Tools and Technologies for Planning the Development of Smart Cities

Bibliography

• L. Aggens, “Identifying Different Levels of Public Interest in Participation,” in J. Creighton, J. Priscoli, and M. Dunning, eds., Public Involvement Techniques: A Reader of Ten Years Experience at the Institute for Water Resources (Alexandria: Institute for Water Resources U.S. Corps Of Engineers, 1998) 193–198.
   Google Scholar
• A.-V. Anttiroiko and M. Malkia, eds., Encyclopedia of Digital Government (Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing, 2007).
   Google Scholar
• S. Arnstein, “A Ladder of Citizen Participation,” Journal of the American Planning Association 35: 4 (1969) 216–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.B.A. van Asselt and N. Rijkens-Klomp, “A Look in the Mirror: Reflection on Participation in Integrated Assessment from a Methodological Perspective,” Global Environmental Change 12 (2002) 167–184. doi: 10.1016/S0959-3780(02)00012-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Aurigi, “Reflections towards an Agenda for Urban-Designing the Digital City,” Urban Design International 18 (2012) <http://www.palgrave-journals.com/udi/journal/v18/n2/pdf/udi201232a.pdf> DOI: 10.157/udi.2012.32.
   Google Scholar
• H. Briasoulis, “Who plans whose sustainability? Alternative roles for planners,” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 42: 6 (1999) 889–902. doi: 10.1080/09640569910885
   Google Scholar
• California Institute for Smart Communities, Ten Steps to Becoming a Smart Community (2001).
   Google Scholar
• A. Caperna, “Integrating ICT into Sustainable Local Policies,” in C.N. Silva, ed., Handbook of Research on E-Planning – ICTs for Urban Development and Monitoring (Hershey, New York: Information Science Reference, 2010) 340–364.
   Google Scholar
• H.W. Chesbrough, Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, (Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2003).
   Google Scholar
• P. Droege, ed., Intelligent Environments - Spatial Aspect of the Information Revolution (Oxford: Elsevier, 1997).
   Google Scholar
• European Union, Cities of Tomorrow – Challenges, Visions, Ways Forward (European Commission, Directorate General for Regional Policy, Brussels, October 2011).
   Google Scholar
• R. Fischler, “Case Studies of Planners at Work,” Journal of Planning Literature 15: 2 (2000a) 184–195. doi: 10.1177/08854120022092980
   Google Scholar
• R. Fischler, “Communicative Planning Theory: A Foucauldian Assessment,” Journal of Planning Education and Research 19 (2000b) 358–368. doi: 10.1177/0739456X0001900405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Forester, Planning in the Face of Power (Berkeley/Los Angeles/London: University of California Press, 1989).
   Google Scholar
• J. Friedmann, “The New Political Economy of Planning: the Rise of the Civil Society,” in M. Douglass, and J. Friedmann, eds, Cities for Citizens (Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 1998) 19–35.
   Google Scholar
• M. Giaoutzi and A. Stratigea, Regional Planning: Theory and Practice (Athens: KRITIKH, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• A.O. Green and L. Hunton-Clarke, “A Typology of Stakeholder Participation for Company Environmental Decision Making,” Business Strategy and the Environment 12 (2003) 292–299. doi: 10.1002/bse.371
   Google Scholar
• R.E. Hall, “The Vision of a Smart City,” paper presented at the 2nd International Life Extension Technology Workshop (Paris, France, 28 September 2000) <http://ntl.bts.gov/lib/14000/14800/14834/DE2001773961.pdf> Accessed September 12, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• HarmoniCOP Project, Public Participation and the European Water Framework Directive – Role of Information and Communication Tools, WorkPackage 3 Report of the HarmoniCOP Project – Harmonising COllaborative Planning, Prepared under contract from the European Commission Contract no EVK1-CT-2002–00120, Deliverable Nr. 4, Cemagref, Montpellier, (2003).
   Google Scholar
• J. Howe, “Crowdsourcing: A Definition” (2006) <http://crowdsourcing.typepad.com/2006/06/crowdsourcing_a.html> Accessed January 16, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Intelligent Community Forum – ICF, “What is an Intelligent Community?” <www.intelligentcommunity.org> Accessed October 15, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• J.E. Innes and D.E. Booher, “Consensus Building and Complex Adaptive Systems – A Framework for Evaluating Collaborative Planning,” APA Journal 65: 4 (1999) 412–423.
   Google Scholar
• INTEL, Digital Communities Initiative will Help Maximize Wireless Capabilities Worldwide, <www.intel.com/technology/magazine> Accessed September 16, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• S.P. Jain and W. Polman, “A Handbook for Trainers on Participatory Local Development,” RAP PUBLICATION 2003/07, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific Bangkok (2003).
   Google Scholar
• JESSICA – Joint European Support for Sustainable Investment in City Areas, JESSICA for Smart and Sustainable Cities, Horizontal Study, Final Report (2012), European Investment Bank, 11 December.
   Google Scholar
• T. Keenan and D. Trotter, “The Changing Role of Community Networks in Providing Citizen Access to the Internet,” Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy 9: 2 (1999) 100–108. doi: 10.1108/10662249910264855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Khakee, “Evaluation and Planning: Inseparable Concepts,” TPR 69: 4 (1998) 359–74.
   Google Scholar
• N. Komninos, Intelligent Cities: Innovation, Knowledge Systems and Digital Spaces (London and New York: Routledge, 2002).
   Google Scholar
• N. Komninos, “The Architecture of Intelligent Cities,” paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Intelligent Environments, Institution of Engineering and Technology (Athens, 5–6 July 2006) (Proceedings 13–20).
   Google Scholar
• N. Komninos, “Intelligent Cities: Towards Interactive and Global Innovation Environments,” International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development 1: 4 (2009) 337–355. doi: 10.1504/IJIRD.2009.022726
   Google Scholar
• C.L. Manzo, “Beyond House and Haven: toward a Revisioning of Emotional Relationships with Places,” Journal of Environmental Psychology 23 (2003) 47–61. doi: 10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00074-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Mitchell, E-topia – Urban Life, Jim-But Not As We Know It (Boston, MA: MIT Press, 2000) ISBN: 9780262133555.
   Google Scholar
• B. Murgante, L. Tilio, F. Scorza, and V. Lanza, “Crowd-Cloud Tourism, New Approaches to Territorial Marketing,” in B. Murgante, O. Gervasi, A. Iglesias, D. Taniar, and B.O. Apduhan, eds, Computational Science and Its Applications, Part II – ICCSA 2011 (Berlin Heidelberg: Springer – Verlag, 2011) 265–276.
   Google Scholar
• OECD, Citizens as Partners – Information, Consultation and Public Participation in Policy-making (Paris: OECD, 2001). <http://www.oecdbookshop.org/> Accessed June 15, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• M. Pallot, “Engaging Users into Research and Innovation: The Living Lab Approach as a User-Centered Open Innovation Ecosystem,” Webergence Blog (2009) <http://www.cwe-projects.eu/> Accessed July 3, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Ch.-A. Papadopoulou and M. Giaoutzi, “Crowdsourcing as a Tool for Knowledge Acquisition in Spatial Planning,” Future Internet/Special Issue: NeoGeography and WikiPlanning 2014, 6: 1 (2014) 109–125. doi: 10.3390/fi6010109
   Google Scholar
• Ch.-A. Papadopoulou and A. Stratigea, “Traditional vs. Web-based Participatory Tools in Support of Spatial Planning in ‘Lagging-Behind’ Peripheral Regions,” in G. Korres, E. Kourliouros, G. Tsobanoglou and A. Kokkinou, eds, Socio-Economic Sustainability, Regional Development and Spatial Planning: European and International Dimensions & Perspectives, (Mytilene: Aegean University, 2014) 164–170. ISBN: 978-960-93-6040-1.
   Google Scholar
• A.G. Pereira and S.C. Quintana, “From Technocratic to Participatory Decision Support Systems: Responding to the New Governance Initiatives,” Journal of Geographic Information and Decision Analysis 6: 2 (2002) 95–107.
   Google Scholar
• D.J. Reed and A. Webster, “Architectures of Motility: ICT Systems, Transport and Planning for Complex Urban Spaces,” in C.N. Silva, ed., Handbook of Research on E-Planning – ICTs for Urban Development and Monitoring (Hershey, New York: Information Science Reference, 2010) 365–387.
   Google Scholar
• J. Saad-Sulonen and L. Horelli, “The Value of Community Informatics to Participatory Urban Planning and Design: A Case Study in Helsinki,” The Journal of Community Informatics 6: 2 (2010). <http://ci-journal.net/index.php/ciej/article/view/579/603> Accessed February 11, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• C.N. Silva, “The E-Planning Paradigm – Theory, Methods and Tools: An Overview,” in C.N. Silva, ed., Handbook of Research on E-Planning – ICTs for Urban Development and Monitoring (Hershey, New York: Information Science Reference, 2010) 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• A. Steventon and S. Wright, Intelligent Spaces: The Application of Pervasive ICT (London: Springer, 2006).
   Google Scholar
• A. Stratigea, “Participatory Planning and Sustainable Local Development: A Methodological Approach,” paper presented at the 2nd National Conference of Urban and Regional Planning and Regional Development (Volos, 24–27 September 2009 ) (Proceedings 43–51).
   Google Scholar
• A. Stratigea, “Energy Sustainable Communities: A Challenge for Planning the Development of Mountainous Regions,” paper presented at the 6th Interdisciplinary Conference on the Integrated Development of Mountainous Regions, National Technical University of Athens (Metsovo, 16–19 September 2010).
   Google Scholar
• A. Stratigea, “The Concept of ‘Smart Cities’ - Towards a Community Development?” in H. Bakis, ed., Digital Territories – Case Studies, Special Issue, NETCOM, 26: 3–4 (2012) 375–388.
   Google Scholar
• A. Stratigea and M. Panagiotopoulou, “Smart Cities as a New Paradigm for Serving Urban Sustainability Objectives – A View in the Mediterranean Experience,” in G. Korres, E. Kourliouros, G. Tsobanoglou and A. Kokkinou, eds, Socio-Economic Sustainability, Regional Development and Spatial Planning: European and International Dimensions & Perspectives (Mytilene: Aegean University, 2014) 213–220. ISBN: 978-960-93-6040-1.
   Google Scholar
• J. Surowiecki, The Wisdom of Crowds (New York: Doubleday, 2004).
   Google Scholar
• W. Tao, “Interdisciplinary Urban GIS for Smart Cities: Advancements and Opportunities,” Geo-spatial Information Science 16: 1 (2013) 25–34. doi: 10.1080/10095020.2013.774108
   Google Scholar
• N. Taylor, Urban Planning Theory Since 1945 (London, UK: Sage Publications Ltd., 1998).
   Google Scholar
• J. A. Throgmorton, Planning as Persuasive Storytelling: the Rhetorical Construction of Chicago's Electric Future (Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press, 1996).
   Google Scholar
• D. Toppeta, The Smart City Vision: How Innovation and ICT Can Build Smart, “Livable,” Sustainable Cities, Report of The Innovation Knowledge Foundation (2010) <http://www.inta-aivn.org/images/cc/Urbanism/background%20documents/Toppeta_Report_005_2010.pdf> Accessed May 23, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Voluntary Services Overseas – VSO, Participatory Approaches: A Facilitator's Guide (London: VSO, 2004).
   Google Scholar
• D. Walters, “Smart Cities, Smart Places, Smart Democracy: Form-Based Codes, Electronic Governance and the Role of Place in Making Smart Cities,” Intelligent Buildings International 3:3 (2011) 198–218.
   Google Scholar
• J. Wilson, Web 2.0 for Urban Designers and Planners, Master Thesis, (Massachusetts Institute of Technology – MIT, September 2008).
   Google Scholar
• World Bank, The World Bank Participation Sourcebook (Washington, DC: The World Bank, 1996).
   Google Scholar
• Websites
   Google Scholar
• Smart Cities – http://www.smartcities.info/
   Google Scholar
• CISCO – http://www.cisco.com/
   Google Scholar
• SmartSantander – http://www.smartsantander.eu/
   Google Scholar
• 21 Computech Inc. – http://www.21computech.com/gis.php
   Google Scholar
• Smart Crowds Trento Territorial Lab – http://www.smartcrowds.net/
   Google Scholar
• Smart Campus – http://www.smartcampuslab.it/
   Google Scholar