Smart City L’Aquila: An Application of the “Infostructure” Approach to Public Urban Mobility in a Post-Disaster Context

Bibliography

• V. Albino, U. Berardi, and R.M. Dangelico, “Smart Cities: Definitions, Dimensions, Performance, and Initiatives,” Journal of Urban Technology 22: 1 (2015) 3–21. doi: 10.1080/10630732.2014.942092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Alexander, “An Evaluation of Medium-Term Recovery Processes After the 6 April 2009 Earthquake in L’Aquila, Central Italy,” Environmental Hazards 12: 1 (2013) 60–73. doi: 10.1080/17477891.2012.689250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Amaratunga and R. Haigh, Post-Disaster Reconstruction of the Built Environment: Rebuilding for Resilience (London: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• I. Anastasiu, “FixVegas: Facilitating Multi-Directional Communication between Government Officials and Citizens to Support Urban Planning in the City of Brisbane” (PhD thesis, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 2012).
   Google Scholar
• M. Baron, “Do We Need Smart Cities for Resilience?” Journal of Economics and Management 10 (2012) 32–46.
   Google Scholar
• G. Brown and M. Kytta, “Key Issues and Research Priorities for Public Participation GIS (PPGIS): A Synthesis Based On Empirical Research,” Applied Geography 46 (2014) 122–136. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.11.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L.M. Calandra, G. Forino, and A. Porru, “Introduction. Why Hold a Session on Hazards and Disasters in the EUGEO Congress 2013?” in L.M. Calandra, G. Forino, and A. Porru, eds, Multiple Geographical Perspectives on Hazards and Disasters (Rome: Valmar, 2014) 5–10.
   Google Scholar
• A. Caragliu, C. Del Bo, and P. Nijkamp “Smart Cities in Europe,” Journal of Urban Technology 18: 2 (2011) 65–82. doi: 10.1080/10630732.2011.601117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Casey and J. Li, “Web 2.0 Technologies and Authentic Public Participation: Engaging Citizens in Decision Making Processes,” K. Kloby and M.J. D’Agostino, eds, Citizens 2.0: Public and Governmental Interaction through Web 2.0 Technologies (Hershey, PA: Information Science References, 2012 767–793).
   Google Scholar
• S. Castellani, “Participation as a Possible Strategy of Post-Disaster Resilience: Young People and Mobility in L’Aquila (Italy),” in Calandra, Forino, and Porru, Multiple Geographical Perspectives on Hazards and Disasters (2014) 105–117.
   Google Scholar
• CIPE, “Ricostruire l’Abruzzo, Comitato Interministeriale per la Programmazione Economica” (2016) <http://www.cipecomitato.it/it/in_primo_piano/ricostruire_abruzzo.html> Accessed April 20, 2106.
   Google Scholar
• V. Cofini, A. Carbonelli, M.R. Cecilia, and F. di Orio, “Quality of Life, Psychological Wellbeing and Resilience: A Survey on the Italian Population Living in a New Lodging After the Earthquake of April 2009,” Annali di Igiene 26 (2014) 46–51. doi: 10.7416/ai.2014.1957.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Comune dell’Aquila, “Aggiornamento del piano urbano della mobilità” (2012) <http://www.comune.laquila.gov.it/pagina1169_il-piano-urbano-della-mobilita.html> Accessed April 20, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Comune dell’Aquila, “Assessorato alla ricostruzione, Settore ricostruzione pubblica, Settore ricostruzione privata” (2014). http://www.comune.laquila.gov.it/pagina82_normativa-e-documenti.html, Accessed April 30, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• D. Contreras, T. Blaschke, S. Kienberger, and P. Zeil, “Spatial Connectivity as a Recovery Process Indicator: The L’Aquila Earthquake,” Technological Forecasting & Social Change 80 (2013) 1782–1803. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.J. Demetsky, M. Asce, and B. Lin, “Bus Stop Location and Design,” Transportation Engineering Journal 108 (1982) 313–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.C. Desouza and A. Bhagwatwar, “Technology-Enabled Participatory Platforms for Civic Engagement: The Case of US Cities,” Journal of Urban Technology 21: 4 (2014) 25–50. doi: 10.1080/10630732.2014.954898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.E. Dunn, “Participatory GIS: A People’s GIS?,” Progress in Human Geography 31: 5 (2007) 616–637. doi: 10.1177/0309132507081493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission), ICT Concepts for Optimization of Mobility in Smart Cities, DG Communications Networks, Content & Technology (Brussels: European Commission, 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Ernst and Young, Italia Smart: Rapporto Smart City Index. Ernst & Young Global Limited (2016). <http://www.ey.com/IT/it/Services/Advisory/Smart-City-Index> Accessed September 14, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• T. Ertiö, “Participatory Apps for Urban Planning-Space for Improvement,” Planning Practice & Research 30: 3 (2015) 301–320. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2015.1052942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Evans-Cowley and J. Hollander, “The New Generation of Public Participation: Internet-based Participation Tools,” Planning Practice & Research 25: 3 (2010) 397–408. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2010.503432.
   Google Scholar
• R. Fielding, “Architectural Styles and the Design of Network-Based Software Architectures (PhD thesis, University of California, Irvine, 2000).
   Google Scholar
• R. Giffinger and H. Gudrun, “Smart Cities Ranking: An Effective Instrument for the Positioning of Cities?,” ACE Architecture, City and Environment 4: 12 (2010) 7–25.
   Google Scholar
• R. Giffinger, C. Fertner, H. Kramar, R. Kalasek, N. Pichler-Milanović, and E. Meijers, Smart Cities: Ranking of European Medium-sized Cities (Vienna: Centre of Regional Science, 2007).
   Google Scholar
• GSSI Youtube Channel, Forum 3 L’Aquila del future, 14 December 2015. Accessed May 30, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• M. Gurstein, What is Community Informatics (and Why Does it Matter)? (Milano: Polimetrica, 2007).
   Google Scholar
• R. Hilliard, I. Malavolta, H. Muccini, and P. Pelliccione, “On the Composition and Reuse of Viewpoints across Architecture Frameworks,” paper presented at the 10th Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA) & 6th European Conference on Software Architecture (ECSA) – WICSA/ECSA, (Helsinki, August 20, 2012). pp. 131–140.
   Google Scholar
• R. G. Hollands, “Will the Real Smart City Please Stand Up?,” City: Analysis of Urban Trends, Culture, Theory, Policy, Action 12: 3 (2008) 303–320. doi: 10.1080/13604810802479126.
   Google Scholar
• Istat, Statistiche focus – mobilità urbana (2011) <http://www.istat.it/it/files/2013/06/Focus_Mobilita_Urbana.pdf?title=Mobilit%C3%A0+urbana+-+14%2Fgiu%2F2013+-+Testo+integrale.pdf> Accessed March 15, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• R. Kitchin, The Data Revolution: Big Data, Open Data, Data Infrastructures and their Consequences ((London: Sage, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• R.E. Klosterman, “Planning Support Systems: A New Perspective on Computer-Aided Planning,” Journal of Planning Education and Research 17: 1 (1997) 45–54. doi: 10.1177/0739456X9701700105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.E. Klosterman, “E-Planning: Retrospect and Prospect,” International Journal of E-Planning Research 1: 1 (2012) 1–4. doi:10.4018/ijepr.2012010101
   Google Scholar
• LAURAq, “Dio salvi L’Aquila. Una ricostruzione difficile,” Urbanistica Dossier 123/124 (2010) 1–70.
   Google Scholar
• D. Linders, “From E-Government to We-Government: Defining a Typology for Citizen Coproduction in the Age of Social Media,” Government Information Quarterly 29: 4 (2012) 446–454. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Malavolta, “Software Architecture Modeling by Reuse, Composition and Customization” (PhD thesis, University of L’Aquila, Computer Science Department, 2012) <http://www.ivanomalavolta.com/files/papers/IvanoMalavoltaPhDThesisLight.pdf> Accessed June 7, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• P. Meier, “Crisis Mapping in Action: How Open Source Software and Global Volunteer Networks Are Changing the World, One Map at a Time,” Journal of Map and Geography Libraries 8: 2 (2012) 89–100.
   Google Scholar
• A. Meijer, “Co-Production in an Information Age: Individual and Community Engagement Supported by New Media,” VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 23: 4 (2012) 1156–1172. doi: 10.1007/s11266-012-9311-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. O’Grady and G. O’Hare, “How Smart Is Your City?” Science 335: 3 (2012) 1581–1582. doi: 10.1126/science.1217637
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Özerdem and G. Rufini, “L’Aquila’s Reconstruction Challenges: Has Italy Learned From Its Previous Earthquake Disasters?,” Disasters 37: 1 (2013) 119–143. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7717.2012.01296.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Panek and K. Benediktsson, “Emotional Mapping and Its Participatory Potential: Opinions about Cycling Conditions in Reykjavík, Iceland,” Cities 61 (2017) 65–73. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.11.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Pelzer and S. Geertman, “Planning Support Systems and Interdisciplinary Learning,” Planning Theory & Practice 15: 4 (2014) 527–542. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2014.963653.
   Google Scholar
• Protezione Civile, “Case–Complessi Antisismici Sostenibili ed Ecocompatibili” (2016). <http://www.protezionecivile.gov.it/jcms/it/view_dossier.wp?contentId=DOS274> Accessed June 6, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• E. Pyrga, F. Schulz, D. Wagner, and C.D. Zaroliagis, “Efficient Models for Timetable Information in Public Transportation Systems”, ACM Journal of Experimental Algorithmics 12 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• F. Ricca and P. Scattoni, “Pianificazione nell’Approccio della Scelta Strategica,” in G. Felici and A. Sciomachen, eds, Scienza delle decisioni in Italia: applicazioni della Ricerca Operativa ai problemi aziendali (Genova: ECIG, 2008) 1–39.
   Google Scholar
• K. Schmidt-Thomé, S. Wallin, T. Laatikainen, J. Kangasoja, and M. Kyttä, “Exploring the Use of PPGIS in Self-Organizing Urban Development: The Case of softGIS in Pacific Beach (California),” The Journal of Community Informatics 10: 3 (2014) 131–144. <http://www.ci-journal.net/index.php/ciej/article/view/1080>. Accessed June 1, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• J.P. Shim, M. Warkentin, J.F. Courtney, D.J. Power, R. Sharda, and C. Carlsson, “Past, Present, and Future of Decision Support Technology,” Decision Support Systems 33: 2 (2002) 111–126. doi: 10.1016/S0167-9236(01)00139-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.N. Silva, “The E-Planning Paradigm––Theory, Methods and Tools: An Overview,” in C.N. Silva, ed., Handbook of Research on E-Planning: ICTs for Urban Development and Monitoring (Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference, 2010) doi:10.4018/978-1-61520-929-3.ch00.
   Google Scholar
• M.M. Skoric, Q. Zhu, D. Goh, and N. Pang, “Social Media and Citizen Engagement: A Meta-Analytic Review,” New Media and Society 18: 9 (2016) 1817–1839. doi: 10.1177/1461444815616221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SMAU, “L’Aquila Smart City: rete elettrica intelligente e mobilità verde” (2015) <http://media.smau.it/x-exhibition/upload/multimedia/pdf/2015/09/28/SMAU_2015_SMART_Aquila_1.pdf> Accessed April 15, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• A. Stratigea, C. Papadopoulou, and M. Panagiotopoulou “Tools and Technologies for Planning the Development of Smart Cities,” Journal of Urban Technology 22: 2 (2015) 43–62. doi: 10.1080/10630732.2015.1018725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Neo4j Team, The Neo4j Manual (2016) <http://neo4j.com/docs/stable/> Accessed June 6, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• M. Tomitsch and M.H. Haeusler, “Infostructures: Towards a Complementary Approach for Solving Urban Challenges through Digital Technologies,” Journal of Urban Technology 22: 3 (2015) 37–53. doi: 10.1080/10630732.2015.1040296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USRA, “Ufficio speciale per la ricostruzione dell’Aquila” <http://www.usra.it/> Accessed April 19, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• M. Valenti, F. Masedu, M. Mazza, S. Tiberti, C. Di Giovanni, A. Calvarese, R. Pirro, and V. Sconci, “A Longitudinal Study of Quality of Life of Earthquake Survivors in L’Aquila, Italy,” BMC Public Health 13: 1143 (2013) 1–7. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1143.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• C. Viktorsson, “From Maps to Apps: Tracing the Organizational Responsiveness of an Early Multi-Modal Travel Planning Service,” Journal of Urban Technology 22: 4 (2016) 87–101. doi: 10.1080/10630732.2015.1073902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.B. West, Introduction to Graph Theory, Vol. 2 (Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 2001).
   Google Scholar
• J.V. Winters, “Why are Smart Cities Growing? Who Moves and Who Stays,” Journal of Regional Science 51: 2 (2011) 253–270. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9787.2010.00693.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Zhao, L. Chow, M. Li, I. Ubaka, and A. Gan, “Forecasting Transit Walk Accessibility: Regression Model Alternative to Buffer,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1835 (2003) 34–41. doi: 10.3141/1835-05
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Zheng, L. Capra, O. Wolfson, and H. Yang, “Urban Computing: Concepts, Methodologies, and Applications,” ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology 5: 3 (2014) 38–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar