Examining Open Data at the Urban Level: An Exploration of “Wellbeing Toronto”

References

• J. Attard, F. Orlandi, S. Scerri, and S. Auer, “A Systematic Review of Open Government Data Initiatives,” Government Information Quarterly 32 (2015) 399–418. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Axelsson, U. Melin, and I. Lindgren, “Public E-services for Agency Efficiency and Citizen Benefit-Findings from a Stakeholder Centered Analysis,” Government Information Quarterly 30 (2013) 10–22. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2012.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Barry and F. Bannister, “Barriers to Open Data Release: A View From the Top,” Information Polity 19 (2014) 129–152. doi: 10.3233/IP-140327
   Google Scholar
• J. Bates, “The Strategic Importance of Information Policy for the Contemporary Neoliberal State: The Case of Open Government Data in the United Kingdom,” Government Information Quarterly 31 (2014) 388–395. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2014.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• City of Toronto, “Toronto Facts: Diversity” <http://www1.toronto.ca> Accessed January 17, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• P. Conradie and S. Choenni, “On the Barriers of Local Government Releasing Open Data,” Government Information Quarterly 31 (2014) 510–517. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2014.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Dawes, L. Vidiasova, and O. Parkhimovich, “Planning and Designing Open Government Data Programs: An Ecosystem Approach,” Government Information Quarterly 33 (2016) 15–27. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2016.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.C. Desouza and A. Bhagwatwar, “Technology-Enabled Participatory Platforms for Civic Engagement: The Case of US Cities,” Journal of Urban Technology 21: 4 (2014) 25–50. doi: 10.1080/10630732.2014.954898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Epstein, M. Newhart, and R. Vernon, “Not By Technology Alone: The ‘Analog’ Aspects of Online Public Engagement in Policy Making. “Government Information Quarterly 31 (2014) 337–344. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2014.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Hulchanski, “The Three Cities Within Toronto: Income Polarization Among Toronto’s Neighborhoods, 1970–2005” (2010) <tre.utoronto.ca/pdfs/curp/tnrn/Three Cities-Within-Toronto-2010-Final.pdf> Accessed March 31, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• M. Janssen and J. van den Hoven, “Big and Open Linked Data (BOLD) in Government: A Challenge to Transparency and Privacy?” Government Information Quarterly 32 (2015) 363–368. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2015.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Janssen, Y. Charalabidis, and A. Zuiderwijk, “Benefits, Adoption Barriers and Myths of Open Data and Open Government,” Information Systems Management 29 (2012) 258–268. doi: 10.1080/10580530.2012.716740
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Johnson and P. Robinson, “Civic Hackathons: Innovation, Procurement, or Civic Engagement?” Review of Policy Research 4 (2014) 349–357. doi: 10.1111/ropr.12074
   Google Scholar
• R. Joseph and N. Johnson, “Big Data and Transformational Government,” IEEE Computer Society 6 (2013) 43–48.
   Google Scholar
• M. Kassen, “A Promising Phenomenon of Open Data: A Case Study of the Chicago Open Data Project,” Government Information Quarterly 30 (2013) 508–513. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2013.05.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H.W. Kim and S. Gupta, “A User Empowerment Approach to Information Systems Infusions,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 61: 4 (2014) 656–668. doi: 10.1109/TEM.2014.2354693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Linders, “From E-Government to We-Government: Defining a Typology for Citizen Coproduction in the Age of Social Media,” Government Information Quarterly 29 (2012) 446–454. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Longo, “Opendata: Digital-Era Governance Thoroughbred or New Public Management Trojan Horse?” Public Policy & Governance Review 2: 2 (2011) 38–51.
   Google Scholar
• R.P. Lourenço, “An Analysis of Open Government Portals: A Perspective of Transparency for Accountability,” Government Information Quarterly (2015) 323–332. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2015.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Martin, M. Foulonneau, S. Turki, and M. Ihadjadene, “Open Data: Barriers, Risks and Opportunities,” paper presented at The European Conference on e-Government (Como, Italy: 13–14 July 2013).
   Google Scholar
• J. Nath, “Reimagining Government in the Digital Age, “National Civic Review 1 (2011), 19–23. doi: 10.1002/ncr.20070
   Google Scholar
• R. Sieber and P. Johnson, “Civic Open Data at a Crossroads: Dominant Models and Current Challenges,” Government Information Quarterly 32 (2015) 308–315. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2015.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Tsai, B. Choi, and M. Perry, “Improving the Process of E-Government Initiative: An In-Depth Case Study of Web-Based GIS implementation,” Government Information Quarterly 26 (2009) 368–376. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2008.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Ulbaldi, “Open Government Data: Towards Empirical Analysis of Open Government Data Initiatives,” OECD Working Paper on Public Governance 22 (Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and. Development, 2013) <https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/governance/open-government-data_5k46bj4f03s7-en> Accessed September 4, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• A. Vetro, L. Canova, M. Torchiano, C.O. Orozco, R. Minotas, R. Iemma, and F. Morando, “Open Data Quality Measurement Framework: Definition and Application to Open Government Data,” Government Information Quarterly 33 (2016) 325–337. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2016.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Zuiderwijk, S. Janssen, R. Choenni, R. Meijer, and R. Sheik, “Socio-Technical Impediments of Open Data,” Electronic Journal of e-Government 10: 2 (2012) 156–172
   Google Scholar
• A. Zuiderwijk and M. Janssen, “Open Data Policies, Their Implementation and Impact: A Framework for Comparison,” Government Information Quarterly 32 (2014) 17–29 doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2013.04.003
   Google Scholar