analysis,” In B. Kaplan, D. Truex, T. Wood-Harper, and J. De Gross, eds., Information Systems Research (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003).
   Google Scholar
• J. Evans-Cowley and J. Hollander, “The New Generation of Public Participation: Internet-Based Participation Tools,” Planning, Practice and Research 25: 3 (2010) 397–408.
   Google Scholar
• J. Evans-Cowley and M. Conroy, “The Growth of E-government in Municipal Planning,” Journal of Urban Technology 13: 1 (2006) 81–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Figueroa, D. Kincaid, M. Rani, and G. Lewis, “Communication for Social Change: An Integrated Model for Measuring the Process and its Outcomes” Working Paper (New York: The Rockefeller Foundation, 2002).
   Google Scholar
• J. Forester, Planning in the Face of Power (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989).
   Google Scholar
• M. Foth, “Facilitating Social Networking in Inner-City Neighborhoods,” Computer 39: 9 (2006) 44–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Fredericks and M. Foth, “Augmenting Public Participation: Enhancing Planning Outcomes Through the Use of Social Media and Web 2.0,” Australian Planner 50: 3 (2013) 244–256.
   Google Scholar
• S. Gill, J. Handley, A. Ennos, and S. Pauleit, “Adapting Cities for Climate Change: The Role of the Green Infrastructure,” Built Environment 33:1 (2007) 115–133.
   Google Scholar
• J. Habermas, The Theory of Communicative Action: Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason, Vol. 2 (Boston: Beacon Press: 1989).
   Google Scholar
• M. Hajer and W. Versteeg, “A Decade of Discourse Analysis of Environmental Politics: Achievements, Challenges, Perspectives,” Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 7: 3 (2005) 175–184.
   Google Scholar
• K. Hampton, “Neighborhoods in the Network Society the e-Neighbors Study,” Information, Communication and Society 10: 5 (2007) 714–748.
   Google Scholar
• K. Hampton, and B. Wellman, “The not so global village of Netville,” The Internet in everyday life (2002): 345–371.
   Google Scholar
• K. Hampton and B. Wellman, “Neighboring in Netville: How the Internet Supports Community and Social Capital in a Wired Suburb,” City and Community 2: 4 (2003) 277–311.
   Google Scholar
• S. Harlan, A. Brazel, L. Prashad, W. Stefanov, and L. Larsen, “Neighborhood Microclimates and Vulnerability to Heat Stress,” Social Science and Medicine 63: 11 (2006) 2847–2863.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Hiltz, The Virtual Classroom: Learning without Limits via Computer Networks (Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation, 1994).
   Google Scholar
• J. Innes and D. Booher. Planning with Complexity: An Introduction to Collaborative Rationality for Public Policy (New York: Routledge, 2010).
   Google Scholar
• L. Jeffres, “The Communicative City: Conceptualizing, Operationalizing, and Policy Making,” Journal of Planning Literature 25: 2 (2010) 99–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Kardinal, S., Wong, E. Hagen, R. Anggoro, and Y. Hong. “The Influence of Land Use on the Urban Heat Island in Singapore,” Habitat International 31: 2 (2007) 232–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Lindsey, M. Maraj, and S. Kuan, “Access, Equity, and Urban Greenways: An Exploratory Investigation,” The Professional Geographer 53: 3 (2001) 332–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Mandarano, M. Meenar, and C. Steins. “Building Social Capital in the Digital Age of Civic Engagement,” Journal of Planning Literature 25: 2 (2010) 123–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O. Märker and B. Schmidt-Belz, “Online Mediation for Urban and Regional Planning,” Computer Science for Environmental Protection (Marburg, Germany: Metropolis, 2000).
   Google Scholar
• C. Marshall and D. Novick, “Conversational Effectiveness in Multimedia Communication,” Information Technology and People 8: 1 (1995) 54–79.
   Google Scholar
• J. Nolon, “Climate Change and Sustainable Development: The Quest for Green Communities Part II,” Planning and Environmental Law 61: 11 (2009) 3–15.
   Google Scholar
• W. Orlikowski and J. Baroudi, “Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions,” Information Systems Research 2: 1 (1991) 1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Ostrom, “Polycentric Systems for Coping with Collective Action and Global Environmental Change,” Global Environmental Change 20: 4 (2010) 550–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Ostrom, “Nested Externalities and Polycentric Institutions: Must We Wait for Global Solutions to Climate Change Before Taking Actions at Other Scales?” Economic Theory 49: 2 (2012) 353–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Paccagnella, “Getting the Seats of Your Pants Dirty: Strategies for Ethnographic Research on Virtual Communities,” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 3: 1 (1997) doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00065.x
   Google Scholar
• N. Panteli and S. Sockalingam, “Trust and Conflict within Virtual Inter-Organizational Alliances: A Framework for Facilitating Knowledge Sharing,” Decision Support Systems 39: 4 (2005) 599–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Rhoads, “Face-to-face and Computer-mediated Communication: What does Theory Tell us and What have We Learned So Far?” Journal of Planning Literature 25: 2 (2010) 111–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Schroeter and K. Houghton, “Neo-planning: Location-Based Social Media to Engage Australia's New Digital Locals,” Proceedings of Planning Institute of Australia National Conference 2011 (Planning Institute of Australia, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Y. Shin and D. Shin, “Community Informatics and the New Urbanism: Incorporating Information and Communication Technologies into Planning Integrated Urban Communities,” Journal of Urban Technology 19: 1 (2012) 23–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Soukup, “Computer-Mediated Communication as a Virtual Third Place: Building Oldenburg's Great Good Places on the World Wide Web,” New Media and Society 8: 3 (2006) 421–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Talen, “The Spatial Logic of Parks,” Journal of Urban Design 15: 4 (2010) 473–491.
   Google Scholar
• A. Tayebi, “‘Communihood:’ A Less Formal or More Local Form of Community in the Age of the Internet,” Journal of Urban Technology 20: 2 (2013) 77–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Townsend, “Life in the Real-Time City: Mobile Telephones and Urban Metabolism,” Journal of Urban Technology 7: 2 (2000) 85–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Watson, G. DeSanctis, and M. Poole, “Using a GDSS to Facilitate Group Consensus: Some Intended and Unintended Consequences,” MIS Quarterly 12: 2 (1988) 463–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Wellman, A. Haase, J. Witte, and K. Hampton, “Does the Internet Increase, Decrease, or Supplement Social Capital? Social Networks, Participation, and Community Commitment,” American Behavioral Scientist 45: 3 (2001) 436–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Williamson and B. Parolin, “Web 2.0 and Social Media Growth in Planning Practice: A Longitudinal Study,” Planning Practice and Research 28: 5 (2013) 544–562.
   Google Scholar