City Compactness: Assessing the Influence of the Growth of Residential Land Use

Bibliography

• S. Abdullahi, A. R. Mahmud, and B. Pradhan, “Spatial Modelling of Site Suitability Assessment for Hospitals Using Geographical Information System-Based Multicriteria Approach at Qazvin City, Iran,” Geocarto International 29:2 (2014), 164–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Abdullahi, and B. Pradhan, “Sustainable Brownfields Land Use Change Modeling Using GIS-Based Weights-Of-Evidence Approach,” Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy 9:1 (2016), 21–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Abdullahi, B. Pradhan, and M. N. Jebur, “GIS-Based Sustainable City Compactness Assessment Using Integration Of MCDM, Bayes Theorem and RADAR Technology,” Geocarto International 30:4 (2015a), 365–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Abdullahi, B. Pradhan, S. Mansor, and A. R. M. Shariff, “GIS-Based Modeling for the Spatial Measurement and Evaluation of Mixed Land Use Development for a Compact City,” GIScience & Remote Sensing 52:1 (2015b), 18–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Adolphson, “Kernel Densities and Mixed Functionality In A Multicentred Urban Region,” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 37:3 (2010), 550–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. A. Al-sharif and B. Pradhan, “Spatio-temporal Prediction of Urban Expansion Using Bivariate Statistical Models: Assessment of the Efficacy of Evidential Belief Functions and Frequency Ratio Models,” Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy 9: 2 (2015), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• O. F. Althuwaynee, B. Pradhan, and S. Lee, “Application of An Evidential Belief Function Model In Landslide Susceptibility Mapping,” Computers & Geosciences 44 (2012), 120–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Arbury, “From Urban Sprawl to Compact City: An Analysis of Urban Growth Management in Auckland” (PhD thesis, Auckland University, Auckland).
   Google Scholar
• S. D. Arifwidodo, “Exploring the Effect of Compact Development Policy To Urban Quality Of Life in Bandung, Indonesia,” City, Culture and Society 3:4 (2012), 303–311.
   Google Scholar
• D. Banister, “Assessing the Reality: Transport and Land Use Planning To Achieve Sustainability”, The Journal of Transport & Land Use 5:3 (2012), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• G. Bonham-Carter, Geographic information systems for geoscientists: modelling with GIS (New York: Elsevier, 1994).
   Google Scholar
• R. W. Burchell and S. Mukherji, “Conventional Development Versus Managed Growth: The Costs Of Sprawl,” American Journal of Public Health 93:9 (2003), 1534–1540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. G. Burnside, R. F. Smith, and S. Waite, “Recent Historical Land Use Change on the South Downs, United Kingdom,” Environmental Conservation 30:1 (2003), 52–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Burton, “The Compact City: Just Or Just Compact? A Preliminary Analysis,” Urban Studies 37:11 (2000), 1969–2006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Burton, “Measuring Urban Compactness in UK Towns and Cities,” Environment and Planning B 29:2 (2002), 219–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Burton, M. Jenks, and K. Williams, The Compact City: A Sustainable Urban Form? (Oxford, UK: Routledge, 2003).
   Google Scholar
• J. I. Carruthers, “The impacts of state growth management programmes: a comparative analysis. Urban Studies 39:11 (2002), 1959–1982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. I. Carruthers and G. F. Ulfarsson, “Does Smart Growth Matter To Public Finance?” Urban Studies 45:9 (2008), 1791–1823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I.-C. C. Chang and E. Sheppard, “China's Eco-Cities As Variegated1 Urban Sustainability: Dongtan Eco-City and Chongming Eco-Island,” Journal of Urban Technology 20:1 (2013), 57–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Chen, B. He, and Z. Zeng, “A Method for Mineral Prospectivity Mapping Integrating C4. 5 Decision Tree, Weights-Of-Evidence and M-Branch Smoothing Techniques: A Case Study in the Eastern Kunlun Mountains, China,” Earth Science Informatics 7:1 (2014), 13–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. N. Dadhich and S. Hanaoka, “Spatio-Temporal Urban Growth Modeling of Jaipur, India,” Journal of Urban Technology 18:3 (2011), 45–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. R. Dahal, S. Hasegawa, A. Nonomura, M. Yamanaka, T. Masuda, and K. Nishino, “GIS-based Weights-Of-Evidence Modelling of Rainfall-Induced Landslides in Small Catchments For Landslide Susceptibility Mapping,” Environmental Geology 54:2 (2008), 311–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. M. de Almeida, M. Batty, A. M. V. Monteiro, G. Câmara, B. S. Soares-Filho, G. C. Cerqueira, G. C., and C. L. Pennachin, “Stochastic Cellular Automata Modeling of Urban Land Use Dynamics: Empirical Development and Estimation,” Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 27:5 (2003), 481–509.
   Google Scholar
• A. P. Dempster, “Upper and Lower Probabilities Induced By A Multivalued Mapping,” The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 38: 2 (1967), 325–339.
   Google Scholar
• C. Ding, “Urban Spatial Development in the Land Policy Reform Era: Evidence from Beijing,” Urban Studies 41:10 (2004), 1889–1907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Duany, E. Plater-Zyberk, and J. Speck, Suburban Nation: The Rise Of Sprawl and the Decline of the American Dream (New York, USA: Macmillan, 2001).
   Google Scholar
• J. Egan, “Rethinking Construction,” Construction Task Force Report for Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (HMSO, London, 1998).
   Google Scholar
• X. Gainza and F. Livert, “Urban Form and the Environmental Impact Of Commuting in a Segregated City, Santiago de Chile,” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 40:3 (2013), 507–522.
   Google Scholar
• Z. Gu, Q. Sun, and R. Wennersten, “Impact of Urban Residences On Energy Consumption and Carbon Emissions: An Investigation in Nanjing, China,” Sustainable Cities and Society 7 (2013) 52–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Hoppenbrouwer and E. Louw, “Mixed-Use Development: Theory and Practice in Amsterdam's Eastern Docklands,” European Planning Studies 13:7 (2005), 967–983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Houet, T. R. Loveland, L. Hubert-Moy, C. Gaucherel, D. Napton, C. A. Barnes, and K. Sayler, “Exploring Subtle Land Use And Land Cover Changes: A Framework For Future Landscape Studies,” Landscape Ecology 25:2 (2010), 249–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Houghton, “The Worldwide Extent Of Land-Use Change,” BioScience 44:5 (1994), 305–313.
   Google Scholar
• M. Jenks, E. Burton, K. Williams, and M. Symes, “The Compact City: A Sustainable Urban Form?” Land Use Policy 14:3 (1997), 115–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Kii and K. Doi, “Multiagent Land-Use and Transport Model For the Policy Evaluation of a Compact City,” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 32:4 (2005), 485–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Kolb, J.-F. Mas, and L. Galicia, “Evaluating Drivers of Land-Use Change and Transition Potential Models In A Complex Landscape in Southern Mexico,” International Journal of Geographical Information Science 27:9 (2013), 1804–1827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. A. J. Kuijpers-Linde, A. Bouwman, and M.-e. Natuurplanbureau, Nederland later: tweede duurzaamheidsverkenning: deel fysieke leefomgeving Nederland (Den Haag, Netherland: Milieu en Natuur Planbureau, 2007).
   Google Scholar
• B. Lakshminarayana and Rao, K. G., 2010. Artificial Neural Networks in spectral-spatial land use classification. ISH Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 16(sup1), 64–73.
   Google Scholar
• X. Li, Q. Yang, and X. Liu, “Discovering and Evaluating Urban Signatures For Simulating Compact Development Using Cellular Automata,” Landscape and Urban Planning 86:2 (2008), 177–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Li and A. G.-O. Yeh, “Analyzing Spatial Restructuring Of Land Use Patterns In A Fast Growing Region Using Remote Sensing and GIS,” Landscape and Urban Planning 69:4 (2004), 335–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.-J. Lin and A.-T. Yang, “Does the compact-city paradigm foster sustainability? An empirical study in Taiwan,” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 33:3 (2006), 365–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Livingstone, Housing for a Compact City: Greater London Authority, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• G. S. Macfarlane, L. A. Garrow, and P. L. Mokhtarian, “The Influences Of Past And Present Residential Locations On Vehicle Ownership Decisions,” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 74 (2015), 186–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Manaugh and T. Kreider, “What Is Mixed Use? Presenting An Interaction Method For Measuring Land Use Mix,” Journal of Transport and Land Use 6:1 (2013), 63–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. B. Matthews, N. G. Gilbert, A. Roach, J. G. Polhill, and N. M. Gotts, “Agent-Based Land-Use Models: A Review Of Applications,” Landscape Ecology 22:10 (2007), 1447–1459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. E. Medley, B. W. Okey, G. W. Barrett, M. F. Lucas, and W. H. Renwick, “Landscape Change With Agricultural Intensification in a Rural Watershed, Southwestern Ohio, USA,” Landscape Ecology 10:3 (1995), 161–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Middel, A. Brazel, B. Hagen, and S. Myint, “Land Cover Modification Scenarios and Their Effects on Daytime Heating in the Inner Core Residential Neighborhoods of Phoenix, Arizona,” Journal of Urban Technology 18:4 (2011), 61–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Mohammady, H. R. Pourghasemi, and B. Pradhan, “Landslide Susceptibility Mapping at Golestan Province, Iran: A Comparison Between Frequency Ratio, Dempster-Shafer, and Weights-Of-Evidence Models,” Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 61 (2012), 221–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Mubareka, E. Koomen, C. Estreguil, and C. Lavalle, “Development of A Composite Index Of Urban Compactness For Land Use Modelling Applications,” Landscape and Urban Planning 103:3 (2011), 303–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Musakwa and A. Van Niekerk, “Implications of Land Use Change For the Sustainability of Urban Areas: A Case Study of Stellenbosch, South Africa,” Cities 32 (2013), 143–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Nampak, B. Pradhan, and M. A. Manap, “Application of GIS Based Data Driven Evidential Belief Function Model To Predict Groundwater Potential Zonation,” Journal of Hydrology 513 (2014), 283–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Neuman, “The Compact City Fallacy,” Journal of Planning Education and Research 25:1 (2005), 11–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Newton, S. Tucker, and M. Ambrose, “Housing Form, Energy Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions,” Achieving Sustainable Urban Form (2000), 74–83.
   Google Scholar
• J. D. Olden, M. K. Joy, and R. G. Death, “An Accurate Comparison Of Methods For Quantifying Variable Importance In Artificial Neural Networks Using Simulated Data,” Ecological Modelling 178:3 (2004), 389–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. C. Pijanowski, K. Alexandridis, and D. Mueller, “Modelling Urbanization Patterns in Two Diverse Regions of the World,” Journal of Land Use Science 1:2–4 (2006), 83–108.
   Google Scholar
• B. C. Pijanowski, D. G. Brown, B. A. Shellito, and G. A. Manik, “Using Neural Networks and GIS to Forecast Land Use Changes: A Land Transformation Model,” Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 26:6 (2002), 553–575.
   Google Scholar
• B. C. Pijanowski, S. Pithadia, B. A. Shellito, and K. Alexandridis, “Calibrating a Neural Network-Based Urban Change Model For Two Metropolitan Areas of the Upper Midwest of the United States,” International Journal of Geographical Information Science 19: (2005), 197–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. C. Pijanowski, A. Tayyebi, J. Doucette, B. K. Pekin, D. Braun, and J. Plourde, “A Big Data Urban Growth Simulation At A National Scale: Configuring the GIS and Neural Network Based Land Transformation Model to Run in a High Performance Computing (HPC) Environment,” Environmental Modelling & Software 51 (2014), 250–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. G. Pontius Jr and M. Millones, “Death to Kappa: Birth Of Quantity Disagreement and Allocation Disagreement For Accuracy Assessment,” International Journal of Remote Sensing 32:15 (2011), 4407–4429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. G. Pontius and L. C. Schneider, “Land-Cover Change Model Validation By An ROC Method for the Ipswich Watershed, Massachusetts, USA,” Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 85: 1 (2001), 239–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. R. Pourghasemi, B. Pradhan, C. Gokceoglu, M. Mohammadi, and H. R. Moradi, “Application of Weights-Of-Evidence and Certainty Factor Models and Their Comparison in Landslide Susceptibility Mapping at Haraz Watershed, Iran,” Arabian Journal of Geosciences 6:7 (2013), 2351–2365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Pradhan, “An Assessment of the Use of an Advanced Neural Network Model With Five Different Training Strategies for the Preparation Of Landslide Susceptibility Maps,” Journal of Data Science 9:1 (2011), 65–81.
   Google Scholar
• B. Pradhan, H.-J. Oh, and M. Buchroithner, “Weights-Of-Evidence Model Applied To Landslide Susceptibility Mapping in a Tropical Hilly Area,” Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk 1:3 (2010), 199–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Regan, “Towards an Urban Renaissance: The Final Report of the Urban Task Force,” The Political Quarterly 71:1 (2000), 115–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. R. Regmi, J. R. Giardino, and J. D. Vitek, “Modeling Susceptibility To Landslides Using The Weight Of Evidence Approach: Western Colorado, USA,” Geomorphology 115:1 (2010), 172–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Shafer, A Mathematical Theory Of Evidence (Vol. 1) (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1976).
   Google Scholar
• Y. Song and G.-J. Knaap, “Measuring the Effects of Mixed Land Uses On Housing Values,” Regional Science and Urban Economics 34:6 (2004), 663–680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Song, L. Merlin, and D. Rodriguez, “Comparing Measures Of Urban Land Use Mix,” Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 42 (2013), 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Tayyebi, B. C. Pijanowski, M. Linderman, and C. Gratton, “Comparing Three Global Parametric And Local Non-Parametric Models to Simulate Land Use Change in Diverse Areas of the World,” Environmental Modelling & Software 59 (2014), 202–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. S. Tehrany, B. Pradhan, and M. N. Jebur, “Flood Susceptibility Mapping Using A Novel Ensemble Weights-Of-Evidence and Support Vector Machine Models in GIS,” Journal of Hydrology 512 (2014), 332–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. K. Thiam, “An Evidential Reasoning Approach to Land Degradation Evaluation: Dempster-Shafer Theory of Evidence,” Transactions in GIS 9:4 (2005), 507–520.
   Google Scholar
• N. X. Thinh, G. Arlt, B. Heber, J. Hennersdorf, and I. Lehmann, “Evaluation of Urban Land-Use Structures With A View To Sustainable Development,” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 22:5 (2002), 475–492.
   Google Scholar
• TRB (Transportation Research Board), Does Built Environment Influence Physical Activity? (Transportation Research Board, Washington DC, 2005)
   Google Scholar
• J. R. Van Eck and E. Koomen, “Characterising Urban Concentration and Land-Use Diversity In Simulations Of Future Land Use,” The Annals of Regional Science 42:1 (2008), 123–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. van Schrojenstein Lantman, P. H. Verburg, A. Bregt, and S. Geertman, “Core Principles and Concepts in Land-Use Modelling: A Literature Review,” in: E. Koomen, J. Borsboom-van Beurden, eds, Land-Use Modelling in Planning Practice 101 (pp. 35–57) (Berlin: Springer, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• F. Wang, “A Cellular Automata Model to Simulate Land-use Changes at Fine Spatial Resolution” (PhD thesis, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, 2012).
   Google Scholar
• S. M. Wheeler, “Planning for Metropolitan Sustainability,” Journal of Planning Education and Research 20:2 (2000), 133–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Williams, “Urban Intensification Policies In England: Problems and Contradictions,” Land Use Policy 16:3 (1999), 167–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Wu, “SimLand: A Prototype To Simulate Land Conversion Through The Integrated GIS and CA with AHP-Derived Transition Rules,” International Journal of Geographical Information Science 12:1 (1998), 63–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Xu, “Application of System Dynamics, GIS and 3D Visualization in a Study of Residential Sustainability,” in: B. Murgante, O. Gervasi, A. Iglesias, D. Taniar, B.O. Apduhan, eds, Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2011. ICCSA 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6782 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg).
   Google Scholar
• L. Yin and B. Muller, “Urbanization and Resort Regions: Creating an Agent-Based Simulation of Housing Density in 'Ski Country,'” Journal of Urban Technology 15:2 (2008), 55–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. M. Youssef, B. Pradhan, H. R. Pourghasemi, and S. Abdullahi, “Landslide Susceptibility Assessment at Wadi Jawrah Basin, Jizan Region, Saudi Arabia Using Two Bivariate Models in GIS,” Geosciences Journal 19:3 (2015) 449–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Zagorskas, M. Burinskienė, E. Zavadskas, and Z. Turskis, “Urbanistic Assessment of City Compactness on the Basis of GIS Applying the COPRAS Method,” Ekologija 53:2 (2007), 55–63.
   Google Scholar
• H. Zahiri, D. Palamara, P. Flentje, G. M. Brassington, and E. Baafi, “A GIS-Based Weights-Of-Evidence Model For Mapping Cliff Instabilities Associated With Mine Subsidence,” Environmental Geology 51:3 (2006), 377–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Zell, N. Mache, R. Hübner, G. Mamier, M. Vogt, M. Schmalzl, and K.-U. Herrmann, “SNNS (stuttgart neural network simulator),” in: J. Skrzypek, eds, Neural Network Simulation Environments. The Kluwer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science, vol 254, pp. 165–186. (Springer, Boston, MA: Springer, 1994).
   Google Scholar
• J. M. Zurada, Introduction to Artificial Neural Systems (West Publishing Co. St. Paul, MN, USA, 1992).
   Google Scholar