Knowledge Structures of City Innovation Systems: Singapore and Hong Kong

Bibliography

• V. Albino, U. Berardi, and R. M. Dangelico, “Smart Cities: Definitions, Dimensions, Performance, and Initiatives,” Journal of Urban Technology 22:1 (2015) 3–21. doi: 10.1080/10630732.2014.942092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Altuntas, T. Dereli, and A. Kusiak A, “Forecasting Technology Success Based On Patent Data,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 96 (2015) 202–214. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Amir, K. Thiruchelvam, and B.-K. Ng, “Understanding the Regional Innovation Support Systems in Developing Countries: The State of Sabah in Malaysia,” International Development Planning Review 35:1 (2013) 41–66. doi: 10.3828/idpr.2013.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Angelidou, “Smart Cities: A Conjuncture Of Four Forces,” Cities 47 (2015) 95–106. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2015.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Athey, M. Nathan, C. Webber, and S. Mahroum, “Innovation and the City,” Innovation 10:2–3 (2008) 156–169. doi: 10.5172/impp.453.10.2-3.156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Baark and N. Sharif, “Hong Kong’s Innovation System In Transition: Challenges of Regional Integration and Promotion of High Technology,” in B.-A. Lundvall, P. Intarakumnerd, and J. Vang, eds, Asia’s Innovation Systems in Transition (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2006) 123–147.
   Google Scholar
• R. Baptista and P. Swann, “Do Firms in Clusters Innovate More?” Research Policy 27:5 (1998) 525–540. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00065-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Beise and H. Stahl, “Public Research and Industrial Innovations in Germany,” Research Policy 28:4 (1999) 397–422. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00126-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Benneworth, D. Charles, and A. Madanipour, “Building Localized Interactions between Universities and Cities through University Spatial Development,” European Planning Studies 18:10 (2010) 1611–1629. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2010.504345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. M. Bettencourt, J. Lobo, and D. Strumsky, “Invention in the City: Increasing Returns To Patenting as a Scaling Function Of Metropolitan Size,” Research Policy 36:1 (2007) 107–120. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Boschma, P.-A. Balland, and D. F. Kogler, “Relatedness and Technological Change in Cities: The Rise and Fall of Technological Knowledge in US Metropolitan Areas from 1981 to 2010,” Industrial and Corporate Change 24:1 (2014) 223–250. doi: 10.1093/icc/dtu012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Cheah and C. Yu, “Assessing Economic Impact of Research and Innovation Originating from Public Research Institutions and Universities: Case of Singapore PRIs,” Triple Helix 3:6 (2016) doi:10.1186/s40604-016-0037-6.
   Google Scholar
• M. Y. Chew, C. Watanabe, and Y. Tou, “The Challenges in Singapore NEWater Development: Co-Evolutionary Development for Innovation and Industry Evolution,” Technology in Society 33:3 (2011) 200–211.
   Google Scholar
• P. Cooke, C. Davies, and R. Wilson, “Innovation Advantages of Cities: From Knowledge to Equity in Five Basic Steps,” European Planning Studies 10:2 (2002) 233–250. doi: 10.1080/09654310120114517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Cosgrave, K. Arbuthnot, and T. Tryfonas, “Living Labs, Innovation Districts and Information Marketplaces: A Systems Approach for Smart Cities,” Procedia Computer Science 16 (2013) 668–677. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2013.01.070
   Google Scholar
• G. Csomós and G. Tóth, “Exploring the Position of Cities in Global Corporate Research and Development: A Bibliometric Analysis by Two Different Geographical Approaches,” Journal of Informetrics 10:2 (2016) 516–532. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2016.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Cullinane and K. Cullinane, “City Profile: Hong Kong,” Cities 20:4 (2003) 279–288. doi: 10.1016/S0264-2751(03)00027-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Dolfsma and D. Seo, “Government Policy and Technological Innovation: A Suggested Typology,” Technovation 33:6 (2013) 173–179. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2013.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Duranton and D. Puga, “Nursery Cities: Urban Diversity, Process Innovation, and the Life Cycle Of Products,” American Economic Review 91:5 (2001) 1454–1477. doi: 10.1257/aer.91.5.1454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Dvir and E. Pasher, “Innovation Engines for Knowledge Cities: An Innovation Ecology Perspective,” Journal of Knowledge Management 8:5 (2004) 16–27. doi: 10.1108/13673270410558756
   Google Scholar
• C. Elena, “The Making of Knowledge Cities in Romania,” Procedia Economics and Finance 32 (2015) 534–541. doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01429-X
   Google Scholar
• J. Flowerdew, “Identity Politics and Hong Kong’s Return to Chinese Sovereignty: Analysing the Discourse of Hong Kong’s First Chief Executive,” Journal of Pragmatics 36:9 (2004) 1551–1578. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2004.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Foray, The Economics of Knowledge (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2006).
   Google Scholar
• B. C. Garcia and D. Chavez, “Network-based Innovation Systems: A Capital Base for the Monterrey City-region, Mexico,” Expert Systems with Applications 41:36 (2014) 5636–5646. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.02.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Gulbrandsen and L. Nerdrum, “Public Sector Research and Industrial Innovation in Norway: A Historical Perspective” (2007) Working Paper on Innovation Studies No 20070602.
   Google Scholar
• M. Hobday, Innovation in Asia: The Challenge to Japan (Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 1995).
   Google Scholar
• C. Huang and N. Sharif, “Manufacturing Dynamics and Spillovers: The Case of Guangdong Province and Hong Kong, Macau, and Taiwan (H.K.M.T.),” Research Policy 38:5 (2009) 813–828. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.12.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Islam and K. Miyazaki, “An Empirical Analysis Of Nanotechnology Research Domains,” Technovation 30:4 (2010) 229–237. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2009.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Johnson, “Cities, Systems of Innovation and Economic Development,” Innovation 10:2–3 (2008) 146–155. doi: 10.5172/impp.453.10.2-3.146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. R. Kerr, “Breakthrough Inventions and Migrating Clusters of Innovation,” Journal of Urban Economics 67:1 (2010) 46–60. doi: 10.1016/j.jue.2009.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. T. Koh and P. K. Wong, “Competing at the Frontier: The Changing Role Of Technology Policy in Singapore's Economic Strategy,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 72:3 (2005) 255–285. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2004.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Komninos, Intelligent Cities and Globalisation of Innovation Networks (Abindon: Routledge, 2008).
   Google Scholar
• S. Lall, “Technological Capabilities and Industrialization,” World Development 20 (1992) 165–186. doi: 10.1016/0305-750X(92)90097-F
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Lasrado, S. Sivo, C. Ford, T. O'Neal, and I. Garibay, “Do Graduated University Incubator Firms Benefit From Their Relationship With University Incubators?” The Journal of Technology Transfer 41:2 (2016) 205–219. doi: 10.1007/s10961-015-9412-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Makkonen and T. Inkinen, “Innovation Quality in Knowledge Cities: Empirical Evidence Of Innovation Award Competitions in Finland,” Expert Systems with Applications 41:12 (2014) 5597–5604. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.02.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Malerba, “Sectoral Systems: How and Why Innovation Differs Across Sectors,” In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, and R. R. Nelson, eds, The Oxford Handbook of Innovation (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005) 380–406.
   Google Scholar
• J. Marceau, “Introduction: Innovation in the City and Innovative Cities,” Innovation 10:2–3 (2008) 136–145. doi: 10.5172/impp.453.10.2-3.136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. A. Marcus, “Policy Uncertainty and Technological Innovation,” Academy of Management Review 6:3 (1981) 443–448.
   Google Scholar
• M. Markatou and E. Alexandrou, “Urban System of Innovation: Main Agents and Main Factors of Success,” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 195 (2015) 240–250. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.355
   Google Scholar
• T. May and B. Perry, “Cities, Knowledge and Universities: Transformations in the Image of the Intangible,” Social Epistemology 20:3–4 (2006) 259–282. doi: 10.1080/02691720600847290
   Google Scholar
• H. Mayer, F. Sager, D. Kaufmann, and M. Warland, “Capital City Dynamics: Linking Regional Innovation Systems, Locational Policies and Policy Regimes,” Cities 51 (2016) 11–20. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2016.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Mazzucato, The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths (London: Anthem Press, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• P. McCartney, Global Cities, Local Knowledge Creation: Mapping A New Policy Terrain on the Relationship between Universities and Cities (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2005).
   Google Scholar
• H. F. Moed, W. Glänzel, and U. Schmoch, “Editors’ Introduction,” Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research: The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2004) 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• R. R. Nelson and S. G. Winter, An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (London: Belknap Press, 1982).
   Google Scholar
• L. Ning, F. Wang, and J. Li, “Urban Innovation, Regional Externalities Of Foreign Direct Investment and Industrial Agglomeration: Evidence from Chinese Cities,” Research Policy 45:4 (2016) 830–843. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2016.01.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Porter and N. Newman, “Patent Profiling for Competitive Advantage: Deducing Who Is Doing What, Where, and When,” in H. F. Moed, W. Glanzel, and U. Schmoch, eds, Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research, Quantitative Science and Technology Research: The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2004) 587–612.
   Google Scholar
• K. Porter, K. B. Whittington, and W. W. Powell, “The Institutional Embeddedness Of High-Tech Regions: Relational Foundations of the Boston Biotechnology Community,” in S. Breschi and F. Marleba, eds, Clusters, Networks, and Innovation (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005) 261–296.
   Google Scholar
• A. Ratanawaraha, City Innovation Systems in Southeast Asia: Informality, Intermediaries, and Incentives (Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University, 2012).
   Google Scholar
• E. B. Reynolds, H. M. Samel, and J. Lawrence, Learning by Building: Complementary Assets and the Migration of Capabilities in US Innovative Firms (Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• J.-K. Seo, “Balanced National Development Strategies: The Construction of Innovation Cities in Korea,” Land Use Policy 26:3 (2009) 649–661. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.08.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Sharif and C. Huang, “Innovation Strategy, Firm Survival and Relocation: The Case of Hong Kong-Owned Manufacturing in Guangdong Province, China,” Research Policy 41:1 (2012) 69–78. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Shearmur, “Are Cities the Font of Innovation? A Critical Review of the Literature on Cities and Innovation,” Cities 29 (2012) S9–S18. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2012.06.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Smith, “Innovation as a Systemic Phenomenon: Rethinking the Role of Policy,” Enterprise and Innovation Management Studies 1:1 (2000) 73–102.
   Google Scholar
• D. Stoltz, J. Arrias, and P. Lundqvist, “Categorization Framework for Systems Innovation in Eco Cities,” Energy Procedia 75 (2015) 2466–2471. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.221
   Google Scholar
• A. Tatarynowicz, M. Sytch, and R. Gulati, “Environmental Demands and the Emergence of Social Structure Technological Dynamism and Interorganizational Network Forms,” Administrative Science Quarterly 61:1 (2016) 52–86. doi: 10.1177/0001839215609083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Thiruchelvam, V. G. R. Chandran, N. Boon-Kwee, W. Chan-Yuan, Malaysia's Quest for Innovation: Progress and Lessons Learned (Petaling Jaya: Strategic Information and Research Development Centre (S.I.R.D.), 2013).
   Google Scholar
• F. Tödtling, B. Asheim, and R. Boschma, “Knowledge Sourcing, Innovation and Constructing Advantage in Regions of Europe,” European Urban and Regional Studies 20:2 (2013) 161–169. doi: 10.1177/0969776412457173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Williams, N. Turner, and A. Jones, Embedding Universities in Knowledge Cities (London: Work Foundation, 2008).
   Google Scholar
• C.-Y. Wong, “Rent-seeking, Industrial Policies and National Innovation Systems in Southeast Asian Economies,” Technology in Society 33:3 (2011) 231–243. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2011.09.003
   Google Scholar
• C.-Y. Wong, “On a Path to Creative Destruction: Science, Technology and Science-Based Technological Trajectories of Japan and South Korea,” Scientometrics 96:1 (2013) 323–336. doi: 10.1007/s11192-012-0941-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.-Y. Wong, “Convergence Innovation in City Innovation System: Railway Technology Case in Malaysia,” In K.R. Lee, ed., Managing Convergence in Innovation: The New Paradigm of Technological Innovation (London: Routledge, 2017) 117–137.
   Google Scholar
• C.-Y. Wong and K.-L. Goh, “The Sustainability of Functionality Development Of Science and Technology: Papers and Patents of Emerging Economies,” Journal of Informetrics 6:1 (2012) 55–65. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2011.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.-Y. Wong, M.-C. Hu, and J.-W. Shiu, “Collaboration between Public Research Institutes and Universities: A Study of Industrial Technology Research Institute, Taiwan,” Science Technology & Society 20:2 (2015a) 161–181. doi: 10.1177/0971721815579795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.-Y. Wong, M. C. Hu, and J. W. Shiu, “Governing the Economic Transition: How Taiwan Transformed its Industrial System to Attain Virtuous Cycle Development,” Review of Policy Research 32:3 (2015b) 365–387. doi: 10.1111/ropr.12122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.K. Wong, “National Innovation Systems for Rapid Technological Catch-up: An Analytical Framework and a Comparative Analysis of Korea, Taiwan and Singapore,” paper presented at DRUID National Innovation System, Industrial Dynamics and Innovation Policy (Rebild, June 9–12, 1999).
   Google Scholar
• P.-K. Wong, Y.-P. Ho, and A. Singh, “Towards an “Entrepreneurial University” Model to Support Knowledge-Based Economic Development: The Case of the National University of Singapore,” World Development 35:6 (2007) 941–958. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. K. Wong, “Saving, Capital Inflow and Capital Formation,” in C.-Y. Lim and P. J. Lloyd, eds, Singapore: Resources and Growth (Singapore: Oxford University Press, 1986) 45–78.
   Google Scholar
• H. W.-c. Yeung, “Innovating for Global Competition: Singapore's Pathway to High-Tech Development,” in B.-A. Lundvall, P. Intarakumnerd, and J. Vang, eds, Asia's Innovation Systems in Transition (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2006) 257–292.
   Google Scholar