The View from Above: A Survey of the Public’s Perception of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles and Privacy

References

• I. Altman, The Environment and Social Behavior: Privacy, Personal Space, Territory, and Crowding (Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole, 1975).
   Google Scholar
• K. Atherton, Here’s The Map of All of America’s Registered Drone Users (Popular Science, 2016) <http://www.popsci.com/map-registered-drone-users-resembles-population-map-united-states> Accessed December 11, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• AUVSI. 2017 State Legislative Map (Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International) <http://cqrcengage.com/auvsi/statelegmap> Accessed July 6, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• C. J. Bennett, Regulating Privacy: Data Protection and Public Policy in Europe and the United State. (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• W. C. Bennett, Civilian Drones, Privacy, and the Federal-State Balance (Washington DC: Center for Technology Innovation at Brookings, 2014) <https://www.brookings.edu/research/civilian-drones-privacy-and-the-federal-state-balance/> Accessed July 5, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• M. Buhrmester, T. Kwang, and S. D. Gosling, “Amazon’s Mechanical Turk a New Source of Inexpensive, yet High-Quality, Data?” Perspectives on Psychological Science 6: 1 (2011) 3–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. T. Carmichael, R. J. Brulle, and J. K. Huxster, “The Great Divide: Understanding the Role of Media and Other Drivers of the Partisan Divide in Public Concern over Climate Change in the USA, 2001–2014,” Climatic Change 141: 4 (2017) 599–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Cavoukian, Privacy and Drones: Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (Ontario, Canada: Information and Privacy Commissioner, 2012) <http://aspheramedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/pbd-drones.pdf> Accessed August 6, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• V. Chang, P. Chundury, and M. Chetty, “Spiders in the Sky: User Perceptions of Drones, Privacy, and Security,” paper presented at 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, May 6–11, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• R. Clarke, “Internet Privacy Concerns Confirm the Case for Intervention,” Communications of the ACM 42: 2 (1999) 60–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Cobb and J. Macoubrie, “Public Perceptions about Nanotechnology: Risks, Benefits and Trust,” Journal of Nanoparticle Research 6: 4 (2004) 395–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Curran, “Relates to a Private Right of Action for Unwarranted Surveillance of a Neighbor” (New York: Senate, 2017) <https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2017/A4642> Accessed May 8, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• FAA. Modernization and Reform Act. United States House of Representatives (United States: Federal Aviation Administration, 2012).
   Google Scholar
• H. B. Farber, “Eyes in the Sky: Constitutional and Regulatory Approaches to Domestic Drone Deployment,” Syracuse Law Review 64: 1 (2014).
   Google Scholar
• C. Farivar, “Woman Shoots Drone: ‘It Hovered for a Second and I Blasted It to Smithereens.’” Arstechnica (August 29, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• R. L. Finn and D. Wright, “Privacy, Data Protection and Ethics for Civil Drone Practice: A Survey of Industry, Regulators and Civil Society Organisations,” Computer Law & Security Review 32: 4 (2016) 577–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Floridi, The Fourth Revolution: How the Infosphere Is Reshaping Human Reality (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• J. B. Ford, “Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A Comment” Journal of Advertising 46: 1 (2017) 156–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Friedenzohn and A. Mirot, “The Fear of Drones: Privacy and Unmanned Aircraft,” The Journal of Law Enforcement 3: 5 (2014).
   Google Scholar
• B. J. Goold, “Privacy Rights and Public Spaces: CCTV and the Problem of the ‘Unobservable Observer,’” Criminal Justice Ethics 21: 1 (2002) 21–27.
   Google Scholar
• G. Greenwald, “Edward Snowden: The Whistleblower behind the NSA Surveillance Revelations,” The Guardian <https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jun/09/edward-snowden-nsa-whistleblower-surveillance> (June 11, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• R. H. Gruber, “Commercial Drones and Privacy: Can We Trust States with ‘Drone Federalism’?” Journal of Law & Technology 21: 4 (2015) 1–50.
   Google Scholar
• K. G. Herron, H. C. Jenkins Smith, and C. L. Silva, US Public Perspectives on Privacy, Security, and Unmanned Aircraft Systems (Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• R. A. Heverly, “The State of Drones: State Authority to Regulate Drones Game of Drones: The Uses and Potential Abuses of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in the US and Abroad,” Albany Government Law Review 8: 1 (2015) 29–63.
   Google Scholar
• P. Hitlin, “8% of Americans Say They Own a Drone, While More than Half Have Seen One in Operation” (Washington DC: Pew Research Center, 2017) <http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/12/19/8-of-americans-say-they-own-a-drone-while-more-than-half-have-seen-one-in-operation/> Accessed May 19, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• H. Hsu and K. Chen, “Face Recognition on Drones: Issues and Limitations,” paper presented at First Workshop on Micro Aerial Vehicle Networks, Systems, and Applications for Civilian Use (Florence, May 19–22, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• D. M. Kahan, D. Braman, P. Slovic, J. Gastil, and G. Cohen, “Cultural Cognition of the Risks and Benefits of Nanotechnology,” Nature Nanotechnology 4 (2008) 87–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. V. S. Kasper, “Privacy as a Social Good,” Social Thought & Research 28: (2007) 165–189.
   Google Scholar
• LB, “Minutes Laguna Beach City Council Regular Meeting.” (Laguna Beach: Laguna Beach City Council, 2017) <http://lagunabeachcity.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=3&clip_id=662> Accessed April 25, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• C. Lee, D. A. Scheufele, and B. V. Lewenstein, “Public Attitudes toward Emerging Technologies: Examining the Interactive Effects of Cognitions and Effect on Public Attitudes toward Nanotechnology,” Science Communication 27: 2 (2005) 240–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Libeu, “What Is a Reasonable Expectation of Privacy,” Western State University Law Review 12: 2 (1984) 849–859.
   Google Scholar
• R. Luppicini and A. So, “A Technoethical Review of Commercial Drone Use in the Context of Governance, Ethics, and Privacy,” Technology in Society 46: (2016) 109–119 doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2016.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Matiteyahu, “Drone Regulations and Fourth Amendment Rights: The Interaction of State Drone Statutes and the Reasonable Expectation of Privacy,” Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems 48: 2 (2014) 265–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. S. Mattick and B. R. Allenby, “Cultured Meat: The Systemic Implications of an Emerging Technology,” paper presented at IEEE International Symposium on Sustainable Systems and Technology (Boston, May 16–18, 2012).
   Google Scholar
• C. McCarthy “N.J. Man Faces Prison for Shooting down Drone, Cops Say,” NJ <https://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2015/08/nj_man_faces_prison_for_shooting_down_drone_cops_say.html> (August 25, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• M. E. McCombs and D. L. Shaw, “The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media,” Public Opinion Quarterly 36: 2 (1972) 176–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Mortensen, M. G. Alcalá, M. T. French, and T. Hu, “Self-Reported Health Status Differs for Amazon’s Mechanical Turk Respondents Compared with Nationally Representative Surveys,” Medical Care 56: 3 (2018) 211–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Moylan and D. Olsen, “Criminal Code HB3906-Drone Privacy” (Chicago: Illinois House of Representatives, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• K. J. Mullinix, T. J. Leeper, J. N. Druckman, and J. Freese, “The Generalizability of Survey Experiments,” Journal of Experimental Political Science 2: 2 (2015) 109–138.
   Google Scholar
• H. Nissenbaum, “Protecting Privacy in an Information Age: The Problem of Privacy in Public,” Law and Philosophy 17: 5 (1998) 559–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OC. Drones: Know before You Fly (Santa Ana: Orange County Grand Jury, 2016) <http://www.ocgrandjury.org/pdfs/2015_2016_GJreport/2016-05-26_Website_Report.pdf> Accessed February 6, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• G. Paolacci and J. Chandler, “Inside the Turk: Understanding Mechanical Turk as a Participant Pool,” Current Directions in Psychological Science 23: 3 (2014) 184–188 doi: 10.1177/0963721414531598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. J. Przybilla and W. Wester-Ebbinghaus, “Aerial Photos by Means of Radio-Controlled Aircraft,” Bildmessung Und Luftbildwesen 47: 5 (1979) 137–142.
   Google Scholar
• C. Raley, “Local and State UAS Enforcement Authorities,” paper presented at FAA UAS Symposium (Reston: March 27–29, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• E. M. Redmiles, S. Kross, A. Pradhan, and M. L. Mazurek, “How Well Do My Results Generalize? Comparing Security and Privacy Survey Results from MTurk and Web Panels to the US” (Maryland: Digital Repository of the University of Maryland, 2017) <http://hdl.handle.net/1903/19164> Accessed April 4, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• A. B. Rhodes, “Legislating Agency Use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in Washington State,” Washington Law Review 91: 2 (2016) 887–927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Rotolo, D. Hicks, and B. R. Martin, “What Is an Emerging Technology?” Research Policy 44: 10 (2015) 1827–1843 doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.06.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. A. Scheufele, E. A. Corley, T. Shih, K. E. Dalrymple, and S. S. Ho, “Religious Beliefs and Public Attitudes toward Nanotechnology in Europe and the United States,” Nature Nanotechnology 4 (2008) 91–94 doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2008.361
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Sheets, C. M. Rowling, and T. M. Jones, “The View from Above (and Below): A Comparison of American, British, and Arab News Coverage of US Drones,” Media, War & Conflict 8: 3 (2015) 289–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Siegrist, M. Cousin, H. Kastenholz, and A. Wiek, “Public Acceptance of Nanotechnology Foods and Food Packaging: The Influence of Affect and Trust,” Appetite 49: 2 (2007) 459–466 doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2007.03.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Slobogin, “Public Privacy: Camera Surveillance of Public Places and the Right to Anonymity,” Mississippi Law Journal 72 (2002) 213–285 http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.364600.
   Google Scholar
• USDOT. “FAA Drone Registry Tops One Million” (Washington DC: USDOT, 2018) <https://www.transportation.gov/briefing-room/faa-drone-registry-tops-one-million> Accessed May 2, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Wang, H. Xia, Y. Yao, and Y. Huang, “Flying Eyes and Hidden Controllers: A Qualitative Study of People’s Privacy Perceptions of Civilian Drones in the US,” Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies 2016: 3 (2016) 172–190.
   Google Scholar
• S. D. Warren and L. D. Brandeis, “The Right to Privacy,” Harvard Law Review 4: 5 (1890) 193–220 doi: 10.2307/1321160
   Google Scholar
• A. F. Westin, “Privacy and Freedom,” Washington and Lee Law Review 25: 1 (1968) 166–170.
   Google Scholar
• M. D. White and H. F. Fradella, Stop and Frisk: The Use and Abuse of a Controversial Policing Tactic (New York: NYU Press, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• A. L. Young and A. Quan-Haase, “Information Revelation and Internet Privacy Concerns on Social Network Sites: A Case Study of Facebook,” paper presented at Fourth International Conference on Communities and Technologies (State College, June 25–27, 2009).
   Google Scholar