Urban Resilience and Planning Support Systems: The Need for Sentience

Bibliography

• T. Abdelzaher, B. Blum, Y. Chen, D. Evans, J. George, S. George, T. He, et al., “EnviroTrack: Towards an Environmental Computing Paradigm for Distributed Sensor Network,” paper presented at the 24th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (Tokyo, Japan, 23–26 Mar. 2004).
   Google Scholar
• M. Addlesee, R. Curwen, S. Hodges, J. Newman, P. Steggles, A. Ward, and A. Hopper, “Implementing a Sentient Computing System,” Computer 34: 8 (2001) 50–56. doi: 10.1109/2.940013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Alberti, and J. Marzluff, “Ecological Resilience in Urban Ecosystems: Linking Urban Patterns to Human and Ecological Functions,” Urban Ecosystems 7: 3 (2004) 241–265. doi: 10.1023/B:UECO.0000044038.90173.c6
   Google Scholar
• M. Batty, “Smart Cities and Big Data: How We Can Make Cities More Resilient,” Keynote presented at the Joint AESOP-ACSP Congress (Dublin, Ireland, 15–19 Jul. 2013).
   Google Scholar
• M. Batty, K. Axhausen, F. Giannotti, A. Pozdnoukhov, A. Bazzani, M. Wachowicz, G. Ouzounis, and Y. Portugali, “Smart Cities of the Future,” The European Physical Journal Special Topics 214: 1 (2012) 481–518. doi: 10.1140/epjst/e2012-01703-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.A. Bell, The Five Principles of Organizational Resilience, Report of Gartner Research, 2002. <http://home.trg-inc.com/sites/default/files/The%20Five%20Principles%20of%20Organizational%20Resilience.pdf> Accessed June 04, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• P. Berke, “Does Sustainable Development Orter a New Direction for Planning? Challenges for the Twenty-First Century,” Journal of Planning Literature 17: 1 (2002) 21–36. doi: 10.1177/088122017001002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Berkes, J. Colding, and C. Folke,: Navigating Social-Ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2008).
   Google Scholar
• A. Bostrom, Risk Communication: A Mental Models Approach (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2002).
   Google Scholar
• A. Bostrom, Risk Assessment, Modeling and Decision Support: Strategic Directions (Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2008).
   Google Scholar
• R. Brail, Planning Support Systems for Cities and Regions (Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, 2008).
   Google Scholar
• R. Brail, and R. Klostermann, Planning Support Systems: Integrating Geographic Information Systems, Models, and Visualization Tools (Redlands, CA: ESRI Press, 2001).
   Google Scholar
• K. Budthimedhee, J. Li, and R. George, “ePlanning: A Snapshot of the Literature on Using the World Wide Web in Urban Planning,” Journal of Planning Literature 17: 2 (2002) 227–246. doi: 10.1177/088541202762475964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Bulkeley, and M. Betsill, Cities and Climate Change: Urban Sustainability and Global Environmental Governance Vol. 4 (Hove, UK: Psychology Press, 2005).
   Google Scholar
• H. Bulkeley, and M. Betsill, “Revisiting the Urban Politics of Climate Change,” Environmental Politics 22: 1 (2013) 136–154. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2013.755797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Cao, and Y. Miyamoto, 2003. “Direct Slicing from AutoCAD Solid Models for Rapid Prototyping,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 21: 10 (2003) 739–742. doi: 10.1007/s00170-002-1316-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L.K. Comfort, Y. Sungu, D. Johnson, and M. Dunn, “Complex Systems in Crisis: Anticipation and Resilience in Dynamic Environments,” Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 9: 3 (2001) 144–158. doi: 10.1111/1468-5973.00164
   Google Scholar
• C. Conati, and H. McLaren, “Exploring the Role of Individual Differences in Information Visualization,” paper presented at the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI ‘08) (Napoli, Italy, 28–30 May, 2008).
   Google Scholar
• D.J. Cox, “The Art of Scientific Visualization,” Academic Computing 46 (1990) 20–56.
   Google Scholar
• S. Davoudi, and L. Porter, “What Does It Mean in Planning Practice?” Planning Theory & Practice 13: 2 (2012) 299–333. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   Google Scholar
• B. Deal, and A. Chakraborty, “Cyber-physical Planning Support Systems: Advancing Participatory Decision Making in Complex Urban environments.” International Journal of Operations and Quantitative Management v16: 4 (2010) 353–367.
   Google Scholar
• B. Deal, and V. Pallathucheril, “Simulating Regional Futures: The Land-Use Evolution and Impact Assessment Model (LEAM).” in R. Brail, ed., Planning Support Systems for Cities and Regions (Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute for Land Policy, 2008) 61–68.
   Google Scholar
• B. Deal, and V. Pallathucheril, “Sustainability and Urban Dynamics: Assessing Future Impacts on Ecosystem Services,” Sustainability 1 (2009a) 346–362. doi: 10.3390/su1030346
   Google Scholar
• B. Deal, V. Pallathucheril, “A Use-Driven Approach to Large-Scale Urban Modeling and Planning Support.” in S. Geertman and J. Stillwell, eds., Planning Support Systems: Best Practice and New Methods (New York, NY: Springer, 2009b) 29–51.
   Google Scholar
• B. Deal, and D. Schunk, “Spatial Dynamic Modeling and Urban Land Use Transformation: A Simulation Approach to Assessing the Costs of Urban Sprawl,” The Journal of Ecological Economics 51: 1-2 (2004) 79–95. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. De Roo, and G. Porter, Fuzzy Planning: The Role of Actors in a Fuzzy Governance Environment (Surrey, UK: Ashgate Publishing Limited, 2007).
   Google Scholar
• H. Ernstson, The Social Production of Ecosystem Services: Lessons from Urban Resilience Research, PhD Dissertation (Stockholm University, 2008).
   Google Scholar
• S. Ervin, “A System for Geodesign.” in Digital Landscape Architecture Conference, Dessau, Germany (2011), <http://www.kolleg.loel.hs-analt.de/landschaftsinformatik/fileadmin/user_upload/_temp_/2011/Proceedings/305_ERVIN_2011May10.pdf> Accessed January 29, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• M. Estrom, Digital Image Processing (San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1984).
   Google Scholar
• J. Fiksel, “Sustainability and Resilience: Toward a Systems Approach,” Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy 2: 2 (2006) 14–21.
   Google Scholar
• M. Flaxman, “Fundamentals of Geodesign,” Proceedings of Digital Landscape Architecture, Anhalt University of Applied Science 2: (2010) 28–41.
   Google Scholar
• C. Folke, “Resilience: The Emergence of a Perspective for Social–ecological Systems Analyses,” Global Environmental Change 16: 3 (2006) 253–267. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Folke, S. Carpenter, T. Elmqvist, L. Gunderson, C.S. Holling, and B. Walker, “Resilience and Sustainable Development: Building Adaptive Capacity in a World of Transformations,” AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment 31: 5 (2002) 437–440. doi: 10.1579/0044-7447-31.5.437
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Folke, T. Hahn, P. Olsson, and J. Norberg, “Adaptive Governance of Social-Ecological Systems,” Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30 (2005) 441–73. doi: 10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Fortner, “Are You Ready for BIM?” Civil Engineering, ASCE 78: 5 (2008) 44–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Fraser, W. Mabee, and O. Slaymaker, “Mutual Vulnerability, Mutual Dependence: The Reflexive Relation between Human Society and the Environment,” Global Environmental Change 13: 2 (2003) 137–144. doi: 10.1016/S0959-3780(03)00022-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Geertman, and J. Stillwell, Planning Support Systems in Practice (New York, NY: Springer, 2003).
   Google Scholar
• S. Geertman, F. Toppen, and J. Stillwell, Planning Support Systems: Best Practices and New Methods (Heidelberg, Germany: Springer, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• M. Goodchild, “Towards Geodesign: Repurposing Cartography and GIS?” Cartographic Perspectives 66 (2010) 7–22. doi: 10.14714/CP66.93
   Google Scholar
• D.R. Godschalk, 2003. Urban hazard mitigation: Creating resilient cities. Natural Hazards Review 4 (3) 146–143. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Harrison, and I. Donnelly, “A Theory of Smart Cities,” paper presented at the 55th Annual Meeting of the ISSS-2011 (Hull, UK, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• A. Harter, A. Hopper, P. Steggles, A. Ward, and P. Webster, “The Anatomy of a Context-Aware Application,” paper presented at the 5th annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Mobile computing and networking (MobiCom ‘99) (Seattle, WA, 15–19, Aug. 1999).
   Google Scholar
• K. Henricksen, J. Indulska, and A. Rakotonirainy, “Using Context and Preferences to Implement Self-Adapting Pervasive Computing Applications,” Software: Practice and Experience 36: 11-12 (2006) 1307–1330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Holling, “Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems,” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4 (1973) 1–23. doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Google Scholar
• C. Holling, L. Gunderson, and D. Ludwig, “In Quest of a Theory of Adaptive Change,” in H. Gunderson, and C. Holling, ed., Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems (Chicago, IL: Island Press, 2001) 3–22.
   Google Scholar
• A. Hooper, “The Royal Society Clifford Paterson Lecture, 1999 - Sentient Computing,” Philosophical Transactions, Royal Society London 358 (2000) 2349–2358. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2000.0652
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Kindberg, and J. Barton, “Towards a real-world wide web.” In Proceedings of the 9th workshop on ACM SIGOPS European workshop: beyond the PC: new challenges for the operating system, pp. 195–200. ACM, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• J. Liu, T. Dietz, S. Carpenter, M. Alberti, C. Folke, E. Moran, A. Pell, et al., “Complexity of Coupled Human and Natural Systems,” Science 317: 5844 (2007) 1513–1516. doi: 10.1126/science.1144004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Mahdavi, “Aspects of Self-Aware Building,” International Journal of Design Sciences and Technology 9: 1 (2001) 35–52.
   Google Scholar
• A. Mahdavi, “Self-Organizing Models for Sentient Buildings,” in A. Malkawi, and G. Augenbroe, ed., Advanced Building Simulation (London, UK: Routledge, 2004) 159–188.
   Google Scholar
• W. Malm, K. Keller, J. Molenar, and T. Daniel, “Human Perception of Visual Air Quality (Uniform Haze),” Atmospheric Environment 15: 10/11 (1981) 1875–1890. doi: 10.1016/0004-6981(81)90223-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Masucci, K. Stanilov, and M. Batty, “Limited Urban Growth: London’s Street Network Dynamics since the 18th Century,” PLoS ONE 8: 8 (2013) < http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/asset?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0069469.PDF> Accessed June 05, 2016. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Norberg, and G. Cumming, Complexity Theory for a Sustainable Future (New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 2008).
   Google Scholar
• D. Onstad, “Population Dynamics Theory: The Roles of Analytical, Simulation, and Supercomputer Models,” Ecological Modeling 43 (1988) 111–24. doi: 10.1016/0304-3800(88)90075-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Orland, “Evaluating Regional Changes on the Basis of Local Expectations: A Visualization Dilemma,” Landscape and Urban Planning 21: 4 (1992) 257–59. doi: 10.1016/0169-2046(92)90035-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Paroutis, M. Bennett, and L. Heracleous, “A Strategic View on Smart City Technology: The Case of IBM Smarter Cities during a Recession,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 89: 11 (2014) 262–272. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.08.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Portugali, Self-Organization and the City (Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 2000).
   Google Scholar
• D. Power, and D. Sharda, “Decision Support Systems,” in S. Nof, ed., Springer Handbook of Automation (Heidelbery, Germany: Springer, 2009) 1539–1548.
   Google Scholar
• A. Rozenfield, and A. Kak, Digital Picture Processing (San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1982).
   Google Scholar
• D. Saha, and A. Mukherjee, “Pervasive Computing: A Paradigm for the 21st Century.” Computer 36: 3 (2003) 25–31. doi: 10.1109/MC.2003.1185214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Schaeffer, and L. Hopkins, “Planning Behavior: The Economics of Information and Land Development,” Environment and Planning A 19 (1987) 1221–32. doi: 10.1068/a191221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Schilit, N. Adams, and R. Want, “Context-Aware Computing Applications,” paper presented at First Workshop Mobile Computing Systems and Applications (Washington, DC, 8–9 Dec. 1994).
   Google Scholar
• S. Timm, and B. Deal, “Effective or ephemeral? The role of energy information dashboards in changing occupant energy behaviors.” Energy Research & Social Science 19 (2016): 11–20. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2016.04.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Voorhees, “The Nature and Uses of Models in City Planning,” Journal of the American Institute of Planners 25: 2 (1959) 57–60. doi: 10.1080/01944365908978304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Wickens, Engineering Psychology and Human Performance (New York, NY: Harper Collins, 1992).
   Google Scholar
• E. Wilson, and J. Piper, Spatial Planning and Climate Change (London, UK: Routledge, 2010).
   Google Scholar
• M. Wu, A. Friday, G. Blair, T. Sivaharan, P. Okanda, H. Duran-Limon, C. Sørensen, G. Biegel, R. Meier, and EU FET, “Novel Component Middleware for Building Dependable Sentient Computing Applications,” Paper presented at ECOOP’04 Workshop on Component-Oriented Approaches to Context-Aware Systems (Oslo, Norway, 14–18, Jun. 2004).
   Google Scholar
• R. Zimmerman, “Social Implications of Infrastructure Network Interactions,” Journal of Urban Technology 8: 3 (2001) 97–119. doi: 10.1080/106307301753430764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar